Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Electrical Cardiometry Cardiac Index versus Continuous Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Method: A Prospective, Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of accuracy, precision, and trending ability of cardiac index (CI) measurements using the Aesculon™ bioimpedance electrical cardiometry (Aesc) compared to the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter (PAC) technique before, during, and after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational study with fifty patients with ASA 3-4. At six time points (T), measurements of CI simultaneously by continuous cardiac output pulmonary thermodilution and thoracic bioimpedance and standard hemodynamics were performed. Analysis was performed using Bland-Altman, four-quadrant plot, and polar plot methodology. RESULTS: CI obtained with pulmonary artery thermodilution and thoracic bioimpedance ranged from 1.00 to 6.75 L min-1 and 0.93 to 7.25 L min-1, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias between CIBIO and CIPAC of 0.52 liters min-1 m-2, with LOA of [-2.2; 1.1] liters min-1 m-2. Percentage error between the two techniques was above 30% at every time point. Polar plot methodology and 4-quadrant analysis showed poor trending ability. Skin incision had no effect on the results. CONCLUSION: CI obtained by continuous PAC and CI obtained by Aesculon bioimpedance are not interchangeable in cardiac surgical patients. No effects of skin incision were found. International clinical trial registration number is ISRCTN26732484.

Clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node procedure versus follow-up: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-08).

BACKGROUND: Studies showed that axillary lymph node dissection can be safely omitted in presence of positive sentinel lymph node(s) in breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy. Since the outcome of the sentinel lymph node biopsy has no clinical consequence, the value of the procedure itself is being questioned. The aim of the BOOG 2013-08 trial is to investigate whether the sentinel lymph node biopsy can be safely omitted in clinically node negative breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy. METHODS: The BOOG 2013-08 is a Dutch prospective non-inferiority randomized multicentre trial. Women with pathologically confirmed clinically node negative T1-2 invasive breast cancer undergoing breast conserving therapy will be randomized for sentinel lymph node biopsy versus no sentinel lymph node biopsy. Endpoints include regional recurrence after 5 (primary endpoint) and 10 years of follow-up, distant-disease free and overall survival, quality of life, morbidity and cost-effectiveness. Previous data indicate a 5-year regional recurrence free survival rate of 99% for the control arm and 96% for the study arm. In combination with a non-inferiority limit of 5% and probability of 0.8, this result in a sample size of 1.644 patients including a lost to follow-up rate of 10%. Primary and secondary endpoints will be reported after 5 and 10 years of follow-up. DISCUSSION: If the sentinel lymph node biopsy can be safely omitted in clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, this study will cost-effectively lead to a decreased axillary morbidity rate and thereby improved quality of life with non-inferior regional control, distant-disease free survival and overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The BOOG 2013-08 study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov since October 20, 2014, Identifier: NCT02271828. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02271828.

The value of completion axillary treatment in sentinel node positive breast cancer patients undergoing a mastectomy: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-07).

BACKGROUND: Trials failed to demonstrate additional value of completion axillary lymph node dissection in case of limited sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy. It has been suggested that the low regional recurrence rates in these trials might partially be ascribed to accidental irradiation of part of the axilla by whole breast radiation therapy, which precludes extrapolation of results to mastectomy patients. The aim of the randomized controlled BOOG 2013-07 trial is therefore to investigate whether completion axillary treatment can be safely omitted in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy. DESIGN: This study is designed as a non-inferiority randomized controlled multicentre trial. Women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with unilateral invasive clinically T1-2 N0 breast cancer who are treated with mastectomy, and who have a maximum of three axillary sentinel lymph nodes containing micro- and/or macrometastases, will be randomized for completion axillary treatment versus no completion axillary treatment. Completion axillary treatment can consist of completion axillary lymph node dissection or axillary radiation therapy. Primary endpoint is regional recurrence rate at 5 years. Based on a 5-year regional recurrence free survival rate of 98 % among controls and 96 % for study subjects, the sample size amounts 439 per arm (including 10 % lost to follow-up), to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the rate for study and control subjects is inferior by at least 5 % with a probability of 0.8. Results will be reported after 5 and 10 years of follow-up. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that completion axillary treatment can be safely omitted in sentinel node positive breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. If confirmed, this study will significantly decrease the number of breast cancer patients receiving extensive treatment of the axilla, thereby diminishing the risk of morbidity and improving quality of life, while maintaining excellent regional control and without affecting survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The BOOG 2013-07 study is registered in the register of ClinicalTrials.gov since April 10, 2014, Identifier: NCT02112682 .

Comparison of two scoring systems for diagnosing levator ani muscle damage.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Levator defects are risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and its recurrence. The most widely used scoring systems for severity of defects shown on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and perineal ultrasound (US) are not identical. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between these classification systems with regard to levator defects on US and their clinical relevance for recurrence after prolapse surgery. METHODS: Women with previous cystocele repair underwent transperineal 3D US. Levator defects were graded according to the scoring system described with regard to MRI (DeLancey et al.) and perineal US (Dietz et al.). The results were compared using the weighted kappa and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (SPSS version 20.0). RESULTS: We assessed 152 women. On US classification, more defects were categorized as highest grade compared with MRI classification [n = 64 (42 %) vs. n = 41 (28 %), p < 0.01]. The grades of levator defects on both scoring systems showed very good agreement, with a weighted kappa of 0.82 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.88). The predictive value of scoring systems for cystocele recurrence after prolapse surgery showed an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.63 and 0.64, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the two scoring systems showed good agreement but was lowest for the highest-grade defects. There was no difference in predictive value between scoring systems for cystocele recurrence after prolapse surgery.

Transperineal ultrasound compared to evacuation proctography for diagnosing enteroceles and intussusceptions.

INTRODUCTION: This study concerns the level of agreement between transperineal ultrasound and evacuation proctography for diagnosing enteroceles and intussusceptions. METHOD: In a prospective observational study, 50 consecutive women who were planned to have an evacuation proctography underwent transperineal ultrasound too. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value, as well as the positive and negative likelihood ratio of transperineal ultrasound were assessed in comparison to evacuation proctography. To determine the interobserver agreement of transperineal ultrasound, the quadratic weighted kappa was calculated. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to show the diagnostic capability of transperineal ultrasound. RESULTS: For diagnosing intussusceptions (PPV 1.00), a positive finding on transperineal ultrasound was predictive of an abnormal evacuation proctography. Sensitivity of transperineal ultrasound was poor for intussusceptions (0.25). For diagnosing enteroceles, the positive likelihood ratio was 2.10 and the negative likelihood ratio, 0.85. There are many false-positive findings of enteroceles on ultrasonography (PPV 0.29). The interobserver agreement of the two ultrasonographers assessed as the quadratic weighted kappa of diagnosing enteroceles was 0.44 and that of diagnosing intussusceptions was 0.23. CONCLUSION: An intussusception on ultrasound is predictive of an abnormal evacuation proctography. For diagnosing enteroceles, the diagnostic quality of transperineal ultrasound was limited compared to evacuation proctography.

A patient-centred instrument for assessment of quality of breast cancer care: results of a pilot questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: In several breast cancer research environments, there was a need to develop a questionnaire that would (1) provide data on how breast cancer patients experience healthcare services, (2) address issues corresponding with patients' needs and expectations and (3) produce useful data for quality assessment and improvement projects aimed at breast cancer care. This article describes the first part of the quantitative process of item selection, instrument construction and optimisation based on the results of a pilot questionnaire. METHODS: Based on qualitative research, a pilot questionnaire with items formulated as "performance" and "importance" statements was developed and sent to all breast cancer patients operated on in the previous 3-15 months in five participating hospitals. Reduction criteria, exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis were used as part of the process of instrument optimisation. RESULTS: Of the 637 questionnaires sent out, 299 (47%) were returned and 276 (43%) were used for analyses. Out of the 72 quality items included in the pilot questionnaire, 42 items did not meet the inclusion criteria for the revised version. The remaining items refer to the factors patient education regarding aspects related to postoperative treatment, services by the breast nurse, services by the surgeon, patient education regarding activities at home and patient education regarding aspects related to preoperative treatment (Cronbach α = 0.70-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the number of items to be included in the self-administered questionnaire was reduced. The resulting set of items that determines patients' perceptions on quality of breast cancer care is easy to complete and enables anonymous responses. Further research can be aimed at establishing the reliability of the current questionnaire.

Association between guideline adherence and clinical outcome for patients referred for diagnostic breast imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the adherence to a guideline for additional breast ultrasonography in a cross-sectional survey among hospitals in The Netherlands. Furthermore, consequences of current practice non-adherence for the patient outcome of diagnostic breast imaging were studied. METHODS: Current practice was compared with a guideline made up of three recommendations for the use of ultrasonography after mammography and three recommendations for not using ultrasonography. All patients referred for mammography to the radiology departments of the participating hospitals during 2 months in 2004 were eligible for the study. No data on the gold standard for breast cancer were analysed, but clinical consequences were estimated by using a probability model based on the data of a former prospective clinical study. RESULTS: In total, 17 of the 66 hospitals approached were participating in the study. Of the 13,694 patients assessed for eligibility, 6457 were included. High adherence rates (81-97%, mean 94%) were observed for the recommendations, which indicate additional ultrasonography, whereas lower adherence rates (68-94%, mean 83%) were seen for the recommendations which do not advise additional ultrasonography. Overall, in all included hospitals, non-adherence would result in 27.2 false-positive and 1.1 false-negative imaging results. CONCLUSION: Current daily practice of diagnostic breast imaging in the hospitals in this survey corresponds to a great extent to the guideline proposed. Non-adherence in current practice results in a relatively small number of false-positive and false-negative imaging results.

Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.

PURPOSE: In the setting of an increasing workload for radiologists, this study focuses on the feasibility of skill mixing in breast imaging in a hospital radiology department. METHODS: Two radiological technologists with more than 10 years of experience in performing mammograms were trained in prereading mammograms to select the cases that require further evaluation by a radiologist. Mammograms of consecutive patients were independently evaluated by the technologists, next to the standard clinical interpretation by the radiologist on duty. Mammographic findings were recorded and a BI-RADS classification was assigned for each breast. Different prereading scenarios were analysed using clinical decision rules. Two different cut-off points of BI-RADS classifications were applied to the data. Analysis was performed for the overall clinical patient population as well as for a subgroup of patients with no immediate indication for further work-up. RESULTS: Mammograms of 1994 patients were evaluated. In total, 93 breast cancers were found in 91 patients (prevalence 4.6%). Sensitivity and specificity in selecting mammographic findings (cut-off point between BI-RADS 1 and BI-RADS 0, 2-5 and the radiologist's diagnosis as reference standard) was 98% and 74% for technologist 1 and 98% and 78% for technologist 2. In distinguishing normal and benign mammograms from those with abnormalities that are probably benign, suspicious or highly suggestive for malignancy (cut-off point BI-RADS 1-2 and BI-RADS 0, 3-5 and pathology results as reference standard), sensitivity decreased to 89% and 91% respectively. Specificity increased to 82% for both technologists. In a subgroup of 1389 patients with no immediate indication for additional imaging with the involvement of a radiologist, technologists obtained a mean sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 77% in detecting mammographic findings, and a mean sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 88% in detecting suspicious abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The employment of technologists in prereading mammograms seems to be an effective working strategy in daily clinical practice. However, its position in clinical practice remains indistinct as a continuous availability of radiologists still needs to be guaranteed. Nevertheless, as a substantial proportion of mammograms could be evaluated without the attention of a radiologist, the employment of technologists in prereading mammograms seems a promising new working strategy.

Patients' opinions on quality of care before and after implementation of a short stay programme following breast cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess breast cancer patients' opinions on quality of care during an implementation study on short hospital stay, and to formulate patient inspired targets for further quality improvement based on results of the QUOTE (Quality of Care Through the Patients' Eyes) breast cancer instrument. RESULTS: Quality of patient education regarding activities at home was in need of improvement in both measurements. Quality of services delivered by the surgeon improved somewhat after implementation. Although quality of waiting and process times improved after implementation, there was still room for further improvement on these aspects. CONCLUSION: A breast cancer care programme in short stay was introduced while, on average, preserving quality of care as perceived by the patient. However, aspects regarding education on drains, prosthesis, exercises after surgery, survival rates, and waiting and process times require continuing attention to enhance patients' assessment of quality of care.

Urinary tract infection in male general practice patients: uropathogens and antibiotic susceptibility.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uropathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility in male general practitioner (GP) patients presenting with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based study was conducted among males, 18 years and older, general practice patients, who had symptoms indicative of an uncomplicated UTI. A UTI was defined as >/=10(3) colony-forming units/mL (CFU/mL). The etiology of the infection, antimicrobial susceptibility, and treatment strategies used by the GP were determined. RESULTS: Escherichia coli was most frequently isolated (48%), followed by other enterobacteriaceae (24%) and enterococci (9%). The etiology of infection was age-dependent; E. coli was more frequently isolated in younger patients and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the elderly. The overall susceptibility rates were low for amoxicillin (63%) and trimethoprim (70%), and high for fluoroquinolones (91%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (90%), which is similar to susceptibility rates in females with UTIs from the same population. Antibiotics were prescribed to 59% of the males with symptoms of UTI. Fluoroquinolones were given to 33% of the patients and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to 24%. No difference in antibiotic prescription, nor in duration of therapy, was found between the different age groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the male presenting with complaints of an acute uncomplicated UTI at the GP, E. coli, followed by other Gram-negative bacteria were the most frequently isolated uropathogens. Susceptibility rates in uncomplicated male and female UTIs were similar, indicating that data from UTI susceptibility studies in females from the same geographic region can be useful in the choice of empirical therapy in males.

Vascular calcifications as a marker of increased cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several imaging techniques may reveal calcification of the arterial wall or cardiac valves. Many studies indicate that the risk for cardiovascular disease is increased when calcification is present. Recent meta-analyses on coronary calcification and cardiovascular risk may be confounded by indication. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed with extensive subgroup analysis to assess the overall cardiovascular risk of finding calcification in any arterial wall or cardiac valve when using different imaging techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: A meta-analysis of prospective studies reporting calcifications and cardiovascular end-points was performed. Thirty articles were selected. The overall odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for calcifications versus no calcifications in 218,080 subjects after a mean follow-up of 10.1 years amounted to 4.62 (CI 2.24 to 9.53) for all cause mortality, 3.94 (CI 2.39 to 6.50) for cardiovascular mortality, 3.74 (CI 2.56 to 5.45) for coronary events, 2.21 (CI 1.81 to 2.69) for stroke, and 3.41 (CI 2.71 to 4.30) for any cardiovascular event. Heterogeneity was largely explained by length of follow up and sort of imaging technique. Subgroup analysis of patients with end stage renal disease revealed a much higher odds ratio for any event of 6.22 (CI 2.73 to 14.14). CONCLUSION: The presence of calcification in any arterial wall is associated with a 3-4-fold higher risk for mortality and cardiovascular events. Interpretation of the pooled estimates has to be done with caution because of heterogeneity across studies.

Local recurrence in rectal cancer can be predicted by histopathological factors.

AIM: The main cause of local recurrence (LR) in rectal cancer is involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM). However, patients with a negative CRM can also develop LR, suggesting that additional factors are important for LR. The aim of this study was to identify histopathological factors predictive for the development of LR after primary rectal cancer treatment. METHODS: T x N x M0 patients treated for locally recurrent rectal cancer at the Catharina hospital from 1994 to 2006 (n=92) were matched with a control group of patients who did not develop LR after primary rectal cancer treatment for at least 2 years (n=185) based on the type of neoadjuvant treatment in a 1:2 ratio. The pathology of all primary rectal cancers was reviewed. Patient, treatment and histopathological characteristics were studied in relation to the development of LR with logistic regression. RESULTS: Logistic regression indicated the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI, OR 4.66, P<0.001), extramural venous invasion (EMVI, OR 4.54, P<0.001), positive CRM (OR 2.56, P=0.032), serosal involvement (OR 6.74, P=0.035) and poor differentiation (OR 2.59, P=0.012) as factors with an increased risk to develop LR. Older age was a protective factor (OR 0.95, CI 0.93-0.98, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Apart from a positive CRM and serosal involvement, LVI, EMVI and poor differentiation are important independent predictive factors for the development of LR. Adjuvant therapy may be considered in the presence of these features in order to decrease the risk of a local recurrence.

To eat or not to eat: facilitating early oral intake after elective colonic surgery in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It was shown that patients in the Netherlands remain exposed to unnecessarily prolonged starvation after abdominal surgery. The present study examined whether a structured collaborative effort would help to implement the early start of oral nutrition after colorectal surgery. METHODS: In 2006, twenty-six Dutch hospitals signed up to a "breakthrough project" concerning the implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme with early oral feeding as one of the key elements. Each hospital determined the usual start of food intake by analyzing 50 patients who underwent a colorectal resection in 2004 (n=1126). Subsequently, over the course of one year 861 colorectal surgery patients were treated according to the ERAS programme. The first day that patients were eating before and after the breakthrough project was compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Patients treated according to the ERAS programme were eating 3 days earlier than the patients traditionally treated (p<0.000). Two days after surgery 65% of the ERAS patients were eating normal food versus 7% of the pre-ERAS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present nationwide collaborative effort was successful in implementing a change towards an early start of oral nutrition after abdominal surgery.

Screening strategies for tubal factor subfertility.

BACKGROUND: Different screening strategies exist to estimate the risk of tubal factor subfertility, preceding laparoscopy. Three screening strategies, comprising Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibody testing (CAT), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) testing and hysterosalpingography (HSG), were explored using laparoscopy as reference standard and the occurrence of a spontaneous pregnancy as a surrogate marker for the absence of tubal pathology. METHODS: In this observational study, 642 subfertile women, who underwent tubal testing, participated. Data on serological testing, HSG, laparoscopy and interval conception were collected. Multiple imputations were used to compensate for missing data. RESULTS: Strategy A (HSG) has limited value in estimating the risk of tubal pathology. Strategy B (CAT-->HSG) shows that CAT significantly discerns patients with a high versus low risk of tubal pathology, whereas HSG following CAT has no additional value. Strategy C (CAT-->hs-CRP-->HSG) demonstrates that hs-CRP may be valuable in CAT-positive patients only and HSG has no additional value. CONCLUSIONS: CAT is proposed as first screening test for tubal factor subfertility. In CAT-negative women, HSG may be performed because of its high specificity and fertility-enhancing effect. In CAT-positive women, hs-CRP seems promising, whereas HSG has no additional value. The position and timing of laparoscopy deserves critical reappraisal.

Prospective evaluation of ischemia in brachial-basilic and forearm prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis.

UNLABELLED: Ischemia is a devastating complication after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. When not timely corrected, it may lead to amputation. Symptomatic ischemia occurs in 3.7-5% of the hemodialysis population. Upper arm AVFs have a higher incidence of ischemia compared to forearm AVFs. As more patients may need upper arm AVFs in the growing and older hemodialysis population, occurrence of symptomatic ischemia may increase. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors for occurrence of ischemia. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of ischemia was performed in patients randomised for either a brachial-basilic (BB-) AVF or a prosthetic forearm loop AVF. Clinical parameters, preoperative vessel diameters, access flows, digital blood pressures, digit-to-brachial indices (DBI) and interventions for ischemia were recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (BB-AVF 28) were studied. Seventeen patients (BB-AVF 8) developed ischemic symptoms. Six patients (BB-AVF 3) needed interventions for severe symptoms. Age, history of peripheral arterial reconstruction and radial artery volume flow were significant predictors for the occurrence of ischemia. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic ischemia occurred in 28% of patients with brachial-basilic and prosthetic forearm AVFs. Age, history of peripheral arterial reconstruction and radial artery volume flow might be important for prediction of ischemia.

Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are designed to reduce hospital length of stay by shortening the postoperative recovery period. The intended effect of an accelerated recovery on the length of stay may be frustrated by a delayed discharge. This study was designed to assess the influence of an ERAS program on the proportion, appropriateness, and extent of delay in discharge. METHODS: Patients who enrolled in the ERAS program (n = 121) between 2003 and 2006 were compared with 52 patients who were managed traditionally in 2001. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the pre-ERAS patients and 87% of the ERAS patients were not discharged on the day that discharge criteria were fulfilled. The additional stay of 59% of the pre-ERAS patients and 69% of the ERAS patients was inappropriate. Wound care (15% in the pre-ERAS and 3% of the ERAS group) and observation of any symptoms pointing to an anastomotic leakage (10% in both groups) were the most important reasons for a medical appropriate delay of discharge. The extent of delay in discharge decreased significantly from a median of two days in the pre-ERAS group to a median of 1 day in the ERAS group (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in length of stay up to a median of 2 days after start of an enhanced recovery program may relate to changes in organization of care and not to a shorter recovery period. Recovery statistics should replace or at least be added to the length of stay as outcome of enhanced recovery programs.

The prevalence of postoperative pain in a sample of 1490 surgical inpatients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of postoperative pain, an assessment was made of 1490 surgical inpatients who were receiving postoperative pain treatment according to an acute pain protocol. METHODS: Measurements of pain (scores from 0 to 100 on a visual analogue scale) were obtained three times a day on the day before surgery and on days 0-4 postoperatively; mean pain intensity scores were calculated. Patients were classified as having no pain (score 0-5), mild pain (score 6-40), moderate pain (score 41-74) or severe pain (score 75-100). RESULTS: Moderate or severe pain was reported by 41% of the patients on day 0, 30% on days 1 and 19%, 16% and 14% on days 2, 3 and 4. The prevalence of moderate or severe pain in the abdominal surgery group was high on postoperative days 0-1 (30-55%). A high prevalence of moderate or severe pain was found during the whole of days 1-4 in the extremity surgery group (20-71%) and in the back/spinal surgery group (30-64%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that despite an acute pain protocol, postoperative pain treatment was unsatisfactory, especially after intermediate and major surgical procedures on an extremity or on the spine.

Location of involved mesorectal and extramesorectal lymph nodes in patients with primary rectal cancer: preoperative assessment with MR imaging.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the location of involved mesorectal and extramesorectal lymph nodes as depicted on preoperative MRI. Preoperative availability of this information might be useful for the surgeon as well as the radiation therapist and medical oncologist for optimal treatment strategy: type and extent of neoadjuvant treatment as well as extent of surgical resection. METHODS: Forty-one patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer were included. All patients underwent preoperative MRI using USPIO (lymph node specific contrast agent). Location of all mesorectal and extramesorectal nodes visible on MRI was recorded, as well as USPIO prediction on nodal status. Lesion-by-lesion analysis using histology after surgery was performed for patients who did not receive long course chemoradiation therapy. RESULTS: There were 438 nodes visible, 94 of which were malignant. Most nodes are located in the laterodorsal part of the mesorectum, with no difference in distribution between positive and negative nodes. In relation to height of tumor, the majority of positive nodes are located at tumor height or above. There were significantly more negative nodes (9.6%) located below tumor height as compared to positive nodes (2.1%). There were 40 extramesorectal nodes, in 16 patients, 5 of which were positive in 4 patients. All patients had distal rectal cancer. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, positive mesorectal nodes are located in the laterodorsal part of the mesorectum, at tumor height or above. Positive nodes distal to the tumor are rare, and occur in patients with more proximal nodal metastases. Positive extramesorectal nodes mainly occur in patients with distal rectal cancer with nodal metastases in the mesorectum.

Effect of upper arm brachial basilic and prosthetic forearm arteriovenous fistula on left ventricular hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Creation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) may increase left ventricular hypertrophy in the hemodialysis population. Aim of this study was to compare the effects of a brachial-basilic (BB) AVF and the prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access (PTFE) on cardiac performance. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive BB-AVF or prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop access. Before and three months after AVF creation patients underwent an echocardiographic examination. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare relative increase between the measured cardiac parameters for the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients participated in the study. The relative increase in left ventricular parameters was not significantly different between the two groups. Only left ventricular end-diastolic diameter tended to be of significance. Mean blood flow through the brachial artery was 1680+/-156 and 1450+/-221 mL/min three months after surgery for the PTFE and the BB-AVF group, respectively. CONCLUSION: After three months of follow-up, changes in cardiac structure were comparable between patients with BB and PTFE AVFs. Also access flow was comparable at this time. In general, the effects of creation of a fistula on LV structure were limited. Longer follow up time may be needed to explore the long term effects of different vascular accesses on cardiac function.