Delayed initiation of disease modifying therapy increases relapse frequency and motor disability in pediatric onset multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate association between time to initiation of disease modifying treatment (DMT) and outcomes in pediatric-onset Multiple Sclerosis (POMS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of children with POMS from two tertiary referral pediatric Neuroimmunology clinics. Outcome measures comprised annualized relapse rate (ARR), MRI lesion burden (T1, T2-FLAIR, and post-GAD contrast sequences), EDSS, and 25-ft walk duration at the latest follow-up visit. Univariate and multivariate analysis using linear and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between patient characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 68 patients were reviewed. More than half of patients were female (62 %) and 32 (47 %) were Hispanic/LatinX. Median age at diagnosis was 14.2 years (IQR: 11.0-16.5), and median duration from diagnosis to the latest follow-up was 2.5 years (IQR: 1.6-4.6). Sensory (29.4 %), brainstem (23.5 %), and pyramidal (19.1 %) symptoms were most common. Interferon beta (32.4 %), dimethyl fumarate (27.9 %) and rituximab (26.5 %) were the most frequently used first-line DMT. Patients had a median ARR of 0.5 (IQR: 0.08-0.84), and EDSS score of 1.0 (IQR: 0.0-2.0) at the most recent follow-up. Delayed DMT initiation correlated with higher ARR (R = 0.38, p = 0.0016) and longer 25-ft walk duration (R = 0.34, p = 0.0077). In multivariate analysis, delayed DMT remained a significant predictor of higher ARR (p = 0.002) and longer 25-ft walk duration (p = 0.047). Delayed DMT initiation and use of low/moderate efficacy DMT predicted GAD enhancing lesions at the latest follow-up (p = 0.004 and 0.019 respectively). CONCLUSION: Delayed DMT initiation in POMS is linked to unfavorable outcomes, including higher ARR and longer 25-ft walk duration.

Neuroimaging abnormalities associated with immunotherapy responsiveness in Down syndrome regression disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of neuroimaging abnormalities in individuals with Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD) and evaluate if neuroimaging abnormalities were predictive of therapeutic responses. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, case-control study which reviewed neuroimaging studies of individuals with DSRD and compared them to a control cohort of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) alone was performed. Individuals aged 10-30 years and meeting international consensus criteria for DSRD were included. The presence of T1, T2/FLAIR, and SWI signal abnormalities was reviewed. Response rates to various therapies, including immunotherapy, were evaluated in the presence of neuroimaging abnormalities. RESULTS: In total, 74 individuals (35%) had either T2/FLAIR and/or SWI signal abnormality compared to 14 individuals (12%) without DSRD (p < 0.001, 95%CI: 2.18-7.63). T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities were not appreciated more frequently in individuals with DSRD (14%, 30/210) than in the control cohort (9%, 11/119) (p = 0.18, OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 0.79-3.40). SWI signal abnormalities were appreciated at a higher frequency in individuals with DSRD (24%, 51/210) compared to the control cohort (4%, 5/119) (p < 0.001, OR: 7.31, 95%CI: 2.83-18.90). T2/FLAIR signal abnormalities were localized to the frontal (40%, 12/30) and parietal lobes (37%, 11/30). SWI signal abnormalities were predominantly in the bilateral basal ganglia (94%, 49/52). Individuals with DSRD and the presence of T2/FLAIR and/or SWI signal abnormalities were much more likely to respond to immunotherapy (p < 0.001, OR: 8.42. 95%CI: 3.78-18.76) and less likely to respond to benzodiazepines (p = 0.01, OR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.25-0.83), antipsychotics (p < 0.001, OR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.11-0.55), or electroconvulsive therapy (p < 0.001, OR: 0.12; 95%CI: 0.02-0.78) compared to individuals without these neuroimaging abnormalities. INTERPRETATION: This study indicates that in individuals diagnosed with DSRD, T2/FLAIR, and SWI signal abnormalities are more common than previously thought and predict response to immunotherapy.

Safety and tolerability of intravenous immunoglobulin infusion in Down syndrome regression disorder.

Three large multi-center studies have identified the clinical utility of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in the treatment of Down syndrome regression disorder (DSRD). Yet the tolerability of infusions in individuals with DS and the safety of IVIg remains unknown in this population. This study sought to evaluate the safety and tolerability of IVIg in individuals with DSRD compared to a real-world cohort of individuals with pediatric onset neuroimmunologic disorders. A single-center, retrospective chart review evaluating clinically documented infusion reactions was performed for individuals meeting international consensus criteria for DSRD and having IVIg infusions between 2019 and 2023. Infusion reactions were evaluated for severity and need for alterations in infusion plan. This cohort was compared against an age and sex matched cohort of children with neuroimmunologic conditions who had also received IVIg infusions. In total, 127 individuals with DSRD and 186 individuals with other neuroimmunologic disorders were enrolled. There was no difference in the overall rate of adverse reactions (AEs) between the DSRD and general neuroimmunology cohorts (p = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.80-2.00), but cardiac-related AEs specifically were more common among the DSRD group (p = 0.02, 95% CI: 1.23-17.54). When AEs did occur, there was no difference in frequency of pharmacologic intervention (p = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.34-1.13) or discontinuation of therapy (p = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.06-7.44). There was a higher incidence of lab abnormalities on IVIG among the general neuroimmunology cohort (p = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.24-0.94) compared to the DSRD cohort. Transaminitis was the most common laboratory abnormality in the DSRD group. In a large cohort of individuals with DSRD, there were no significant differences in the safety and tolerability of IVIg compared to a cohort of children and young adults with neuroimmunologic conditions.

Hypovitaminosis D in persons with Down syndrome and autism spectrum disorder.

BACKGROUND: Plasma levels of vitamin D have been reported to be low in persons with Down syndrome (DS) and existing data is limited to small and homogenous cohorts. This is of particular importance in persons with DS given the high rates of autoimmune disease in this population and the known relationship between vitamin D and immune function. This study sought to investigate vitamin D status in a multi-center cohort of individuals with DS and compare them to individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurotypical (NT) controls. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-center review was performed. The three sites were located at latitudes of 42.361145, 37.44466, and 34.05349. Patients were identified by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 or ICD-10 codes for DS, ASD, or well-child check visits for NT individuals. The first vitamin D 25-OH level recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR) was used in this study as it was felt to be the most reflective of a natural and non-supplemented state. Vitamin D 25-OH levels below 30 ng/mL were considered deficient. RESULTS: In total, 1624 individuals with DS, 5208 with ASD, and 30,775 NT controls were identified. Individuals with DS had the lowest mean level of vitamin D 25-OH at 20.67 ng/mL, compared to those with ASD (23.48 ng/mL) and NT controls (29.20 ng/mL) (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -8.97 to -6.44). A total of 399 (24.6%) individuals with DS were considered vitamin D deficient compared to 1472 (28.3%) with ASD and 12,397 (40.3%) NT controls (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -5.43 to -2.36). Individuals with DS with higher body mass index (BMI) were found to be more likely to have lower levels of vitamin D (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -0.3849 to -0.1509). Additionally, having both DS and a neurologic diagnosis increased the likelihood of having lower vitamin D levels (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -5.02 to -1.28). Individuals with DS and autoimmune disease were much more likely to have lower vitamin D levels (p < 0.001, 95% CI: -6.22 to -1.55). Similarly, a history of autoimmunity in a first-degree relative also increased the likelihood of having lower levels of vitamin D in persons with DS (p = 0.01, 95% CI: -2.45 to -0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with DS were noted to have hypovitaminosis D in comparison to individuals with ASD and NT controls. Associations between vitamin D deficiency and high BMI, personal autoimmunity, and familial autoimmunity were present in individuals with DS.

Thiamine metabolism dysfunction syndrome 5 (THMD5) mimicking acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.

Thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), the substrate of Thiamine pyrophosphate kinase (TPK), is an important cofactor in carbohydrate metabolism, specifically as a cofactor of the Pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDH) complex. The nervous system is particularly dependent on TPP due to its reliance on glucose metabolism. In this case, a four-year-old girl had a previously unreported pathogenic variant of the gene encoding TPK (TPK1) which presented as Thiamine metabolism dysfunction syndrome 5 (THMD5; OMIM 614458). She had been diagnosed with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and initially presented with fever and agitation following vaccinations. After follow-up with genetic testing, our patient was found to have compound heterozygous pathogenic variants of TPK1. After treatment with biotin and thiamine her clinical status improved, and her ASD features resolved. The presentation of our patient was consistent with previous reports and adds to the evidence that thiamine and biotin are effective treatments of TPK1 related metabolic deficiencies. The improvement of neurobehavioral symptoms in this case was marked, highlighting the importance of early identification and therapeutic intervention in this condition.

Alternative Diagnoses in the Work Up of Down Syndrome Regression Disorder.

PURPOSE: Down Syndrome Regression Disorder (DSRD) is a diagnosis of exclusion. Psychiatric and neuroimmunologic etiologies have been proposed although the exact etiology remains unknown. This study sought to review non-DSRD diagnoses at a large quaternary medical center specializing in the diagnosis of DSRD and compare clinical characteristics between those diagnosed with DSRD and those with non-DSRD diagnoses. METHODS: The authors performed a single-center retrospective, chart-based, review of referrals for developmental regression in individuals with Down syndrome. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six individuals were evaluated for DSRD and of these, 54 (20%) ultimately had alternative diagnoses. Individuals with DSRD were more likely to have shorter nadir to clinical symptoms (p = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.36-0.47) and have preceding triggers (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.13-1.43) compared to those with alternative diagnoses. Individuals with non-DSRD diagnoses were more likely to be born premature (p = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.51-0.87) and have a history of epilepsy (p = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.23-0.77) but were also less likely to have a history of cytokine abnormalities on bloodwork (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.19-1.43) and have catatonia (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.54-2.17). The majority of alternative diagnoses (41/54, 76%) were autism spectrum disorder. In these cases, symptoms were more likely to be longstanding (symptoms > 12 months) and earlier onset (median 8 years, IQR: 6-11). Other diagnoses included epilepsy (5/54, 9%), Celiac disease (5/54, 9%), cerebrovascular disease (3/54, 6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies that 20% of individuals referred with concerns for DSRD have alternative diagnoses. The majority of these diagnoses were autism, but rare treatable conditions were also identified, highlighting the importance of a thorough neurodiagnostic assessment.

The Impact of Neuroimmunologic Disease and Developing Nervous System.

Over the last two decades, neuroimmunologic disorders of childhood have been increasingly described, phenotyped, and treated. These disorders remain rare in the general population and while sharing common therapeutic interventions due to their immune pathophysiology, are heterogeneous with regard to presentation and risk of recurrence. As such, the impact of these disorders on the developing brain has come into the forefront of emerging research in pediatric neuroimmunology. Investigations into the singular impact of monophasic disease on long-term development and the impact of early and aggressive disease-modifying therapy in relapsing conditions are quickly becoming areas of ripe investigation as the field's most optimal way to treat and monitor these conditions over time. Although critically important in evaluating the developing brain, research has been heterogeneous among these diseases and limited by small cohort size. This narrative review details the role of common neuroimmunologic disorders in long-term neurological and cognitive outcomes in children as they develop.

Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG) Associated Diseases: Updates in Pediatric Practice.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is a membrane bound protein found on the surface of oligodendrocyte cells and the outermost surface of myelin sheaths. MOG is posited to play a role as a cell surface receptor or cell adhesion molecule, though there is no definitive answer to its exact function at this time. In the last few decades, there has been a recognition of anti-MOG-antibodies (MOG-Abs) in association with a variety of neurologic conditions, though primarily demyelinating and white matter disorders. In addition, MOG associated disease (MOGAD) appears to have a predilection for pediatric populations and in some patients may have a relapsing course. There has been considerable debate as to whether MOG-Abs are truly directly pathogenic or a disease biomarker associated with neuorinflammatory disease. In this manuscript we will review the current literature surrounding MOGAD, review new clinical phenotypes, discuss treatment and prognosis, and provide insight into potential future directions that studies may focus on.