Impact of number of previous surgeries on the continence state and healing after repeat surgery for recurrent anal fistula.

BACKGROUND: The management of recurrent anal fistulas after previous surgery is usually challenging. The present study aimed to review the characteristics and treatment outcomes of recurrent anal fistulas as compared to primary anal fistulas. METHODS: The records of patients with anal fistula who underwent surgery were reviewed. Characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with recurrent anal fistulas were compared to those of patients with primary anal fistula without a history of surgery. RESULTS: The study included 138 patients with recurrent anal fistulas, 76.8% of which were complex. Failure of healing was recorded in 25 (18.1%) patients and fecal incontinence (FI) in 9 (6.5%). Patients with recurrent anal fistulas had significantly higher percentage of anterior, complex, and horseshoe fistulas than patients with primary fistulas. Surgery for recurrent anal fistulas was followed by a significantly higher rate of failure of healing than primary fistulas (18.1% vs. 9.8%, P=0.011), whereas the rates of FI were comparable amongst the two groups (6.5% vs. 2.8%, P=0.07). Patients who had more than two previous operations for anal fistula had a significantly higher rate of FI than patients who underwent one or two previous surgeries (20% vs. 3.7% vs. 14.3%, P=0.04), yet healing rates were comparable. CONCLUSION: Recurrent anal fistulas were more complex than primary fistulas. Surgical treatment of recurrent anal fistula was followed by a significantly higher rate of failure of healing and similar rate of FI as compared to primary anal fistulas. The number of previous fistula surgeries had a significant effect on postoperative continence state.

Utility of the Mansoura Numeroalphabetic Constipation Score in detection of obstructed defaecation syndrome and prediction of the outcome of treatment.

AIM: Thorough assessment of obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) is imperative for the selection of treatment options. The present study aimed to examine the utility of the Mansoura Numeroalphabetic Constipation Score (MNCS) in distinguishing patients with ODS from healthy control subjects and in predicting the outcome of treatment of ODS. METHODS: Patients with ODS associated with anterior rectocele and/or rectoanal intussusception were assessed with the MNCS at the first visit to the clinic. All patients were offered conservative treatment for 3 months and patients who improved were continued on conservative treatment for six more months while patients who failed were treated surgically. The MNCS was reassessed at the end of follow-up in both groups. A cohort of healthy controls was compared to ODS patients with regard to age, sex and baseline MNCS. RESULTS: In all, 124 ODS patients and 53 healthy controls were included. The ODS patients had a significantly higher baseline MNCS than controls (9.5 ± 1.5 vs 0.76 ± 0.71, P < 0.0001). Forty of 124 patients improved after conservative management and showed a significant decrease in MNCS (6.9 ± 1.08 to 3.1 ± 1.2, P < 0.0001). Eighty-four (67.8%) patients failed to respond to conservative measures and were surgically treated, 77 (91.6%) of whom showed significant improvement in symptoms postoperatively while seven (8.4%) failed to improve; the difference in postoperative MNCS between the two groups was significant. CONCLUSION: The MNCS successfully distinguished ODS patients from controls and was able to predict the outcome of ODS treatment.

Bowel dysfunction after sigmoid resection for cancer and its impact on quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have explored functional outcomes after rectal cancer surgery, but bowel dysfunction after sigmoid resection for cancer has hardly been considered. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence and pattern of bowel dysfunction after resection for sigmoid cancer, and the impact of bowel function on quality of life (QoL) by comparison with patients who had polypectomy for cancer. METHODS: This was a national cross-sectional study. Data were collected from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, and a questionnaire regarding bowel function and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire was sent to all Danish colonic cancer survivors treated with sigmoid resection or polypectomy between 2001 and 2014. RESULTS: A total of 3295 patients (3061 sigmoid resection, 234 polypectomy) responded to the questionnaire (response rate 63·8 per cent). Twelve bowel symptoms were more prevalent after sigmoid resection, including: excessive straining, fragmentation, bloating, nocturnal defaecation, bowel false alarm, liquid stool incontinence, incomplete evacuation and sense of outlet obstruction. QoL impairment owing to bowel symptoms was reported in 16·6 per cent of patients in the resection group and 10·1 per cent after polypectomy (P = 0·008). Obstructed defaecation symptoms (ODS) were encountered significantly more often after sigmoid resection than following polypectomy (17·9 versus 7·3 per cent; P < 0·001). In the resection group, patients with ODS had substantial impairment on most aspects of QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30. CONCLUSION: Sigmoid resection for cancer is associated with an increased risk of long-term bowel dysfunction; obstructed defaecation is prevalent and associated with substantial impairment of QoL.

Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Although several surgical techniques for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (SPND) have been described, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical procedure. In this study we compared excision with primary closure and Limberg flap in the treatment of SPND. METHODS: This was a prospective randomised clinical trial in patients with SPND who were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group I (excision and primary closure) and group II (Limberg flap technique). The primary outcome of the trial was recurrence of SPND whereas postoperative complications, return to work and cosmetic results were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included, with a mean age of 24.1 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.8 kg/m2. Group 1 had significantly shorter operation time than group II. Both groups had similar hospital stay and comparable complication rates (43.3% vs 30%; P = 0.4). Group I had significantly higher recurrence rate (20% vs 0; P < 0.02) and significantly better cosmetic satisfaction score than group II. Being hairy (P = 0.04), positive family history (P = 0.03), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.005) and history of previous surgery for SPND (P = 0.01) were the significant predictors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The Limberg flap is an effective technique for the treatment of SPND with very low recurrence rate and comparable complication rate and hospital stay to excision and primary closure. Excision and primary closure offered the advantages of quicker healing time, earlier resumption of daily activities, better cosmetic results, which may render it more suitable for patients with low risk for recurrence.

Evaluation of anatomical and functional results of overlapping anal sphincter repair with or without the injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate: a case-control study.

AIM: Overlapping anal sphincter repair (OASR) is used for treatment of faecal incontinence due to an external anal sphincter (EAS) defect; however, it is not the optimal treatment as its functional results tend to deteriorate significantly with time. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of local injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) on the outcome of OASR. METHOD: We compared a prospective group of 20 patients with EAS defect who were managed with OASR and BMAC injection (group I) with a historical control group of an equal number of patients managed with OASR alone (group II). Patients were assessed preoperatively and during follow-up by the Wexner continence score and endoanal ultrasound. The primary end-points were the improvement of the continence level measured by the Wexner score and the residual EAS defect size measured by endoanal ultrasound. RESULTS: At the end of follow-up, group I had significantly lower mean postoperative Wexner score (5.4 ± 7.6 vs 10.6 ± 7.4; P = 0.03) and smaller EAS defect percentage (12.2 ± 17.5 vs 18.3 ± 18.9). These findings were statistically significant in patients with a small preoperative EAS defect equal to or less than one-third of the anal circumference. Patients with larger preoperative EAS did not show a significant improvement of the continence level after repair in either group. CONCLUSION: Augmenting OASR with local injection of BMAC in patients with faecal incontinence caused by an EAS defect, particularly a smaller defect, can improve both functional and anatomical outcomes of OASR.

Indications for and outcome of primary repair compared with faecal diversion in the management of traumatic colon injury.

AIM: Injuries of the colon are a serious sequel of abdominal trauma owing to the associated morbidity and mortality. This study aims to assess postoperative outcome and complications of faecal diversion and primary repair of colon injuries when applied according to established guidelines for the management of colon injuries. METHOD: This retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients with colon injuries. Guided by estimation of risk factors, patients were managed either by primary repair alone, repair with proximal diversion or diversion alone. RESULTS: There were 102 (92.7%) male patients and 8 (7.3%) female patients of median age 38 years. Thirty-seven were managed by primary repair and 73 by faecal diversion. Colon injuries were caused by penetrating abdominal trauma in 65 and blunt trauma in 45 patients. Forty-three patients were in shock on admission, and were all managed by faecal diversion. Forty patients developed 84 complications after surgery. Primary repair had a significantly lower complication rate than faecal diversion (P = 0.037). Wound infection was the commonest complication. The overall mortality rate was 3.6%. CONCLUSION: Primary repair, when employed properly, resulted in a significantly lower complication rate than faecal diversion. Significant predictive factors associated with a higher complication rate were faecal diversion, severe faecal contamination, multiple colon injuries, an interval of more than 12 h after colon injury and shock.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC): Does it have a role in colorectal tumourigenesis? A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the characterization of many aetiologic genetic changes. The specific causative factors in the development of sporadic colorectal cancer remain unclear. This study was performed to detect the possible role of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) in developing colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Fresh biopsy specimens have been obtained from the colonic mucosa overlying the colorectal cancer as well as from the colon of the healthy controls. Culture, genotyping and virulence of EPEC were done using (nutrient broth culture, and PCR). Strains biochemically identified as Escherichia coli were selected from the surface of a MacConkey's plate and were serogrouped by slide agglutination tests. RESULTS: From January 2011 to June 2014, 213 colorectal cancer patients (Group 1) and 248 healthy controls (Group 2) were prospectively enrolled in this study. EPEC was positive in 108 (50.7%) in group 1 and 51 (20.6%) in group 2 (P = 0.0001). A significant difference between both groups was observed regarding serotyping, genotyping (eae gene) and virulence category (P = 0.0001). A significant difference between the 2 subgroups of colorectal cancer cases was observed regarding genotyping (eae, bfb genes) and virulence category. CONCLUSION: The incidence EPEC was higher significantly in patients with colorectal cancer. E. coli in patients with colorectal cancer significantly differed serotypically and genotypically from the E. coli in normal population. E. coli colonization of the colonic mucosa may be a cause colorectal cancer.

Utility of serum preoperative carcinoemberyonic antigen in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The usefulness of preoperative CEA in CRC remains controversial as regards its biological function, and its use in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management and follow up of CRC patients. the aim of this study was to provide a critical and updated study for the value of CEA in CRC. METHODOLOGY: From January 2000 to June 2005, a prospective randomized study involving 200 CRC patients for whom curative resection was performed, another 100 healthy persons as a control group was included. Basal CEA using chemilumescence technique and routine follow up were done. RESULTS: (1) The mean basal CEA in CRC patients (17.3 ng% +/- 1.67) was significantly higher than control (3.41 ng% +/- 1.1). (2) A significant linear association between basal CEA and Dukes' classes was evident with the mean basal CEA for Dukes' A, B, C were 7.8, 12.7, 25.8 respectively (expressed as ng%). (3) The validity of basal CEA in primary CRC diagnosis was highly positive (sensitivity 80%--PPV 86.95%--accuracy 73.66%), with hig her efficacy in advanced disease detection (sensitivity 93%--NPV 7%--accuracy 84.5%--odds ratio 30.3) and negative exclusion power for DFS prediction (specificity 13.84%). (4) The basal CEA was a discriminate factor in colorectal prognosis - B value (3.74). (5) Patients with CEA < or =5 ng% had better DFS (15%) and DFT (23.6 months) than those with CEA > 5 ng% as they had DFS (33.75%) and DFT (18.48 months). (6) Basal CEA above 15 ng% had a significant shift in the cumulative hazard of recurrence. CONCLUSION: The CEA is a metastasis potentiator. The high serum CEA in CRC screening programs should be considered a marker of malignancy especially in patients with appropriate symptoms. The preop CEA in CRC patients identifies subsets with favorable, indolent and uneven biological behavior (< or =5 ng%, < or =15 ng%, > 15 ng% respectively). Moreover, the addition of preop CEA level to conventional staging forms a strong prognostic tool and supplies adopted practice guideline initiative for follow up and therapy in CRC.

Potential utility of antineoplaston A-10 levels in breast cancer.

Antineoplastons, first described by Burzynski, are naturally occurring peptides and amino acid derivatives, which control neoplastic growth. Antineoplaston A-10 (3-phenylacetyl amino-2, 6-pepridinedione) is the first chemically identified antineoplaston. Here we describe the potential utility of antineoplaston A-10 as a predictive test for breast cancer. Antineoplaston A-10 level was measured in the urine of 31 breast cancer patients and 17 normal women using high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC). Significantly lower antineoplaston A-10 levels were detected among patients with breast cancer with a P value <0.001. These data suggest a strong inverse association of urinary antineoplaston A-10 level with breast cancer. Such finding was the stimulus for further investigations of antineoplaston A-10 levels in some benign as well as other malignant diseases to determine the utility of this approach as a predictive test for women who are at risk of developing breast cancer.