The landscape of receptor-mediated precision cancer combination therapy via a single-cell perspective.

Mining a large cohort of single-cell transcriptomics data, here we employ combinatorial optimization techniques to chart the landscape of optimal combination therapies in cancer. We assume that each individual therapy can target any one of 1269 genes encoding cell surface receptors, which may be targets of CAR-T, conjugated antibodies or coated nanoparticle therapies. We find that in most cancer types, personalized combinations composed of at most four targets are then sufficient for killing at least 80% of tumor cells while sparing at least 90% of nontumor cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, as more stringent and selective killing is required, the number of targets needed rises rapidly. Emerging individual targets include PTPRZ1 for brain and head and neck cancers and EGFR in multiple tumor types. In sum, this study provides a computational estimate of the identity and number of targets needed in combination to target cancers selectively and precisely.

Resolving spatial inconsistencies in chromosome conformation measurements.

BACKGROUND: Chromosome structure is closely related to its function and Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) is a widely used technique for exploring spatial properties of chromosomes. 3C interaction frequencies are usually associated with spatial distances. However, the raw data from 3C experiments is an aggregation of interactions from many cells, and the spatial distances of any given interaction are uncertain. RESULTS: We introduce a new method for filtering 3C interactions that selects subsets of interactions that obey metric constraints of various strictness. We demonstrate that, although the problem is computationally hard, near-optimal results are often attainable in practice using well-designed heuristics and approximation algorithms. Further, we show that, compared with a standard technique, this metric filtering approach leads to (a) subgraphs with higher statistical significance, (b) lower embedding error, (c) lower sensitivity to initial conditions of the embedding algorithm, and (d) structures with better agreement with light microscopy measurements. Our filtering scheme is applicable for a strict frequency-to-distance mapping and a more relaxed mapping from frequency to a range of distances. CONCLUSIONS: Our filtering method for 3C data considers both metric consistency and statistical confidence simultaneously resulting in lower-error embeddings that are biologically more plausible.