RESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the efficacy and safety of oral vismodegib (Erivedge; Genentech) in the management of locally advanced orbital and periorbital basal cell carcinoma (BCC). METHODS: A literature search was conducted last in September 2023 in the PubMed database for English language original research that evaluated the effect of oral vismodegib on orbital and periorbital BCC. Sixty articles were identified and 16 met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Most studies demonstrated high response rates, with up to 100% of patients responding to the medication in individual studies and initial complete regression occurring in up to 88% of patients. Vismodegib treatment resulted in significant reductions in tumor volume, resulting in globe preservation for most patients. However, in 12% of patients, the response was partial. Recurrences also occurred with substantial frequency, even after an initial complete response. As such, up to 79.4% of patients required surgical intervention, and up to 23% of patients still required exenteration. Use of these agents resulted in reductions in tumor volume that may delay or prevent the need for exenteration in some, but not all, patients. Importantly, molecular analysis of tissue excised after vismodegib therapy revealed persistent tumor in all patients, with frequent accumulation of mutations that may confer resistance to further hedgehog inhibitor therapy. Although most adverse events were rated as level I or II, side effects were common, with up to 100% of patients in studies experiencing at least 1 event. Muscle cramps, alopecia, weight loss, fatigue, and dysgeusia were the most common adverse events, and several patients discontinued therapy because of them. Furthermore, 1 patient died of sepsis that may have resulted from the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although level I and II evidence are lacking, most studies indicate a benefit from the use of oral vismodegib to treat orbital and periorbital BCC tumor volume. However, patients should be cautioned about the adverse side effects of treatment and the persistence of tumor cells with mutations that may cause long-term resistance. Use of vismodegib as short-term neoadjuvant therapy may be effective in shrinking tumor volume to reduce surgical morbidity while reducing the frequency and severity of side effects. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of progressive corneal ectasia. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was most recently conducted in March 2024 with no date restrictions and limited to studies published in English. The search identified 359 citations that were reviewed in abstract form, and 43 of these were reviewed in full text. High-quality randomized clinical trials comparing epithelium-off CXL with conservative treatment in patients who have keratoconus (KCN) and post-refractive surgery ectasia were included. The panel deemed 6 articles to be of sufficient relevance for inclusion, and these were assessed for quality by the panel methodologist; 5 were rated level I, and 1 was rated level II. There were no level III studies. RESULTS: This analysis includes 6 prospective, randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of epithelium-off CXL to treat progressive KCN (5 studies) and post-laser refractive surgery ectasia (1 study), with a mean postoperative follow-up of 2.4 years (range, 1-5 years). All studies showed a decreased progression rate in treated patients compared with controls. Improvement in the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was observed in the treatment groups compared with control groups. A decrease in corneal thickness was observed in both groups but was greater in the CXL group. Complications were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelium-off CXL is effective in reducing the progression of KCN and post-laser refractive surgery ectasia in most treated patients with an acceptable safety profile. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the efficacy and safety of the use of intraoperative image guidance (IIG) in orbital and lacrimal surgery. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was last conducted in November 2023 for English-language original research that assessed the use of any image guidance system in orbital and lacrimal surgery that included at least 5 patients. The search identified 524 articles; 94 were selected for full-text analysis by the panel. A total of 32 studies met inclusion criteria. The panel methodologist assigned a level II rating to 2 studies and a level III rating to 30 studies. No study met the criteria for level I evidence. RESULTS: Procedures reported on were as follows: fracture repair (n = 14), neoplasm and infiltrate biopsy or excision (n = 6), orbital decompression for Graves ophthalmopathy (n = 3), dacryocystorhinostomy (n = 1), and mixed etiology and procedures (n = 8). Four studies used more than one IIG system. One study that met level II evidence criteria compared the outcomes of orbital fracture repair with IIG (n = 29) and without IIG (n = 29). Borderline better outcomes were reported in the IIG group: 2% versus 10% with diplopia (P = 0.039) and 3% versus 10% with enophthalmos (P = 0.065). The other level II study compared the repair of fractures with navigation (n = 20) and without (n = 20). The group in which navigation was used had a measured mean volume reduction of 3.82 cm3 compared with 3.33 cm3 (P = 0.02), and there was a greater measured reduction in enophthalmos in the navigation group of 0.72 mm (P = 0.001). Although the remaining 30 assessed articles failed to meet level II criteria, all alleged a benefit from IIG. No complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A small number of comparative studies suggest that there are improved outcomes when IIG is used in orbital fracture repair, but each study suffers from various limitations. No high-quality comparative studies exist for the management of lacrimal surgery, neoplastic disease, or decompression. Complications attributable to the use of IIG have not been identified, and IIG has not been analyzed for cost savings. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmic Technology Assessment aims to assess the effectiveness of conventional teleretinal screening (TS) in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted most recently in July 2023 to identify data published between 2006 and 2023 on any of the following elements related to TS effectiveness: (1) the accuracy of TS in detecting DR or DME compared with traditional ophthalmic screening with dilated fundus examination or 7-standard field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography, (2) the impact of TS on DR screening compliance rates or other patient behaviors, and (3) cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction of TS compared with traditional DR screening. Identified studies then were rated based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine grading system. RESULTS: Eight level I studies, 14 level II studies, and 2 level III studies were identified in total. Although cross-study comparison is challenging because of differences in reference standards and grading methods, TS demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and good specificity in detecting DR; moderate to good agreement between TS and reference-standard DR grading was observed. Performance of TS was not as robust in detecting DME, although the number of studies evaluating DME specifically was limited. Two level I studies, 5 level II studies, and 1 level III study supported that TS had a positive impact on overall DR screening compliance, even increasing it by more than 2-fold in one study. Studies assessing cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction were not graded formally, but they generally showed that TS was cost-effective and preferred by patients over traditional surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional TS is an effective approach to DR screening not only for its accuracy in detecting referable-level disease, but also for improving screening compliance in a cost-effective manner that may be preferred by patients. Further research is needed to elucidate the ideal approach of TS that may involve integration of artificial intelligence or other imaging technologies in the future. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Academias e Institutos , Retinopatia Diabética , Edema Macular , Oftalmologia , Fotografação , Telemedicina , Humanos , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Fotografação/economia , Fotografação/métodos , Estados Unidos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesAssuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides , Extração de Catarata , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Metanálise como Assunto , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Revisões Sistemáticas como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the evidence on the effectiveness and complications of periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies for noninfectious uveitic macular edema. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted last in December 2021 and a post-assessment search was conducted in March 2023. The searches were limited to articles published in English and no date restrictions were imposed. The combined searches yielded 739 citations; 53 articles were selected for inclusion because the studies (1) evaluated periocular corticosteroid injection, intraocular corticosteroid injection or implant, suprachoroidal corticosteroid injection, or a combination thereof for uveitic macular edema; (2) had outcomes that included visual acuity (VA) or macular edema assessed clinically or imaged by OCT or fluorescein angiography; and (3) included more than 20 patients. RESULTS: This assessment reviewed 23 articles that provided level I or level II evidence from 18 studies on the use of periocular, suprachoroidal, and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injections and intravitreal dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants or inserts in noninfectious uveitic macular edema. These reports consistently demonstrated that all investigated periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies improved VA, macular structure, or both. One comparative study showed that intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection and the dexamethasone intravitreal implant had effectiveness superior to that of periocular triamcinolone acetonide injection for these outcomes. As a group, the studies highlighted the potential for these therapies to elevate intraocular pressure and to accelerate cataract formation. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature provides high-quality evidence that periocular and intraocular corticosteroid therapies are effective and safe for the treatment of noninfectious uveitic macular edema. However, information on the relative effectiveness and complication rates across the different therapies is limited. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Academias e Institutos , Glucocorticoides , Injeções Intravítreas , Edema Macular , Oftalmologia , Uveíte , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Edema Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiologia , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Uveíte/tratamento farmacológico , Uveíte/complicações , Uveíte/diagnóstico , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Estados Unidos , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Triancinolona Acetonida/uso terapêutico , Fluocinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Fluocinolona Acetonida/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Implantes de Medicamento , Angiofluoresceinografia , Tomografia de Coerência ÓpticaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the published literature on the safety and outcomes of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplantation and living-related conjunctival limbal allograft (lr-CLAL) transplantation for bilateral severe/total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). METHODS: Literature searches were last conducted in the PubMed database in February 2023 and were limited to the English language. They yielded 523 citations; 76 were reviewed in full text, and 21 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies were rated level II, and the remaining 19 studies were rated level III. There were no level I studies. RESULTS: After KLAL surgery, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in 42% to 92% of eyes at final follow-up (range, 12-95 months). The BCVA was unchanged in 17% to 39% of eyes and decreased in 8% to 29% of eyes. Two of 14 studies that evaluated the results of KLAL reported a notable decline in visual acuity over time postoperatively. Survival of KLAL was variable, ranging from 21% to 90% at last follow-up (range, 12-95 months) and decreased over time. For patients undergoing lr-CLAL surgery, BCVA improved in 31% to 100% of eyes at final follow-up (range, 16-49 months). Of the 9 studies evaluating lr-CLAL, 4 reported BCVA unchanged in 30% to 39% of patients, and 3 reported a decline in BCVA in 8% to 10% of patients. The survival rate of lr-CLAL ranged from 50% to 100% at final follow-up (range, 16-49 months). The most common complications were postoperative elevation of intraocular pressure, persistent epithelial defects, and acute allograft immune rejections. CONCLUSIONS: Given limited options for patients with bilateral LSCD, both KLAL and lr-CLAL are viable choices that may provide improvement of vision and ocular surface findings. The studies trend toward a lower rejection rate and graft failure with lr-CLAL. However, the level and duration of immunosuppression vary widely between the studies and may impact allograft rejections and long-term graft survival. Complications related to immunosuppression are minimal. Repeat surgery may be needed to maintain a viable ocular surface. Reasonable long-term success can be achieved with both KLAL and lr-CLAL with appropriate systemic immunosuppression. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Assuntos
Academias e Institutos , Doenças da Córnea , Limbo da Córnea , Oftalmologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Limbo da Córnea/citologia , Doenças da Córnea/cirurgia , Doenças da Córnea/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Aloenxertos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/fisiologia , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Células-Tronco do LimboRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the published literature on the diagnostic capabilities of the newest generation of corneal imaging devices for the identification of keratoconus. METHODS: Corneal imaging devices studied included tomographic platforms (Scheimpflug photography, OCT) and functional biomechanical devices (imaging an air impulse on the cornea). A literature search in the PubMed database for English language studies was last conducted in February 2023. The search yielded 469 citations, which were reviewed in abstract form. Of these, 147 were relevant to the assessment objectives and underwent full-text review. Forty-five articles met the criteria for inclusion and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. Twenty-six articles were rated level II, and 19 articles were rated level III. There were no level I evidence studies of corneal imaging for the diagnosis of keratoconus found in the literature. To provide a common cross-study outcome measure, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were extracted. (A perfect diagnostic test that identifies all cases properly has an AUC of 1.0.) RESULTS: For the detection of keratoconus, sensitivities for all devices and parameters (e.g., anterior or posterior corneal curvature, corneal thickness) ranged from 65% to 100%. The majority of studies and parameters had sensitivities greater than 90%. The AUCs ranged from 0.82 to 1.00, with the majority greater than 0.90. Combined indices that integrated multiple parameters had an AUC in the mid-0.90 range. Keratoconus suspect detection performance was lower with AUCs ranging from 0.66 to 0.99, but most devices and parameters had sensitivities less than 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Modern corneal imaging devices provide improved characterization of the cornea and are accurate in detecting keratoconus with high AUCs ranging from 0.82 to 1.00. The detection of keratoconus suspects is less accurate with AUCs ranging from 0.66 to 0.99. Parameters based on single anatomic locations had a wide range of AUCs. Studies with combined indices using more data and parameters consistently reported high AUCs. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Ceratocone , Oftalmologia , Humanos , Córnea/diagnóstico por imagem , Paquimetria Corneana/métodos , Topografia da Córnea/métodos , Ceratocone/diagnóstico por imagem , Curva ROC , TomografiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the current published literature for high-quality studies on the use of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) for the treatment of glaucoma. This is an update of the Ophthalmic Technology Assessment titled, "Laser Trabeculoplasty for Open-Angle Glaucoma," published in November 2011. METHODS: Literature searches in the PubMed database in March 2020, September 2021, August 2022, and March 2023 yielded 110 articles. The abstracts of these articles were examined to include those written since November 2011 and to exclude reviews and non-English articles. The panel reviewed 47 articles in full text, and 30 were found to fit the inclusion criteria. The panel methodologist assigned a level I rating to 19 studies and a level II rating to 11 studies. RESULTS: Data in the level I studies support the long-term effectiveness of SLT as primary treatment or as a supplemental therapy to glaucoma medications for patients with open-angle glaucoma. Several level I studies also found that SLT and argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) are equivalent in terms of safety and long-term efficacy. Level I evidence indicates that perioperative corticosteroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug eye drops do not hinder the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of SLT treatment. The impact of these eye drops on lowering IOP differed in various studies. No level I or II studies exist that determine the ideal power settings for SLT. CONCLUSIONS: Based on level I evidence, SLT is an effective long-term option for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and is equivalent to ALT. It can be used as either a primary intervention, a replacement for medication, or an additional therapy with glaucoma medications. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Glaucoma , Oftalmologia , Trabeculectomia , Humanos , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/cirurgia , Lasers , Soluções Oftálmicas , Malha Trabecular/cirurgia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Importance: The number of syphilis cases continues to increase in the US every year since 2001 with a 74% increase observed since 2017. In addition, there remains a national shortage of injectable penicillin G. Despite the increase in reported cases, to the authors' knowledge, there has been no recent nationwide study investigating the trends in incidence of syphilitic uveitis. Objective: To evaluate the national and regional incidence of syphilitic uveitis-related hospitalizations in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all inpatient admissions with a diagnosis of syphilitic uveitis in the US between the years 2010 and 2019. Analyses were performed to determine baseline sociodemographic characteristics and identify national and regional trends in incidence. All patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of syphilis, uveitis, and/or syphilitic uveitis were eligible for inclusion. Statistical analysis of study data took place in June 2023. Exposure: Diagnosis of syphilis, uveitis, and/or syphilitic uveitis on inpatient admissions during the years 2010 to 2019 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was to determine trends in the national and regional incidence of syphilitic uveitis-related hospitalizations in the US. Secondary outcome measures included sociodemographic characteristics of patients with syphilitic uveitis, incidence stratified by sex and race and ethnicity, and median charge per syphilitic uveitis hospital admission. Results: From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, inpatient data from 444â¯674 patients (median [IQR] age, 53 [37-67] years; 54.8% male) were analyzed. There were an estimated 5581 syphilitic uveitis-related hospitalizations during the 10-year study period. The median (IQR) age of individuals with syphilitic uveitis was 45 (35-55) years, and 4395 patients (78.9%) were male. Syphilitic uveitis disproportionately affected African American individuals (1787 patients [32%], although they compose 13.6% of the population) and those belonging to the lowest median household income quartile (2163 [38.8%]). The national incidence was 0.15 per 100â¯000 population and showed an increasing trend over the years, with the lowest incidence in 2011 (0.08 per 100â¯000 population) and the highest incidence in 2019 (0.23 per 100â¯000 population; P = .04). Regional analysis showed an increase in incidence across all 4 US geographical regions. A total of 1293 patients (23.2%) had comorbid AIDS. Conclusion and Relevance: Although this cross-sectional study only captured inpatient diagnosis, an increasing incidence of syphilitic uveitis-related hospitalizations was observed in the US between 2010 and 2019. Given the concomitant national shortage of injectable penicillin G, results suggest that clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for syphilis when evaluating patients with intraocular inflammation.
Assuntos
Sífilis , Uveíte , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/epidemiologia , Sífilis/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incidência , Estudos Transversais , Uveíte/diagnóstico , Uveíte/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Penicilina GRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the current published literature on the utility of the 10-2 visual field (VF) testing strategy for the evaluation and management of early glaucoma, defined here as mean deviation (MD) better than -6 decibels (dB). METHODS: A search of the peer-reviewed literature was last conducted in June 2023 in the PubMed database. Abstracts of 986 articles were examined to exclude reviews and non-English-language articles. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 26 articles were selected, and the panel methodologist rated them for strength of evidence. Thirteen articles were rated level I, and 8 articles were rated level II. The 5 level III articles were excluded. Data from the 21 included articles were abstracted and reviewed. RESULTS: The central 12 locations on the 24-2 VF test grid lie within the central 10 degrees covered by the 10-2 VF test. In early glaucoma, defects detected within the central 10 degrees generally agree between the 2 tests. Defects within the central 10 degrees of the 24-2 VF test can predict defects on the 10-2 VF test, although the 24-2 may miss defects detected on the 10-2 VF test. In addition, results from the 10-2 VF test show better association with findings from OCT scans of the macular ganglion cell complex. Modifications of the 24-2 test that include extra test locations within the central 10 degrees improve detection of central defects found on 10-2 VF testing. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence to date does not support routine testing using 10-2 VF for patients with early glaucoma. However, early 10-2 VF testing may provide sufficient additional information for some patients, particularly those with a repeatable defect within the central 12 locations of the standard 24-2 VF test or who have inner retinal layer thinning on OCT scans of the macula. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Glaucoma , Oftalmologia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Campos Visuais , Escotoma/diagnóstico , Células Ganglionares da Retina , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Testes de Campo Visual , Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Glaucoma/complicações , Pressão IntraocularRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the recently published literature on the efficacy and safety of the use of aqueous shunts with extraocular reservoir for the management of adult open-angle glaucomas (OAGs). METHODS: A search of peer-reviewed literature was last conducted in April 2023 of the PubMed database and included only articles published since the last aqueous shunt Ophthalmic Technology Assessment, which assessed articles published before 2008. The abstracts of these 419 articles were examined, and 58 studies were selected for full-text analysis. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 28 articles were selected and assigned ratings by the panel methodologist according to the level of evidence. Twenty-five articles were rated level I and 3 articles were rated level II. There were no level III articles. RESULTS: Implantation of aqueous shunts with extraocular reservoir can lower intraocular pressure (IOP) by between one-third and one-half of baseline IOP, depending on whether it is undertaken as the primary or secondary glaucoma surgery. Success rates for aqueous shunts were found to be better than for trabeculectomies in eyes with prior incisional surgery. Conversely, in eyes without prior incisional surgery, implantation of aqueous shunts was found to have an overall lower success rate as the primary glaucoma procedure compared with trabeculectomy. Although both valved and nonvalved aqueous shunts with extraocular reservoir were effective, the nonvalved device generally achieved slightly lower long-term IOPs with fewer glaucoma medications and less need for additional glaucoma surgery. Both devices slow the rates of visual field progression with efficacy comparable with that of trabeculectomy. Early aqueous humor suppression after aqueous shunt implantation is recommended for the management of the postoperative hypertensive phase and long-term IOP control. No strong evidence supports the routine use of mitomycin C with aqueous shunt implantation for OAG. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of aqueous shunts with extraocular reservoir, including valved or nonvalved devices, has been shown to be an effective strategy to lower IOP. Strong level I evidence supports the use of aqueous shunts with extraocular reservoir by clinicians for the management of adult OAG. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Glaucoma , Oftalmologia , Trabeculectomia , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/cirurgia , Pressão Intraocular , Trabeculectomia/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction of various trabecular procedures (a form of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery [MIGS]) combined with cataract surgery compared with cataract surgery alone, to compare the safety of the various trabecular procedures, and to highlight patient characteristics that may favor one trabecular procedure over another. METHODS: A search of English-language peer-reviewed literature in the PubMed database was initially conducted in February 2021 and updated in April 2023. This yielded 279 articles. Twenty studies met initial inclusion and exclusion criteria and were assessed for quality by the panel methodologist. Of these, 10 were rated level I, 3 were rated level II, and 7 were rated level III. Only the 10 level I randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this assessment, and all were subject to potential industry-sponsorship bias. RESULTS: The current analysis focuses on the amount of IOP reduction (in studies that involved medication washout) and on IOP reduction with concurrent medication reduction (in studies that did not involve medication washout). Based on studies that performed a medication washout, adding a trabecular procedure to cataract surgery provided an additional 1.6 to 2.3 mmHg IOP reduction in subjects with hypertensive, mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) at 2 years over cataract surgery alone, which itself provided approximately 5.4 to 7.6 mmHg IOP reduction. In other words, adding a trabecular procedure provided an additional 3.8% to 8.9% IOP reduction over cataract surgery alone, which itself provided 21% to 28% IOP reduction. There was no clear benefit of one trabecular procedure over another. Patient-specific considerations that can guide procedure selection include uveitis predisposition, bleeding risk, metal allergy, and narrowing of Schlemm's canal. There are no level I data on the efficacy of trabecular procedures in subjects with pretreatment IOP of 21 mmHg or less. CONCLUSIONS: Trabecular procedures combined with cataract surgery provide an additional mild IOP reduction over cataract surgery alone in hypertensive OAG subjects. Additional research should standardize outcome definitions, avoid industry sponsorship bias, and study the efficacy of these procedures in normotensive OAG. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto , Glaucoma , Oftalmologia , Humanos , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/complicações , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the published literature evaluating the visual and refractive outcomes and rotational stability of eyes implanted with toric monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the correction of keratometric astigmatism during cataract surgery and to compare those outcomes with outcomes of eyes implanted with nontoric monofocal IOLs and other astigmatism management methods performed during cataract surgery. This assessment was restricted to the toric IOLs available in the United States. METHODS: A literature search of English-language publications in the PubMed database was last conducted in July 2022. The search identified 906 potentially relevant citations, and after review of the abstracts, 63 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one studies ultimately were determined to be relevant to the assessment criteria and were selected for inclusion. The panel methodologist assigned each a level of evidence rating; 12 studies were rated level I and 9 studies were rated level II. RESULTS: Eyes implanted with toric IOLs showed excellent postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), reduction of postoperative refractive astigmatism, and good rotational stability. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was better and postoperative cylinder was lower with toric IOLs, regardless of manufacturer, when compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Correcting pre-existing astigmatism with toric IOLs was more effective and predictable than using corneal relaxing incisions (CRIs), especially in the presence of higher magnitudes of astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Toric monofocal IOLs are effective in neutralizing pre-existing corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery and result in better UCDVA and significant reductions in postoperative refractive astigmatism compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Toric IOLs result in better astigmatic correction than CRIs, particularly at high magnitudes of astigmatism. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Assuntos
Astigmatismo , Catarata , Lentes Intraoculares , Oftalmologia , Facoemulsificação , Humanos , Astigmatismo/cirurgia , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Desenho de Prótese , Refração OcularRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the published literature assessing the clinical utility of genetic testing in individuals with infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS), defined as binocular conjugate nystagmus and onset prior to 6 months of age, with or without associated findings. METHODS: A literature search was last conducted in October 2022. The results were limited to articles published in English. The search yielded 517 abstracts, of which 72 papers were reviewed in full text. Of these papers, 4 met the criteria for inclusion and were graded by a study methodologist. RESULTS: The 4 studies that met inclusion criteria used next-generation sequencing with gene panels ranging from 31 to 336 genes. The overall molecular diagnostic rate ranged from 35% to 60% in the included studies, although the yield was higher when genetic testing was guided by clinical phenotyping (approximately 80%) and in the subsets of patients with a family history (up to 88%). As many as 30% of patients tested had a reclassification of the diagnosis based on the genetic testing results. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing has the potential to provide a definitive diagnosis and identify treatable conditions in patients presenting with INS, especially when considered in conjunction with clinical phenotyping and family history.
Assuntos
Nistagmo Patológico , Humanos , Testes GenéticosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the literature on the adjuvant use of mitomycin C (MMC) during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) in adults with primary nasolacrimal duct obstructions (NLDOs) to determine the efficacy in improving functional and anatomic outcomes with an acceptable level of risk. METHODS: A literature search conducted in November 2020 and updated in November 2022 yielded 137 articles. Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria and were rated for level of evidence by the panel methodologist. Inclusion criteria required controlled studies on the effect of MMC on outcomes of external, endoscopic endonasal, or diode laser-assisted transcanalicular DCR in adults with primary acquired nasolacrimal obstruction with 6 months minimum follow-up and at least 10 participants. RESULTS: Six of the 24 articles were rated level I evidence, 15 level II , and 3 level III. In primary external DCR, MMC significantly improved functional outcomes in 3 of 9 series. In primary endoscopic endonasal DCR, MMC significantly improved functional outcomes in 1 of 9 series. In revision endoscopic endonasal DCR, MMC significantly improved functional success in 1 of 3 series. The use of MMC did not improve outcomes statistically in any diode laser-assisted transcanalicular DCR studies. Concentrations of MMC ranged from 0.05 to 1 mg/ml, with 0.2 mg/ml used most frequently in 12 series, with duration of application ranging from 2 to 30 minutes. Ostium size was significantly larger in MMC groups than in control groups at 6 months after surgery in 4 of 5 reporting studies. However, these larger ostia did not confer higher functional success rates. Reporting of adverse events related to MMC were rare, with delayed cutaneous wound healing reported in 1 of 750 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative use of MMC in external and endoscopic endonasal DCR has been shown to improve functional and anatomic outcomes compared with controls in some series, but there is no agreement on the recommended concentration or application time for MMC in DCR. The data support that MMC use can result in a larger ostium size, decreased granulation tissue formation, and a decreased number of postoperative nasal debridements compared with controls, but this does not translate into improved functional success. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the published literature on the use of levodopa/carbidopa to augment the treatment of amblyopia. METHODS: Literature searches for English language studies were last conducted in October 2022 in the PubMed database with no date restrictions. The combined searches yielded 55 articles, of which 23 were reviewed in full text. Twelve of these were considered appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. Nine studies were rated level I, and 3 studies were rated level II; there were no level III studies. RESULTS: The duration of treatment was limited to 3 to 16 weeks because of concern about long-term adverse effects such as tardive dyskinesia. This complication was not reported in any of the study participants. The dose of levodopa ranged from 1.5 to 8.3 mg/kg/day, generally divided into 3 daily doses. The carbidopa dose was approximately 25% of the levodopa dose in all treatments. Evidence from these studies indicates that augmenting traditional patch occlusion therapy with the oral administration of levodopa/carbidopa can improve the vision of amblyopic children, but the effect was small (0.17-0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units) and only statistically significant when compared with patching alone in 2 of the 12 studies cited. Regression of vision was reported in the majority of studies (9 of 12 reported; range, 0-0.17 logMAR unit regression) after discontinuation of therapy. Short-term side effects of the medications were not consistently reported but were most frequently mild and included headache and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: The best available evidence is currently insufficient to show that augmenting amblyopia therapy using up to 16 weeks of levodopa/carbidopa will result in meaningful improvement in visual acuity. Given the potential for significant side effects such as tardive dyskinesia with long-term therapy, levodopa/carbidopa does not appear to be a viable option for amblyopia therapy FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Assuntos
Ambliopia , Oftalmologia , Discinesia Tardia , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Carbidopa/uso terapêutico , Carbidopa/efeitos adversos , Ambliopia/tratamento farmacológico , Discinesia Tardia/induzido quimicamente , Discinesia Tardia/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Privação SensorialRESUMO
PURPOSE: To review the literature to determine the efficacy and safety of thermal pulsation technologies in improving signs or symptoms of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and dry eye compared with no therapy or with conventional warm compress therapy or eyelid hygiene. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database in June 2022 and again in March 2023 to identify all studies in the English language on the use of thermal pulsation to treat MGD or dry eye. The search yielded 59 citations, and 11 articles met all of the inclusion criteria. The panel methodologist then assigned a level of evidence rating for each study; 8 studies were rated level I evidence and 3 studies were rated level II evidence. RESULTS: All included studies evaluated a single 12-minute session using the LipiFlow automated thermal pulsation system (TearScience, Inc, or Johnson & Johnson). Improvements were detected in subjective and objective metrics of MGD or dry eye in patients within 1 to 12 months of thermal pulsation treatment compared with nontreatment. Most of the studies (9/11) reported greater efficacy with thermal pulsation than with standard warm compress therapy and eyelid hygiene. Four of these studies showed relevant industry conflicts of interest. Two of the 4 level I studies without direct industry participation concluded that thermal pulsation treatment was not significantly different from conventional hygiene or warm compress therapy control treatments (in symptoms in one of the studies and in objective findings in the second study). No serious adverse events were reported in any of the 11 studies. CONCLUSIONS: According to the current literature, a single thermal pulsation session may improve subjective or objective parameters of MGD and dry eye safely. However, industry support and participation were present in 4 of the 8 level I studies. The durability beyond several months and cost efficacy remain uncertain. Because the inclusion parameters of this assessment captured only the LipiFlow system, the conclusions are limited to that product. High-quality independent studies are needed to assess the long-term benefits of this intervention. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.