Changes in absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance during exercise in patients with ANOCA.

BACKGROUND: Whether saline-induced hyperaemia captures exercise-induced coronary flow regulation remains unknown. AIMS: Through this study, we aimed to describe absolute coronary flow (Q) and microvascular resistance (Rµ) adaptation during exercise in participants with angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) and to explore the correlations between saline- and exercise-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR). METHODS: Rµ, Q, CFR and MRR were assessed in the left anterior descending artery using continuous thermodilution with saline infusion at 10 mL/min (rest), 20 mL/min (hyperaemia) and finally at a 10 mL/min infusion rate during stress testing with a dedicated supine cycling ergometer. An incremental workload of 30 watts every two minutes was applied. A saline-derived CFR (CFRsaline) cutoff <2.5 was used to identify coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). RESULTS: CFRsaline-defined CMD was observed in 53.3% of the participants (16/30). While cycling, these patients less of an ability to increase Q (7 [interquartile range [IQR] 30.5-103.0] vs 21 [IQR 5.8-45.0] mL/min/30 watts; p=0.01) due to a smaller decrease of Rµ (109 {IQR 32-286} vs 202 [IQR 102-379] Wood units [WU]/30 watts; p<0.01) as compared with the group with normal CFRsaline. In the overall population, CFRsaline and exercise-derived CFR (CFRexercise) were 2.70±0.90 and 2.85±1.54, respectively, with an agreement classification of 83.3%. A good correlation between saline and exercise techniques for both CFR (r=0.73; p<0.0001) and MRR (r=0.76; p<0.0001) was observed. Among participants with normal CFRsaline, 28.7% (4/14) had an impaired CFRexercise <2.5 at the peak of exercise due to a moderate and late decrease of Rµ. CONCLUSIONS: Saline-induced hyperaemia provided a valid surrogate for exercise physiology independently of the absolute level of CFR and MRR, although exercise provided more granularity to evaluate adaptation among participants with exercise-related CMD.

Ten-year trends in characteristics, management and outcomes of patients admitted with cardiogenic shock in the ACTION-SHOCK cohort.

BACKGROUND: The ACTION-SHOCK registry offers a decade-long perspective on patients admitted with cardiogenic shock (CS). AIMS: To assess trends in the management and outcomes of patients with CS over 10 years. METHODS: Trends in the characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with CS admitted into the cardiac intensive care unit of Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital from 2011 to 2020 were analysed. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality, heart transplantation or ventricular assist device. Long-term outcomes were all-cause death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, data from 700 patients with CS (median [interquartile range] age 61 [50-72] years; 73% of men) were analysed. The proportion of CS related to acute myocardial infarction decreased (from 45% in 2011-2012 to 27% in 2019-2020) while the proportions related to chronic coronary syndrome (18% to 23%) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies (37 to 51%) increased (P<0.01). The use of rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation remained stable (19 to 14%) and intra-aortic balloon pump use decreased (22% to 7%) (P<0.01). In-hospital mortality remained stable (27 to 29%) as did the proportions of patients discharged after transplantation (17 to 14%) or with a durable ventricular assist device (2 to 4%). Among patients discharged alive, death or readmission for acute heart failure at 1 year remained high (37 to 47%). CONCLUSION: CS remained associated with a poor prognosis over the last decade. There are significant unmet needs in the management strategies of patients with CS.

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Clopidogrel-Naive Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Whether ticagrelor may reduce periprocedural myocardial necrosis after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with and without chronic clopidogrel therapy is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with and without chronic clopidogrel therapy before undergoing elective PCI. METHODS: In this prespecified analysis of the ALPHEUS (Assessment of Loading With the P2Y12 Inhibitor Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel to Halt Ischemic Events in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Stenting) trial, patients were defined as clopidogrel(+) and clopidogrel(-) according to the presence and absence of clopidogrel treatment for ≥7 days before PCI, respectively. The primary endpoint was the composite of PCI-related myocardial infarction and major injury as defined by the third and fourth universal definition 48 hours after PCI. RESULTS: A total of 1,882 patients were included, 805 (42.7%) of whom were clopidogrel(+). These patients were older, had more comorbidities, and had more frequent features of complex PCI. The primary endpoint was less frequently present in clopidogrel(-) compared to clopidogrel(+) patients (32.8% vs 40.0%; OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60-0.88), but no significant differences were reported for the risk of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischemic attack at 48 hours or 30 days. Ticagrelor did not reduce periprocedural myocardial necrosis or the risk of adverse outcomes, and there was no significant interaction regarding the presence of chronic clopidogrel treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel-naive patients presented less periprocedural complications compared to clopidogrel(+) patients, a difference related to a lower risk profile and less complex PCI. The absence of clopidogrel at baseline did not affect the absence of a difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in terms of PCI-related complications supporting the use of clopidogrel as the standard of care in elective PCI in patients with or without chronic clopidogrel treatment.