Comparison of a coupling system and the suture method in end-to-side microvascular anastomosis in head and neck reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Use of coupling devices in microvascular anastomosis continues to increase, but it is not yet actively used in end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis because there is no standard method. Therefore, we propose an easy and time-saving ETS micro-anastomosis method using coupling devices in head and neck reconstruction and compare it with the conventional suture method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 consecutive cases (43 anastomoses) of ETS anastomosis in head and neck reconstruction from 2018 to 2022. Patient characteristics, operative details, and anastomosis time were evaluated. When using the coupling device, a cross incision was created in the recipient vessel to form vascular flaps. By pulling the flaps out of the ring, the intact vessel lining was fixed. Other procedures were the same as for a traditional anastomosis. RESULTS: The mean anastomosis time was 12.81 min (range, 6.7-24.87) for the suture and 4.96 min (range, 2.02-9.4) for the coupling device, a statistically significant difference (p-value <.00005). There was no venous insufficiency or flap failure with either method. CONCLUSIONS: ETS venous anastomosis using the coupling device is an easy-to-use, safe, and timesaving procedure for head and neck reconstruction.

Perineal perforator switch flap for three-dimensional vulvovaginal reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Vulvovaginal reconstruction is challenging. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of vulvovaginal reconstruction with "perineal perforator switch flap" (PPSF) and compared it with other conventional flaps. In addition, the long-term esthetic results were compared with the perineal perforator propeller flap (PPPF), which we previously used. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 16 patients (27 flaps) who underwent vulvovaginal reconstruction with PPSF. After tumor resection, perineal perforators close to the genitofemoral sulcus were identified. The flap was designed as an island with the perforator at the center. The flap was elevated while preserving the soft tissue surrounding the pedicle, and transferred to the defect via the subcutaneous tunnel without pedicle skeletonization. RESULTS: All flaps survived and no major surgical complications were observed. The total follow-up period was 16.13±3.38 months. The mean operation time was 79.38±19.65 min, and the initiation of walking and the length of hospitalization were 1.69 ± 0.79 and 5.69 ± 0.79 days, respectively. Perineal function was well preserved. Comparison of esthetic results with PPPF showed that PPSF showed better results in symmetrical and labial shape (2.29 ± 0.73 vs. 3.13 ± 0.81; p=0.015, 2.43 ± 1.02 vs. 3.25 ± 0.68; p=0.031, respectively), and in total score. (10.29 ± 2.16 vs. 12.31 ± 1.82; p=0.017). CONCLUSION: PPSF was technically simple and significantly reduced the duration of operation and the overall recovery time. PPSF also prevented delay in radiation. Therefore, PPSF is a promising method for vulvovaginal reconstruction.

Analysis of 461 Consecutive Patients' Donor Site Morbidity following Abdominal Tissue-Based Breast Reconstruction without Fascia Reinforcement Graft.

Despite the popularity of breast reconstruction with abdominal flap, the integrity of the abdominal wall gets compromised after the operation. To decrease donor site morbidity, researchers have developed various inlay or onlay graft materials. However, the indications of use are unclear and dependent on the subjective decision of the surgeons. In this study, we have investigated donor site morbidities in breast reconstruction with free abdominal flap surgery in which graft materials were not used. We reviewed 461 consecutive cases for the preoperative characteristics of patients, intraoperative details, and postoperative donor site complications from May 2013 to March 2019. While 386 patients underwent deep inferior epigastric perforators (83.7%), muscle sparing type 2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps were performed in 75 patients (16.3%). Bilateral dissection of the pedicle was performed in 162 patients, compared to unilateral dissection in 299 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 22.7 months. The overall complication rate in the donor site was 7.2%. The flap height was significantly associated with the overall complication. While majority of them were delayed wound healing (n = 28, 6.1%), there were four cases of hematoma (0.9%). There were two cases of bulging (0.4%), which occurred in patients receiving bipedicle dissection; however, there was no case of hernia. Conclusions. Breast reconstruction with an abdominal free flap can be safely performed without fascia reinforcement graft even with bilateral dissection of the pedicle. With complete preservation of fascia and zigzag fascial incision, a low incidence of abdominal bulging can be obtained even with bilateral harvesting of the flap.

Intraosseous Hemangioma of Nasal Bone: Unusual Cause of Epiphora.

Intraosseous hemangioma is very rare, accounting for <1% of bone tumors. Nasal bone origin of it is even rarer. A 63-year-old female patient visited our clinic with a complaint of epiphora. On physical examination, about 2-cm-sized nontender and fixed mass was palpated along the left nasomaxillary suture area. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with intraosseous hemangioma originating from the nasal bone. Epiphora was thought to be developed due to the mass effect and a marginal resection of the mass was performed. The defect was reconstructed with a septal cartilage and porous polyethylene implant (Synpor). Postoperatively, epiphora subsided and there has been no sign of recurrence or facial deformity during 6 months of follow-up.

An Aplasia Cutis Congenita: Suggestion of Management Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: When a child is born with Aplasia cutis congenita (ACC), it is important for the surgeon to decide promptly whether to perform early surgical intervention, or proceed with conservative care. Several patients of ACC have been reported in which various treatments have attempted. However, the criteria of treatment remain controversial. In this study, the authors present an algorithm and the literature review to assist with objective decisions during ACC management. METHODS: A total of 4 cases of infants born with ACC were referred to our department between January 2017 and April 2019. Conservative care was to be considered a first choice of management. RESULTS: The ACC lesions were presented in the scalp vertex area in all 4 infants with the intact dura mater. There was no large vein exposure or sagittal sinus exposure in all infants. All 4 infants were managed with conservative care, which immediately resulted in complete healing of the defects without any complications. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid decision-making is required whether or not the patient requires emergency surgical coverage. Even extensive defects may be healed by conservative care alone, if the dura mater is intact and accompanying large vein or sagittal sinus exposure is not identified.

Reconstruction of radiation-induced ulcers with free flaps using the perforating vessel as a recipient vessel.

BACKGROUND: Free flaps can be options for coverage of radiation ulcers. However, due to radiation damage, it may be hard to find and dissect a reliable recipient vessel for microsurgical anastomosis. When the radiation fields are targeted for deep tissues, superficial tissues may be less affected by radiation. Therefore, damage to perforator vessels near the skin may be lesser than that to the major vessels in deeper structures. We would like to introduce our experiences of using these less injured perforating vessels within or near the wound as recipient vessels for free flap coverage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2013 to 2015, 11 patients underwent free flap coverage for the treatment of radiation-induced ulceration. The location of ulcers were three cases of thigh, two cases of inguinal area, axilla, trochanteric area, chest wall, lower leg, perineal area, and back. Eleven cases were reconstructed using the anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap, and in one case, the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap was used for inguinal area defect. With preoperative computed tomography, we found perforating vessels around the radiation ulcer. The perforating vessels that were identified before the operation were detected by hand-held Doppler during the operation and meticulous dissection was performed. In all-cases, the perforating vessels were accompanied by vena commitantes. A reliable perforator is one with visible pulsation, strong sound detected on Doppler, and sufficient diameter, preferably larger than 0.6 mm. Anastomosis was performed after confirming that the blood vessel was reliable. RESULTS: The flap sizes ranged from 7 × 6 cm to 24 × 10 cm. No flap total necrosis developed. Patients were followed in the outpatient clinic for 21 to 31 months postoperatively. No patients experienced recurrence of ulceration during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In free flap reconstruction of radiation ulcers, using perforating vessels within or outside the ulcer as recipient vessels provided less damaged vessels and healthier flaps for the defects with minimal wound complications. These perforating vessels can be a good option as recipient vessel for free flap coverage of radiation ulcers.

Metachronous malignant tumors in ipsilateral salivary glands.

Salivary gland tumors usually appear in solitary mass in single salivary gland. The coexistence of tumors with different histological types occurring within a unilateral parotid gland is an extremely rare event. We experienced a case which two different types of malignant tumors developed at different time points in same gland; metachronous tumors. The second tumor was excised widely and reconstruction was performed by free tissue transfer. Sensory and motor nerve to the left cheek appeared to be intact, and circulation was adequate. This rare case was presented in this article.