Capacity building for pediatric neuro-oncology in Pakistan- a project by my child matters program of Foundation S.

Introduction: Initiated in June 2019, this collaborative effort involved 15 public and private sector hospitals in Pakistan. The primary objective was to enhance the capacity for pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) care, supported by a My Child Matters/Foundation S grant. Methods: We aimed to establish and operate Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards (MTBs) on a national scale, covering 76% of the population (185.7 million people). In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, MTBs transitioned to videoconferencing. Fifteen hospitals with essential infrastructure participated, holding monthly sessions addressing diagnostic and treatment challenges. Patient cases were anonymized for confidentiality. Educational initiatives, originally planned as in-person events, shifted to a virtual format, enabling continued implementation and collaboration despite pandemic constraints. Results: A total of 124 meetings were conducted, addressing 545 cases. To augment knowledge, awareness, and expertise, over 40 longitudinal lectures were organized for healthcare professionals engaged in PNO care. Additionally, two symposia with international collaborators and keynote speakers were also held to raise national awareness. The project achieved significant milestones, including the development of standardized national treatment protocols for low-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, and high-grade glioma. Further protocols are currently under development. Notably, Pakistan's first pediatric neuro-oncology fellowship program was launched, producing two graduates and increasing the number of trained pediatric neuro-oncologists in the country to three. Discussion: The initiative exemplifies the potential for capacity building in PNO within low-middle income countries. Success is attributed to intra-national twinning programs, emphasizing collaborative efforts. Efforts are underway to establish a national case registry for PNO, ensuring a comprehensive and organized approach to monitoring and managing cases. This collaborative initiative, supported by the My Child Matters/Foundation S grant, showcases the success of capacity building in pediatric neuro-oncology in low-middle income countries. The establishment of treatment protocols, fellowship programs, and regional tumor boards highlights the potential for sustainable improvements in PNO care.

Prognostic impact of pre-referral tumor resection in unilateral Wilms tumor: A single-institute experience from a lower middle-income country.

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prognostic impact of pre-referral surgical resection of Wilms tumor (WT) performed at non-oncology centers, and to strategize an improved care plan for this very curable pediatric tumor. METHODS: In this study conducted in a large pediatric cancer center in Pakistan, we retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of 149 patients with unilateral WT from September 2008 to August 2017. Based on treatment approach, patients were categorized into two groups: (i) pre-referral tumor resection (PTR: n = 75), and (ii) post-neoadjuvant chemo nephrectomy (PCN: n = 74). RESULTS: The proportion of metastatic disease in PTR and PCN groups was 33.3% and 35.1%, respectively. In the PTR subset, median time to admission after PTR was 5 weeks (mean 11, SEM 2.8, range: 2-202) weeks, with 53.3% (n = 40) presenting more than 4 weeks after PTR. Twenty patients had no cross-sectional imaging prior to PTR and underwent surgery after abdominal ultrasound only. On baseline imaging at our center, 58.7% (n = 44) of the PTR group had radiologically evaluable disease (four metastases only, 19 local residual tumor only, 21 both localized tumor and visible metastases). Disease staging was uncertain in 23 patients because of no or inadequate histology specimens and/or lymph node sampling in patients with no evaluable disease. Statistically significant differences were recorded for the two subsets regarding tumor volume, extent and nodularity, renal vein and renal sinus involvement, lymph node status, tumor rupture and histopathologic features, and tumor stage, with a 10-year event-free survival (EFS) for PCN and PTR of 74.3% and 50.7%, respectively (p < .001). In the PTR group, EFS for those presenting within 4 weeks and later was 91.4% versus 15.0%, respectively (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Suboptimal pre-referral surgical intervention results in poor survival outcomes in unilateral WT. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive action plan for educating healthcare professionals engaged in WT diagnosis and referral process. PCN in a multidisciplinary team approach can reduce surgical morbidity and seems to be a better strategy to improve the survival rates in low-resource settings.

Psychosocial services for pediatric oncology patients in low- and middle-income countries from health care providers' perspectives: A survey-based report from the SIOP Global Health Network Psychosocial Working Group.

OBJECTIVES: While pediatric cancer survival rates have improved in high-income countries, they remain much lower in low- and middle-income countries (L/MICs). While much focus in recent years has been on remediating the survivorship gap, less is known about the psychosocial needs and availability of psychosocial services for this population. METHODS: A questionnaire was created by the SIOP Global Health Network Psychosocial Working Group to assess psychosocial needs and services in L/MIC. The questionnaire was distributed to pediatric oncology professionals, both in-person at the SIOP Annual Congress in Lyon (2019) conference and then electronically. Individuals not part of SIOP were also invited to participate via social media posts. RESULTS: Sixty-six respondents from 31 countries completed the questionnaire. The majority of participants were physicians, followed by nurses. Participants from low- and lower-middle-income countries (L/LMICs) perceived patients as having higher rates of anxiety and caregivers as having higher rates of depression as compared to those in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs). Across all L/MICs represented, 85% of physicians reported that psychosocial issues sometimes, frequently, or always affect their clinical obligations. Participants reflected on the availability of professionals who treat mental health concerns; the availability of social workers, psychologists, and non-professional volunteers differed significantly between L/LMICs and UMICs. Treatment abandonment and myths/disinformation were highlighted as the most pressing psychosocial priorities. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights pediatric oncology providers' perceptions of psychosocial concerns. Based on responses, proposals for minimum standards of care are made, as well as the importance of training existing providers and funding additional psychosocially-focused professionals.

Current Challenges of Asian National Children's Cancer Study Groups on Behalf of Asian Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Group.

In Asia, a few countries have a long and established history of collaborative clinical trials successfully formed national children's cancer study groups, but many still do not have such groups. The process of forming national children's cancer groups is fraught with many hurdles, which varies among the countries. One of the basic requirements for running clinical trials is an affordable health care system in which most of the children with cancer can receive the proposed treatment. The health insurance coverage for children with cancer varies from <20% to as high as 100% among Asian countries, and the operation of clinical trials must also be adjusted accordingly. Shortage of research personnel is common, including medical, nursing, research coordinators, and data managers. The establishment of the Asian Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Group aims to provide a good platform for promotion of international clinical trials in the Asian countries.

Development of EPAT: An assessment tool for pediatric hematology/oncology training programs.

PURPOSE: In the absence of a standardized tool to assess the quality of pediatric hematology/oncology training programs, the Education Program Assessment Tool (EPAT) was conceptualized as a user-friendly and adaptable tool to evaluate and identify areas of opportunity, pinpoint needed modifications, and monitor progress for training programs around the world. METHODS: The development of EPAT consisted of three main phases: operationalization, consensus, and piloting. After each phase, the tool was iteratively modified based on feedback to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity. RESULTS: The operationalization process led to the development of 10 domains with associated assessment questions. The two-step consensus phase included an internal consensus phase to validate the domains and a subsequent external consensus phase to refine the domains and overall function of the tool. EPAT domains for programmatic evaluation are hospital infrastructure, patient care, education infrastructure, program basics, clinical exposure, theory, research, evaluation, educational culture, and graduate impact. EPAT was piloted in five training programs in five countries, representing diverse medical training and patient care contexts for proper validation of the tool. Face validity was confirmed by a correlation between the perceived and calculated scores for each domain (r = 0.78, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: EPAT was developed following a systematic approach, ultimately leading to a relevant tool to evaluate the different core elements of pediatric hematology/oncology training programs across the world. With EPAT, programs will have a tool to quantitatively evaluate their training, allowing for benchmarking with centers at the local, regional, and international level.

Pediatric oncology infrastructure and workforce training needs: a report from the Pediatric Oncology East and Mediterranean (POEM) Group.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate numbers of trained healthcare providers (HCPs), contribute to poor pediatric oncology (PO) outcomes, particularly in low- and lower middle-income countries (L/LMICs). An understanding of the characteristics of the workforce challenges are vital for addressing these problems. METHODS: The Pediatric Oncology East and Mediterranean (POEM) Group surveyed PO centers in countries of the North Africa, Middle East, Central Asia and Indian subcontinent on infrastructure and workforce capacity, service availability, and training opportunities for HCPs. Participating centers were categorized by the World Bank income levels for their countries and correlated with services, workload and staffing characteristics, and training needs. RESULTS: Fifty of 82 member-centers (61%) from 21 countries responded to the survey. 299 pediatric oncologists and 1,176 nurses treated 12,496 new PO patients/year, with a 1,451 beds utilization. The majority (71%) of new cases occurred in L/LMICs. The availability of HCPs correlated with country income level, as did pediatric subspecialty access, while availability of support services was unrelated. Twenty-five centers in 11 countries offered PO fellowship training for physicians, whereas 13 PO nurse training centers in 9 countries had the capacity to train 273 nurses annually. The survey respondents indicated that, among their existing workforce, an average of 3·5 physicians and 14 nurses per institution would benefit from additional PO training opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: The participating centers exhibited intra-regional heterogeneity in financial resources, infrastructure, workload, workforce, and medical services. Our findings provide insight into the disparities and regional resources available to POEM, which can be mobilized to rectify specific deficiencies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Defining Essential Childhood Cancer Medicines to Inform Prioritization and Access: Results From an International, Cross-Sectional Survey.

PURPOSE: Access to essential cancer medicines is a major determinant of childhood cancer outcomes globally. The degree to which pediatric oncologists deem medicines listed on WHO's Model List of Essential Medicines for Children (EMLc) essential is unknown, as is the extent to which such medicines are accessible on the front lines of clinical care. METHODS: An electronic survey developed was distributed through the International Society of Pediatric Oncology mailing list to members from 87 countries. Respondents were asked to select 10 cancer medicines that would provide the greatest benefit to patients in their context; subsequent questions explored medicine availability and cost. Descriptive and bivariate statistics compared access to medicines between low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), and high-income countries (HICs). RESULTS: Among 159 respondents from 44 countries, 43 (27%) were from LMICs, 79 (50%) from UMICs, and 37 (23%) from HICs. The top five medicines were methotrexate (75%), vincristine (74%), doxorubicin (74%), cyclophosphamide (69%), and cytarabine (65%). Of the priority medicines identified, 87% (27 of 31) are represented on the 2021 EMLc and 77% (24 of 31) were common to the lists generated by LMIC, UMIC, and HIC respondents. The proportion of respondents indicating universal availability for each of the top medicines ranged from 9% to 46% for LMIC, 25% to 89% for UMIC, and 67% to 100% for HIC. Risk of catastrophic expenditure was more common in LMIC (8%-20%), compared with UMIC (0%-28%) and HIC (0%). CONCLUSION: Most medicines that oncologists deem essential for childhood cancer treatment are currently included on the EMLc. Barriers remain in access to these medicines, characterized by gaps in availability and risks of catastrophic expenditure for families that are most pronounced in low-income settings but evident across all income contexts.

Mapping Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial Collaborative Groups on the Global Stage.

PURPOSE: The global pediatric oncology clinical research landscape, particularly in Central and South America, Africa, and Asia, which bear the highest burden of global childhood cancer cases, is less characterized in the literature. Review of how existing pediatric cancer clinical trial groups internationally have been formed and how their research goals have been pursued is critical for building global collaborative research and data-sharing efforts, in line with the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. METHODS: A narrative literature review of collaborative groups performing pediatric cancer clinical research in each continent was conducted. An inventory of research groups was assembled and reviewed by current pediatric cancer regional and continental leaders. Each group was narratively described with identification of common structural and research themes among consortia. RESULTS: There is wide variability in the structure, history, and goals of pediatric cancer clinical trial collaborative groups internationally. Several continental regions have longstanding endogenously-formed clinical trial groups that have developed and published numerous adapted treatment regimens to improve outcomes, whereas other regions have consortia focused on developing foundational database registry infrastructure supported by large multinational organizations or twinning relationships. CONCLUSION: There cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach to increasing collaboration between international pediatric cancer clinical trial groups, as this requires a nuanced understanding of local stakeholders and resources necessary to form partnerships. Needs assessments, performed either by local consortia or in conjunction with international partners, have generated productive clinical trial infrastructure. To achieve the goals of the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer, global partnerships must be sufficiently granular to account for the distinct needs of each collaborating group and should incorporate grassroots approaches, robust twinning relationships, and implementation science.

Global Neuroblastoma Network: An international multidisciplinary neuroblastoma tumor board for resource-limited countries.

BACKGROUND: Tumor boards are part of standard care of patients with complex cancers, but appropriate multidisciplinary expertise and infrastructure are often not available in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) for pediatric cancers, such as neuroblastoma. Our goal was to review results of a Global Neuroblastoma Network (GNN) tumor board accessible to LMIC. METHODS: De-identified clinical cases presented via internet conference during a weekly GNN virtual tumor board from 2010 through 2020 were evaluated in a standardized format, including diagnostic imaging, pathology, therapy information, resource limitations, and questions for discussion. Information summarized included the presentations, a survey of the impact on care, and a resource questionnaire. RESULTS: Registered GNN participants included 575 individuals from 77 countries, with a median of 39 participants per session. Total 412 cases were presented from 32 countries, including 351 unique neuroblastoma patients, 52 follow-up cases, and nine non-neuroblastoma diagnoses. Twenty-eight educational sessions were presented. Limited critical resources for diagnostics and staging of cases included MYCN analysis (54.7%), metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans (38.7%), and International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (49%). Therapies were also limited, with markedly decreased use of radiation and autologous stem cell transplant for high-risk cases, and no availability of anti-GD2 antibody in LMIC. Limited sampling with a post-presentation survey showed that 100% found the GNN helpful, and 70% altered the care plan based on the discussion. CONCLUSION: This report shows the utility of an international tumor board for LMIC focused on a challenging solid tumor where local expertise may be limited, with international multidisciplinary expert participation and educational sessions.

Pediatric oncology infrastructure and workforce training needs: A report from the Pediatric Oncology East and Mediterranean (POEM) Group.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate numbers of trained health care providers (HCPs) contribute to poor pediatric oncology (PO) outcomes, particularly in low- and lower middle-income countries (L/LMICs). An understanding of the characteristics of the workforce challenges is vital for addressing these problems. METHODS: The Pediatric Oncology East and Mediterranean (POEM) Group surveyed PO centers in countries of North Africa, Middle East, Central Asia, and Indian subcontinent on infrastructure and workforce capacity, service availability, and training opportunities for HCPs. Participating centers were categorized by the World Bank income levels for their countries and correlated with services, workload and staffing characteristics, and training needs. RESULTS: Fifty of 82 member centers (61%) from 21 countries responded to the survey. Two hundred ninety-nine pediatric oncologists and 1176 nurses treated 12 496 new PO patients/year, with a 1451-bed utilization. The majority (71%) of new cases occurred in L/LMICs. The availability of HCPs correlated with country income level, as did pediatric subspecialty access, while availability of support services was unrelated. Twenty-five centers in 11 countries offered PO fellowship training for physicians, whereas 13 PO nurse training centers in nine countries had the capacity to train 273 nurses annually. The survey respondents indicated that, among their existing workforce, an average of 3.5 physicians and 14 nurses per institution would benefit from additional PO training opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: The participating centers exhibited intraregional heterogeneity in financial resources, infrastructure, workload, workforce, and medical services. Our findings provide insight into the disparities and regional resources available to POEM, which can be mobilized to rectify specific deficiencies.

Outcome of first relapse of Hodgkin lymphoma: single institution experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcome of first relapse of Hodgkin lymphoma with standard dose chemotherapy, and to identify the prognostic factors predicting survival outcome in paediatric patients. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data of Hodgkin lymphoma patients who relapsed at least 3 months after the completion of initial treatment from January 2001 to December 2010. Probabilities of overall survival, event-free survival and cumulative incidence were calculated. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients, 31(72%) were males and 12(29%) were females. Mean age at relapse was 11±3.3 years (range: 4-17 years). In 31(72%) patients, early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy was employed. Median follow-up of the cohort was 62 months (interquartile range: 4-187 months). Overall survival and event-free survival at 10 years was 23(54%) and 15(35%) respectively. On univariate analysis, initial disease stage (p=0.021), stage at relapse (p=0.003), treatment protocol (p=0.005), treatment responsiveness at initial two cycles of salvage chemotherapy (p=0.002) and at the end of treatment assessment (p=0.0009) were statistically significant factors. Multivariate cox regression analysis revealed disease stage at relapse (p=0.004), chemotherapy regimen (p=0.025) and end-of-treatment disease evaluation (p=0.005) as the significant variables. CONCLUSIONS: Improved outcome with early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen was noted for Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had disease-free interval >2 years.

The COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid global response for children with cancer from SIOP, COG, SIOP-E, SIOP-PODC, IPSO, PROS, CCI, and St Jude Global.

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most serious global challenges to delivering affordable and equitable treatment to children with cancer we have witnessed in the last few decades. This Special Report aims to summarize general principles for continuing multidisciplinary care during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. With contributions from the leadership of the International Society for Pediatric Oncology (SIOP), Children's Oncology Group (COG), St Jude Global program, and Childhood Cancer International, we have sought to provide a framework for healthcare teams caring for children with cancer during the pandemic. We anticipate the burden will fall particularly heavily on children, their families, and cancer services in low- and middle-income countries. Therefore, we have brought together the relevant clinical leads from SIOP Europe, COG, and SIOP-PODC (Pediatric Oncology in Developing Countries) to focus on the six most curable cancers that are part of the WHO Global Initiative in Childhood Cancer. We provide some practical advice for adapting diagnostic and treatment protocols for children with cancer during the pandemic, the measures taken to contain it (e.g., extreme social distancing), and how to prepare for the anticipated recovery period.

Late Morbidity among Survivors of Childhood Cancers; Experience at Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital.

Background: Long-term survivors of childhood malignancies are at increased risk of experiencing treatment-related morbidities. Survival into late adulthood in these children provides ample time for the acquisition of long-term sequelae. This study aimed to determine the late adverse effects among long-term survivors of childhood cancer from a low-income country perspective. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from review of charts of patients aged under 18 years at the time of their primary diagnosis between 1 January, 1995, and 31 December, 2008, and who survived for at least 5 years after completion of their treatment. Analysed data included demographics, cancer type, treatment modality, types of chemotherapy agents administered and specific late morbidities including frequency of azoospermia, oligospermia, endocrine abnormalities, hearing and pulmonary function impairment and cardiac dysfunction among the long-term survivors of cancer. Results: The total number of patients was 300 with a mean age of 18 ± 2 years. The male to female ratio was 2.7:1. Median follow-up duration was 18 years (range: 5-25 years). Seventy-seven percent of patients were from Punjab, 20% were from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and 3% were from other provinces. Fifty percent had a diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma, 17% had acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 13% had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 10% had germ cell tumours and 10% had other tumours. Fifty-seven percent received chemotherapy, 23% had chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 15% had chemotherapy and surgery, 3% had chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy and 2% had only surgery. Notable long-term documented sequelae were; azoospermia/oligospermia in 64%, endocrine abnormalities in 25% with hypothyroidism in 13.5% and follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone abnormalities in 11.5%, ototoxicity in 6.5%, impaired pulmonary function tests in 4.6%, cardiotoxicity in 2.4% and second malignancies (acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome) in 1%. Conclusion: Childhood cancer survivors are at increased risk of adverse treatment-related sequelae and a long-term follow-up plan should be in place in centres where they receive treatment for their primary disease.