RESUMO
The influence of the vehicle on the dermal penetration efficacy of three different active ingredient (AI) surrogates (hydrophilic, amphiphilic, lipophilic model drugs), that were incorporated into these vehicles, was investigated with the ex vivo porcine ear model, which allowed to assess time and space resolved dermal penetration profiles of the AI. Fifteen different vehicles, including classical vehicles (hydrogel, oleogel, o/w cream, w/o ointment, amphiphilic cream) and innovative vehicles were included into the study. Results show tremendous differences in the penetration efficacy of the AI among the different vehicles. The differences in the total amounts of penetrated AI between lowest and highest penetration were about 3-fold for the hydrophilic AI surrogate, 3.5-fold for the amphiphilic AI and almost 5-fold for the lipophilic AI. The penetration depth was also affected by the type of vehicle. Some vehicles allowed the AI to penetrate only into the upper layers of the stratum corneum, whereas others allowed the penetration of the AI into deeper layers of the viable dermis. Data therefore demonstrate that the vehicles in compounding medications cannot be exchanged against each other randomly if a constant and safe medication is desired. The data obtained in the study provide first information on which types of vehicles are exchangeable and which types of vehicles can be used for enhanced dermal penetration of AI, thus providing a first base for a science-based selection of vehicles that can provide both, efficient dermal drug delivery and skin barrier function maintenance/strengthening at the same time.