Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and inflammatory markers associated with gallbladder dysplasia: A case-control analysis within a series of patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Inflammation has been associated with the development of gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, little is known about the associations of both, inflammation and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with preneoplastic lesions. We analyzed the association of NSAIDs and gallbladder dysplasia in 82 patients with dysplasia and 1843 patients with gallstones among symptomatic patients from a high-risk population. We also analyzed associations for 33 circulating immune-related proteins in a subsample of all 68 dysplasia cases diagnosed at the time of sample selection and 136 gallstone controls. We calculated age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Biliary colic was reported among most cases (97.6%) and controls (83.9%). NSAID use was inversely associated with gallbladder dysplasia (OR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.26-0.83). Comparing the highest versus lowest category of each immune-related protein, eight proteins were inversely associated with dysplasia with sex- and age-adjusted ORs ranging from 0.30 (95%CI: 0.12-0.77) for IL-33 to 0.76 (95%CI: 0.59-0.99) for MIP-1B. Of those, GRO remained associated with dysplasia (OR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.45-0.91) and BCA-1 was borderline associated (OR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.54-1.01) after adjusting the logistic regression model for sex, age, and NSAIDs. In conclusion, NSAID users were less likely to have gallbladder dysplasia, suggesting that NSAIDs might be beneficial for symptomatic gallstones patients. The inverse association between immune-related markers and dysplasia requires additional research, ideally in prospective studies with asymptomatic participants, to understand the role of the inflammatory response in the natural history of GBC and to address the biological effect of NSAIDs.

Analytical measuring interval, linearity, and precision of serology assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies according to CLSI guidelines.

Serology testing is commonly used to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines and measure antibodies as a marker of previous infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In this study, four laboratory-developed serology enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike and anti-Nucleocapsid immunoglobin G [IgG] and immunoglobin M [IgM]) calibrated to the WHO International Standard 20/136 were validated via analytical measuring interval (limit of blank [LOB], limit of detection [LOD], and limit of quantification [LOQ]), linearity, and precision according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines EP17-A2, EP06 2nd Edition, and EP05-A3. For Spike IgG, LOB was 3.0 binding antibody units per milliliter (BAU/mL), LOD was 4.1 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 27.1 BAU/mL. For Nucleocapsid IgG, LOB was 1.9 BAU/mL, LOD was 3.2 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 24.6 BAU/mL. For Spike IgM, LOB was 57.1 BAU/mL, LOD was 69.0 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 113.5 BAU/mL. For Nucleocapsid IgM, LOD was 242.2 BAU/mL, LOD was 289.9 BAU/mL, and LOQ was 572.4 BAU/mL. Each assay displayed good linearity (max % deviation from linearity (≥LOQ) = 10.7%). The result of within-run repeatability evaluation for medium positive samples was 7.7% for Spike IgG, 4.6% for Nucleocapsid IgG, 7.5% for Spike IgM, and 10.1% for Nucleocapsid IgM. The total precision, including medium positive sample variability across 20 days, three reagent kits, and two operators, was 13.5% for Spike IgG, 14.5% for Nucleocapsid IgG, 17.6% for Spike IgM, and 16.2% for Nucleocapsid IgM. The assays were successfully validated following the applicable CLSI guidelines. All assays met the ±20% deviation from linearity and the ±20% coefficient of variation specification for precision and repeatability. IMPORTANCE: Reliable and validated serology assays are of increasing importance as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus continues to evolve and cause outbreaks. Validation of serology assays along with calibration to the International and National Standards (such as anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin WHO International Standard 20/136 or Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research's National Serology Standard COVID-NS01097) is critical to ensuring that results from clinical studies are reliable and comparable among various assays and laboratories. We describe the design and execution of a comprehensive study that established the analytical measuring intervals, linearity, precision, and repeatability of four in-house developed serology enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike immunoglobin G [IgG] and immunoglobin M [IgM] and anti-Nucleocapsid IgG and IgM) following applicable Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Overall, this study provides practical guidance on experimental design strategies and data analysis techniques, pertaining to the validation of COVID-19 serology assays according to CLSI guidelines, for use in clinical research studies.

Reproducibility Assessment of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays to Detect Anti-HPV16 L1-Specific IgG1, IgG3, IgA, and IgM Antibodies.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been used to measure anti-human-papillomavirus (HPV) immunoglobulin IgG. The goal of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of ELISAs measuring different HPV immunoglobulin isotypes, IgG1, 2, 3, and 4, IgA, and IgM, against HPV16. METHODS: Seventy-two serum samples collected from participants in the Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial (CVT) and immunized with bivalent HPV vaccine (2vHPV) were used for reproducibility assessment. IgG2 and IgG4 levels were too low to be detected. Levels of IgG1, IgG3, IgA, and IgM were measured, and the data were used to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CVs). RESULTS: CVs were assessed between technicians (12.8-22.7%) and across days (6.2-30.6%). The overall CVs ranged from 7.7-31.1%. IgM ELISA showed higher CVs (15.8-31.1%) than IgG1, IgG3, and IgA (6.2-22.7%). All ICC values were >98.7%. IgG3 was detected in all samples, while IgG1 and IgA had >86.3% detectability and IgM had 62.1% detectability. Pearson correlational analyses between different antibodies all showed significant correlations (p ≤ 0.001), except when comparing IgGs or IgA to IgM (p = 0.29-0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that these ELISAs are reproducible and detect isotype antibodies to HPV16 L1 across a range of concentrations in 2vHPV-vaccinated participants.

WHO International Standards for antibodies to HPV6 HPV11 HPV31 HPV33 HPV45 HPV52 and HPV58.

Previously established World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards (IS) for anti-HPV16 and HPV18 antibodies are used to harmonize results across human papillomavirus (HPV) serology assays. Here, we present an international collaborative study to establish ISs for antibodies against HPV6 (NIBSC code 19/298), HPV11 (20/174), HPV31 (20/176), HPV33 (19/290), HPV45 (20/178), HPV52 (19/296) and HPV58 (19/300). The candidate standards were prepared using sera from naturally infected individuals. Each candidate was shown to be monospecific for reactivity against its indicated HPV type except for the HPV11 candidate, which was also reactive against other types. Expression of antibody levels relative to the relevant candidate IS reduced inter-laboratory variation allowing greater comparability between laboratories. Based on these results, the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization established each of the 7 candidates as the 1st IS for antiserum to its indicated HPV type for use in the standardization of HPV pseudovirion-based neutralization and antibody-binding assays.

Blood collection tube and anticoagulant influence on SARS-CoV-2 antibody and avidity levels.

SARS-CoV-2 serology plays a crucial role in assessing COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Tube type and anticoagulant may influence serology results. Thus, understanding the influence of these variables in test results is key. We evaluated the influence of serum collection tube type and anticoagulant on anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody levels detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and Luminex multiplex assays (11-plex) in serum and plasma samples. Anti-spike IgG avidity was also evaluated in both sample types. No significant differences were found between serology assay results using different blood (serum) collection tube types. However, significantly lower antibody concentrations (p < 0.05) were observed in tubes with the anticoagulants sodium citrate and acid citrate dextrose (ACD) in the ELISA and Multiplex assays (n = 29), compared to expected concentrations. These differences mostly disappeared after adjusting for the dilution factor caused by the anticoagulant volume, indicating that anticoagulant does not significantly impact the assay results, while anticoagulant volume does. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in IgG avidity (M) of plasma samples (p < 0.05) compared to serum, but anticoagulant type had no effect. Overall, these findings indicate that the choice of collection tube may introduce subtle variations in assay results if the volumes of anticoagulants are not taken into consideration. Additionally, differences between serum and anticoagulant-treated plasma matrices were observed in avidity ELISAs, indicating that these samples are not interchangeable for these assays; a finding that requires further investigation.

Development of a human papillomavirus (HPV) multiplex immunoassay to profile HPV antibodies.

Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are considered the primary mechanism of vaccine-mediated protection against human papillomaviruses (HPV), the causative agent of cervical cancer. However, the minimum level of NAb needed for protection is currently unknown. The HPV pseudovirion-based neutralization assay (PBNA) is the gold standard method for assessing HPV antibody responses but is time-consuming and labor-intensive. With the development of higher valency HPV vaccines, alternative serological assays with the capacity for multiplexing would improve efficiency and output. Here we describe a multiplex bead-based immunoassay to characterize the antibody responses to the seven oncogenic HPV types (HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58) contained in the current licensed nonavalent HPV vaccine. This assay can measure antibody isotypes and subclasses (total IgG, IgM, IgA1-2, IgG1-4), and can be adapted to measure other antibody features (e.g., Fc receptors) that contribute to vaccine immunity. When tested with serum samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals, we found high concordance between HPV-specific IgG using this multiplex assay and NAbs measured with PBNA. Overall, this assay is high-throughput, sample-sparing, and time-saving, providing an alternative to existing assays for the measurement and characterization of HPV antibody responses.

Longitudinal Assessment of BNT162b2- and mRNA-1273-Induced Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG Levels and Avidity Following Three Doses of Vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-induced protection against infection is likely to be affected by functional antibody features. To understand the kinetics of antibody responses in healthy individuals after primary series and third vaccine doses, sera from the recipients of the two licensed SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were assessed for circulating anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG levels and avidity for up to 6 months post-primary series and 9 months after the third dose. Following primary series vaccination, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG levels declined from months 1 to 6, while avidity increased through month 6, irrespective of the vaccine received. The third dose of either vaccine increased anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG levels and avidity and appeared to enhance antibody level persistence-generating a slower rate of decline in the 3 months following the third dose compared to the decline seen after the primary series alone. The third dose of both vaccines induced significant avidity increases 1 month after vaccination compared to the avidity response 6 months post-primary series vaccination (p ≤ 0.001). A significant difference in avidity responses between the two vaccines was observed 6 months post-third dose, where the BNT162b2 recipients had higher antibody avidity levels compared to the mRNA-1273 recipients (p = 0.020).

Safety and immunogenicity of Innovax bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in girls 9-14 years of age: Interim analysis from a phase 3 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organization human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination recommendations include a single- or two-dose schedule in individuals 9-20 years old and advice for generating data on single-dose efficacy or immunobridging. The ongoing Phase 3 trial of Innovax's bivalent (types 16 and 18) HPV vaccine (Cecolin®) assesses in low- and middle-income countries alternative dosing schedules and generates data following one dose in girls 9-14 years old. Interim data for the 6-month dosing groups are presented. METHODS: In Bangladesh and Ghana, 1,025 girls were randomized to receive either two doses of Cecolin at 6-, 12-, or 24-month intervals; one dose of Gardasil® followed by one dose of Cecolin at month 24; or two doses of Gardasil 6 months apart (referent). Serology was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and, in a subset, by neutralization assays. Primary objectives include immunological non-inferiority of the Cecolin schedules to referent one month after the second dose. Safety endpoints include reactogenicity and unsolicited adverse events for 7 and 30 days post-vaccination, respectively, as well as serious adverse events throughout the study. RESULTS: Interim analyses included data from the two groups on a 0, 6-month schedule with 205 participants per group. One month after Dose 2, 100% of participants were seropositive by ELISA and had seroconverted for both antigens. Non-inferiority of Cecolin to Gardasil was demonstrated. Six months following one dose, over 96% of participants were seropositive by ELISA for both HPV antigens, with a trend for higher geometric mean concentration following Cecolin administration. Reactogenicity and safety were comparable between both vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Cecolin in a 0, 6-month schedule elicits robust immunogenicity. Non-inferiority to Gardasil was demonstrated one month after a 0, 6-month schedule. Immunogenicity following one dose was comparable to Gardasil up to six months. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated (ClinicalTrials.gov No. 04508309).

Comparing one dose of HPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years in Tanzania (DoRIS) with one dose in young women aged 15-20 years in Kenya (KEN SHE): an immunobridging analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The first randomised controlled trial of single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine efficacy, the Kenya single-dose HPV-vaccine efficacy (KEN SHE) trial, showed greater than 97% efficacy against persistent HPV16 and HPV18 infection at 36 months among women in Kenya. We compared antibody responses after one dose of HPV vaccine in the Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study (DoRIS), the first randomised trial of the single- dose regimen in girls aged 9-14 years, the target age range for vaccination, with those after one dose of the same vaccine in KEN SHE. METHODS: In the DoRIS trial, 930 girls aged 9-14 years in Tanzania were randomly assigned to one, two, or three doses of the 2-valent vaccine (Cervarix) or the 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil-9). The proportion seroconverting and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) at month 24 after one dose were compared with those in women aged 15-20 years who were randomly assigned to one dose of the same vaccines at the same timepoint in KEN SHE. Batched samples were tested together by virus-like particle ELISA for HPV16 and HPV18 IgG antibodies. Non-inferiority of GMC ratios (DoRIS trial:KEN SHE) was predefined as a lower bound of the 95% CI less than 0·50. FINDINGS: Month 24 HPV16 and HPV18 antibody GMCs in DoRIS were similar or higher than those in KEN SHE. 2-valent GMC ratios were 0·90 (95% CI 0·72-1·14) for HPV16 and 1·02 (0·78-1·33) for HPV18. 9-valent GMC ratios were 1·44 (95% CI 1·14-1·82) and 1·47 (1·13-1·90), respectively. Non-inferiority of antibody GMCs and seropositivity was met for HPV16 and HPV18 for both vaccines. INTERPRETATION: HPV16 and HPV18 immune responses in young girls 24 months after a single dose of 2-valent or 9-valent HPV vaccine were comparable to those in young women who were randomly assigned to a single dose of the same vaccines and in whom efficacy had been shown. A single dose of HPV vaccine, when given to girls in the target age range for vaccination, induces immune responses that could be effective against persistent HPV16 and HPV18 infection at least two years after vaccination. FUNDING: The UK Department of Health and Social Care, the Foreign, Commonwealth, & Development Office, the Global Challenges Research Fund, the UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials scheme, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the US National Cancer Institute; the US National Institutes of Health, and the Francis and Dorothea Reed Endowed Chair in Infectious Diseases. TRANSLATION: For the KiSwahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Development of a proficiency testing program for HPV serology assays used to evaluate antibody responses in vaccine trials.

In this study, a proficiency panel was created for evaluation of assay performance and inter- and intra-laboratory assay comparisons, especially the ability to accurately measure negative, low, intermediate, and high levels of HPV type-specific antibodies. Comprised of 80 deidentified samples, this panel is designed for individual labs to evaluate assay performance characteristics on a biennial basis, to promote standardization of methodology and harmonization of data from human papillomavirus (HPV) serology tests in vaccine trials. The proficiency panel was qualified using 2 types of assays (singleplex Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays [ELISAs] or Multiplex antibody-binding assays and Pseudovirion-based neutralization assays [PBNAs]) in 10 laboratories from 7 countries, monitoring HPV antibody responses for up to 9 HPV types and using 3 different analysis methods. Sensitivity, specificity, and correlations (concordance, accuracy, and precision) were evaluated for each HPV type. In laboratories that tested all 80 samples, results from most (74/80) samples were reported with 100% accuracy across all 9 HPV types. The average sensitivity and specificity for singleplex and multiplex antibody binding assays ranged from 86.7% to 98.3% (sensitivity) and 84.2% to 94.3% (specificity), while the average sensitivity and specificity for the Pseudovirion (PsV)-based neutralization assays (PBNA) ranged from 87.6% to 99.4% (sensitivity) and 52.4% to 94.4% (specificity). This proficiency panel will help with assessing performance characteristics of HPV serology assays used in clinical trial studies and assure the data generated from these assays is harmonized.

HPV16/18 Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of Nonavalent HPV Vaccine.

OBJECTIVES: A single dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine would simplify logistics and reduce costs of vaccination programs worldwide. We conducted a phase IIa trial to determine the stability of HPV type-specific antibody responses after a single dose of the nonavalent HPV vaccine, Gardasil9. METHODS: Two hundred-and-one healthy 9 to 11-year-old girls and boys were enrolled at 2 centers in the United States to receive a prime dose of the nonavalent vaccine at baseline, a delayed dose at month 24, and an optional third dose at month 30. Blood samples were collected to measure HPV type-specific antibodies at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after the prime dose. The primary outcomes were serum HPV16 and HPV18 antibody responses. RESULTS: In both girls and boys, geometric mean concentrations of HPV16 and HPV18 antibodies increased at 6 months, declined between months 6 to 12, and then remained stable and high (at 20- and 10-times those at baseline for HPV16 and HPV18, respectively) throughout months 12, 18, and 24 (prebooster) visits. Both HPV16 and HPV18 antibody responses demonstrated anamnestic boosting effect at 30-months after the delayed (24-month) booster dose. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of the nonavalent HPV vaccine induced persistent and stable HPV16 and HPV18 antibody responses up to 24 months. This study contributes important immunogenicity data to inform feasibility of the single dose HPV vaccination paradigm. Further research is needed to assess the long-term antibody stability and individual clinical and public health benefit of the single dose schedule.

The HPV Serology Laboratory leads an initiative to standardize and harmonize human papillomavirus serology assays.

The HPV Serology Laboratory is leading a global partnership initiative aiming for standardization and harmonization of current serology assay platforms being used to assess immune responses to HPV vaccines. Serology standardization is particularly important given the increasing number of immunobridging trials relying on serology data for approval of new vaccine dosing schedules or vaccine formulations. The initiative was established in 2017 to enable comparisons of data between different vaccines and relevant studies as well as expedite the implementation of new vaccines and vaccine indications. The HPV Serology Laboratory has held or attended several meetings with partnering laboratories, including international meetings in 2017, 2018, and 2021.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG Spike antibody levels and avidity in natural infection or following vaccination with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 vaccines.

Certain aspects of the immunogenicity and effectiveness of the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines (mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2) developed in response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic are still uncharacterized. Serum or plasma samples from healthy donor recipients of either vaccine (BNT162b2 n = 53, mRNA-1273 n = 49; age 23-67), and individuals naturally infected with SARS-CoV-2 (n = 106; age 18-82) were collected 0-2 months post-infection or 1- and 4 months after second dose of vaccination. Anti-Spike antibody levels and avidity were measured via an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Overall, vaccination induced higher circulating anti-Spike protein immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels and avidity compared to infection at similar time intervals. Both vaccines produced similar anti-Spike IgG concentrations at 1 month, while mRNA-1273 demonstrated significantly higher circulating antibody concentrations after 4 months. mRNA-1273 induced significantly higher avidity at month 1 compared to BNT162b2 across all age groups. However, the 23-34 age group was the only group to maintain statistical significance by 4 months. Male BNT162b2 recipients were approaching statistically significant lower anti-Spike IgG avidity compared to females by month 4. These findings demonstrate enhanced anti-Spike IgG levels and avidity following vaccination compared to natural infection. In addition, the mRNA-1273 vaccine induced higher antibody levels by 4 months compared to BNT162b2.

Assay Harmonization Study To Measure Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccines: a Serology Methods Study.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented the scientific community with an immediate need for accurate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology assays, resulting in an expansion of assay development, some without following a rigorous quality control and validation, and with a wide range of performance characteristics. Vast amounts of data have been gathered on SARS-CoV-2 antibody response; however, performance and ability to compare the results have been challenging. This study seeks to analyze the reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of a set of widely used commercial, in-house, and neutralization serology assays, as well as provide evidence for the feasibility of using the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) as a harmonization tool. This study also seeks to demonstrate that binding immunoassays may serve as a practical alternative for the serological study of large sample sets in lieu of expensive, complex, and less reproducible neutralization assays. In this study, commercial assays demonstrated the highest specificity, while in-house assays excelled in antibody sensitivity. As expected, neutralization assays demonstrated high levels of variability but overall good correlations with binding immunoassays, suggesting that binding may be reasonably accurate as well as practical for the study of SARS-CoV-2 serology. All three assay types performed well after WHO IS standardization. The results of this study demonstrate there are high performing serology assays available to the scientific community to rigorously dissect antibody responses to infection and vaccination. IMPORTANCE Previous studies have shown significant variability in SARS-CoV-2 antibody serology assays, highlighting the need for evaluation and comparison of these assays using the same set of samples covering a wide range of antibody responses induced by infection or vaccination. This study demonstrated that there are high performing assays that can be used reliably to evaluate immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in the context of infection and vaccination. This study also demonstrated the feasibility of harmonizing these assays against the International Standard and provided evidence that the binding immunoassays may have high enough correlation with the neutralization assays to serve as a practical proxy. These results represent an important step in standardizing and harmonizing the many different serological assays used to evaluate COVID-19 immune responses in the population.

Development, Validation, and Utilization of a Luminex-Based SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Serology Assay.

SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing is important for seroprevalence studies and for evaluating vaccine immune responses. We developed and validated a Luminex bead-based multiplex serology assay for measuring IgG levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against full-length spike (S), nucleocapsid (N), and receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of wild-type, RBD N501Y mutant, RBD E484K mutant, RBD triple mutant SARS-CoV-2 proteins, Sars-CoV-1, MERS-CoV, and common human coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2, OC43, 229E, HKU1, and NL63. Assay cutoff values, sensitivity, and specificity were determined using samples from 160 negative controls and 60 PCR-confirmed, SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. The assay demonstrated sensitivities of 98.3%, 95%, and 100% and specificities of 100%, 99.4%, and 98.8% for anti-(S), -N, and -RBD, respectively. Results are expressed as IgG antibody concentrations in BAU/mL, using the WHO international standard (NIBSC code 20/136) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. When the multiplex assay was performed and compared with singleplex assays, the IgG antibody measurement geometric mean ratios were between 0.895 and 1.122, and no evidence of interference was observed between antigens. Lower and upper IgG concentration limits, based on accuracy (between 80% and 120%), precision (percent relative standard deviation, ≤25%), and sample dilutional linearity (between 75% and 125%), were used to establish the assay range. Precision was established by evaluating 24 individual human serum samples obtained from vaccinated and SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. The assay provided reproducible, consistent results with typical coefficients of variation of ≤20% for all assays, irrespective of the run, day, or analyst. Results indicate the assay has high sensitivity and specificity and thus is appropriate for use in measuring SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in infected and vaccinated individuals. IMPORTANCE The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic resulted in the development and validation of multiple serology tests with variable performance. While there are multiple SARS-CoV-2 serology tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, the focus is usually either on only one antigen at a time or multiple proteins from only one SARS-CoV-2 variant. These tests usually do not evaluate antibodies against viral proteins from different SARS-CoV-2 variants or from other coronaviruses. Here, we evaluated a multiplex serology test based on Luminex technology, where antibodies against multiple domains of SARS-CoV-2 wild type, SARS-CoV-2 mutants, and common coronavirus antibodies are detected simultaneously in a single assay. This Luminex-based multiplex serology assay can enhance our understanding of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.

The second HPV serology meeting: Progress and challenges in standardization of human papillomavirus serology assays.

The HPV Serology Laboratory in the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research is working in partnership with the scientific community with the goal of standardizing and harmonizing current HPV serology assay platforms in response to the increasing number of immunobridging trials relying on serology data for approval of new vaccine dosing schedules and new formulations. A virtual meeting was held on June 29-30, 2021, to review the progress of the standardization initiative thus far and to bridge scientific gaps and outstanding questions. The main aims and outcomes of the meeting were to discuss: 1) standardization of assays and reagents; 2) International Standard calibration procedures; 3) assay cut-off values; 4) current immunobridging clinical trials; and 5) gaps and challenges in standardization of HPV serology.

Selection, Characterization, Calibration, and Distribution of the U.S. Serology Standard for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic resulted in a demand for highly specific and sensitive serological testing to evaluate seroprevalence and antiviral immune responses to infection and vaccines. Hence, there was an urgent need for a serology standard to harmonize results across different natural history and vaccine studies. The Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR) generated a U.S. serology standard for SARS-CoV-2 serology assays and subsequently calibrated it to the WHO international standard (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control [NIBSC] code 20/136) (WHO IS). The development included a collaborative study to evaluate the suitability of the U.S. serology standard as a calibrator for SARS-CoV-2 serology assays. The eight laboratories participating in the study tested a total of 17 assays, which included commercial and in-house-derived binding antibody assays, as well as neutralization assays. Notably, the use of the U.S. serology standard to normalize results led to a reduction in the inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) for IgM levels (pre-normalization range, 370.6% to 1,026.7%, and post-normalization range, 52.8% to 242.3%) and a reduction in the inter-assay CV for IgG levels (pre-normalization range, 3,416.3% to 6,160.8%, and post-normalization range, 41.6% to 134.6%). The following results were assigned to the U.S. serology standard following calibration against the WHO IS: 246 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL for Spike IgM, 764 BAU/mL for Spike IgG, 1,037 BAU/mL for Nucleocapsid IgM, 681 BAU/mL for Nucleocapsid IgG assays, and 813 neutralizing international units (IU)/mL for neutralization assays. The U.S. serology standard has been made publicly available as a resource to the scientific community around the globe to help harmonize results between laboratories.

Comparing one dose of HPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years in Tanzania (DoRIS) with one dose of HPV vaccine in historical cohorts: an immunobridging analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are given as a two-dose schedule in children aged 9-14 years, or as three doses in older individuals. We compared antibody responses after one dose of HPV vaccine in the Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study (DoRIS), a randomised trial of different HPV vaccine schedules in Tanzania, to those from two observational HPV vaccine trials that found high efficacy of one dose up to 11 years against HPV16 and HPV18 (Costa Rica Vaccine Trial [CVT] and Institutional Agency for Research on Cancer [IARC] India trial). METHODS: In this immunobridging analysis of an open-label randomised controlled trial, girls were recruited from 54 government schools in Mwanza, Tanzania, into the DoRIS trial. Girls were eligible if they were aged 9-14 years, healthy, and HIV negative. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1), using permutated block sizes of 12, 18, and 24, to one, two, or three doses of the 2-valent vaccine (Cervarix, GSK Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) or the 9-valent vaccine (Gardasil 9, Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France). For this immunobridging analysis, the primary objective was to compare geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) at 24 months after one dose in the per-protocol population compared with in historical cohorts: the one-dose 2-valent vaccine group in DoRIS was compared with recipients of the 2-valent vaccine Cervarix from CVT and the one-dose 9-valent vaccine group in DoRIS was compared with recipients of the 4-valent vaccine Gardasil (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) from the IARC India trial. Samples were tested together with virus-like particle ELISA for HPV16 and HPV18 IgG antibodies. Non-inferiority of GMC ratios (DoRIS trial vs historical cohort) was predefined as when the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than 0·50. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02834637. FINDINGS: Between Feb 23, 2017, and Jan 6, 2018, we screened 1002 girls for eligibility, of whom 930 were enrolled into DoRIS and 155 each were assigned to one dose, two doses, or three doses of 2-valent vaccine, or one dose, two doses, or three doses of 9-valent vaccine. 154 (99%) participants in the one-dose 2-valent vaccine group (median age 10 years [IQR 9-12]) and 152 (98%) in the one-dose 9-valent vaccine group (median age 10 years [IQR 9-12]) were vaccinated and attended the 24 month visit, and so were included in the analysis. 115 one-dose recipients from the CVT (median age 21 years [19-23]) and 139 one-dose recipients from the IARC India trial (median age 14 years [13-16]) were included in the analysis. At 24 months after vaccination, GMCs for HPV16 IgG antibodies were 22·9 international units (IU) per mL (95% CI 19·9-26·4; n=148) for the DoRIS 2-valent vaccine group versus 17·7 IU/mL (13·9-22·5; n=97) for the CVT (GMC ratio 1·30 [95% CI 1·00-1·68]) and 13·7 IU/mL (11·9-15·8; n=145) for the DoRIS 9-valent vaccine group versus 6·7 IU/mL (5·5-8·2; n=131) for the IARC India trial (GMC ratio 2·05 [1·61-2·61]). GMCs for HPV18 IgG antibodies were 9·9 IU/mL (95% CI 8·5-11·5: n=141) for the DoRIS 2-valent vaccine group versus 8·0 IU/mL (6·4-10·0; n=97) for the CVT trial (GMC ratio 1·23 [95% CI 0·95-1·60]) and 5·7 IU/mL (4·9-6·8; n=136) for the DoRIS 9-valent vaccine group versus 2·2 IU/mL (1·9-2·7; n=129) for the IARC India trial (GMC ratio 2·12 [1·59-2·83]). Non-inferiority of antibody GMCs was met for each vaccine for both HPV16 and HPV18. INTERPRETATION: One dose of HPV vaccine in young girls might provide sufficient protection against persistent HPV infection. A one-dose schedule would reduce costs, simplify vaccine delivery, and expand access to the vaccine. FUNDING: UK Department for International Development/UK Medical Research Council/Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials Scheme, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the US National Cancer Institute. TRANSLATION: For the KiSwahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) for COVID-19: Depth and Breadth of Serology Assays and Plans for Assay Harmonization.

In October 2020, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) was established to study the immune response to COVID-19, and "to develop, validate, improve, and implement serological testing and associated technologies" (https://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/covid-19/coronavirus-research-initiatives/serological-sciences-network). SeroNet is comprised of 25 participating research institutions partnering with the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR) and the SeroNet Coordinating Center. Since its inception, SeroNet has supported collaborative development and sharing of COVID-19 serological assay procedures and has set forth plans for assay harmonization. To facilitate collaboration and procedure sharing, a detailed survey was sent to collate comprehensive assay details and performance metrics on COVID-19 serological assays within SeroNet. In addition, FNLCR established a protocol to calibrate SeroNet serological assays to reference standards, such as the U.S. severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology standard reference material and first WHO international standard (IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (20/136), to facilitate harmonization of assay reporting units and cross-comparison of study data. SeroNet institutions reported development of a total of 27 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods, 13 multiplex assays, and 9 neutralization assays and use of 12 different commercial serological methods. FNLCR developed a standardized protocol for SeroNet institutions to calibrate these diverse serological assays to reference standards. In conclusion, SeroNet institutions have established a diverse array of COVID-19 serological assays to study the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and vaccines. Calibration of SeroNet serological assays to harmonize results reporting will facilitate future pooled data analyses and study cross-comparisons. IMPORTANCE SeroNet institutions have developed or implemented 61 diverse COVID-19 serological assays and are collaboratively working to harmonize these assays using reference materials to establish standardized reporting units. This will facilitate clinical interpretation of serology results and cross-comparison of research data.