Incidence of thrombotic complications and overall survival in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in the second and first wave.

INTRODUCTION: In the first wave, thrombotic complications were common in COVID-19 patients. It is unknown whether state-of-the-art treatment has resulted in less thrombotic complications in the second wave. METHODS: We assessed the incidence of thrombotic complications and overall mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to eight Dutch hospitals between September 1st and November 30th 2020. Follow-up ended at discharge, transfer to another hospital, when they died, or on November 30th 2020, whichever came first. Cumulative incidences were estimated, adjusted for competing risk of death. These were compared to those observed in 579 patients admitted in the first wave, between February 24th and April 26th 2020, by means of Cox regression techniques adjusted for age, sex and weight. RESULTS: In total 947 patients with COVID-19 were included in this analysis, of whom 358 patients were admitted to the ICU; 144 patients died (15%). The adjusted cumulative incidence of all thrombotic complications after 10, 20 and 30 days was 12% (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8-15%), 16% (13-19%) and 21% (17-25%), respectively. Patient characteristics between the first and second wave were comparable. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for overall mortality in the second wave versus the first wave was 0.53 (95%CI 0.41-0.70). The adjusted HR for any thrombotic complication in the second versus the first wave was 0.89 (95%CI 0.65-1.2). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was reduced by 47% in the second wave, but the thrombotic complication rate remained high, and comparable to the first wave. Careful attention to provision of adequate thromboprophylaxis is invariably warranted.

Luteinizing hormone signaling and breast cancer: polymorphisms and age of onset.

Estrogen exposure has repeatedly been shown to associate with the risk of developing breast cancer. Estrogen synthesis is under the control of LH and FSH, where LH, through its receptor (LHR), stimulates production of ovarian androgens; and FSH, their aromatization to estrogens. Here, we investigated whether functional polymorphic variants in the LH signaling pathway are associated with the risk of breast cancer or its clinical phenotype. A PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping approach was used to investigate this in 266 breast cancers. The LHR18insLQ allele does not seem to influence breast cancer risk. However, women who were homozygous for the LHR18insLQ allele were, on average, 8.3 yr younger at diagnosis, compared with those homozygous for the wild-type LHR allele (mean age, 51.9 yr vs. 60.2 yr; P = 0.03). Trends were observed for associations between LHR18insLQ carriers and nodal involvement or larger tumor size. Patients who were LHR18insLQ carriers revealed a significantly worse overall survival, compared with those who were homozygous for LHR [hazard ratio = 2.4; 95% CI (1.3-4.3); P = 0.006]. In contrast, no associations between the LH genotype and any of the clinical parameters were observed. Our findings suggest that the LHR18insLQ gene polymorphism determines an earlier age of disease onset and is prognostic for poor outcome of breast cancer.