Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Healthc Eng ; 2020: 8835258, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32850105

RESUMO

In this study, a hesitant fuzzy AHP method is presented to help decision makers (DMs), especially policymakers, governors, and physicians, evaluate the importance of intervention strategy alternatives applied by various countries for the COVID-19 pandemic. In this research, a hesitant fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM) method, hesitant fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (hesitant F-AHP), is implemented to make pairwise comparison of COVID-19 country-level intervention strategies applied by various countries and determine relative importance scores. An illustrative study is presented where fifteen intervention strategies applied by various countries in the world during the COVID-19 pandemic are evaluated by seven physicians (a professor of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology, an infectious disease physician, a clinical microbiology physician, two internal medicine physicians, an anesthesiology and reanimation physician, and a family physician) in Turkey who act as DMs in the process.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Infecções por Coronavirus , Tomada de Decisões , Lógica Fuzzy , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Médicos , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Projetos de Pesquisa , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA