General practitioner and nurse experiences of type 2 diabetes management and prescribing in primary care: a qualitative review following the introduction of funded SGLT2i/GLP1RA medications in Aotearoa New Zealand.

AIM: To explore the views of general practitioners (GPs) and nurses on type 2 diabetes (T2D) management, including the use of recently funded T2D medications in New Zealand (NZ) and their perceived barriers to providing optimal care. BACKGROUND: T2D is a significant health concern in NZ, particularly among Maori and Pacific adults. Characterised by prolonged hyperglycaemia, T2D is generally a progressive condition requiring long-term care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July and December 2022 with 21 primary care clinicians (10 GPs and 11 nurses/nurse prescribers) from nine different general practice clinics across the Auckland and Waikato regions of NZ. Framework analysis was conducted to identify common themes in clinicians' perceptions and experiences with T2D management. FINDINGS: Three themes were identified: health-system factors, new medications, and solution-based approaches. Lack of clinician time, healthcare funding, staff shortages, and burn-out were identified as barriers to T2D management under health-system factors. The two newly funded medications, empagliflozin and dulaglutide, were deemed to be a positive change for T2D care in that they improved patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes, but several clinicians were hesitant to prescribe these medications. Participants suggested that additional education and specialist diabetes support would be helpful to inform optimal medication prescribing and that better use of a multi-disciplinary team (clinical and support staff) could support T2D care by reducing workload, addressing cultural gaps in healthcare delivery, and reducing burnout. An improved primary care work environment, including appropriate professional development to support prescribing of new medications and the value of collaboration with a non-regulated workforce, may be required to facilitate optimal T2D management in primary care. Future research should focus on interventions to increase support for both clinical teams and patients while adopting a culturally appropriate approach to increase patient satisfaction and improve health outcomes.

Characteristics and outcomes of lung cancer patients presenting through the emergency department: a Waikato District Health Board study.

AIM: This research examines the characteristics and survival outcomes of patients receiving a lung cancer diagnosis after attending the emergency department (ED) of Waikato hospitals in New Zealand. METHODS: This retrospective study was based on a comprehensive database of Waikato patients recorded on the Midland Lung Cancer Register from 2011 to 2021. We compared the characteristics of patients with and without emergency presentations within 14 days before their lung cancer diagnosis. The survival of patients with and without ED attendance was compared between Maori and non-Maori. This study also analysed the odds ratios (OR) of presenting via ED before diagnosis and surviving 12 months based on logistic regressions. RESULTS: In total, 2,397 patients were included, with 39.6% attending the ED prior to diagnosis. Maori were 1.27 times more likely than non-Maori to be diagnosed after attending the ED. Other characteristics of patients included being male, being diagnosed with small cell lung cancer and having more advanced-stage disease. Patients attending the ED were less likely to survive 12 months than those without ED visits (OR 0.42), and those with two or more ED visits were even less likely to survive 12 months (OR 0.33). CONCLUSION: Patients presenting through the ED have more advanced-stage disease, while those presenting through their general practitioners (GPs) have evidence of being diagnosed earlier and having better survival. Barriers to early diagnoses through attendance with a GP, particularly for Maori and for men, need to be explored.

He Aroka Uruta. Rural health provider perspectives of the COVID-19 vaccination rollout in rural Aotearoa New Zealand with a focus on Maori and Pasifika communities: a qualitative study.

Introduction From a coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic perspective, Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) rural residents formed an at-risk population, and disparities between rural and urban COVID-19 vaccination coverage have been found. Aim To gain insight into factors contributing to the urban-rural COVID-19 vaccination disparity by exploring NZ rural health providers' experiences of the vaccine rollout and pandemic response in rural Maori and Pasifika communities. Methods Rural health providers at four sites participated in individual or focus group semi-structured interviews exploring their views of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Thematic analysis was undertaken using a framework-guided rapid analysis method. Results Twenty interviews with 42 participants were conducted. Five themes were identified: Pre COVID-19 rural situation, fragile yet resilient; Centrally imposed structures, policies and solutions - urban-centric and Pakeha focused; Multiple logistical challenges - poor/no consideration of rural context in planning stages resulting in wasted resource and time; Taking ownership - rural providers found geographically tailored, culturally anchored and locally driven solutions; Future directions - sustained investment in rural health services, including funding long-term integrated (rather than 'by activity') health services, would ensure success in future vaccine rollouts and other health initiatives for rural communities. Discussion In providing rural health provider perspectives from rural areas serving Maori and Pasifika communities during the NZ COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the importance of the rural context is highlighted. Findings provide a platform on which to build further research regarding models of rural health care to ensure services are designed for rural NZ contexts and capable of meeting the needs of diverse rural communities.

Are patients with type 2 diabetes in the Waikato District provided with adequate education and support in primary care to self-manage their condition? A qualitative study.

Introduction In Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), type 2 diabetes (T2D) is predominantly managed in primary care. Despite established guidelines, patients are often suboptimally managed, with inequitable health outcomes. To date, few NZ studies have evaluated the primary care management of T2D at the time of diagnosis. Aim This study aims to explore patients' the provision of education and delivery of care to patients at the time of diagnosis, which is a crucial time in the disease trajectory. Methods Participants were recruited from a Maori health provider in the Waikato District, and diagnosed with T2D after January 2020. Patients were texted a link to opt into a survey (larger study) and then registered interest by providing contact details for an interview (current study). Semi-structured interviews were conducted and were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed. Results In total, 11 participants aged 19-65 years completed the interviews (female n = 9 and male n = 20); the comprised Maori (n = 5), NZ European (n = 5) and Asian (n = 1) participants. Three overarching themes were identified, including: (1) ineffective provision of resources and education methods; (2) poor communication from healthcare practitioners; and (3) health system barriers. Discussion Evidently, there are difficulties in primary care diabetes mellitus diagnosis and management. Improvements could include locally relevant resources tailored to patients' experiences and cultural identities. Utilising whanau support and a non-clinical workforce, such as health navigators/kaiawhina, will drastically address current workforce issues and assist patient self-management. This will allow improved diagnosis experiences and better health outcomes for patients and whanau.

Ethnic differences in the characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer in the Te Manawa Taki region of New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Maori have three times the mortality from lung cancer compared with non-Maori. The Te Manawa Taki region has a population of 900 000, of whom 30% are Maori. We have little understanding of the factors associated with developing and diagnosing lung cancer and ethnic differences in these characteristics. AIMS: To explore the differences in the incidence and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer between Maori and non-Maori. METHODS: Patients were identified from the regional register. Incidence rates were calculated based on population data from the 2013 and 2018 censuses. The patient and tumour characteristics of Maori and non-Maori were compared. The analysis used Χ2 tests and logistic models for categorical variables and Student t tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 4933 patients were included, with 1575 Maori and 3358 non-Maori. The age-standardised incidence of Maori (236 per 100 000) was 3.3 times higher than that of non-Maori. Maori were 1.3 times more likely to have an advanced stage of disease and 1.97 times more likely to have small cell lung cancer. Maori were more likely to have comorbidities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. They also had higher levels of social deprivation and tended to be younger, female and current smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings point to the need to address barriers to early diagnosis and the need for system change including the need to introduce a lung cancer screening focussing on Maori. There is also the need for preventive programmes to address comorbidities that impact lung cancer outcomes as well as a continued emphasis on creating a smoke-free New Zealand.

Non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy treatment outcomes and ethnicity: a twenty-year single-centre patterns of care study.

AIM: To investigate the treatment of patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over a 20-year period in a single Aotearoa New Zealand centre with reference to the use of systemic anti-cancer chemotherapy (SACT) and to explore ethnic disparities in treatment and outcomes. METHOD: Using a SACT database maintained by the Oncology Department at Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, Aotearoa New Zealand from 2000 to 2021 we derived summary statistics for patient factors and SACT regimens by ethnicity (Maori and non-Maori). We investigated Kaplan-Meier all-cause survival by ethnicity and SACT. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios of surviving 12 months and receiving first and second SACT. RESULTS: One thousand and fifty-seven patients with advanced NSCLC were included, with 30% identified as Maori and 53% treated with SACT. The median survival for non-Maori and Maori receiving SACT was 11.9 and 8.5 months respectively (unadjusted odds ratio of surviving 12 months: 1.968; 95% CI: 1.352-2.865; p<0.001). Non-Maori receiving SACT were 86.2% more likely to survive 12 months than Maori. There were no ethnic disparities in the proportion of patients receiving first-line SACT; however, non-Maori were 1.5 times more likely to receive a second SACT than Maori. CONCLUSION: Significant ethnic difference between Maori and non-Maori exists for both survival and receipt of second-line SACT.

Investigation and treatment after non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome for patients presenting to rural or urban hospitals in Aotearoa New Zealand: ANZACS-QI 75.

AIMS: Compare the care patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) received in Aotearoa New Zealand depending on the rural-urban category of the hospital they are first admitted to. METHODS: Patients with NSTEACS investigated with invasive coronary angiogram between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2019 were included. There were three hospital categories (routine access to percutaneous coronary intervention [urban interventional], other urban [urban non-interventional] and rural) and three ethnicity categories (Maori, Pacific and non-Maori/non-Pacific). Clinical performance measures included: angiography ≤3 days, assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prescription of secondary prevention medication. RESULTS: Of 26,779 patients, 66.2% presented to urban-interventional, 25.6% to urban non-interventional and 8.2% to rural hospitals. A smaller percentage of patients presenting to urban interventional than urban non-interventional and rural hospitals were Maori (8.1%, 17.0% and 13.0%). Patients presenting to urban interventional hospitals were more likely to receive timely angiography than urban non-interventional or rural hospitals (78.5%, 60.8% and 63.1%). They were also more likely to have a LVEF assessment (78.5%, 65.4% and 66.3%). In contrast, the use of secondary prevention medications at discharge was similar between hospital categories. Maori and Pacific patients presenting to urban interventional hospitals were less likely than non-Maori/non-Pacific to receive timely angiography but more likely to have LVEF assessed. However, LVEF assessment and timely angiography in urban non-interventional and rural hospitals were lower than in urban interventional hospitals for both Maori and non-Maori/non-Pacific. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting to urban hospitals without routine interventional access and rural hospitals were less likely to receive LVEF assessment or timely angiography. This disproportionately impacts Maori, who are more likely to live in these hospital catchments.

Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes - does New Zealand General Practice adequately prepare patients to self-manage their Condition?

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is predominantly managed in primary care, and patients need to be provided with appropriate knowledge and education to understand how to best self-manage their condition. For optimal T2D self-management, primary care teams should share this information from the time of diagnosis. Little is currently known about how and when these resources are being provided to patients with T2D in New Zealand. METHODS: An online survey was carried out between Oct 2022 and Feb 2023. Patients diagnosed with T2D after Jan 2020 were invited to participate, with recruitment occurring via primary care and social media. Questions included information about demographics, diagnosis, provision of education resources and/or referral services as well as about current diabetes management. All responses were analysed with chi square tests. Free-text comments were summarised only. RESULTS: A total of 203 participants from across New Zealand completed the survey, but 18 were excluded due to being diagnosed more than 3 years ago, or self-reporting with type 1 diabetes rather than T2D. Nearly three quarters (70.7%) of participants reported that they were given appropriate resources to understand and manage their T2D, though half of these would have like more information. Overall, family and friends, self-led research and healthcare-provided education were equally useful, though this differed by ethnic groups. Similarly, approx. 70% of patients thought that medications had been well explained. Free text comments suggested a need for more targeted information around food choice and insulin use as well as a need for empathy and appropriate language from healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care appears to be providing most newly diagnosed patients with appropriate resources to understand and manage their T2D, but there is room for improvement with up to a third of participants not understanding how to manage foods, medication and lifestyle choices to optimise health outcomes. Further work is required to address this gap and should include the use of culturally-appropriate materials to meet the multi-ethnic population needs.

The ownership elephant is becoming a mammoth: a policy focus on ownership is needed to transform Aotearoa New Zealand's health system.

Explicit government policy about ownership of health services is an important yet missing element in Aotearoa New Zealand's health system. Policy has not systematically addressed ownership as a health system policy tool since the late 1930s. It is timely to revisit ownership amid health system reform and increasing reliance on private provision (for-profit companies), notably for primary and community care, and also as an integral part of digitalisation. Simultaneously, policy should recognise the importance and potential of both the third sector (NGOs, Pasifika, community-owned services), Maori ownership and direct government provision of services to address health equity. Iwi-led developments over recent decades, along with the establishment of the Te Aka Whai Ora (Maori Health Authority), and Iwi Maori Partnership Boards provide opportunities for emerging Indigenous models of health service ownership, more consistent with Te Tiriti o Waitangi and matauranga Maori. Four ownership types relevant to health service provision and equity are briefly explored: private for-profit, NGOs and community, government and Maori. These ownership domains operate differently in practice and over time, influencing service design, utilisation and health outcomes. Overall, the New Zealand state should take a deliberate strategic view of ownership as a policy instrument, in particular because of its relevance to health equity.

Reducing the burden of knee osteoarthritis through community pharmacy: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the Knee Care for Arthritis through Pharmacy Service.

INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) negatively impacts the health outcomes and equity, social and employment participation, and socio-economic wellbeing of those affected. Little community-based support is offered to people with knee OA in Aotearoa New Zealand. Identifying Maori and non-Maori with knee OA in community pharmacy and providing co-ordinated, evidence- and community-based care may be a scalable, sustainable, equitable, effective and cost-effective approach to improve health and wellbeing. AIM: Assess whether the Knee Care for Arthritis through Pharmacy Service (KneeCAPS) intervention improves knee-related physical function and pain (co-primary outcomes). Secondary aims assess impacts on health-related quality of life, employment participation, medication use, secondary health care utilisation, and relative effectiveness for Maori. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial will compare the KneeCAPS intervention to the Pharmaceutical Society of New Zealand Arthritis Fact Sheet and usual care (active control) at 12 months for Maori and non-Maori who have knee OA. Participants will be recruited in community pharmacies. Knee-related physical function will be measured using the function subscale of the Short Form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Knee-related pain will be measured using an 11-point numeric pain rating scale. Primary outcome analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using linear mixed models. Parallel within-trial health economic analysis and process evaluation will also be conducted. ETHICS AND TRIAL DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Central Health and Ethics Committee (2022-EXP-11725). The trial is registered with ANZCTR (ACTRN12622000469718). Findings will be submitted for publication and shared with participants.

Outcomes and access to angiography following non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in patients who present to rural or urban hospitals: ANZACS-QI 72.

AIM: This study's aim was to identify differences in invasive angiography performed and health outcomes for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) presenting to either i) a rural hospital, or an urban hospital ii) with or iii) without routine access to percutaneous intervention (PCI) in New Zealand. METHODS: Patients with NSTEACS between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017 were included. Logistic regression was used to model each of the outcome measures: angiography performed within 1 year; 30-day, 1-year and 2-year all-cause mortality; and readmission within 1 year of presentation with either heart failure, a major adverse cardiac event or major bleeding. RESULTS: There were 42,923 patients included. Compared to urban hospitals with access to PCI, the odds of a patient receiving an angiogram were reduced for rural and urban hospitals without routine access to PCI (odds ratio [OR] 0.82 and 0.75) respectively. There was a small increase in the odds of dying at 2 years (OR 1.16), but not 30 days or 1 year for patients presenting to a rural hospital. CONCLUSION: Patients who present to hospitals without PCI are less likely to receive angiography. Reassuringly there is no difference in mortality, except at 2 years, for patients that present to rural hospitals.

Understanding weight management experiences from patient perspectives: qualitative exploration in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a complex health issue affecting the quality of life of individuals and contributing to an unsustainable strain on healthcare professionals and national health systems. National policy guidelines indicate that general practice is best suited to deliver obesity healthcare, however, obesity rates continue to rise worldwide indicating interventions are ineffective in this space. The aim of this study was to explore the weight management experiences from patient perspectives. METHODS: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 16 rural Waikato general practice patients. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: Inconsistent Information, Significance of Holistic Factors, Obesity Centre Need, and Education. Participants expressed frustration at contradictory health messages, commercial company and 'expert' definition distrust, and that 'holistic' aspects to health significant to the weight management journey were unable to be addressed in general practice. CONCLUSION: Whilst primary care is positioned as suitable for delivering obesity healthcare, this study found that participants do not perceive general practice to be equipped to deliver this care. Instead, participants argued for a specialist obesity centre capable of meeting all their obesity healthcare needs. Further, wider issues including on-line commodification of health and neo-liberal capitalism - factors that exploit people with a stigmatised health issue - can cause further harm to the participant. A radical modernisation of education, information, and resources from regulated, qualified and 'trusted' healthcare professionals who can provide safe, non-stigmatising supportive services is recommended to meet the unique and changing food climate, reduce obesity rates and improve health outcomes.

Variation in open access vildagliptin use in Waikato patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To determine what the variation was in the initial use of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes following approval of open access funding in October 2018, including by ethnicity, gender, age, funding model and patient HbA1c levels. METHODS: Data were collected from 31 general practices for all adult patients with type 2 diabetes. National Health Index-matched medication data were obtained from the national Pharmaceutical Collection. Patients were included for analysis if they had received at least one diabetes medication in the 12 months prior to funding approval for vildagliptin. The proportion of patients who initiated vildagliptin therapy following open access funding approval was then evaluated, as was the time taken until the first dispensing (days since funding approval). RESULTS: A total of 724 of 3,971 (18.2%) of patients initiated vildagliptin therapy; mean time to first dispensing was 192.1±112.4 days. In logistic regression, Asian patients were more likely and Maori less likely to receive vildagliptin than Europeans. Younger patients and those with an HbA1c of >64mmol/mol were also more likely to initiate therapy. Vildagliptin use by general practice ranged from 0.0-82.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite open access funding, there was inequity in the initial use of vildagliptin. Substantial variation by general practice indicates that practitioner education may be needed to ensure appropriate and early adoption of new diabetes medications.

Reducing healthcare inequities for Maori using Telehealth during COVID-19.

AIM: Maori experience barriers to accessing timely, quality healthcare. The March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown in New Zealand required provision of Telehealth consultation options in primary care. Telehealth consultations have the potential to improve access to healthcare for Maori, and thereby reduce health inequities. Conversely, Telehealth may present additional barriers that contribute to inequities overall. This scoping project investigated Maori experiences of Telehealth consultations during the March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. METHOD: Semi-structured key informant interviews were completed with five Maori health professionals, six Maori Telehealth patients, and six Maori in-clinic patients, about their healthcare consultation experiences during COVID-19 lockdown. Participants were asked about what worked, what did not work, and for suggestions to improve future Telehealth provision to Maori whanau. Kaupapa Maori methodology underpinned thematic analysis of the interviews. RESULTS: Key findings are presented in three overarching themes: benefits (safety, cost, time, options); challenges (health literacy, access to Information Technology (IT), supply and demand, limited physical assessment); and suggested improvements (systems fit for purpose, supporting IT and health literacy, Telehealth as a routine option, rapport building, and cross system efficiency and information sharing). CONCLUSION: Telehealth is a viable long-term option that can support Maori whanau access to healthcare.

‘Look, wait, I’ll translate’: refugee women’s experiences with interpreters in healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand.

This study aimed to explore refugee women's experiences of interpreters in healthcare in Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine women who arrived in NZ as refugees. Analysis involved a 'text in context' approach. An iterative and interpretive process was employed by engaging with participant accounts and field notes. The various meanings behind participants' experiences were unpacked in relation to the literature and the broader socio-cultural contexts in which these experiences occurred. Findings highlighted issues with professional and informal interpreters. These issues included cost, discrepancies in dialect, translation outside appointments, and privacy. Findings indicate ethical and practical implications of using interpreters in healthcare for refugee women. A step to achieving equitable healthcare for refugee women in New Zealand entails putting in place accessible and robust communicative infrastructure.

Barriers to Diabetes Self-Management in a Subset of New Zealand Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and Poor Glycaemic Control.

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that there is an increasingly effective armoury of medications to treat diabetes, many people continue to have substantially elevated blood glucose levels. The purpose of this study was to explore what the barriers to diabetes management are in a cohort of people with diabetes and poor glycaemic control. METHODS: Qualitative semistructured interviews were carried out with 10 people with diabetes who had known diabetes and a recent HbA1c of >11.3% (100 mmol/mol) to explore their experiences of barriers to diabetes self-management and glycaemic control. RESULTS: Barriers to diabetes management were based around two key themes: biopsychosocial factors and knowledge about diabetes. Specifically, financial concerns, social stigma, medication side effects, and cognitive impairment due to hyperglycaemia were commonly reported as barriers to medication use. Other barriers included a lack of knowledge about their own condition, poor relationships with healthcare professionals, and a lack of relevant resources to support diet and weight loss. CONCLUSION: People with diabetes with poor glycaemic control experience many of the same barriers as those reported elsewhere, but also experience issues specifically related to their severe hyperglycaemia. Management of diabetes could be improved via the increased use of patient education and availability of locally relevant resources.