Eribulin versus S-1 as first or second-line chemotherapy to assess health-related quality of life and overall survival in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (RESQ study): a non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Background: Eribulin prolongs overall survival (OS) of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), particularly in later chemotherapy (ChT) treatment. However, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and efficacy of first or second-line therapy in eribulin-treated patients remain unknown. Using eribulin in the first- or second-line may demonstrate the non-inferiority of HRQoL compared to S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, while maintaining OS. Methods: This randomised, controlled, open-label, phase III trial was conducted at 50 hospitals in Japan. Patients were enrolled from June 2016 and October 2019. Patients with HER2-negative MBC once under or no previous ChT were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive eribulin or S-1. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) every six weeks until week 24 and every nine weeks until week 42. The primary endpoint was the deterioration defined as more than 10 points worsening of the general health score of QLQ-C30 or death within one year after randomisation. The secondary endpoints included OS. (Trial ID: UMIN000021398). Findings: Three hundred and two patients were enrolled, with 152 and 148 assigned to the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The questionnaire compliance rate was 85.6%. Risk difference of global health status deterioration through one year was -0.66% (95% CI: -12.47-11.16; non-inferiority P = 0.077) for eribulin compared to S-1 groups. Median time to first deterioration for global health status score was 5.64 (95% CI: 3.51-8.00) and 5.28 months (95% CI: 3.28-7.80) in the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The median OS was 34.7 and 27.8 months, (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.96; P = 0.026); the median progression-free survival was 7.57 and 6.75 months in the eribulin and S-1 groups, (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.16; P = 0.35), respectively. No new adverse events occurred. Interpretation: The time of the first clinical deterioration was similar between the two groups and OS significantly increased in eribulin-treated patients. Funding: This study was funded by CSPOR-BC and Eisai CO., Ltd.

Prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: subanalysis from Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay from primary breast tissue predicts the prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancers (ABCs) treated with fulvestrant monotherapy (Group A) and the addition of palbociclib combined with fulvestrant (Group B), which included those who had progression in Group A from the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial). METHODS: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis based on original recurrence score (RS) categories (Low: 0-17, Intermediate: 18-30, High: 31-100) by treatment groups (A and B) and types of ABCs (recurrence and de novo stage IV). RESULTS: In total, 102 patients [Low: n = 44 (43.1%), Intermediate: n = 38 (37.5%), High: n = 20 (19.6%)] in Group A, and 45 in Group B, who had progression in Group A were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23.8 months for Group A and 8.9 months for Group B. Multivariate analysis in Group A showed that low-risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.53, P = 0.003] and intermediate-risk (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.78) with de novo stage IV breast cancer were significantly associated with better prognosis compared to high-risk. However, no significant difference was observed among patients with recurrence. No prognostic significance was observed in Group B. CONCLUSION: We found a distinct prognostic value of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay by the types of ABCs and a poor prognostic value of the high RS for patients with de novo stage IV BC treated with fulvestrant monotherapy. Further validations of these findings are required.

Statistical Analysis Methods and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials for Cancer Conducted in Japan: A Systematic Review.

The Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data (SISAQOL) initiative was established in 2016 to assess the quality and standardization of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data analysis in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on advanced breast cancer. The initiative identified deficiencies in PRO data reporting, including nonstandardized methods for handling missing data. This study evaluated the reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Japanese cancer RCTs to provide insights into the state of PRO reporting in Japan. The study reviewed PubMed articles published from 2010 to 2018. Eligible studies included Japanese cancer RCTs with ≥50 adult patients (≥50% were Japanese) with solid tumors receiving anticancer treatments. The evaluation criteria included clarity of the HRQOL hypotheses, multiplicity testing, primary analysis methods, and reporting of clinically meaningful differences. Twenty-seven HRQOL trials were identified. Only 15% provided a clear HRQOL hypothesis, and 63% examined multiple HRQOL domains without adjusting for multiplicity. Model-based methods were the most common statistical methods for the primary HRQOL analysis. Only 22% of the trials explicitly reported clinically meaningful differences in HRQOL. Baseline assessments were reported in most trials, but only 26% reported comparisons between the treatment groups. HRQOL analysis was based on the intention-to-treat population in 19% of the trials, and 74% reported compliance at follow-up; however, 41% did not specify how missing values were handled. Although the rates of reporting clinical hypotheses and clinically meaningful differences were relatively low, the current state of HRQOL evaluation in the Japanese cancer RCT appears comparable to that of previous studies.

Appendiceal Metastasis of Breast Cancer: A Case Report and a Literature Review.

Appendiceal metastases of breast cancer (BC) are very rare, and there are few reports of resection. Asymptomatic appendiceal enlargement is often suspected to be a primary appendiceal tumor, making it difficult to suspect metastatic tumors, especially metastases from BC. On the other hand, advances in drug therapy, including hormonal therapy for BC, have prolonged survival, and there is a possibility of encountering metastatic cases that have rarely been seen before. We herein present a case in which an enlarged appendix, identified during hormonal therapy for advanced BC, was laparoscopically removed and diagnosed as BC metastasis. A 53-year-old woman had been diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) based on a breast biopsy, and the appendiceal specimen was diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). We herein report this unique case and provide a detailed review of 13 previous reports.

Pilot trial of an electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring system in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-reported outcomes monitoring (ePROM) is a useful communication tool for patients and healthcare providers in cancer chemotherapy. In this study, we examined the feasibility of our newly developed ePROM system, which we refer to as "Hibilog". METHODS: An ePROM app was developed by extracting 18 items from the Patient-Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Symptom monitoring was conducted every two weeks for patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The primary outcome was the response rate to the ePROM system. The secondary outcomes were response time, item missing rate, and distribution of responses for each symptom. RESULTS: A total of 71 cases (mean age 52.6 years) were analyzed. Performance status was 0 in 76% of the cases and 1 or higher in 24%. First-line treatment was being administered in 30% of cases, second-line treatment in 17%, and third-line or higher treatment in 53%. The response rate to the ePROM system from registration to week 40 remained high at around 80%, indicating good compliance. The average response time was 5.5 min and the missing rate for each item was below 0.4%. Among 1,093 responses, the top 3 symptoms causing interference with daily life were Fatigue (63%), Numbness and tingling (48%), and General pain (46%). CONCLUSION: Our developed ePROM system was able to capture symptoms accurately in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy while maintaining a high response compliance.

Changes in cell-free DNA after short-term palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment for advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Here, we investigated the potential predictive and elucidating efficacy of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) changes on clinical outcomes and biological effects, respectively, after short-term palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE) trial, blood cfDNA was obtained before palbociclib treatment and on day 15 of cycle one (28-day cycle). Target enrichment was performed using next-generation sequencing; progression-free survival (PFS) was compared based on cfDNA changes between baseline and day 15 of cycle one after combination therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (112 paired blood samples) were examined. The median follow-up time was 8.9 months. PIK3CA (30.4%, 17/56), FOXA1 (30.4%, 17/56), and ESR1 (28.6%, 16/56) were most frequently mutated at baseline. The number of mutated genes was significantly decreased on day 15 compared with that at baseline (paired t test: P value = 0.025). No significant difference was observed in PFS (decrease group, 7.9 m vs the others, 9.3 m; log-rank P value = 0.75; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-2.41). Among patients without previous aromatase inhibitor treatment (n = 15), three (20%) had ESR1 mutations after progression to fulvestrant. CONCLUSION: No significant association was observed between changes in mutated genes after short-term palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment and disease progression; a significant reduction in cfDNA mutation level was observed on day 15 of cycle one. Clinical meanings of cfDNA should be investigated in the future trials.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia Distress Scale.

BACKGROUND: The Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia Distress Scale (CADS) is a patient-reported outcome measure for assessing distress associated with Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA). This study aimed to confirm the psychometric validity of the Japanese version of the CADS (CADS-J). METHODS: A total of 132 patients with breast cancer who developed CIA were asked to complete the CADS-J twice at 2 week intervals to confirm test-retest reliability. The body image domain of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) breast cancer-specific module, the self-esteem scale from the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the emotional domain of the EORTC QLQ Core 30 were used to confirm the convergent validity of the CADS-J. The overall quality of life and physical domains of the EORTC QLQ Core 30 were used to confirm the discriminant validity of the CADS-J. RESULTS: In total, 125 participants provided valid responses. The mean age was 52.2 years. The overall Cronbach's alpha for the CADS-J was 0.903. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the first and second responses were r = 0.874, r = 0.952, r = 0.911, and r = 0.959 for the physical domain, emotional domain, activity domain, and relationship domain, respectively. In terms of convergent validity, the total CADS-J score was moderately correlated with body image (r = - 0.63), self-esteem (r = - 0.48), and the emotional domain (r = - 0.61). Regarding discriminant validity, the total CADS-J score was weakly correlated with the overall quality of life (r = - 0.34) and physical domain (r = - 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The CADS-J is psychometrically reliable and valid for evaluating the distress caused by CIA. It is expected to be used in daily practice and as an endpoint in various studies.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for systemic treatment of breast cancer, 2022 edition.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for systemic treatment of breast cancer were updated to the 2022 edition through a process started in 2018. The updated guidelines consist of 12 background questions (BQs), 33 clinical questions (CQs), and 20 future research questions (FRQs). Multiple outcomes including efficacy and safety were selected in each CQ, and then quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews were conducted to determine the strength of evidence and strength of recommendation, which was finally determined through a voting process among designated committee members. Here, we describe eight selected CQs as important updates from the previous guidelines, including novel practice-changing updates, and recommendations based on evidence that has emerged specifically from Japanese clinical trials.

De-differentiation in cultures of organoids from luminal-type breast cancer is restored by inhibition of NOTCH signaling.

Estrogen receptor (ER) expression in breast cancer can change during progression and the treatment, but the mechanism has not been well studied. In this study, we successfully prepared organoids from samples obtained from 33 luminal-type breast cancer patients and studied their ER expression. The expression status was well maintained in primary organoids, whereas it decreased after passaging in most of the cases. In fact, the studied organoid lines were classified into those that retained a high level of ER expression (9%), those that completely lost it (9%), and those that repressed it to varying degrees (82%). In some cases, the ER expression was suddenly and drastically decreased after passaging. Marker protein immunohistochemistry revealed that after passaging, the differentiation status shifted from a luminal- to a basal-like status. Differentially expressed genes suggested the activation of NOTCH signaling in the passaged organoids, wherein a NOTCH inhibitor was able to substantially rescue the decreased ER expression and alter the differentiation status. Our findings suggest that the differentiation status of luminal-type cancer cells is quite flexible, and that by inhibiting the NOTCH signaling we can preserve the differentiation status of luminal-type breast cancer organoids.

Development and validation of a symptom illustration scale from the patient-reported outcome common terminology criteria for adverse events for patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Emojis are commonly used for daily communication and may be useful in assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a Symptom Illustration Scale (SIS) as a new PRO measurement. METHODS: Eighteen original SIS items were developed from the PRO-CTCAE. In cohort one, the SIS validity and reliability were examined in patients with breast cancer, using a semi-structured five-question survey to investigate content validity. PROs with PRO-CTCAE and SIS were examined twice to determine criteria validity and test-retest reliability. In cohort two, the responsiveness of the scales were examined in patients treated with anthracycline, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and endocrine therapy. PROs with PRO-CTCAE and SIS were investigated two or three times, depending on the therapy. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from August 2019 to October 2020. In cohort one (n = 70), most patients had no difficulties with the SIS, but 16 patients indicated that it was difficult to understand severities in the SIS. For criterion validity, Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rs) between PRO-CTCAE and SIS items were ≥ 0.41, except for "Decreased appetite." For test-retest reliability, κ coefficients of the SIS were ≥ 0.41 for 16/18 items (88.9%). Response time was significantly shorter for the SIS than for PRO-CTCAE (p < 0.001). In cohort two (n = 106), score changes between PRO-CTCAE and SIS for relevant symptoms all had correlations with rs ≥ 0.41. CONCLUSION: An original SIS from the PRO-CTCAE for patients with breast cancer were verified the validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Further studies to improve and validate the SIS are needed.

Dramatic Recovery of Vision after Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Pituitary Metastasis.

In recent years, both the number of patients with breast cancer and those with associated brain metastases (BMs) have increased. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer has a high BM frequency. The prognosis of BM from breast cancer is poor, and establishing effective treatment for this disease is essential. We report a HER2-positive patient with multiple BM and right-eye blindness due to pituitary metastasis. She responded promptly to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in the 5th line of treatment, which shrunk the tumors and restored vision. Although the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) predicted survival of 13 months, the patient recovered well after treatment and continued T-DXd use with no progression, including vision loss at 22 months after treatment initiation. This case demonstrates the successful action of T-DXd in the face of multiple BM and poorly predicted outcomes.

Fulvestrant plus palbociclib in advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer after fulvestrant monotherapy: Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE trial).

PURPOSE: The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy is a standard treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC); however, their toxicities and financial burden are major issues, especially for prolonged treatment. We investigated fulvestrant plus palbociclib in patients with HR-positive MBC resistant to fulvestrant monotherapy. METHODS: Patients who initially received fulvestrant as their first- or second-line endocrine therapy were assigned to group A. Patients with disease progression during fulvestrant monotherapy who subsequently received fulvestrant plus palbociclib were assigned to group B. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS1) in group B. We set the threshold median PFS of 5 months (null hypothesis). RESULTS: Between January 2018 and February 2020 we enrolled 167 patients in group A (January 2018-February 2020) from 55 institutions, of whom 72 subsequently received fulvestrant plus palbociclib and were enrolled in group B. The median follow-up was 23.8 and 8.9 months in groups A and B, respectively. The median PFS in group B (combination therapy) was 9.4 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 6.9-11.2) months (p < 0.001). This was 25.7 (90% CI: 21.2-30.3) months in group A (fulvestrant monotherapy). The TTF in group B was 7.2 (90% CI: 5.5-10.4) months. In the post-hoc analysis, the median PFS1 in group B among patients with longer-duration fulvestrant monotherapy (> 1 year) was longer than that of patients with shorter-duration monotherapy (≤ 1 year) (11.3 vs. 7.6 months). No new toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that palbociclib plus fulvestrant after disease progression despite fulvestrant monotherapy is potentially safe and effective in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced MBC.

Patient-reported outcome and quality of life research policy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) policy.

Assessments of patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials have been increasingly emphasized recently because patient and public involvement in cancer treatment development has been promoted by regulatory authorities and academic societies. To assess patient experiences during and after cancer treatment, there is interest in implementing patient-reported outcome and health-related quality of life assessments into cancer clinical trials. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group quality of life ad hoc committee previously created a version of the Quality of Life Assessment Policy in 2006. Recently, there has been increasing demand from Japan Clinical Oncology Group researchers to assess patient-reported outcome/health-related quality of life in clinical trials. Although guidelines are available regarding planning and reporting clinical trials that include patient-reported outcome/health-related quality of life as an endpoint, there are still issues regarding the lack of consensus on standardized methods for analysing and interpreting the results. Hence, it was considered necessary to reorganize the Japan Clinical Oncology Group patient-reported outcome/quality of life research committee and to revise the former patient-reported outcome/quality of life research policy to promote patient-reported outcome/health-related quality of life research in future Japan Clinical Oncology Group trials. The purpose of this Japan Clinical Oncology Group patient-reported outcome/quality of life research policy is to define patient-reported outcome/health-related quality of life research and provide guidelines for including patient-reported outcome/health-related quality of life as an endpoint in Japan Clinical Oncology Group trials.

Association of Genetic Polymorphism with Taxane-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Sub-analysis of a Randomized Phase II Study to Determine the Optimal Dose of 3-week Cycle Nab-Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an important clinical challenge that threatens patients' quality of life. This sub-study of the ABROAD trial investigated the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on CIPN, using genotype data from a randomized study to determine the optimal dose of a 3-week-cycle regimen of nab-paclitaxel (q3w nab-PTX) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with HER2-negative MBC were randomly assigned to three doses of q3w nab-PTX (SD: 260 mg/m2 vs. MD: 220 mg/m2 vs. LD: 180 mg/m2). Five SNPs (EPHA4-rs17348202, EPHA5-rs7349683, EPHA6-rs301927, LIMK2-rs5749248, and XKR4-rs4737264) were analyzed based on the results of a previous genome-wide association study. Per-allele SNP associations were assessed by a Cox regression to model the cumulative dose of nab-PTX up to the onset of severe or worsening sensory neuropathy. A total of 141 patients were enrolled in the parent study; 91(65%) were included in this sub-study. Worsening of CIPN was significantly greater in the cases with XKR4 AC compared to those with a homozygote AA (HR 1.86, 95%CI: 1.00001-3.46, p=0.049). There was no significant correlation of CIPN with any other SNP. A multivariate analysis showed that the cumulative dose of nab-PTX was most strongly correlated with CIPN (p<0.01).

Efficacy of Telemedicine Using Videoconferencing Systems in Outpatient Care for Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of telemedicine (TM) using videoconferencing systems in outpatient care for patients with cancer. METHODS: We searched six electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov) through June 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of TM using videoconferencing systems compared with usual face-to-face care in outpatient care for patients with cancer. We assessed the certainty of evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: From the 2,400 articles screened, six randomized controlled trials were eligible for this study. Two studies evaluated the use of TM in cancer follow-up and four investigated psychotherapy for cancer. TM using videoconferencing systems may result in no differences in primary outcomes such as patient satisfaction (standardized mean difference, 0.11; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.40) and outpatient attendance complete proportion (risk difference, 0.02%; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.09), and secondary outcomes such as medical professional satisfaction, time devoted to outpatient care, and depression score. The certainty of evidence for these outcomes was low. Although the average money spent on outpatient visit was a primary outcome, the level of evidence was uncertain. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that TM using videoconferencing systems in outpatient care for patients with cancer may be as effective as usual face-to-face care. Use of TM more frequently may be considered for patients with cancer who are expected to obtain benefit from TM using videoconference systems.

Health-related quality of life and estimation of the minimally important difference in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptom score in postmenopausal ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with low sensitivity to endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: The HORSE-BC study previously demonstrated that second-line endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with acquired endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) still provided a clinically meaningful benefit. Herein, we investigated the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the HORSE-BC study. METHODS: Patients with acquired endocrine-resistant MBC who were scheduled for second-line ET were recruited. The HRQOL was assessed at baseline, and 1 and 3 months after second-line ET initiation. To investigate the minimally important difference (MID) in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES), we evaluated the means and standard deviations for the distribution-based method, and differences in the change in HRQOL for the anchor-based method. We also investigated the association between FACT-ES total scores and clinical benefit. RESULTS: Overall, 56 patients were enrolled. Of these, 47 were analyzed. When defined as 1/3 standard deviation estimates based on the distribution method, the calculated MID was 5.9. The MIDs of the FACT-ES total scores based on the anchor method were 7.7 for decline and 4.1 for improvement. The MID decline proportions were 6.1% and 14.7% lower in patients who experienced clinical benefits than in those who did not at 1 and 3 months, respectively. The ratios of MID improvement in patients who experienced clinical benefits were 18.3% and 3.2% higher, respectively; the mean change in the FACT-ES total score from baseline improved in patients who experienced clinical benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining the HRQOL as determined by FACT-ES may be associated with clinical benefits in patients with acquired endocrine-resistant MBC treated with ET.

Prospective Cohort Study of Combination Therapy With Abemaciclib and Hormonal Therapy for Chemotherapy-Treated Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Background: Combination therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and hormonal therapy as the first-line and second-line treatments has already been shown to be effective in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical trials. On the other hand, in clinical practice, CDK4/6 inhibitors are used not only as first-/second-line but also as later-line hormonal therapies, or for patients receiving prior chemotherapy in metastatic setting. However, the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in these patients remain unclear. In this study, we evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combination therapy with abemaciclib and hormonal therapy for chemotherapy-treated patients with HR+ HER2- MBC. Methods: This multi-institutional prospective cohort study will involve a total of 300 chemotherapy-treated patients with HR+ HER2- MBC. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, time to treatment failure, response rate, clinical benefit rate, and adverse events. The preplanned subpopulation analysis is the number of chemotherapy regimens for HR+ HER2- MBC (two or less vs. three or more), prior treatment history with CDK4/6 inhibitors other than abemaciclib (presence vs. absence) and menopausal status (pre vs. post). We also planned to determine PFS of the subpopulation treated with abemaciclib as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy. Discussion: In this multi-institutional prospective cohort study, we evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combination therapy with abemaciclib and hormonal therapy for chemotherapy-treated patients with HR+ HER2- MBC. We also evaluate this combination therapy as maintenance therapy in patients who respond to early-line chemotherapy.

Association of change in health-related quality of life and treatment discontinuation in metastatic breast cancer: a post hoc, exploratory analysis of two randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Identifying factors associated with treatment alteration (treatment discontinuation and dose reduction) may help to attain the treatment goals for metastatic breast cancer. The value of changes in the quality of life (QOL) in predicting treatment alteration remained unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between changes in the QOL and treatment alteration of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: We merged data from two randomized clinical trials in Japan, conducted from 2006 to 2017, that included patients who were diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative and endocrine treatment-resistant breast cancer, with metastatic disease at presentation or recurrence after surgery. The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 was used to assess QOL. The association between change in time-dependent QOL (worsening by 10-point or not) and time to treatment alteration was assessed using the Cox regression models controlling for patient characteristics (age, liver metastasis, hormone status, and treatment regimen) and baseline QOL. RESULTS: Worsening physical functioning, global health status, and dyspnea were significantly associated with treatment discontinuation. Worsening role functioning, global health status, and fatigue were significantly associated with dose reduction. The threshold for defining worsening did not have a significant impact on the relationship. CONCLUSION: Changes in QOL are associated with the probability of treatment alteration among metastatic breast cancer patients. Physical functioning, role functioning, global health status, dyspnea, and fatigue should be prioritized for symptom management in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Effectiveness of eribulin as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative hormone-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer: findings from the multi-institutional, prospective, observational KBCRN A001: E-SPEC study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal positioning of eribulin treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of eribulin administration as first- and second-line chemotherapy in patients with endocrine-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC) in the real-world clinical setting. METHODS: This multi-institutional prospective cohort study enrolled patients with triple-negative AMBC or estrogen receptor-positive AMBC refractory to at least one previous endocrine therapy. The overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line (OS1) and second-line chemotherapy (OS2) was assessed. Data analysis included real-world chemotherapy sequences of first- to third-line chemotherapy regimens. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for treatment regimen comparison was calculated using a stratified proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Among 201 patients enrolled, 180 were included in the final analysis. Eribulin was administered as first- and second-line chemotherapy to 46 (26.6%) and 70 (47.9%) patients, respectively. Median OS1 and OS2 were 2.25 (95% CI 1.07-2.68) and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.28-2.45) years for first- and second-line eribulin, respectively. Oral 5-FU followed by eribulin had a numerically longer OS1 (2.84 years) than the other sequences. Among patients who proceeded to second-line or later chemotherapy, the median OS1 for those treated with anthracycline or taxane as first- or second-line (n = 98) was 2.56 years (95% CI 2.27-2.74), while it was 2.87 years (95% CI 2.20-4.32) for those who avoided anthracycline and taxane as first- and second-line (n = 48) (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI 0.70-2.06). In the exploratory analysis, OS1 was 2.55 (95% CI 2.14-2.75) and 2.91 years (95% CI 2.61-4.32) for those aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years, respectively (adjusted HR of ≥ 65, 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Eribulin or oral 5-FU administration in first- and second-line chemotherapy without anthracycline/taxane was acceptable in the real-world setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT 02,551,263).

Switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab after bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BOOSTER): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Anticancer treatment regimens typically cause unpleasant side-effects. We aimed to investigate the benefit of switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab after fixed cycles of first-line induction chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: BOOSTER was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study done in 53 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were women aged 20-75 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, who had not received chemotherapy for ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. All patients received four to six cycles (in which 4 weeks of treatment constitute one cycle) of weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab induction therapy (weekly paclitaxel 90 mg/m2, administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle, plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each cycle; first registration). Patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease after induction therapy (responders) were then randomly assigned (1:1) using the randomisation enrolment form to either continue weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or switch to maintenance endocrine therapy (an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant with or without ovarian-function suppression) plus bevacizumab. Randomisation was stratified by induction therapy period, response to induction therapy, age, history of endocrine therapy, and study site. Patients could receive weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab reinduction if they had disease progression with maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was time to failure of strategy (TFS). Efficacy and safety analyses were done in all treated patients (full analysis set). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01989780, and registration and follow-up are closed. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2015, we enrolled 160 patients who began weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab induction therapy. 125 (78%) patients (responders) were randomly assigned to endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab (n=62; n=61 in the full analysis set) or weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (n=63; n=63 in the full analysis set). Among 61 patients in the switch maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab group, 32 (52%) were reinitiated on weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. At a median follow-up of 21·3 months (IQR 13·0-28·2), TFS was significantly longer in the endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab group than in the weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab group (median 16·8 months [95% CI 12·9-19·0] vs 8·9 months [5·7-13·8]; hazard ratio 0·51 [0·34-0·75]; p=0·0006). The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events after randomisation were proteinuria (in ten [16%] of 61 patients in the endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab group vs eight [13%] of 63 patients in the weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab group), hypertension (six [10%] vs six [10%]), and peripheral neuropathy (one [2%] vs six [10%]). One treatment-related death was reported in the weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab group (duodenal ulcer perforation). INTERPRETATION: Switch to maintenance endocrine therapy plus bevacizumab with the possibility of weekly paclitaxel reinduction if needed is an efficacious alternative, with a better safety profile, to continuing weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have responded to induction therapy. FUNDING: Chugai Pharmaceutical. TRANSLATION: For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.