Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 19(6): 606-12, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18373664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) may play a role in the genesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). One type of CFAE is continuous electrical activity (CEA). The prevalence and characteristics of CEA in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF are unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 44 patients (age = 59 +/- 8 years) with paroxysmal (25) or persistent (19) AF, bipolar electrograms were systematically recorded for > or =5 seconds at 24 left atrial (LA) sites, including 8 antral sites, and 2 sites within the coronary sinus (CS). CEA was defined as continuous depolarization for >1 second with no isoelectric interval. CEA was recorded at the LA septum (79%), antrum (66%), posterior (68%) and anterior walls (67%), roof (66%), base of the LA appendage (61%), inferior wall (61%), posterior mitral annulus (48%), CS (41%), and in the LA appendage (14%). Antral CEA was equally prevalent in patients with paroxysmal (63%) and persistent AF (70%, P = 0.12). In patients with paroxysmal AF, the prevalence of CEA was similar among antral and nonantral LA sites, except for the LA appendage. However, in patients with persistent AF, CEA was more prevalent at the nonantral (80%) than antral sites (70%, P = 0.03). CEA at nonantral sites except the CS was more prevalent in persistent than in paroxysmal AF (80% vs 57%, P < 0.001). The mean duration of intermittent episodes of CEA was longer in persistent than in paroxysmal AF (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The higher prevalence and duration of CEA at nonantral sites in persistent than in paroxysmal AF is consistent with a greater contribution of LA reentrant mechanisms in persistent AF. However, the high prevalence of CEA at nonantral sites in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) suggests that CEA alone is a nonspecific marker of appropriate target sites for ablation of AF. The characteristics of CEA that most accurately identify drivers of AF remain to be determined.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Eletrocardiografia , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/fisiopatologia , Taquicardia Paroxística/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Átrios do Coração/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Taquicardia Paroxística/epidemiologia
2.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 1(1): 6-13, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19808388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With electrogram-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), the best results have been reported when complex fractionated electrograms (CFAEs) in both the left (LA) and right (RA) atria were targeted. However, many studies have reported excellent outcomes from RFA of long-lasting persistent AF with the use of other ablation strategies that were limited to the LA. The incremental value of RFA of RA CFAEs is yet to be defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 85 patients with long-lasting persistent AF (age=59+/-10 years), RFA was directed at CFAEs in the LA and coronary sinus until AF terminated (19) or all identified LA CFAEs were eliminated. Sixty-six patients who remained in AF were randomly assigned to cardioversion and no further RFA (n=33) or to RFA of RA CFAEs (n=33). RA sites consisted of the crista terminalis (69%), septum (38%), superior vena cava (28%), coronary sinus ostium (22%), and the base of the appendage (31%). AF terminated in 1 (3%) of 33 patients during RA RFA. At 17+/-6 months after a single ablation procedure, 74% of the patients in whom AF terminated during LA RFA were in sinus rhythm. Rates of freedom from AF were similar in the patients randomized to no RFA in the RA (24%) and those randomized to RFA of RA CFAEs (30%, P=0.8). The ablation procedure was repeated in 26 patients (31%) for AF (n=22) or atrial flutter (n=4). At 16+/-7 months after the final procedure, 89% of the patients in whom AF terminated during LA RFA were in sinus rhythm. Among the randomized patients, the proportion of patients who remained in sinus rhythm was similar in patients who did not undergo RFA of RA CFAEs (52%) and those who did (58%, P=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: After RFA of CFAEs in the LA and coronary sinus, ablation of CFAEs in the RA provides little or no increment in efficacy among patients with long-lasting persistent AF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Adulto , Idoso , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Seio Coronário/fisiopatologia , Seio Coronário/cirurgia , Cardioversão Elétrica , Feminino , Átrios do Coração/fisiopatologia , Átrios do Coração/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Reoperação , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA