Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Leg J ; 89(2): 102-105, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33691511

RESUMO

Recent reports suggest that the use of an outpatient-based procedure (pneumatic retinopexy, PR) for retinal detachment repair should be encouraged within the UK, especially in light of Covid-19 and possible restrictions/competing demands on access to operating theatres. It is therefore essential that patients receive comprehensive information about the risks and benefits of this approach compared with a formal surgical repair either by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and/or scleral buckling (SB). We report a retrospective case series of retinal detachments (RD) satisfying the strict selection criteria for PR but who were managed with formal surgery. Single-operation success rate for PPV/SB at six months follow-up was 93.8% in our study, higher than published primary success rates for PR (60-80%). When counselling patients for possible PR, the ease, speed and potentially reduced co-morbidity of an outpatient-based procedure needs to be balanced against its significantly higher failure rate in comparison with primary PPV/SB.


Assuntos
Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/normas , Retina/cirurgia , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera/normas , Vitrectomia/normas , Idoso , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retina/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recurvamento da Esclera/estatística & dados numéricos , Vitrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA