A scoping review of registered nurses' delegating care and support to unlicenced care and support workers.

AIM: To scope the international literature about registered nurses delegated models of care to unlicenced workers, identify gaps and reflect upon how the evidence relates to nursing in multiple contexts. DESIGN: Scoping review of the peer reviewed literature from the year 2000 onwards, using the PRISMA-ScR checklist. METHODS: The study searched the following databases in February 2022: CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, and SCOPUS, and included keywords, Boolean operators and subject headings relevant to registered nurses delegating the provision of care to unlicenced workers. RESULTS: A total of 49 articles met the eligibility criteria for this study, and relevant data were extractedThree models of delegation were highlighted within the literature: direct, indirect and a mixture of both. The data highlighted that direct delegation mainly occurred in acute contexts, with delegation decreasing with increasing patient acuity and/or complexity but the threshold of when this would occur was not clear. There was one intervention study that measured patient outcomes which could aid in the determination of what is effective delegation. For studies that did report on it (n = 6), there were few examples of better patient outcomes in cases where care was delegated from registered nurses to unlicenced workers. CONCLUSIONS: The scoping review highlighted heterogeneity in practice areas and methods of delegation practice. A key gap in literature is the absence of studies focusing on patient outcomes, with a clear baseline to measure and identify effective delegation practices. Additionally, the legal and logistical implications presented in both direct and indirect delegation practices is not evident in the literature. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Decisions related to delegation are often made at the service level and prescribed to those who work within the service, suggesting that models of indirect delegation are in fact not delegation at all, rather a re-distribution of nurses' work. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Delegation is a vital component of the scope of practice of registered nurses. This review has highlighted unique differences in delegation by practice context, where the proliferation of unlicensed workers in certain contexts places a vastly different professional and legal burden on the registered nurse.

The Experience of Facilitating Inclusive Research Advisory Groups With Parents and People With Intellectual Disability and/or Autism Spectrum Disorder.

There is little nursing research about process issues in conducting inclusive project advisory groups of people with autism and/or intellectual disability or those who are parents/carers of this cohort. Through a descriptive qualitative design, this article aims to analyze the processes, challenges, and solutions when facilitating these groups for a nursing project in Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis was utilized to analyze field notes and meeting minutes. Results highlight the need for a defined, robust communication process between researchers and advisory groups, skilled facilitators, and careful planning of when in the life of the project the groups can contribute meaningfully. This project offers a proposed framework for the valuable contribution of lived experiences from research advisory groups.

A scoping review to inform an auditing framework evaluating healthcare environments for inclusion of people with intellectual disability and/or autism.

People with intellectual disability and/or autism are likely to be in hospital more often, for longer, and have poorer health outcomes. Few audit tools exist to identify their barriers in mainstream healthcare environments. This study aimed to identify evidence of audit characteristics of healthcare contexts specifically for people with intellectual disability and/or autism, for conceptual development of an auditing framework. A scoping review of evaluations of healthcare environments was completed in January 2023. Findings were presented using the PAGER framework. Of the sixteen studies identified, most originated in the UK, nine focused on intellectual disability, four on autism, and three were concerned with mixed diagnosis. Six domains for auditing healthcare environments were identified: care imperatives, communication to individuals, understanding communication from individuals, providing supportive environments of care, supporting positive behaviour, and actions to make things go well. Further research is recommended to refine an audit framework.

Registered nurses' awareness and implementation of reasonable adjustments for people with intellectual disability and/or autism.

AIM: To describe Australian registered nurses' awareness, and implementation of reasonable adjustments within their practice when caring for people with intellectual disability and/or autism. Additionally, the association between key demographic, workforce, and respondent variables and familiarity of the term and regularity of use was explored. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Survey data were collected between August and October 2020 using an online survey tool. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Familiarity of the concept of reasonable adjustments was relatively low, compared to respondents who report applying adjustments when caring for people with intellectual disability and/or autism. Higher levels of confidence, comfort, and knowledge when caring for this cohort were associated with greater awareness and application of reasonable adjustments. CONCLUSION: A higher volume, and diversity in type of, nursing education related to care for people with intellectual disability and/or autism is indicated.

A cross-practice context exploration of nursing preparedness and comfort to care for people with intellectual disability and autism.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the self-perceived preparedness, knowledge, comfort and confidence of Australian Registered Nurses when caring for people with ID and/or ASD across contexts of practice: primary care and community, intensive care, acute hospital, emergency department, paediatrics and ID/ASD. BACKGROUND: There is limited research comparing nursing preparedness and competency when caring for people with intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism (ASD) across nursing contexts of practice. A greater understanding of the differed educational preparedness, confidence and comfort across contexts of practice can aid the development of tailored educational programmes to improve nursing capacity to care for this cohort. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. METHODS: A descriptive survey tool of registered nurses (n = 69.3). Comparative inferential analysis was undertaken between the independent categorical variable of six nursing contexts of practice across several dependent variables including age, years since registration, educational content and exposure, knowledge, comfort and confidence. This cross-sectional study was undertaken according to the STROBE Statement checklist of items. RESULTS: Occupying an ID/ASD nursing role was significantly associated with higher reported levels of educational preparedness, professional development and postgraduate education relevant to caring for people with ID and/or ASD. Levels of self-reported knowledge of care issues, confidence and comfort when undertaking healthcare tasks was significantly associated with the context of practice, with nurses working in ID/ASD settings reporting the highest levels across all variables. CONCLUSION: The findings of the study highlight an association between greater educational exposure to content relevant to working with people with ID/ASD and subsequently working in that field. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study has highlighted that professional development programmes aiming to improve nursing capacity to care for people with ID and/or ASD, should be informed by and address differing gaps in confidence, comfort and educational preparedness across nursing contexts of practice.

Developing community mobility and driving with youth on the autism spectrum: A psychosocial perspective.

BACKGROUND: Youth on the autism spectrum face particular challenges with community mobility and driving, contributing to reduced community participation. Skill development may be uniquely shaped by complex interactions between autistic traits, psychosocial influences and community environments. Research to guide occupational therapy practice is sparse. OBJECTIVE: This short report explores the complex interplay between psychosocial and environmental influences on community mobility development, to stimulate further occupational therapy research and provide considerations for practice. METHOD: Because of the lack of autism specific research, we firstly discuss psychosocial and environmental influences impacting non-autistic youth, then draw on current research to identify challenges for youth on the spectrum. Finally, we propose considerations for practice and research. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial considerations for developing community mobility and driving include social communication, safety, navigating unpredictable community environments, emotional regulation and motivation for community participation. Future research should explore how to develop foundational community mobility skills; communication and social skills; and autistic needs for inclusive design. Supporting normative community mobility skills during adolescence may underpin transition to independence in adulthood. SIGNIFICANCE: Broadening the focus of community mobility and driving research to understand environmental and psychosocial contexts of community environments, is necessary to provide guidance for occupational therapists supporting youth on the spectrum with independent community participation.

Independent Community Mobility and Driving Experiences of Adults on the Autism Spectrum: A Scoping Review.

IMPORTANCE: Autistic adults face decreased community participation for employment, education, and social activities plus barriers to driving and transportation. However, little is known about their experiences of moving around community environments. OBJECTIVE: To explore contextual issues and experiences of independent community mobility and driving for autistic adults and to determine the modes of community mobility, regions studied, and methodologies used. DATA SOURCES: Seven databases were searched from 2000 to 2019. All empirical research relating to autism, community mobility, and driving for people older than age 5 yr was mapped. Studies examining experiences of community mobility and driving were selected for scoping review. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews methodology was used. Thirteen studies reporting specifically on autistic adults' experiences with public transportation, driving, and pedestrian navigation of community environments were included. These studies were analyzed using concepts from the Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance Model. FINDINGS: Nine studies examined experiences of autistic adults. Seven studies explored proxy perspectives. Those studies examining driving primarily focused on learner driver experiences. Although most studies reported on personal and environmental factors, some studies reported on broader social communication and personal narrative factors. None used inclusive methodology involving autistic adults. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A broader focus on the contextual experiences of community mobility and driving is needed to support participation of autistic adults in their communities. Linking community mobility experiences with participation outcomes and expanding research to include experienced drivers and nonurban populations is an important component of this work. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: Occupational therapy interventions should address community mobility and driving skills before school transition. Autistic adults' skill development may be affected by person factors such as motivation, anxiety, social skills, communication, and occupational performance desires. Environmental factors such as parental concerns, community safety, pedestrian environments, traffic volume, and public transportation design are important. Further research partnering with autistic adults could better inform future occupational therapy interventions for community mobility and driving.

"In Their Own Time": Parents Gently Push Their Autistic Youth Towards Independent Community Mobility and Participation.

Autistic adults have decreased independence in community mobility and driving, which is associated with decreased participation in work, education and community participation. This is the first exploration of the development of community mobility, driving and participation skills over adolescence and emerging adulthood. Interviews with 15 mothers of autistic youth, capable of independence, were qualitatively analysed using grounded theory. Four major themes emerged: mothers gently pushing, teaching, letting go and working towards hopes and dreams. These results suggest earlier intervention across adolescence to address social skills, communication and anxiety in normative community environments, is required for successful development of community mobility and driving skills. Further understanding the critical role of confidence, feeling safe and accepted, could ultimately improve independence.