RESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine the accuracy of cystography under general anesthesia in children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of children who had VUR on cystography without general anesthesia (i.e., the gold-standard), and who are candidates for endoscopic VUR repair surgery. All children subsequently underwent a cystography under general anesthesia before injection using standardized method, which was compared to the gold-standard cystography. χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare proportions and medians between groups. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2021, 126 renal units in 13 boys and 50 girls were included. Median age was 3.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-6.5). Median time from cystography without to cystography with general anesthesia was 3.8 months (IQR 2.7-6). Of the 126 renal units, 96 had VUR on cystography without general anesthesia. On dichotomous analysis (no VUR vs. any VUR) sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of cystography under general anesthesia were 47% (45/96), 87% (26/30), 34% (26/77) and 92% (45/49), respectively. Accuracy was 56.3%; Cohen's Kappa coefficient was 0.22, indicating poor agreement. In subgroup analysis, the sensitivity of cystography under general anesthesia was significantly lower in primary VUR (20% vs. 55% in secondary VUR, p = 0.01) and active VUR (14% vs. 52% in passive VUR, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Cystography under general anesthesia was poorly correlated to cystography performed while the child was awake or lightly sedated. Clinical decision relying on this cystography is questionable.
Assuntos
Infecções Urinárias , Refluxo Vesicoureteral , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/diagnóstico por imagem , Refluxo Vesicoureteral/cirurgia , Cistografia/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Rim , Anestesia Geral , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Urinárias/complicaçõesRESUMO
As far as we know this is the first report on bulking agent injection into intravesical ectopic ejaculatory orifices reported in the English literature. During a follow-up period of 23 months, the child was free of episodes of epididymo-orchitis. Deflux injection in this rare anomaly of intravesical refluxing ducts had prevented irreversible damage to the testes from recurrent EO. Thus, it may be a better option than vasectomy when antibiotic treatment fails.