Improving pain control during transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma performed under local anesthesia with multimodal analgesia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of a reinforced analgesic protocol (RAP) on pain control in patients undergoing conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients (57 men, 24 women) with a mean age of 69 ± 10 (standard deviation) years (age range: 49-92 years) underwent 103 cTACEs. Standard antalgic protocol (50 mg hydroxyzine, 10 mg oxycodone, 8 mg ondansetron, and lidocaine for local anesthesia) was prospectively compared to a RAP (standard + 40 mg 2-h infusion nefopam and 50 mg tramadol). The individual pain risk was stratified based on age, the presence of cirrhosis and alcoholic liver disease, and patients were assigned to a low-risk group (standard protocol) or high-risk group (RAP). The primary endpoint was severe periprocedural abdominal pain (SAP), defined as a visual analog scale score ≥30/100. A predefined intermediate analysis was performed to monitor the benefit-risk of the RAP. Based on the intermediate analysis, all patients were treated with the RAP. RESULTS: The intermediate analysis performed after 52 cTACE showed that 2/17 (12%) high-risk patients (i.e., those receiving the RAP) experienced SAP compared to 15/35 (43%) low-risk patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.98; P = 0.03). Analysis of all procedures showed that 12/67 (18%) patients in cTACE receiving the RAP experienced SAP compared to 15/36 (42%) patients who did not receive it (OR = 3.27; 95% CI: 1.32-8.14; P = 0.01). There were no statistical differences in adverse events, particularly for nausea, between groups. CONCLUSION: Reinforcing the analgesic protocol by combining non-opioid and opioid molecules reduces perioperative pain in patients undergoing cTACE for HCC.

Predictive factors of severe abdominal pain during and after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the frequency of severe abdominal pain during and after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the visual analog scale (VAS), and to identify predictive factors. METHODS: Ninety-eight TACE performed in 80 patients (mean 65 ± 12 years old, 60 men) were consecutively and prospectively included. Abdominal pain was considered severe if the VAS ≥ 30/100 after treatment administration, or if opioid analgesic (grades 2-3) intake was required during hospitalization. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as technical factors associated with severe pain were identified by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The criterion for severe pain was met in 41/98 (42%) of procedures (peri-procedural pain 30/98 [31%] and opioid consumption during hospitalization 24/98 [25%]). Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.943 (95% confidence interval 0.895-0.994), p = 0.029), cirrhosis (OR = 0.284 (0.083-0.971), p = 0.045), and alcoholic liver disease (OR = 0.081 (0.010-0.659), p = 0.019) as negative predictive factors of severe abdominal pain. Severe abdominal pain occurred in or after 1/13 (8%), 8/34 (24%), 22/41 (54%), and 10/10 (100%) TACE sessions when none, one, two, and three of the protective factors were absent, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of the combination of factors for the prediction of severe abdominal pain was 0.779 (CI 0.687-0.871). CONCLUSION: Severe abdominal pain was frequent during and after TACE revealing a clinically relevant and underestimated problem. A predictive model based on three readily available clinical variables suggests that young patients without alcoholic liver disease or cirrhosis could benefit from reinforced analgesia. KEY POINTS: • Severe abdominal pain occurs in 43% of TACE for HCC. • Younger age, absence of cirrhosis, and absence of alcoholic liver disease were identified as independent predictive factors of severe abdominal pain. • A simple combination of the three abovementioned features helped predict the occurrence of severe abdominal pain.