Dual modality feeders: a group of human milk feeders with unique practices and needs.

OBJECTIVE: Dual modality feeding (DMF) - feeding human milk interchangeably from the breast and from a bottle - comes with unique practical, emotional and relational challenges, as well as support needs. Yet, there is little research that explores the experiences of individuals who use DMF in the Canadian context. The aim of this study is to explore the practices, challenges, reasons and enablers of DMF. DESIGN: Repeat, semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted at 8 weeks and 22 weeks postpartum. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using a critical feminist lens. SETTING: Nova Scotia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Ten DMF mothers. RESULTS: DMF practices were influenced by a mix of social and material circumstances, including breast-feeding challenges, the involvement of support persons, finances and access to lactation support. Individuals who predominantly fed at the breast expressed milk strategically to mitigate transitory breast-feeding challenges, for convenience under specific circumstances, and to share feeding responsibilities with other caregivers for personal and practical reasons. Individuals who mainly bottle-fed did so due to long-term breast-feeding challenges or a need to return to employment. Enablers of successful DMF were consistent between the two groups and included practical, personal and relational aspects. CONCLUSIONS: DMF is a unique practice compared to feeding human milk solely from the breast or bottle. Despite the potential growing prevalence of DMF, it is currently understudied and inadequately addressed in existing support programmes in Nova Scotia. Tailored programming and public messaging are needed to support DMF families.

An equitable vaccine delivery system: Lessons from the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing health disparities and disproportionately affected vulnerable individuals and communities (e.g., low-income, precariously housed or in institutional settings, racialized, migrant, refugee, 2SLBGTQ+). Despite their higher risk of infection and sub-optimal access to healthcare, Canada's COVID-19 vaccination strategy focused primarily on age, as well as medical and occupational risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods constant comparative qualitative analysis of epidemiological data from a national database of COVID-19 cases and vaccine coverage in four Canadian jurisdictions. Jurisdictional policies, policy updates, and associated press releases were collected from government websites, and qualitative data were collected through 34 semi-structured interviews of key informants from nine Canadian jurisdictions. Interviews were coded and analyzed for themes and patterns. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out in Canada in three phases, each accompanied by specific challenges. Vaccine delivery systems typically featured large-venue mass immunization sites that presented a variety of barriers for those from vulnerable communities. The engagement and targeted outreach that featured in the later phases were driven predominantly by the efforts of community organizations and primary care providers, with limited support from provincial governments. CONCLUSIONS: While COVID-19 vaccine rollout in Canada is largely considered a success, such an interpretation is shaped by the metrics chosen. Vaccine delivery systems across Canada need substantial improvements to ensure optimal uptake and equitable access for all. Our findings suggest a more equitable model for vaccine delivery featuring early establishment of local barrier-free clinics, culturally safe and representative environment, as well as multi-lingual assistance, among other vulnerability-sensitive elements.

Public health communication in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: Communication is central to the implementation and effectiveness of public health measures. Informed by theories of good governance, COVID-19 pandemic public health messaging in 3 Canadian provinces is assessed for its potential to encourage or undermine public trust and adherence. METHODS: This study employed a mixed-methods constant comparative approach to triangulate epidemiological COVID-19 data and qualitative data from news releases, press briefings, and key informant interviews. Communications were analyzed from January 2020 to October 2021 in Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Alberta. Interview data came from 34 semi-structured key informant interviews with public health actors across Canada. Team-based coding and thematic analysis were conducted to analyze communications and interview transcripts. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged as integral to good communication: transparency, promptness, clarity, and engagement of diverse communities. Our data indicate that a lack of transparency surrounding evidence and public health decision-making, delays in public health communications, unclear and inconsistent terminology and activities within and across jurisdictions, and communications that did not consider or engage diverse communities' perspectives may have decreased the effectiveness of public health communications and adherence to public health measures throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that increased federal guidance with wider jurisdictional collaboration backed by transparent evidence could improve the effectiveness of communication practices by instilling public trust and adherence with public health measures. Effective communication should be transparent, supported by reliable evidence, prompt, clear, consistent, and sensitive to diverse values. Improved communication training, established engagement infrastructure, and increased collaborations and diversity of decision-makers and communicators are recommended.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: La communication est centrale à l'implantation et au succès des mesures de santé publique. À partir des théories de bonne gouvernance, les messages de santé publique sur la COVID-19 de trois provinces canadiennes ont été analysés afin d'évaluer si ces messages renforçaient ou diminuaient la confiance et l'adhésion de la population. MéTHODES: Cette étude utilise une approche comparative constante et des méthodes mixtes pour trianguler des données épidémiologiques sur la COVID-19 avec des données qualitatives provenant de communiqués de presse, de conférences de presse et d'entretiens avec des informateurs clés. Les communications ont été analysées entre janvier 2020 et octobre 2021 en Nouvelle-Écosse, Ontario et Alberta. Les données proviennent également de 34 entretiens semi-dirigés avec des acteurs de santé publique à travers le Canada. Une codification en équipe et une analyse de contenu thématique ont été réalisées pour analyser les communications et les verbatim des entretiens. RéSULTATS: Quatre thèmes principaux sont apparus comme faisant partie intégrante d'une bonne communication : la transparence, la rapidité, la clarté et l'engagement des diverses communautés. Nos données indiquent qu'un manque de transparence en ce qui a trait aux données probantes et aux processus de prise de décision en santé publique, que les retards dans les stratégies de communication de santé publique, qu'une terminologie et des activités incohérentes et inconsistantes dans les provinces et entre elles, ainsi que des communications qui ne tenaient pas compte des points de vue ou qui n'incluaient pas les diverses communautés, ont pu réduire l'efficacité des communications et l'adhésion aux mesures de santé publique tout au long de la pandémie de COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Cette étude suggère que des lignes directrices nationales et une collaboration accrue entre les provinces et les territoires soutenues par des données probantes transparentes pourraient améliorer l'efficacité des communications en suscitant la confiance du public et l'adhésion aux mesures de santé publique. Une communication efficace doit être transparente, appuyée sur des données probantes fiables, rapide, claire, cohérente et sensible aux différentes valeurs. Il est recommandé d'améliorer la formation en communication, d'établir une infrastructure pour accroître l'engagement, et de soutenir la collaboration et la diversité des décideurs et des communicateurs.

Infant feeding experiences and concerns among caregivers early in the COVID-19 State of Emergency in Nova Scotia, Canada.

The global emergency caused by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted access to goods and services such as health care and social supports, but the impact on infant feeding remains unclear. Thus, the objective of this study was to explore how caregivers of infants under 6 months of age perceived changes to infant feeding and other food and health-related matters during the COVID-19 State of Emergency in Nova Scotia, Canada. Four weeks after the State of Emergency began, between 17 April and 15 May 2020, caregivers completed this online survey, including the Perceived Stress Scale. Participants (n = 335) were 99% female and mostly White (87%). Over half (60%) were breastfeeding, and 71% had a household income over CAD$60,000. Most participants (77%) received governmental parental benefits before the emergency, and 59% experienced no COVID-19-related economic changes. Over three quarters of participants (77%) scored moderate levels of perceived stress. Common themes of concern included social isolation, COVID-19 infection (both caregiver and infant), and a lack of access to goods, namely, human milk substitutes ('infant formula'), and services, including health care, lactation support, and social supports. Most COVID-19-related information was sought from the internet and social media, so for broad reach, future evidence-based information should be shared via online platforms. Although participants were experiencing moderate self-perceived stress and shared numerous concerns, very few COVID-19-related changes to infant feeding were reported, and there were few differences by socio-economic status, likely due to a strong economic safety net in this Canadian setting.

Availability and affordability of healthy and less healthy food in Nova Scotia: where you shop may affect the availability and price of healthy food.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to examine the availability and price of healthier compared with less healthy foods by geography, store category and store type for convenience stores, and by store size for grocery stores in Nova Scotia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study that examined differences in the overall availability and price of healthier compared to less healthy foods in grocery and convenience stores in Nova Scotia. The Nova Scotia Consumer Food Environment project was part of a larger initiative of the Nova Scotia government (Department of Health and Wellness) to assess the food and beverage environment in Nova Scotia in 2015/16. SETTING: Four geographic zones (Nova Scotia Health Authority Management Zones) in Nova Scotia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of forty-seven grocery stores and fifty-nine convenience stores were selected from a list of 210 grocery stores and 758 convenience stores in Nova Scotia to ensure geographic and store type representation in our sample. RESULTS: Findings indicate that rurality had a significant effect on food availability as measured by the Nutrition Environment Measures Surveys (NEMS) score (P < 0·01); there was a higher availability of healthy foods in rural compared to urban areas for convenience stores but not grocery stores. Healthier foods were also more available in chain stores compared to independent stores (P < 0·01) and in large stores compared to small and medium stores (P < 0·001 and P < 0·01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of and accessibility to less healthy foods in Nova Scotia food environment suggests that there is a need for government policy action to support a food environment that contributes to healthier diets.

In-store food environment for adults and children in Nova Scotia, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: This paper examines the retail food environment in grocery and convenience stores across Nova Scotia with specific attention to prominence and promotion of foods and beverages, as well as in-store promotion of foods and beverages to children. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional analysis of data on the availability, price, prominence, and promotion of foods and beverages classified as "healthier" and "less healthy" was undertaken as a part of a Nova Scotia Consumer Food Environment (NS-CFE) project. Data were collected in a random stratified sample of 47 grocery stores and 59 convenience stores by trained research assistants working in pairs using adapted Nutrition Environment Measures Survey Toronto grocery store (NEMS-S) and NEMS Corner Store (NEMS-CS) tools. RESULTS: "Less healthy" snack foods and sugar-sweetened beverages were more prominently displayed than "healthier" options with an exception of cereal, at both grocery and convenience stores (all p < 0.001). Coke™ and fruit juice were more expensive than water in both grocery and convenience stores (both p ≤ 0.05). Significantly more child-specific strategies were used to promote "less healthy" compared with "healthier" options in both grocery and convenience stores (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Results of this study demonstrate that "less healthy" options are significantly more prominently displayed and more heavily marketed to all Nova Scotians, including children, in the retail food environment compared with items classified as "healthier". These findings indicate that there is a need for comprehensive structural changes to the retail food environment in Nova Scotia, to support population health.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Notre article porte sur l'environnement alimentaire au détail des épiceries et des dépanneurs en Nouvelle-Écosse, en particulier sur l'emplacement et la promotion des aliments et boissons et sur la promotion sur le lieu de vente des aliments et boissons destinés aux enfants. MéTHODE: Dans le cadre d'un projet sur l'environnement alimentaire de consommation en Nouvelle-Écosse (Nova Scotia Consumer Food Environment, NS-CFE), nous avons mené une analyse transversale descriptive des données sur la disponibilité, le prix, l'emplacement et la promotion d'aliments et de boissons catégorisés comme étant « plus sains ¼ et « moins sains ¼. Les données ont été collectées dans un échantillon aléatoire stratifié de 47 épiceries et de 59 dépanneurs par des adjoints à la recherche formés travaillant deux par deux à l'aide de deux outils de sondage adaptés : le NEMS-S (Nutrition Environment Measures Survey Toronto Grocery Store) et le NEMS-CS (NEMS Corner Store). RéSULTATS: Les grignotines et les boissons édulcorées au sucre « moins saines ¼ étaient placées plus en vue que les options « plus saines ¼, à l'exception des céréales, dans les épiceries comme dans les dépanneurs (tous, p < 0,001). Le Coke™ et les jus de fruits étaient plus chers que l'eau dans les épiceries comme dans les dépanneurs (les deux, p ≤ 0,05). Un nombre sensiblement plus élevé de stratégies visant expressément les enfants étaient employées pour promouvoir les options « moins saines ¼ que les options « plus saines ¼ dans les épiceries comme dans les dépanneurs (les deux, p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Les résultats de cette étude montrent que les options « moins saines ¼ sont placées plus en vue et sont plus intensivement commercialisées aux Néo-Écossais, y compris aux enfants, dans l'environnement alimentaire au détail, que les articles catégorisés comme étant « plus sains ¼. Ces constatations montrent qu'il est nécessaire d'apporter des changements structurels globaux à l'environnement alimentaire au détail de la Nouvelle-Écosse pour favoriser la santé de la population.