Eccentric muscle-damaging exercise in the heat lowers cellular stress prior to and immediately following future exertional heat exposure.

Muscle-damaging exercise (e.g., downhill running [DHR]) or heat exposure bouts potentially reduce physiological and/or cellular stress during future exertional heat exposure; however, the true extent of their combined preconditioning effects is unknown. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of muscle-damaging exercise in the heat on reducing physiological and cellular stress during future exertional heat exposure. Ten healthy males (mean ± Standard Definition; age, 23 ± 3 years; body mass, 78.7 ± 11.5 kg; height, 176.9 ± 4.7 cm) completed this study. Participants were randomly assigned into two preconditioning groups: (a) DHR in the heat (ambient temperature [Tamb], 35 °C; relative humidity [RH], 40%) and (b) DHR in thermoneutral (Tamb, 20 °C; RH, 20%). Seven days following DHR, participants performed a 45-min flat run in the heat (FlatHEAT [Tamb, 35 °C; RH, 40%]). During exercise, heart rate and rectal temperature (Trec) were recorded at baseline and every 5-min. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated to assess heat shock protein 72 (Hsp72) concentration between conditions at baseline, immediately post-DHR, and immediately pre-FlatHEAT and post-FlatHEAT. Mean Trec during FlatHEAT between hot (38.23 ± 0.38 °C) and thermoneutral DHR (38.26 ± 0.38 °C) was not significantly different (P = 0.68), with no mean heart rate differences during FlatHEAT between hot (172 ± 15 beats min-1) and thermoneutral conditions (174 ± 8 beats min-1; P = 0.58). Hsp72 concentration change from baseline to immediately pre-FlatHEAT was significantly lower in hot (-51.4%) compared to thermoneutral (+24.2%; P = 0.025) DHR, with Hsp72 change from baseline to immediately post-FlatHEAT also lower in hot (-52.6%) compared to thermoneutral conditions (+26.3%; P = 0.047). A bout of muscle-damaging exercise in the heat reduces cellular stress levels prior to and immediately following future exertional heat exposure.

The weight, urine colour and thirst Venn diagram is an accurate tool compared with urinary and blood markers for hydration assessment at morning and afternoon timepoints in euhydrated and free-living individuals.

The weight, urine colour and thirst (WUT) Venn diagram is a practical hydration assessment tool; however, it has only been investigated during first-morning. This study investigated accuracy of the WUT Venn diagram at morning and afternoon timepoints compared with blood and urine markers. Twelve men (21 ± 2 years; 81·0 ± 15·9 kg) and twelve women (22 ± 3 years; 68·8 ± 15·2 kg) completed the study. Body mass, urine colour, urine specific gravity (USG), urine osmolality (UOSM), thirst and plasma osmolality (POSM) were collected at first-morning and afternoon for 3 consecutive days in free-living (FL) and euhydrated states. Number of markers indicating dehydration levels were categorised into either 3, 2, 1 or 0 WUT markers. Receiver operating characteristics analysis calculated the sensitivity and specificity of 1, 2 or 3 hydration markers in detecting dehydration or euhydration. Specificity values across morning and afternoon exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for USG (0·890-1·000), UOSM (0·869-1·000) and POSM (0·787-0·990) when 2 and 3 WUT markers were met. Sensitivity values across both timepoints exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for USG (0·826-0·941) and UOSM (0·826-0·941), but not POSM in the afternoon (0·324) when 0 and 1 WUT markers were met. The WUT Venn diagram is accurate in detecting dehydration for WUT2 and WUT3 based off USG, UOSM and POSM during first-morning and afternoon. Applied medical, sport and occupational practitioners can use this tool in field settings for hydration assessment not only at various timepoints throughout the day but also in FL individuals.

Storing urine samples with moisture preserves urine hydration marker stability up to 21 days.

INTRODUCTION: To assess hydration status, hydration markers [urine color, osmolality, and urine-specific gravity (USG)] are used. Urine color, osmolality, and USG have shown to be stable for 7, 7, and 3 days, respectively, at 4 °C. However, refrigeration could produce a dry environment which enhances evaporation and potentially affects urine hydration markers. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of duration and moisture on urine markers with refrigeration. METHODS: 24 participants provided urine samples between 9 and 10 AM. Urine color, osmolality, and USG were analyzed within 2 h (baseline). Then, each urine sample was divided into two urine cups and placed in a storage container with (moisture condition) and without (no moisture condition) water bath at 3 °C. Hydration markers were analyzed at day 1(D1), D2, D7, D10, D14, and D21. A two-way ANOVA (time x condition) and repeated-measures ANOVA on time were performed to examine differences. RESULTS: No significant (p > 0.05) condition x time effect was observed for urine color (p = 0.363), urine osmolality (p = 0.358), and USG (p = 0.248). When urine samples were stored in moisture condition, urine color (p = 0.126) and osmolality (p = 0.053) were stable until D21, while USG was stable until D2 (p = 0.394). CONCLUSION: When assessing hydration status, it appears that the urine color and osmolality were stable for 21 days, while USG was stable for 2 days when stored with moisture at 3 °C. Our results provide guidelines for practitioners regarding urine storage duration and conditions when urine cannot be analyzed immediately.