Establishing Updated Safety Standards for Independent 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Treatment Planning in Radioembolization.

PURPOSE: Significant improvements within radioembolization imaging and dosimetry permit the development of an accurate and personalized pretreatment plan using technetium 99m-labeled macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with anatomical CT (SPECT/CT). Despite these potential advantages, the clinical transition to pretreatment protocols with SPECT/CT is hindered by their unknown safety constraints. This study aimed to address this issue by establishing novel dose limits for 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT to enable quantitative pretreatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Stratification criteria to determine images most viable for dosimetry analysis were created from a cohort of 85 patients. SPECT/CT, cone beam CT, and activity calculations derived from the local deposition method were used to create an accurate pretreatment protocol. Planar and SPECT/CT images were compared using linear regression and modified Bland-Altman analyses to convert accepted planar dose limits to SPECT/CT. To validate these new dose limits, activity calculations based on SPECT/CT were compared with those calculated with the body surface area and planar methods for three treatment plans. RESULTS: A total of 38 of 85 patients were deemed viable for dosimetry analysis. SPECT yielded greater lung shunt fractions (LSFs) than planar imaging when LSFs were <4.89%, whereas SPECT yielded lower LSFs than planar imaging when LSFs were >4.89%. Planar to SPECT/CT dose conversions were 0.76×, 0.70×, and 0.55× for the whole liver, normal liver, and lungs, respectively. Patients with SPECT LSFs ≤4.89% were safely treated with the direct application of planar lung dose limits. Activity calculations with the newly established SPECT/CT dose limits were greater than those of the body surface area method by a median range of 33.1% to 61.9% and were lower than planar-based activity calculations by a median range of 12.5% to 13.7% for the whole liver and by 29.4% to 32.2% for the normal liver. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a safe method for translating dose limits from 99mTc-MAA planar imaging to SPECT/CT. A robust pretreatment protocol was further developed guided by the current knowledge in the field. Established SPECT/CT dose limits safely treated 97.5% of patients and permitted the application of independent pretreatment planning with 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT.

Characterizing the voxel-based approaches in radioembolization dosimetry with reDoseMC.

BACKGROUND: Yttrium-90 ( 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ ) represents the primary radioisotope used in radioembolization procedures, while holmium-166 ( 166 Ho $^{166}{\rm {Ho}}$ ) is hypothesized to serve as a viable substitute for 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ due to its comparable therapeutic potential and improved quantitative imaging. Voxel-based dosimetry for these radioisotopes relies on activity images obtained through PET or SPECT and dosimetry methods, including the voxel S-value (VSV) and the local deposition method (LDM). However, the evaluation of the accuracy of absorbed dose calculations has been limited by the use of non-ideal reference standards and investigations restricted to the liver. The objective of this study was to expand upon these dosimetry characterizations by investigating the impact of image resolutions, voxel sizes, target volumes, and tissue materials on the accuracy of 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ and 166 Ho $^{166}{\rm {Ho}}$ dosimetry techniques. METHODS: A specialized radiopharmaceutical dosimetry software called reDoseMC was developed using the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit and validated by benchmarking the generated 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ kernels with published data. The decay spectra of both 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ and 166 Ho $^{166}{\rm {Ho}}$ were also compared. Multiple VSV kernels were generated for the liver, lungs, soft tissue, and bone for isotropic voxel sizes of 1 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm. Three theoretical phantom setups were created with 20 or 40 mm activity and mass density inserts for the same three voxel sizes. To replicate the limited spatial resolutions present in PET and SPECT images, image resolutions were modeled using a 3D Gaussian kernel with a Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) ranging from 0 to 16 mm and with no added noise. The VSV and LDM dosimetry methods were evaluated by characterizing their respective kernels and analyzing their absorbed dose estimates calculated on theoretical phantoms. The ground truth for these estimations was calculated using reDoseMC. RESULTS: The decay spectra obtained through reDoseMC showed less than a 1% difference when compared to previously published experimental data for energies below 1.9 MeV in the case of 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ and less than 1% for energies below 1.5 MeV for 166 Ho $^{166}{\rm {Ho}}$ . Additionally, the validation kernels for 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ VSV exhibited results similar to those found in published Monte Carlo codes, with source dose depositions having less than a 3% error margin. Resolution thresholds ( FWHM thresh s ${\rm {FWHM}}_\mathrm{thresh}{\rm {s}}$ ), defined as resolutions that resulted in similar dose estimates between the LDM and VSV methods, were observed for 90 Y $^{90}{\rm {Y}}$ . They were 1.5 mm for bone, 2.5 mm for soft tissue and liver, and 8.5 mm for lungs. For 166 Ho $^{166}{\rm {Ho}}$ , the accuracy of absorbed dose deposition was found to be dependent on the contributions of absorbed dose from photons. Volume errors due to variations in voxel size impacted the final dose estimates. Larger target volumes yielded more accurate mean doses than smaller volumes. For both radioisotopes, the radial dose profiles for the VSV and LDM approximated but never matched the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: reDoseMC was developed and validated for radiopharmaceutical dosimetry. The accuracy of voxel-based dosimetry was found to vary widely with changes in image resolutions, voxel sizes, chosen target volumes, and tissue material; hence, the standardization of dosimetry protocols was found to be of great importance for comparable dosimetry analysis.

Corrigendum: A single-institution experience with 177Lu RPT workflow improvements and qualifying the SPECT/CT imaging for dosimetry.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1331266.].

A single-institution experience with 177Lu RPT workflow improvements and qualifying the SPECT/CT imaging for dosimetry.

Background and purpose: Implementing any radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) program requires a comprehensive review of system readiness, appropriate workflows, and training to ensure safe and efficient treatment delivery. A quantitative assessment of the dose delivered to targets and organs at risk (OAR) using RPT is possible by correlating the absorbed doses with the delivered radioactivity. Integrating dosimetry into an established RPT program demands a thorough analysis of the necessary components and system fine-tuning. This study aims to report an optimized workflow for molecular radiation therapy using 177Lu with a primary focus on integrating patient-specific dosimetry into an established radiopharmaceutical program in a radiation oncology setting. Materials and methods: We comprehensively reviewed using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, including efficacy and accuracy of delivery and all aspects of radiation safety of the RPT program. The GE Discovery SPECT/CT 670DR™ system was calibrated per MIM protocol for dose calculation on MIM SurePlan™ MRT software. Jaszcak Phantom with 15-20 mCi of 177Lu DOTATATE with 2.5 µM EDTA solution was used, with the main energy window defined as 208 keV ±10% (187.6 to 229.2 keV); the upper scatter energy window was set to 240 keV ±5% (228 to 252 keV), while the lower scatter energy window was 177.8 keV ±5% (168.9 to 186.7 keV). Volumetric quality control tests and adjustments were performed to ensure the correct alignment of the table, NM, and CT gantry on SPECT/CT. A comprehensive end-to-end (E2E) test was performed to ensure workflow, functionality, and quantitative dose accuracy. Results: Workflow improvements and checklists are presented after systematically analyzing over 400 administrations of 177Lu-based RPT. Injected activity to each sphere in the NEMA Phantom scan was quantified, and the MIM Sureplan MRT reconstruction images calculated activities within ±12% of the injected activity. Image alignment tests on the SPECT/CT showed a discrepancy of more than the maximum tolerance of 2.2 mm on any individual axis. As a result of servicing the machine and updating the VQC and COR corrections, the hybrid imaging system was adjusted to achieve an accuracy of <1 mm in all directions. Conclusion: Workflows and checklists, after analysis of system readiness and adequate training for staff and patients, are presented. Hardware and software components for patient-specific dosimetry are presented with a focus on hybrid image registration and correcting any errors that affect dosimetric quantification calculation. Moreover, this manuscript briefly overviews the necessary quality assurance requirements for converting diagnostic images into dosimetry measurement tools and integrating dosimetry for RPT based on 177Lu.