Successful Treatment of Refractory Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in a Heart Transplant Recipient.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are opportunistic malignancies that complicate the success of hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. These disorders often arise post-transplant due to the immunosuppression required for minimizing the risk of rejection of donor tissue. First-line treatment of these disorders includes limiting immunosuppression when permissible. Subsequent treatment includes the use of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab), and/or combination chemotherapy. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment paradigm in many lymphoid malignancies. It is not approved for PTLD due to exclusion of PTLD patients from pivotal clinical trials. Also, its utilization post-transplant can be complex and multidisciplinary care is of utmost importance for successful administration of a potentially curative treatment. We present a 68-year-old patient with history of heart transplant for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, diagnosed with PTLD that was refractory to treatment using current guidelines until successfully receiving CAR T-cell therapy.

Incidence of malignant pericardial effusion in pericardiocentesis patients and post-procedure care: an oncology center pilot study.

The etiology of pericardial effusion can affect many important factors during and after pericardiocentesis. The frequency of etiologies varies among different patient populations. Pericardiocentesis is an important diagnostic and therapeutic intervention; however, data on the characteristics of malignant pericardial effusion are lacking in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Thus, we conducted a pilot study on the incidence and post-procedure care of patients who underwent pericardiocentesis in our facility to enhance their management and treatment. This retrospective study included all cases of pericardiocentesis between 2011-2019. Epidemiological, clinical, and biochemical data were collected and analyzed. Pericardial fluid analysis, malignancy type, recurrence rate, need for a repeat procedure, and echocardiography findings were reviewed. Thirty-three patients (mean: 47.2 years) underwent pericardiocentesis, and 22 of these patients (66.7%) had malignancy. The predominant cancers were breast cancer (27.3%), lung cancer (27.3%), exudative pericardial effusion and malignant effusion (68%), and bloody fluid (73%). An average of 350 ml was drained from the patients, and the drain was retained for 4 days. Six patients (18.2%) had re-accumulation of pericardial effusion, and 4 patients required repeat procedures. All patients underwent post-procedure echocardiography, and 82% underwent follow-up echo within one week. More than two-thirds of our cancer patients had malignant pericardial effusion. The early diagnosis of the etiology of pericardial effusion may alter its management and prognosis. We would like to conduct further research to determine its influence on the prognosis of cancer patients in the UAE.

A Meningioma Mimic and Distinct Subtype of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Primary Dural Lymphoma.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive form of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma that arises in the brain parenchyma, eyes, meninges, or spinal cord in the absence of systemic disease. Primary dural lymphoma (PDL), in contrast, arises from the dura mater of the brain. PDL is usually a low-grade B-cell marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), whereas other types of PCNSL are usually high-grade large B-cell lymphoma. This specific pathological subtype has important therapeutic and prognostic implications, making PDL a distinct subtype of PCNSL. Herein, we report a case of PDL in an African American patient, in her late thirties, who presented to our emergency room with chronic headaches. An emergent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed a dural-based homogeneously enhancing extra-axial mass along the left hemisphere, which was contained within the anterior and parietal dural mater. A surgical specimen was collected after an emergency debulking procedure. The flow cytometry, done on the surgical specimen obtained, was positive for CD19+, CD20+, and CD22+, but negative for CD5- and CD10-. These findings were consistent with a clonal B-lymphoproliferative disorder. The surgical pathology specimen immunohistochemistry was positive for CD20+ and CD45+, but negative for Bcl-6Cyclin D1- and CD56-. The Ki67 was 10-20%. These findings were consistent with extranodal MZL. Given the location and pathology, the patient was diagnosed with PDL. Due to MZL's indolent nature, location outside the blood-brain barrier, and known efficacy to bendamustine-rituximab (BR), we decided to treat our patient with BR. She completed six cycles without major complications, and her post-therapy brain MRI showed complete remission (CR). Our case adds to the sparse literature about PDL and highlights the efficacy of BR systemic chemotherapy on MZLs.

Treatment Selection and Survival in Patients with Gray Zone Lymphoma: A Comprehensive Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no treatment guidelines for gray-zone lymphoma (GZL), given the disease's rarity and being a relatively new entity. Our objective was to assess factors affecting treatment selection in GZL and its effect on survival, focusing on combined modality treatment (CMT) versus chemotherapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 1047 patients with GZL treated with CMT or chemotherapy alone between 2004 and 2016 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We excluded patients without histologic confirmation of the diagnosis, those who did not receive chemotherapy, and those who started chemotherapy >120 days or radiation >365 days from diagnosis to account for immortal time bias. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. A propensity score-matched methodology was used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: Only 164 patients (15.7%) received CMT, while 883 (84.3%) received chemotherapy alone. Treatment selection was affected by clinical factors (age, odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-0.997, p-value 0.01 and advanced stage, OR for stage 4: 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.34, p-value < 0.001) but not socioeconomic factors. Higher median income was associated with better survival, while increased age, higher comorbidity score, and B symptoms were associated with worse survival. The use of CMT had a survival advantage over chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.351-0.833, p-value 0.005). CONCLUSION: CMT is associated with survival advantage in our analysis. Careful selection of patients is essential to achieve the best outcomes with minimal toxicity. Socioeconomic factors affect treatment selection in patients with GZL that can alter outcomes. Future work should focus on strategies that access disparities without compromising survival.

Primary Testicular Lymphoma: Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Primary testicular lymphoma (PTL) is an exceedingly rare and aggressive form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; the most common subtype is diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL). Standard treatment includes orchiectomy, chemotherapy, central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis, and prophylactic radiation to the contralateral testis. PTL can reoccur years after complete remission. Treatment to immune sanctuary sites, CNS and contralateral testis, is crucial in preventing relapse. There are limited data characterizing this entity and this study aimed to add to existing literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This descriptive retrospective study characterized twelve patients with PTL from years 2010-2021 at Allegheny Health Network. Their demographic data, prognostic factors, treatment regimens, and relapse sites (if any) were tabulated. The mean progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated to describe our experience in treating PTL. RESULTS: Twelve patients were diagnosed with PTL; 10/12 (83.33%) patients were diagnosed with ABC PTL-DLBCL. Median age of diagnosis was 67 years. Eight of the 12 (66.66%) were African American, 4/12 (33.33%) were Caucasian. At the time of diagnosis, 8/12 (66.66%) patients presented with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and 8/12 (66.66%) presented with a left testicular mass. Most were treated with R-CHOP (9/12), intrathecal methotrexate (IT-MTX) (10/12), and radiation to the contralateral testis (9/12). Three of the twelve (25%) patients relapsed. Median time to relapse was 8 months. Mean PFS was 50.417 months. CONCLUSION: We discuss our experience in treating PTL with RCHOP, IT-MTX, and irradiation to the contralateral testis and add to the limited pre-existing data that exist.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab with rituximab and CHOP in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the current standard therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and is curative in ∼60% of patients. Atezolizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that targets programmed death-ligand 1 and has previously shown antitumor activity in several tumor types. In a phase 1b/2 trial (NCT02596971), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in combination with R-CHOP (atezo-R-CHOP; for 6-8 cycles) in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Patients achieving a complete response (CR) at the end of induction received consolidation therapy with atezolizumab on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for an additional 17 cycles. Overall, 42 patients with DLBCL were included in this analysis. The primary endpoint, CR rate at the end of induction, as assessed by an independent review committee (modified Lugano 2014 criteria), was 77.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.0-87.7; n = 40). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were 77.4% (95% CI, 59.7-88.0) and 87.2% (95% CI, 71.9-94.5), respectively. All treated patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE; 32 patients [76.2%] had grade 3-4 AE). One patient had a fatal AE (unconfirmed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy) that was considered related to atezolizumab and rituximab, and 17 patients (40.5%) experienced atezolizumab-related AEs of special interest. In previously untreated patients with DLBCL, atezo-R-CHOP demonstrated encouraging clinical efficacy and a safety profile consistent with the known toxicities of the individual drugs. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02596971.

Glofitamab for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor. Glofitamab is a bispecific antibody that recruits T cells to tumor cells. METHODS: In the phase 2 part of a phase 1-2 study, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who had received at least two lines of therapy previously. Patients received pretreatment with obinutuzumab to mitigate cytokine release syndrome, followed by fixed-duration glofitamab monotherapy (12 cycles total). The primary end point was complete response according to assessment by an independent review committee. Key secondary end points included duration of response, survival, and safety. RESULTS: Of the 155 patients who were enrolled, 154 received at least one dose of any study treatment (obinutuzumab or glofitamab). At a median follow-up of 12.6 months, 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 48) of the patients had a complete response according to independent review. Results were consistent among the 52 patients who had previously received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (35% of whom had a complete response). The median time to a complete response was 42 days (95% CI, 42 to 44). The majority (78%) of complete responses were ongoing at 12 months. The 12-month progression-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 28 to 46). Discontinuation of glofitamab due to adverse events occurred in 9% of the patients. The most common adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (in 63% of the patients). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 62% of the patients, with grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome in 4% and grade 3 or higher neurologic events in 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Glofitamab therapy was effective for DLBCL. More than half the patients had an adverse event of grade 3 or 4. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03075696.).

Venetoclax-induced vitiligo in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Venetoclax, a highly selective Bcl-2 inhibitor, is an orally bioavailable drug that has been approved as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in combination with obinutuzumab, as well as monotherapy in the setting of relapsed CLL. Although some of its life-threatening side effects are well known, including tumor lysis syndrome and cytopenias, others less known side effects include skin reactions. Skin rash is commonly reported in literature, which is often mild and not life-threatening. In this case report, the authors describe what is potentially the second case of venetoclax-induced vitiligo reported in literature. A 77-year-old man with CLL Rai stage II with cytogenetics showed 11 q23 deletion in 14% of cells, and 14q32 partial deletion in 9% of cells developed vitiligo in his extremities 2 years into treatment. A decision was made to continue venetoclax with close monitoring as the side effect was mild and not debilitating. The patient continued to do well. Although vitiligo is not associated with increased mortality risk, its development is associated with increased psychological stress. The mechanism by which vitiligo develops remains unclear. There may be an association between drug-induced vitiligo and improved cancer prognosis; however, larger studies need to be carried out to prove this hypothesis.

Patterns of treatment and their outcomes in primary breast lymphoma; a comprehensive population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is managed differently among centers, using surgery, systemic therapy and/or radiation. With data derived from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we aim to describe treatments utilized in the United States, estimate the overall survival (OS) of different therapeutic modalities and determine the role of systemic therapy in patients with PBL. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified data from the NCDB. The NCDB provided records of 4616 patients diagnosed with PBL between 2004 and 2015. We excluded patients diagnosed with HIV, with no survival data, not treated in the reporting facility, without histologic confirmation, with stage III/ IV disease and for whom surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy was contraindicated. Both propensity score weighting and Cox models were used to obtain adjusted estimates. Based on histopathology, PBL was classified into indolent (I-PBL) and aggressive (A-PBL). RESULTS: In a sample size of 2063 PBL patients, the median age was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR): 57-78), and 97% were females. In 1027 patients with I-PBL, the median follow-up was 66 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-107.2) and 60% of patients had extranodal marginal zone subtype. Systemic therapy did not improve adjusted-OS (median: 154 vs. 143 months, P = 0.36) (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.25, P = 0.42). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were as follows: radiation (85%), surgery (79%), systemic & radiation (87%) and radiation & surgery (87%) (P = 0.9). In 1036 patients with A-PBL, the median follow-up was 67.4 months (95% CI: 35.9-105), and 87% of patients had diffuse large B-cell subtype. Patients with A-PBL who received systemic therapy had an improved adjusted-OS (median: 115 vs. 72 months, P < 0.01) (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53, P < 0.001). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were: systemic (69%), systemic & radiation (77%), systemic & radiation & surgery (79%) and systemic & surgery (79%) (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapy used as first-line treatment is essential in A-PBL. Local therapy in the I-PBL using surgery and/or radiation is effective in long-term disease control. There is significant variation in front-line treatment modalities utilized in PBL across the US, many associated with similar outcomes.

Intrathecal Chemotherapy as a Potential Treatment for Steroid-refractory Immune Effector Cell-associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of various B-cell malignancies. However, it can cause serious adverse effects like immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). ICANS is attributed to disruption of the blood-brain barrier due to inflammatory cytokines and increased levels of immune effector cells (IECs) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Corticosteroids and supportive management are the mainstays of ICANS treatment. However, no guidelines exist for the treatment of steroid-refractory ICANS. Some reports have shown favorable outcomes with no long-term complications in patients with steroid-refractory ICANS treated with intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy. CASE REPORT: We describe the outcomes of two patients with steroid-refractory ICANS treated with IT chemotherapy. Both patients had refractory large B-cell lymphoma and were not candidates for autologous transplant. They developed steroid-refractory ICANS after CAR T-cell infusion. IT chemotherapy with 12 mg methotrexate and 50 mg hydrocortisone resulted in prompt neurological improvement in both patients. One of them passed away due to multiple other comorbidities, and the other patient continues to do well without any complications. CONCLUSION: IT chemotherapy could be considered as a potential approach for the management of steroid-refractory ICANS based on our experience. Prospective studies are needed to validate this approach.

Consolidative Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Whole Brain Radiation in PCNSL; a Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The best consolidation strategy after induction chemotherapy in Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. Our objective is to estimate the overall survival (OS) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus whole brain radiation (WBRT) in the consolidation setting. We also sought to evaluate the factors affecting treatment selection METHODS: We identified 1620 patients with PCNSL who received chemotherapy followed by either ASCT or WBRT between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database. A propensity score weighting methodology was used to compare survival outcomes. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to assess the trend of ASCT use. RESULTS: Only 12.2% of patients received ASCT, and this proportion rose steadily between 2004 and 2015, with APC of +23%. Treatment selection was affected by age, type of area, distance from the treating facility, and level of education. With a median follow-up of 68.4 months, adjusted-median OS was 91.4 months and not reached for WBRT and ASCT groups, respectively (P < .001). 5-year OS was 74.4% in the ASCT group versus 58.7% in the WBRT group (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.60, P -value < .01). CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic factors affect the selection of consolidative treatment in patients with PCNSL which can alter outcomes. Frequency of consolidative ASCT is increasing for patients with PCNSL. This is the first and largest cohort study, to our knowledge, to show an OS advantage in favor of ASCT. This OS benefit needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled fashion.

Predictors and Long-Term Outcomes for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients Undergoing Surgery Prior to Systemic Therapy: A Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A minority of patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergo surgery before the initiation of systemic therapy. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of patients undergoing surgery prior to systemic therapy (surgfirst), the predictors for surgfirst, and the survival outcomes. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2006 and 2015, and we performed a subgroup analysis of patients that received surgfirst. Time-to-initial therapy (TTI) was defined as the time in days (d) from diagnosis to systemic therapy. Overall survival was measured from the day of diagnosis in terms of months (m). RESULTS: Factors associated with lower likelihood of surgfirst were non-Hispanic Black race (p-value<0.005), rural location (p-value<0.005), treatment at academic center (p-value<0.005), Medicaid insurance (p-value=0.01), comorbidity score >=3 (p-value 0.007), year of diagnosis, advanced stages of disease, and presence of B-symptoms. The TTI of systemic therapy was delayed in the surgfirst group - 34 (IQR 22-52) days vs. 23 (IQR 13-38) days, p-value<0.005. The five-year overall survival was 62.7% (95% CI 62.1-63.2%) vs. 58.3% (95% CI 57.7-60.0%) - HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), p-value<0.005. The factors associated with higher mortality were advanced comorbidities, lower educational status, disease primarily located in the bone, brain, and spinal cord, advanced clinical stage, presence of B-symptoms, and advanced age. CONCLUSION: Despite the delay in systemic therapy, we could not identify a detrimental impact of surgfirst on survival. This needs to be confirmed in large-scale multicenter studies. We identified clinical and socioeconomic factors that affect treatment selection and survival.

The Trend of Combined Modality Treatment and its Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Primary CNS Lymphoma: A 12-year Population-based Analysis Using Propensity Score.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The addition of radiation to chemotherapy in elderly patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. This aim of this study was to assess the trend of combined modality treatment (CMT) and compare its survival with chemotherapy alone and radiation alone in non-HIV patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 6,537 patients who received single treatment modality, CMT, or no treatment at all between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to assess the trend of CMT use. A propensity score weighting methodology was used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: Only 12.8% of patients received CMT, and this proportion steadily declined between 2004 (17.7%) and 2015 (8.7%), with an APC of -6.0% (95%CI=-8.0 - -4.0, p-value <0.001) during the 12 years. Apart from classical prognostic factors (age and comorbidities), treatment selection was significantly influenced by sex, facility type, degree of urbanization, and type of insurance. CMT had improved survival [median overall survival 19.5 months (95%CI=15.7-22.8)] compared with single-modality treatment. This effect was more prominent in the first year. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic factors affect the selection of treatment in elderly patients with PCNSL. CMT is falling out of favor in this patient population due to the risks of neurotoxicity. Further work should focus on developing strategies that minimize toxicity and access disparities without compromising survival.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab with obinutuzumab and bendamustine in previously untreated follicular lymphoma.

Obinutuzumab (G) chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) in the GALLIUM trial. Atezolizumab (atezo) is a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor with a complementary mechanism of action to G by restoring cytotoxic T-cell function. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of atezo-G-bendamustine in patients with previously untreated FL in a phase Ib/II trial (#NCT02596971). A safety run-in phase was followed by an expansion phase with atezo-G-bendamustine induction and atezo-G maintenance for ≤24 months. Forty patients with previously untreated FL were enrolled and treated with atezo-G-bendamustine. The primary endpoint, complete response (CR) rate, assessed by an independent review committee (IRC; modified Lugano 2014 criteria) was 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.3% to 85.8%). Three-year investigator-assessed PFS and overall survival rates were 80.9% (95% CI, 63.9% to 90.5%) and 89.3% (95% CI, 73.9% to 95.9%), respectively. At baseline, 21/40 patients had circulating lymphoma-specific clonotypes and underwent repeat testing at end of induction; all were minimal residual disease negative (10-5 sensitivity), with 16 (76.2%) CRs, 3 (14.3%) partial responses, and 2 (9.5%) with stable disease (IRC assessed). Grade 5 (fatal) adverse events (AEs) were reported in 5 patients. The efficacy of atezo-G-bendamustine in previously untreated FL did not appear superior to G-bendamustine efficacy as seen in the GALLIUM trial, and the addition of atezo to G-bendamustine was associated with an increased risk of AEs. Particularly due to the unfavorable safety profile, this regimen cannot be recommended in patients with previously untreated FL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02596971.

Rare Oral Presentation of a Mycophenolate Mofetil-Related Other Iatrogenic Immunodeficiency-Associated Lymphoproliferative Disorder (MMF-OIA-LPD) Lesion: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Oral manifestations of side effects of medications, such as methotrexate (MTX) for management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for solid organ transplant (SOT), are very rare. The known side effects include entities called other iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (OIIA-LPD) due to immunosuppression caused by these medications. While there has been an increased incidence of oral cavity LPD reported in the literature associated with MTX, oral presentations that involve MMF are rare. This case report will detail a 74-year-old man with scleroderma treated with MMF who developed Epstein-Barr virus + polymorphic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder in the right maxillary gingiva presenting as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). His oral presentation was successfully treated with a combination of surgery and MMF dosage reduction with an oral presentation free of disease at 6 months follow-up. This is the first known case report of an oral manifestation of MMF-related OIIA-LPD.

Frontline treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in elderly: a systematic review of clinical trials in post-rituximab era.

Treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains challenging in elderly population and systematic reviews are lacking in this area. Medline and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials in addition to conference proceedings were searched for therapeutic clinical trials on frontline treatment of DLBCL in adults ≥60 in post-rituximab era. Forty-one out of 713 reviewed papers met our inclusion criteria. Six cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) administered every 21 d remain the standard treatment for fit elderly, with no role for maintenance rituximab. For individuals ≥80, the strongest evidence favors rituximab/ofatumumab-miniCHOP. Numerous alternative approaches including the use of liposomal anthracyclines, dose and regimen adjustment to frailty/comorbidity score, brief duration regimens, and consolidative radioimmunotherapy have produced promising outcomes and could be considered for R-CHOP inappropriate elderly. Phase III randomized trials studying the efficacy of liposomal vincristine, extended-exposure rituximab, and lenalidomide plus R-CHOP are ongoing.

Efficacy and tolerability of treatment with azacitidine for 5 days in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients aged ≥ 60 years tolerate standard induction chemotherapy poorly. Therapy with azacitidine at a dose of 75 mg/m(2)/day for 7 days appears to be better tolerated, and is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of elderly AML patients with bone marrow (BM) blast counts of 20-30%. Here, we report the results of a prospective, phase 2, open-label study that evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of a 5-day regimen of single-agent subcutaneous azacitidine 100 mg/m(2)/day administered every 28 days in 15 elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML, 14 of whom had BM blast counts >30%. The overall response rate was 47%. Complete remission, partial remission, and hematologic improvement were achieved by 20, 13, and 13% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 355 days for the entire cohort, and 532 days for responders. Median time to best response was 95 days, and median treatment duration was 198 days (range = 13-724 days). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities comprised predominantly febrile neutropenia (40%) and thrombocytopenia (20%). Febrile neutropenia was the most common cause of hospitalization. Nonhematologic toxicities, consisting of injection-site skin reactions and fatigue (Grades 1-2), occurred in 73% (n = 11) of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. The dose and schedule of therapy remained constant in all but four patients. The findings of this study suggest that administration of subcutaneous azacitidine 100 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days every 28 days is a feasible, well-tolerated, and effective alternative to standard induction chemotherapy in elderly patients with AML.

Effectiveness of varenicline for smoking cessation at 2 urban academic health centers.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a major cause of morbidity in lower socioeconomic groups. In randomized trials, varenicline improves long term quit rates, but effectiveness in a clinic setting is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults who received a prescription for varenicline or nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) at two inner city health centers in 2008-9. Primary outcome was smoking status at 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included follow up visits, behavioral counseling, and side effects. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to compare quit rates with varenicline and NRT adjusted for covariates. KEY RESULTS: A total of 371 patients received a prescription for varenicline (46%) or NRT (54%). The mean age was 43 years, 58% were female, 44% white, 29% African American and 12% Hispanic. Mental illness, alcohol and drug abuse were common. Within one year, 247 (67%) had follow-up, and 26 (10.5%) maintained abstinence through week 52, 10.2% with varenicline and 10.8% with NRT (p=1.0). Loss to follow-up was 37% for varenicline, 31% for NRT (p=0.20). Including lost patients as smokers, the adjusted quit rates for varenicline and NRT were similar (6.5% vs. 7.6%, p=0.69). Only 69/371 (19%) received behavioral counseling. Counseled patients were more likely to maintain abstinence (13% vs. 7.8%, p=0.04). Side effects were more common with varenicline than NRT (6.5% vs. 2.5%, p=0.07). CONCLUSION: In an inner city clinic, abstinence rates were lower than those in clinical trials and did not differ between varenicline and NRT.

Azacitidine in the management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoeitic disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and potential transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). For decades, the mainstay of treatment for MDS was supportive care, including transfusion of blood products and growth factors. Further understanding of disease biology led to the discovery of a high prevalence of hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in high-risk MDS and secondary leukemias. Hence, the role of irreversible DNA methlytransferase inhibitors such as azacitidine was investigated with promising outcomes in the treatment of MDS. Azacitidine was initially approved in the USA by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 for the treatment of all subtypes of MDS and was granted expanded approval in 2009 to reflect new overall survival data demonstrated in the AZA-001 study of patients with higher-risk MDS. Azacitidine has demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful prolongation of survival in higher-risk patients with MDS and has changed the natural history of these disorders. The agent maintains a relatively safe toxicity profile, even in older patients. The role of azacitidine has been explored in the treatment of AML and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and has also been studied in the peritransplant setting. Azacitidine has been combined with other novel agents such as lenalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitors and growth factors in the hope of achieving improved outcomes. Currently, both intravenous and subcutaneous forms of azacitidine are approved for use in the USA with the oral form being granted fast track status by the FDA.