Predictors of Sinonasal Improvement After Highly Effective Modulator Therapy in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: The 22-question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) assesses chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) severity. We aimed to identify predictors of SNOT-22 score improvement following highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) initiation and to corroborate the SNOT-22 minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: Prospective observational data was pooled from four studies across 10 US centers investigating people with CF (PwCF) and CRS. Three studies evaluated HEMT's impact on CRS. For participants enrolled prior to HEMT initiation, SNOT-22 scores were obtained at baseline and after 3-6 months of HEMT. Multivariate regression identified predictors of improvement. Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were used to assess internal consistency and calculate the MCID of the SNOT-22. RESULTS: A total of 184 PwCF participated with mean baseline SNOT-22 scores ranging from 18.1 to 56.7. Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.90 across sites. Participants at sites with pre- and post-HEMT data reported improvement in SNOT-22 scores after initiating HEMT (all p < 0.05). Worse baseline SNOT-22 score (odds ratio (OR): 1.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), F508del homozygosity (OR: 4.30, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 1.14-18.99), and absence of prior modulator therapy (OR: 4.99, p = 0.017, 95% CI: 1.39-20.11) were associated with greater SNOT-22 improvement. The mean MCID calculated via distribution-based methods was 8.5. CONCLUSION: Worse baseline sinonasal symptoms, F508del homozygosity, and absence of prior modulator therapy predicted greater improvement after HEMT initiation. The mean MCID for SNOT-22 in PwCF is 8.5 points, similar to non-CF individuals with CRS, and provides a threshold specifically for PwCF. The SNOT-22 has strong internal consistency in PwCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in people with cystic fibrosis and factors associated with improvement after highly effective modulator therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a validated instrument that evaluates olfactory-specific quality-of-life. The QOD minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and factors associated with olfactory improvement after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor have not been determined for PwCF. METHODS: Prospective observational data were pooled from three studies that enrolled adult PwCF with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). QOD scores and disease characteristics were assessed. To evaluate internal consistency and calculate the QOD MCID, Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were employed. For participants who enrolled prior to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD scores were obtained at baseline and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with QOD improvement. RESULTS: Of 129 PwCF included, 65 had QOD scores before and 3-6 months after starting elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Mean baseline QOD score was 6.5 ± 7.9. Mean Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.85. The MCID estimates were as follows: Cohen's effect size = 1.6, standard error of measurement = 2.5, ½ baseline standard deviation = 4.0, and minimal detectable change = 6.9. Mean MCID was 3.7. Of those with pre/post elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor QOD scores, the mean change in QOD was -1.3 ± 5.4. After elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD improvement surpassed the MCID in 22% of participants (14/65). Worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps were associated with improved QOD scores after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (both p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: The QOD MCID in PwCF was estimated to be 3.7. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor led to qualitative but not clinically meaningful improvements in QOD score for most PwCF; PwCF with worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps improved in a clinically significant manner.

Olfaction, body mass index, and quality of life with cystic fibrosis combination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Triple-combination therapy of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Although patient body mass index (BMI) favorably increases with ETI treatment, factors contributing to this improvement are poorly characterized. Olfaction contributes to appetite stimulation and anticipation of eating, where higher rates of olfactory impairment (OI) in PwCF may contribute to malnutrition and BMI instability in this population. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective cohort study analyzing 41 CF patient responses to the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQR) and the 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and used generalized estimating equations to understand the change in survey variables from being untreated (baseline) to undergoing 3 months of ETI therapy (follow-up). RESULTS: Patients reported significant improvement in their sense of smell at follow-up (p = 0.0036). Their improvements in sense of smell were not confounded by changes in rhinologic or extranasal rhinologic symptoms. Self-reported quality of life (QoL) improved after 3 months of ETI therapy (p = < 0.0001) as did BMI (p = < 0.0001), but improved sense of smell did not independently mediate these changes in QoL and BMI. CONCLUSION: Our results support the impression that ETI therapy improves CF-associated rhinologic symptoms and reverses OI, while contributing to improvement in rhinologic QoL. Sense of smell is not an independent mediator of improved QoL and BMI in this population, suggesting that other factors may have a stronger role in these realms. However, given the subjective improvement in sense of smell, additional evaluation of OI using psychophysical chemosensory assessment will clarify the connection between olfaction, BMI, and QoL in PwCF.

Safety and efficacy of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in adults with cystic fibrosis: randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2 trials.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been shown to be safe and efficacious in people with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del allele. Our aim was to identify a novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator combination capable of further increasing CFTR-mediated chloride transport, with the potential for once-daily dosing. METHODS: We conducted two phase 2 clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of a once-daily combination of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in participants with cystic fibrosis who were aged 18 years or older. A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study (VX18-561-101; April 17, 2019, to Aug 20, 2020) was carried out to compare deutivacaftor monotherapy with ivacaftor monotherapy in participants with CFTR gating mutations, following a 4-week ivacaftor monotherapy run-in period. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h, deutivacaftor 25 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 50 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily, or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily in a 1:1:2:2:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline at week 12. A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, controlled, proof-of-concept study of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (VX18-121-101; April 30, 2019, to Dec 10, 2019) was conducted in participants with cystic fibrosis and heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function mutation (F/MF genotypes) or homozygous for F508del (F/F genotype). Participants with F/MF genotypes were randomly assigned 1:2:2:1 to receive either 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg of vanzacaftor in combination with tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or a triple placebo for 4 weeks, and participants with the F/F genotype were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor active control for 4 weeks, following a 4-week tezacaftor-ivacaftor run-in period. Primary endpoints for part 1 and part 2 were safety and tolerability and absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline to day 29. Secondary efficacy endpoints were absolute change from baseline at day 29 in sweat chloride concentrations and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score. These clinical trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03911713 and NCT03912233, and are complete. FINDINGS: In study VX18-561-101, participants treated with deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily (n=23) or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily (n=24) had mean absolute changes in ppFEV1 of 3·1 percentage points (95% CI -0·8 to 7·0) and 2·7 percentage points (-1·0 to 6·5) from baseline at week 12, respectively, versus -0·8 percentage points (-6·2 to 4·7) with ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h (n=11); the deutivacaftor safety profile was consistent with the established safety profile of ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h. In study VX18-121-101, participants with F/MF genotypes treated with vanzacaftor (5 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=9), vanzacaftor (10 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=19), vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=20), and placebo (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline at day 29 in ppFEV1 of 4·6 percentage points (-1·3 to 10·6), 14·2 percentage points (10·0 to 18·4), 9·8 percentage points (5·7 to 13·8), and 1·9 percentage points (-4·1 to 8·0), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -42·8 mmol/L (-51·7 to -34·0), -45·8 mmol/L (95% CI -51·9 to -39·7), -49·5 mmol/L (-55·9 to -43·1), and 2·3 mmol/L (-7·0 to 11·6), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 17·6 points (3·5 to 31·6), 21·2 points (11·9 to 30·6), 29·8 points (21·0 to 38·7), and 3·3 points (-10·1 to 16·6), respectively. Participants with the F/F genotype treated with vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=18) and tezacaftor-ivacaftor (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline (taking tezacaftor-ivacaftor) at day 29 in ppFEV1 of 15·9 percentage points (11·3 to 20·6) and -0·1 percentage points (-6·4 to 6·1), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -45·5 mmol/L (-49·7 to -41·3) and -2·6 mmol/L (-8·2 to 3·1), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 19·4 points (95% CI 10·5 to 28·3) and -5·0 points (-16·9 to 7·0), respectively. The most common adverse events overall were cough, increased sputum, and headache. One participant in the vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor group had a serious adverse event of infective pulmonary exacerbation and another participant had a serious rash event that led to treatment discontinuation. For most participants, adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. INTERPRETATION: Once-daily dosing with vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor was safe and well tolerated and improved lung function, respiratory symptoms, and CFTR function. These results support the continued investigation of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in phase 3 clinical trials compared with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. FUNDING: Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

The gut microbiome, short chain fatty acids, and related metabolites in cystic fibrosis patients with and without colonic adenomas.

BACKGROUND: Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) are at increased risk for colon cancer. CF patients have reductions in intestinal bacteria that produce short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), although it is unclear whether this corresponds with intestinal SCFA levels and the presence of colonic neoplasia. The aim of this study was to compare gut microbiome and SCFA composition in patients with and without CF, and to assess associations with colonic adenomas. METHODS: Colonic aspirates were obtained from adults with and without CF undergoing colon cancer screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Microbiome characterization was performed by 16S rRNA V3-V4 sequencing. Targeted profiling of SCFAs and related metabolites was performed by LC-MS. RESULTS: 42 patients (21 CF, 21 control) were enrolled. CF patients had significantly reduced alpha diversity and decreased relative abundance of many SCFA-producing taxa. There were no significant differences in SCFA levels in CF patients, although there were reduced levels of branched chain fatty acids (BCFAs) and related metabolites. CF patients with adenomas, but not controls with adenomas, had significantly increased relative abundance of Bacteroides fragilis. CF microbiome composition was significantly associated with isovalerate concentration and the presence of adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: CF patients have marked disturbances in the gut microbiome, and CF patients with adenomas had notably increased relative abundance of B. fragilis, a pathogen known to promote colon cancer. Reductions in BCFAs but not SCFAs were found in CF. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of B. fragilis as well the biological significance of reductions in BCFAs in CF.

Body mass index and additional risk factors for cancer in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) have an increased risk of a variety of cancers, notably gastrointestinal cancers. In CF higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with improved long-term outcomes, yet in the general population high BMI is associated with increased cancer risk. We aimed to delineate associations between BMI and other factors with cancer risk in adults with CF. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using CF Foundation Patient Registry data from 1992 to 2015. Data were collected on age, sex, CFTR mutation class, pancreatic insufficiency, and annualized data on BMI and FEV1. The primary analysis was the association between BMI and cancer, with secondary analyses focused on BMI trajectory. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, with analyses stratified by history of transplant. RESULTS: Of 26,199 adults with CF, 446 (1.7%) had cancer diagnosed by histology at a mean age of 40.0 years (SD 12.2), with a higher proportion of transplanted patients developing cancer (137 (3.8%) v 309(1.4%), p < 0.001). Among non-transplanted patients, there was no association between BMI and cancer (p for trend = 0.43). Pancreatic insufficiency (p < 0.01) and higher FEV1 (p < 0.01) were associated with increased cancer risk. In transplanted patients, higher BMI was associated with reduced risk of cancer (p for trend = 0.04). Older age was associated with increased risk in both groups (p < 0.001). BMI trajectories were not associated with cancer risk in either group. CONCLUSION: Higher BMI is associated with a reduced risk of cancer in transplanted adults with CF. Pancreatic insufficiency is a risk factor for cancer in non-transplanted CF patients.

The clinical impact of the Covid-19 pandemic first wave on patients with cystic fibrosis in New York.

BACKGROUND: People with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) may be at risk of complications from COVID-19 but the impact of COVID-19 on pwCF remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic first wave on pwCF in the New York metropolitan area (NY) from March 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020. Objectives were to determine (1) the prevalence of COVID-19 by PCR and IgG antibody testing, (2) the clinical characteristics of COVID-19, (3) delay in routine outpatient care, and (4) the effect on anxiety and depression in pwCF. RESULTS: There were 26 COVID-19 cases diagnosed by PCR or antibody testing among the study cohort of 810 pwCF. The prevalence of COVID-19 by PCR (1.6%) and IgG antibody (12.2%) testing was low. 58% of cases were asymptomatic and 82% were managed at home. 8% were hospitalized and 1 person died. 89% of pwCF experienced delay in care. The prevalence of anxiety increased from 43% baseline to 58% during the pandemic (P<0.01). In post-hoc analysis, the proportion of patients with diabetes (38% versus 16%, P<0.01) and pancreatic insufficiency (96% versus 66%, P<0.01) were higher while CFTR modulator use was lower (46% versus 65%, P = 0.05) in pwCF who tested positive for COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of COVID-19 among pwCF in NY during the pandemic first wave was low and most cases were managed at home. CFTR modulators may be protective. PwCF experienced delay in routine care and increased anxiety.

Survival in cystic fibrosis after acute respiratory failure supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and/or invasive mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Despite therapeutic advances, people with cystic fibrosis (CF) develop progressive worsening and exacerbations of their lung disease, which can lead to acute respiratory failure. Historically, survival after mechanical ventilation (MV) has been poor. Outcomes related to use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have not been well described in CF. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients with CF admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure and requiring invasive MV with or without ECMO between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2016. Separate analysis for the subgroup of MV patients who were eligible for transplant was conducted. RESULTS: Mortality for all patients with respiratory failure requiring advanced support was 37%. Ten of 28 (36%) MV patients, 10 of 26 (38%) ECMO+MV patients and 7 of the 21 (33%) transplant eligible MV patients died. Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) was 24.5±16.6 days for ECMO+MV; 12.9±9.0 days for MV (p=0.001), and 12.3 ±10 days for transplant eligible MV patients (p=0.005 for ECMO+MV comparison). Seven transplant eligible MV patients (33%) and 16 ECMO+MV patients (62%) underwent lung transplantation (p<0.001) during the hospital admission. One and 2-year survival for individuals who survived ICU admission was similar regardless of mode of support. Cox-proportional hazards model did not yield any variables that significantly influenced ICU mortality, 1-year or 2-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Survival for CF patients with acute respiratory failure requiring MV with or without ECMO has improved over time. ECMO may be an appropriate modality for respiratory support in patients with CF and acute respiratory failure who have greater risk of death from MV alone.

Association of Quality of Life Measures and Otolaryngologic Care in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Appropriate management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) is important in improving quality of life. Otolaryngologists play a critical role in reducing CRS symptom burden. This study seeks to evaluate the role of patient-reported quality-of-life measures in guiding interventions for CF-related sinus disease. METHODS: We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of 105 patients presenting to a CF-accredited clinic between July and September 2018. Demographic data and sinus surgery history were collected, in addition to Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD-NS) scores. Statistical analysis was conducted using correlation and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Baseline well-care visits accounted for 71.4% of all clinical evaluations. Prior otolaryngology intervention was noted in 69 (66%) patients, where the majority of these patients (63/69; 91%) underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Patients with a history of otolaryngology intervention had an average SNOT-22 score of 33.2 (SD = 20.6) compared to 24.9 (SD = 18.5) for patients without prior intervention (P = .048). The average QOD-NS score was 5.5 (SD = 6.4) among patients referred to otolaryngologists and 3.1 (SD = 5.7) for non-referred patients (P = .012). SNOT-22 and QOD-NS scores were modestly correlated (R of .43). CONCLUSION: CF patients with symptoms resulting in worse quality-of-life assessments were more likely to have established coordinated care with an otolaryngologist. Further validation of the utility of SNOT-22 and QOD-NS questionnaires as care coordination metrics is necessary in the CF population.

Health Disparities among adults cared for at an urban cystic fibrosis program.

BACKGROUND: Evidence is conflicting regarding differential health outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities with cystic fibrosis (CF), a rare genetic disease affecting approximately 28,000 Americans. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of health outcomes in Black/Latinx patients compared with non-Hispanic Caucasian patients cared for in a CF center in New York City. Adult patients enrolled in the CF Foundation Patient Registry at the Columbia University Adult CF Program and seen at least once during 2019 were included. Health metrics were compared between Black/Latinx and non-Hispanic Caucasian patients. RESULTS: 262 patients were eligible. 39 patients (15%) identified as Black/Latinx or non-Hispanic Caucasian. Descriptive statistics are reported with mean (standard deviation). Current age was 35.9 (13.3) years for non-Hispanic Caucasian and 32.0 (9.3) years for Black/Latinx patients (p = 0.087). Age of diagnosis did not differ between groups; 9.56 (15.96) years versus 11.59 (15.8) years for non-Hispanic Caucasian versus Black/Latinx respectively (p = 0.464). Pulmonary function, measured as mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 70.6 (22.5) percent predicted in non-Hispanic Caucasian versus 59.50 (27.9) percent predicted in Black/Latinx patients (p = 0.010). Number of visits to the CF clinic were similar between groups. When controlled for age, gender, co-morbidities, median income, and insurance status, there was a continued association between minority status and lower FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: Minorities with CF have significantly lower pulmonary function, the major marker of survival, than non-Hispanic Caucasians, even when controlled for a variety of demographic and socioeconomic factors that are known to affect health status in CF. Significant health disparities based on race and ethnicity exist at a single CF center in New York City, despite apparent similarities in access to guideline based care at an accredited CF Center. This data confirms the importance of design of culturally appropriate preventative and management strategies to better understand how to direct interventions to this vulnerable population with a rare disease.

Laryngeal Injury Due to Amikacin Inhalation for Refractory Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection.

Inhaled antibiotics have long been used for chronic lung infections, especially in patients with cystic fibrosis and increasingly for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) has emerged as a promising treatment for Mycobacterium avium complex infection refractory to oral antibiotics. However, despite its efficacy, nearly one-half of patients in phase II and III trials experienced dysphonia as a treatment-associated adverse effect. Here, we describe a patient who experienced severe, acute-onset laryngitis while receiving ALIS for refractory M avium complex infection, prompting discontinuation of ALIS therapy. This is the first report directly describing vocal fold injury due to such therapy. Given the high frequency of dysphonia reported with ALIS, this case highlights the potential severity of laryngeal toxicity, the importance of coordination of care for patients receiving inhaled antibiotics for chronic pulmonary disease, and the need for better insight into mechanisms of toxicity.

Telerehabilitation Using Fitness Application in Patients with Severe Cystic Fibrosis Awaiting Lung Transplant: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to pilot a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program administered via a telemedicine approach using a combination of fitness application and self-selected activity in lung transplant candidates with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: We recruited adult patients with CF. The main outcome was adherence, measured by number of sessions completed in 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, six-minute walk distance (6MWD), and dyspnea. Participants were provided a personalized exercise program and equipment including a fitness application that provided exercise videos, recorded exercise time, and corresponding heart rate. We reviewed data daily and provided text messages with feedback. We compared our study outcomes to a retrospective data set of CF patients who participated in a 24-session outpatient hospital-based PR program. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Eleven patients participated in the home PR program, 45% female, age 33 ± 7 years, FEV1 27 ± 5% predicted. Sessions completed were 19 ± 12 home-based PR vs. 9 ± 4 hospital-based PR, p = .03. Fifty percent of the home-based group completed ≥24 sessions in 12 weeks versus 0% of the hospital-based patients (p = .03). There were no adverse events during exercise. Completers of the home-based program demonstrated a clinically meaningful lower decline in 6 MWD than noncompleters (6MWD -7 ± 15 vs. -86 ± 108 meters). Only one participant performed a post 6 MWD in the hospital-based PR. CONCLUSION: Patients with severe CF demonstrated adherence to home PR delivered using fitness application and self-selected activity with no adverse events. This program style may be a viable solution for telerehabilitation in severe CF and is particularly relevant in the COVID era.

PhI(OAc)2 and iodine-mediated synthesis of N-alkyl sulfonamides derived from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon scaffolds and determination of their antibacterial and cytotoxic activities.

The development of new approaches toward chemo- and regioselective functionalization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) scaffolds will provide opportunities for the synthesis of novel biologically active small molecules that exploit the high degree of lipophilicity imparted by the PAH unit. Herein, we report a new synthetic method for C-X bond substitution that is speculated to operate via a N-centered radical (NCR) mechanism according to experimental observations. A series of PAH sulfonamides have been synthesized and their biological activity has been evaluated against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains (using a BacTiter-Glo assay) along with a series of mammalian cell lines (using CellTiter-Blue and CellTiter-Glo assays). The viability assays have resulted in the discovery of a number of bactericidal compounds that exhibit potency similar to other well-known antibacterials such as kanamycin and tetracycline, along with the discovery of a luciferase inhibitor. Additionally, the physicochemical and drug-likeness properties of the compounds were determined experimentally and using in silico approaches and the results are presented and discussed within.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Susceptibility Patterns and Associated Clinical Outcomes in People with Cystic Fibrosis following Approval of Aztreonam Lysine for Inhalation.

The approval of aztreonam lysine for inhalation solution (AZLI) raised concerns that additional antibiotic exposure would potentially affect the susceptibility profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. This 5-year, prospective, observational study tracked susceptibility changes and clinical outcomes in CF patients in the United States with chronic P. aeruginosa infection. Sputum cultures were collected annually (2011 to 2016). The primary study endpoint was the proportion of subjects whose least susceptible P. aeruginosa isolate had an aztreonam MIC that was >8 µg/ml (parenteral breakpoint) and increased ≥4-fold compared with the least susceptible isolate from the previous year. Annualized data for pulmonary exacerbations, hospitalizations, and percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1% predicted) were obtained from the CF Foundation Patient Registry and compared between subjects meeting and those not meeting the primary endpoint. A total of 510 subjects were enrolled; 334 (65%) completed the study. A consistent proportion of evaluable subjects (13 to 22%) met the primary endpoint each year, and AZLI use during the previous 12 months was not associated with meeting the primary endpoint. While the annual declines in lung function were comparable for subjects meeting and those not meeting the primary endpoint, more pulmonary exacerbations and hospitalizations were experienced by those who met it. The aztreonam susceptibility of P. aeruginosa remained consistent during the 5-year study. The relationship between P. aeruginosa isolate susceptibilities and clinical outcomes is complex; reduced susceptibility was not associated with an accelerated decline in lung function but was associated with more exacerbations and hospitalizations, likely reflecting increased overall antibiotic exposure. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01375036.).

Effect of highly effective modulator treatment on sinonasal symptoms in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor is a highly effective modulator for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients homozygous or heterozygous for F508del. Effects of the drug on sinonasal symptoms have not been studied. METHODS: Adult participants were prospectively evaluated at baseline and after three months of treatment using validated questionnaires assessing sinonasal symptoms (SNOT-22) and CF-related quality of life (CFQ-R). RESULTS: Forty-three participants completed the study; 23 were taking other CF transmembrane conductance (CFTR) modulators at the time of study participation. There was a significant improvement in mean SNOT-22 from 34.8 (29.4-40, 95% confidence interval) to 24.4 (19.9-29.0) (p = 0.000003) and in the Respiratory domain of the CFQR from 60.6 (57.1-64.1) to 83.3 (79.4-87.2) (p = 0.0000002), both achieving a minimal clinically important difference. Patients previously taking CFTR modulators experienced a greater benefit in sinonasal and respiratory symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor is associated with significant improvement in sinonasal symptoms; previous use of CFTR modulators is associated with greater benefit.

Effect of highly effective modulator therapy on quality of life in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is a highly effective modulator that improves function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, resulting in improved pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We hypothesize that improvements in lung function are associated with improvements in health-related quality of life and sinonasal health. The aim of this study is to measure the effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on patient-reported sinonasal and overall quality of life, and to determine the relationship between changes in these 2 outcome measures. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at an accredited adult CF care center. Participants completed the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), a validated patient-reported outcome metric for CF patients, at baseline and at 3 months after initiation of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. RESULTS: Forty-three individuals completed the study. There was significant improvement in nearly all domains of the SNOT-22 and CFQ-R after 3 months of therapy. SNOT-22 improved from 34.8 to 24.4 (p = 0.000003). Mean baseline FEV-1 improved from 65% to 76% predicted (p = 0.0000005). The greatest effect was seen in those participants previously taking modulator therapy. Linear regression between the change in SNOT-22 individual domains and the CFQ-R respiratory domain revealed the strongest correlation between the extranasal domain score and the respiratory domain of the CFQ-R (R2 = 0.24). CONCLUSION: CF patients taking elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor experience a significant improvement in both sinonasal and health-related quality of life.

Sinonasal quality-of-life declines in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: In cystic fibrosis (CF), the relationship between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and pulmonary disease is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between scores on the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and CF Questionnaire-revised for adolescents and adults over 14 (CFQ-R 14+), and pulmonary function tests in 2 cohorts of CF patients: those at their baseline health and those with a pulmonary exacerbation. METHODS: Patients >18 years old seen in a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation-accredited clinic completed the SNOT-22 and CFQ-R 14+ instruments. Patients presenting for routine care represented the baseline cohort. Patients diagnosed with a pulmonary exacerbation represented the exacerbation cohort. Average SNOT-22 and CFQ-R 14+ scores for both groups were compared using a 2-sample t test, and correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: One hundred three patients were enrolled over 3 months (30 exacerbations and 73 baseline). Patients' mean age was 32 years (56% female and 44% male). Average SNOT-22 and CFQ-R 14+ scores were significantly worse for exacerbation patients (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0003, respectively). Percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity were both higher for baseline patients (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively). Average SNOT-22 score for all patients was worse than the average score for non-CF, non-CRS patients. CONCLUSION: CF patients with pulmonary exacerbations have worse SNOT-22 and CFQ-R 14+ scores than CF patients at their baseline health. This finding suggests a temporal relationship between sinonasal and pulmonary quality of life, and that worsening of both is associated with reduced pulmonary function.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Cystic Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Medical Management.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is nearly ubiquitous in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). CF CRS is a challenging entity to define, diagnose, and treat, as patients often have severe refractory sinus disease in addition to complex medical comorbidities. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the medical management of CF CRS and determine how to best identify, diagnose, and manage CF CRS. Ultimately, the treatment of these patients requires a multi-disciplinary approach involving the pulmonologist and otolaryngologist.