Clomiphene citrate improved testosterone and sperm concentration in hypogonadal males.

When considering empirical medical management (EMT) options for men with unexplained infertility (UI), clomiphene citrate (CC) has been shown to positively influence sperm parameters in hypogonadal men. Unfortunately, the optimal cut point for defining hypogonadism for this patient population has not been established. We hypothesized that hypogonadal men with UI having the lowest serum total testosterone (TT) (<265 ng/dL) would have a significant post-CC improvement in both TT and semen characteristics compared to those in the TT > 264 ng/dL group. We performed our study based on an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of 83 males with UI receiving more than 90 days of 50 mg daily CC. Serum TT and semen characteristics were studied in 83 patients before and in 23 patients after CC treatment. Median TT level increased from 256 ng/dL to 630 ng/dL (p < 0.001, n = 83) and SC increased from 6 ( 106 /ml) to 20 ( 106 /ml) (p < 0.016, n = 23). Overall, our results demonstrated the following: (1) CC treatment at all currently used serum TT cut-points resulted in significant improvement in both TT (p < 0.001) and sperm concentration (p = 0.03). No significant change in post-CC sperm motility or morphology was noted. (2) Correlation and linear regression analyses demonstrated that CC treatment significantly increased TT in 96% (22 of 23) of patients, and (3) when grouped as two cohorts (≤264 and >264 ng/dL), sperm concentration and TT improved 2.3 to 2.6-fold (p < 0.001) and 1.45 to 2.5-fold (p < 0.01) respectively. Thus, for hypogonadal men with UI, CC significantly improved TT and sperm concentration regardless of pre-treatment, baseline serum TT level. For this reason, CC treatment should be considered in men with UI having a TT < 400 ng/dL.

Defining hypogonadism in male partners of couples with unexplained infertility.

INTRODUCTION: Men with unexplained infertility (UI) should undergo an initial hormonal evaluation including serum FSH and total testosterone (TT). Unfortunately, there is no consensus regarding which TT cut point should be used to define hypogonadism in such men. To determine the best definition for hypogonadism, three different, literature-based TT cut points were used to assess associations between TT and semen parameters. The hypothesis was that the lowest TT cut point would associate with poorest sperm parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of 247 consecutive males presenting for evaluation of male factor infertility. After exclusions, basic statistics and correlation analysis of semen analysis parameters, TT, age, and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated on 128 men (age 34+/-33.5) categorized by three different TT cut points: 65 males were hypogonadal according to a TT cutoff of < 264; 16 with a cutoff of 264-300; 44 with a cutoff of 301-400; and 42 with a TT over 400 ng/dL. Basic statistics, one-way ANOVA and Levene comparative analysis were performed. Besides a negative correlation between TT and BMI, there was no significant association between the three TT literature-based cut points and the other studied parameters. These findings were further supported by multiple comparison analyses. RESULTS: For men with UI, regardless of how hypogonadism was defined, no relationship between semen parameters and TT was found. CONCLUSION: Conventional, TT-based definitions of male hypogonadism in the setting of UI need to be clarified. Clinically relevant, accurate and reproducible multivariable biomarkers need to be investigated to further advance best practices for treating men with UI.