Paramedic and Surgeon Views on Trauma Surgical Readiness: Implications for Guideline Implementation.

Centers for disease control (CDC) Guidelines for Field Triage are effective when proper implementation by EMS personnel is paired with surgeon willingness to care for trauma victims. We hypothesized that in a state with an immature trauma system, a discrepancy exists between medic and surgeon perception of surgical readiness, coinciding with inconsistent implementation of protocols. Surveys were conducted among medics and general surgeons. Destination protocols, trauma center locations, surgeon readiness, and interest in trauma were assessed. A standard clinical trauma scenario was also used. Surgeon willingness to operate is not affected by working outside of trauma centers or interest in trauma. Medics working far from trauma centers are less confident in local surgeon's willingness to operate and less likely to have destination protocols. Trauma center proximity affects medic perception of surgeon willingness to operate, but mere presence of general surgeons does not. In a trauma scenario, surgeon willingness to operate was related to medic perception but not action. In rural states, most surgeons do not work in trauma centers and most medics do not work near them. Although most responding surgeons indicate willingness to operate, medics are confident of such willingness only half the time. This disparity results in inconsistent use of the CDC guidelines. Although most medics report protocols for destination determination, nearly one-fourth of victims are taken to the geographically closest centers, sometimes with no surgeon at all. Efforts at medic training, enhancing surgeon readiness, and alignment of goals are necessary for the CDC Guidelines to be effective.

A prospective, controlled evaluation of the abdominal reapproximation anchor abdominal wall closure system in combination with VAC therapy compared with VAC alone in the management of an open abdomen.

Dramatic increases in damage control and decompressive laparotomies and a significant increase in patients with open abdominal cavities have resulted in numerous techniques to facilitate fascial closure. We hypothesized addition of the abdominal reapproximation anchor system (ABRA) to the KCI Abdominal Wound Vac™ (VAC) or KCI ABThera™ would increase successful primary closure rates and reduce operative costs. Fourteen patients with open abdomens were prospectively randomized into a control group using VAC alone (control) or a study group using VAC plus ABRA (VAC-ABRA). All patients underwent regular VAC changes; patients receiving VAC-ABRA also underwent concomitant daily elastomer adjustment of the ABRA system. Primary end points included abdominal closure, number of operating room (OR) visits, and OR time use. Eight patients were included in the VAC-ABRA group and six patients in the control group. Primary closure rates between groups were not statistically different; however, the number of trips to the OR and OR time use were different. Despite higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, larger starting wound size, and higher rates of abdominal compartment syndrome, closure rates in the VAC-ABRA group were similar to VAC alone. Importantly, however, fewer OR trips and less OR time were required for the VAC-ABRA group.

On and off the horse: mechanisms and patterns of injury in mounted and unmounted equestrians.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to determine whether discrepant patterns of horse-related trauma exist in mounted vs. unmounted equestrians from a single Level I trauma center to guide awareness of injury prevention. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from the University of Kentucky Trauma Registry for patients admitted with horse-related injuries between January 2003 and December 2007 (n=284). Injuries incurred while mounted were compared with those incurred while unmounted. RESULTS: Of 284 patients, 145 (51%) subjects were male with an average age of 37.2 years (S.D. 17.2). Most injuries occurred due to falling off while riding (54%) or kick (22%), resulting in extremity fracture (33%) and head injury (27%). Mounted equestrians more commonly incurred injury to the chest and lower extremity while unmounted equestrians incurred injury to the face and abdomen. Head trauma frequency was equal between mounted and unmounted equestrians. There were 3 deaths, 2 of which were due to severe head injury from a kick. Helmet use was confirmed in only 12 cases (6%). CONCLUSION: This evaluation of trauma in mounted vs. unmounted equestrians indicates different patterns of injury, contributing to the growing body of literature in this field. We find interaction with horses to be dangerous to both mounted and unmounted equestrians. Intervention with increased safety equipment practice should include helmet usage while on and off the horse.

Influence of in-house attending presence on trauma outcomes and hospital efficiency.

BACKGROUND: The influence of in-house (IH) attendings on trauma patient survival and efficiency measures, such as emergency department length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and hospital LOS, has been debated for more than 20 years. No study has definitively shown improved outcomes with IH vs home-call attendings. This study examines trauma outcomes in a single, Level I trauma center before and after the institution of IH attending call. STUDY DESIGN: Patient data were collected from the University of Kentucky's trauma registry. Based on the Trauma-Related Injury Severity Score, survival rates were compared between the IH and home-call groups. To evaluate efficiency, emergency department LOS, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS were compared. A separate subanalysis for the most severely injured patients (trauma alert red) was also performed. RESULTS: The home-call group (n = 4,804) was younger (p = 0.018) and had a higher Injury Severity Score (p = 0.003) than the IH group (n = 5259), but there was no difference in Trauma-Related Injury Severity Score (p = 0.205) between groups. In-house attending presence did not reduce mortality. Emergency department LOS, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS were shorter during the IH period. Emergency department to operating room time was not different. There was no change in trauma alert red mortality with an attending present (20.7% vs 18.2%, p = 0.198). CONCLUSIONS: In-house attending presence does not improve trauma patient survival. For the most severely injured patients, attendings presence does not reduce mortality. In-house coverage can improve hospital efficiency by decreasing emergency department LOS, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS.

An acute care surgery service generates a positive contribution margin in an appropriately staffed hospital.

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) includes trauma, surgical critical care, and emergent general surgery. There is a national shortage of institutions that can provide for patients needing access to emergency surgical care. Inability to fund ACS surgeons can be a barrier. We hypothesize that an ACS service, in an appropriately staffed hospital, generates a positive contribution margin (CM). STUDY DESIGN: Fiscal data for 2009 were retrospectively reviewed at the University of Kentucky, a Level I trauma center with an ACS service. Contribution margin (ie, net revenue minus direct costs) and mean length of stay were calculated for all patients admitted to the ACS service. Inpatient data were stratified by trauma vs general surgery, emergent vs elective, and by payor mix. RESULTS: Annual CM associated with the 5 ACS faculty was $21,799,000. Trauma generated higher CM than general surgery. General surgery had a greater CM, more if emergent than if elective ($9,500 vs $5,500; p < 0.01). Self-payment was lower with emergent general surgery vs trauma (20% vs 25%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Acute care surgery generates a positive CM. Emergent general surgery generates a greater CM than elective general surgery because of increased case mix index. These data suggest that hospital subsidization of acute care surgeons is financially feasible and might address the surgical workforce shortage and the critical problem of access to emergency surgical services.

An acute care surgery rotation contributes significant general surgical operative volume to residency training compared with other rotations.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resident rotations on trauma services are criticized for little operative experience and heavy workloads. This has resulted in diminished interest in trauma surgery among surgical residents. Acute care surgery (ACS) combines trauma and emergency/elective general surgery, enhancing operative volume and balancing operative and nonoperative effort. We hypothesize that a mature ACS service provides significant operative experience. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of ACGME case logs of 14 graduates from a major, academic, Level I trauma center program during a 3-year period. Residency Review Committee index case volumes during the fourth and fifth years of postgraduate training (PGY-4 and PGY-5) ACS rotations were compared with other service rotations: in total and per resident week on service. RESULTS: Ten thousand six hundred fifty-four cases were analyzed for 14 graduates. Mean cases per resident was 432 ± 57 in PGY-4, 330 ± 40 in PGY-5, and 761 ± 67 for both years combined. Mean case volume on ACS for both years was 273 ± 44, which represented 35.8% (273 of 761) of the total experience and exceeded all other services. Residents averaged 8.9 cases per week on the ACS service, which exceeded all other services except private general surgery, gastrointestinal/minimally invasive surgery, and pediatric surgery rotations. Disproportionately more head/neck, small and large intestine, gastric, spleen, laparotomy, and hernia cases occurred on ACS than on other services. CONCLUSIONS: Residents gain a large operative experience on ACS. An ACS model is viable in training, provides valuable operative experience, and should not be considered a drain on resident effort. Valuable ACS rotation experiences as a resident may encourage graduates to pursue ACS as a career.

Imaging may delay transfer of rural trauma victims: a survey of referring physicians.

BACKGROUND: Delayed transfer to a trauma center due to unnecessary imaging results in suboptimal patient outcome and increases healthcare costs. Unnecessary imaging may result from beliefs regarding trauma center requirements and legal concerns. We hypothesized that referring physicians consider factors other than clinical criteria when deciding to order imaging studies before transfer of trauma patients. METHODS: A mail survey of 218 referring physicians to a level I trauma center elicited factors affecting decision to obtain imaging studies before transfer. Graded answers to six questions were obtained and demographics of the physician respondent. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine of 218 surveys were returned (68.3%). One-third (33.1%) of respondents obtain imaging because of perceived expectations of the receiving trauma center, independent of patient acuity. Twenty percent incorrectly think that the law prohibits transfer before patients are stabilized. Twenty-eight percent obtain imaging because of liability concerns, even if that imaging delays transfer. Overall, 45% obtain imaging for either perceived requirement or liability concern. Non-advanced trauma life support (ATLS)-certified physicians are more likely to use all available resources before transfer than ATLS-certified physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Factors other than patient care dictate imaging acquisition in almost half of those surveyed. Misperception of expectations, misunderstanding of legal imperatives, and liability concerns all delay transport of the injured. ATLS-certified individuals use imaging more appropriately, thus, promoting more timely transfer. State-wide protocols, education, and liability reform may reduce transport delays.

Supplemental enteral arginine is metabolized to ornithine in injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Arginine has been added to immune enhancing diets that may improve patient outcomes, but little is known about the metabolic fate of supplemental arginine. We hypothesize that supplemental enteral arginine in injured patients is metabolized to ornithine by increased activity of the enzyme arginase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five adult patients with injury severity scores > or =20 received up to 14 days of enteral nutrition supplemented with arginine (30 g/day) or placebo in a prospective, randomized, blinded study. Plasma arginine, citrulline, and ornithine concentrations and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) arginase activity were measured at baseline and on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Clinical data collected included demographics, injury patterns, lengths of stay, and infectious complications. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and t test. RESULTS: PBMC arginase activity was elevated in all patients. In the supplemented group, plasma arginine concentrations increased at days 7, 10, and 14 when compared to baseline (P < 0.05) and were higher at day 14 when compared to those of controls (P < 0.05). Citrulline concentrations in both groups were unchanged over time. Ornithine concentration increased within 24 h of arginine supplementation and remained elevated when compared to baseline (P < 0.01). Ornithine concentration in the supplemented group was higher at days 1, 3, 5, and 7 when compared to that of controls (P < 0.05). There were no differences in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental enteral arginine is absorbed in injured patients and increases arginine levels. Supplemental arginine appears to be metabolized to ornithine. Increased arginase enzyme activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells may be a contributor.

The open peritoneal cavity: etiology correlates with the likelihood of fascial closure.

The use of laparostomy in damage control surgery and uncontrolled intra-abdominal infection has been well described. We examined 71 patients who required laparostomy to see if trends in management and outcome could be identified based on the underlying disease state. The underlying etiology included gastrointestinal sepsis (n = 25), pancreatitis (n = 21), or trauma (n = 25). Pancreatitis patients required more operations per patient (P < 0.05). The likelihood and type of closure (fascial, mesh, or none) was related to the underlying etiology: trauma patients were more likely to have fascial closure (P < 0.02), patients with GI sepsis were more likely to require mesh closure, and pancreatitis patients were more likely to have no formal closure (P < 0.02). Only 29 per cent of patients achieved definitive fascial closure. Mortality in trauma patients was 20 per cent, 36 per cent for GI sepsis, and 43 per cent in patients with pancreatitis. Complications of laparostomy included enterocutaneous fistula (16.9%) and abscess formation (7%). Though the use of laparostomy has become more prevalent, it is still associated with significant hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. In our study, the number of operations and likelihood of abdominal closure appears to correlate with the etiology of the underlying disease requiring use of laparostomy.

Regulation of arginase expression by T-helper II cytokines and isoproterenol.

BACKGROUND: Trauma causes a release of catecholamines, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), and T-helper II cytokines (TH2). Individually, these substances also induce arginase in macrophages. The purpose of this study was to determine the synergistic interactions between isoproterenol, TGF-beta, and TH2 cytokines on arginase expression in macrophages. METHODS: Confluent RAW 264.7 macrophages were incubated with various combinations of interleukins 4, 10, and 13 (IL-4, IL-10, IL-13), and TGF-beta with isoproterenol over 48 hours. Arginase activity, as well as arginase I expression by Western blot and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, were measured. RESULTS: Although isoproterenol, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 individually induced arginase, significant synergy between the combination of isoproterenol with either TGF-beta or the TH2 cytokines was observed. All cytokines except IL-10 also induced arginase I protein and mRNA. Arginase II protein was detected in cells exposed to IL-10. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that isoproterenol synergizes with IL-4, IL-13, and TGF-beta to increase arginase I mRNA and protein, as well as arginase activity in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Further, IL-10 synergizes with isoproterenol to increase arginase activity and arginase II protein. These synergistic mechanisms may compete with nitric oxide synthase for l-arginine substrate, thus shunting away available arginine from nitric oxide production and contributing to cellular immunosuppression observed after trauma.

Hypothermia in the trauma patient.

Hypothermia is a common finding in severely injured patients. Historically described as a consequence of wartime casualties where cold exposure was common, this topic has resurfaced in the trauma literature because of the increasing recognition of the morbidity and mortality associated with hypothermia. Hypothermia, along with acidosis and coagulopathy, has been identified as a component of the "lethal triad" in injured patients, and has been shown to contribute to increased mortality in these patients. Decreases in core temperature during the course of initial evaluation and resuscitation are common, and can contribute to poor outcomes in the injured patient. As induced hypothermia has been shown to be beneficial in some clinical situations, recent animal studies have attempted to investigate whether hypothermia in the trauma patient has any beneficial effects. This review examines the incidence and pathophysiology of hypothermia, and discusses mechanisms of heat loss and rewarming techniques that can be utilized in the trauma patient.

Defining and assessing tolerance in enteral nutrition.

Nutrition support has become widely recognized as an essential component of optimal care for acutely ill patients. Enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral routes when possible. However, prescribed enteral nutritional regimens are sometimes met with side effects and even complications. These adverse events have been collectively termed "intolerance," and forms of intolerance occur in a spectrum from bothersome at least to life threatening when most severe. Here we discuss nutritional access and its maintenance, introduce and define intolerance, and then review the current literature with regard to principal forms of enteral nutrition intolerance.

Enteral nutrition in patients with an open peritoneal cavity.

Recent surgical advances have led to the increased survival of critically ill patients requiring postoperative nutritional supplementation. One technique, which has been increasingly used, is that of the open peritoneal cavity. In these cases, the peritoneum is left open, and the viscera are protected with a temporary dressing until the abdomen can be closed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of enteral nutrition in patients who need open peritoneal cavity management techniques. Patients at a tertiary referral center requiring the use of open peritoneal cavity management who received at least 4 days of enteral nutrition were included in the study. Retrospective data were collected on patients admitted between January 1999 and December 2000, and prospective data were collected on patients between January and May 2001. Energy expenditure and actual caloric and protein intake were determined in all patients. Prealbumin levels and nitrogen balance studies were analyzed when available. Intolerance, defined as diarrhea or gastric reflux, was also evaluated. Average daily total caloric intake was 77 +/- 27%, and average daily protein intake was 68 +/- 24% of estimated needs. Initial serum prealbumin levels were low and remained below normal but increased in some patients during the study. Average nitrogen balance studies from 3 patients was -15 +/- 9.7 g/d. Diarrhea and gastric reflux occurred in 42% and 36% of patients, respectively, and were easily treated. Enteral nutrition can be effectively used in patients requiring open peritoneal cavity management after laparotomy. Overall, enteral nutrition is relatively well tolerated in this patient population.

Injury during contact with horses: recent experience with 75 patients at a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine equine-related trauma at a trauma center servicing a region in which there is significant contact between horses and humans. METHODS: Data were collected on all patients admitted to the University of Kentucky Medical Center from January 1994 to December 1998 for treatment of horse-related injuries. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were admitted to our center after injuries due to contact with horses (0.75% of all trauma admissions). There were 42 men (55%). The mean age was 37 years (range, 3 to 81 years). The majority of patients (67/75) were injured during recreational activities, and most fell or were thrown (40/75). Only 14% of patients were wearing helmets. The most common injuries were extremity fractures and head injuries, but thoracic and abdominal injuries were not rare. Of the 75 patients, 34 required surgery. Five patients (6.7%) died, all of head injury. During the study period, 11 people died in Kentucky due to contact with horses. CONCLUSIONS: Injury due to contact with horses is uncommon even at a center servicing a region with a large equine population. However, injuries are often serious and lead to significant morbidity and occasional mortality. Prevention of death from horse-related trauma is synonymous with prevention of head injury.