RESUMO
Introduction: Perioperative visual loss (POVL) owing to hemi-retinal vein occlusion (HRVO) following prone positioning during spinal surgery is rare. Here, we report a case of HRVO with macular edema (ME) after spinal surgery that was successfully treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections and retinal photocoagulation (RP). Case Presentation: A 63-year-old Japanese man underwent spinal surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Surgery was performed with the patient in the prone position under general anesthesia; the operation time was 305 min. No complications were associated with intraoperative anesthesia. On postoperative day 4, the patient noticed decreased visual acuity in his left eye and visited the Department of Ophthalmology on postoperative day 9. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the left eye was 0.1. Fundus and optical coherence tomography revealed HRVO and ME in the left eye. IVA injections and RP were performed in the eye, which substantially decreased the ME and improved the patient's BCVA to 0.8. Conclusions: HRVO can cause POVL after prone positioning during spinal surgery. This is the first case of HRVO with ME after spinal surgery, which was successfully treated with IVA injections and RP.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Progressive esotropia accompanied by restricted abduction and supraduction due to high myopia is known as esotropia fixus with high myopia or heavy eye syndrome (HES). Some conditions, such as sagging eye syndrome (SES), show esotropia for distance or cyclovertical strabismus with no abduction limitations despite highly myopic eyes. We evaluated the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and clinical features of HES, high myopia with SES-like symptoms (highly myopic SES), and SES. METHODS: We reviewed all patients diagnosed with HES, highly myopic SES, and SES who underwent MRI of the orbits and brain over 6 years. To quantitatively assess the orbital anatomy, we compared the conditions of the superior rectus muscle (SR), lateral rectus muscle (LR), and inferior rectus muscle (IR) using orbital MRI among the three groups. RESULTS: Among the 14 patients (27 eyes) with high myopia, 5 (9 eyes) had HES, and 9 (18 eyes) had highly myopic SES. Eleven patients (22 eyes) with SES were also compared with these 14 patients. The mean axial length was 29.6 ± 1.0 mm in participants with HES, 29.0 ± 1.5 mm in those with HES-SES, and 23.7 ± 0.9 mm in those with SES. The average distance esotropia was 48.0 ± 19.9Δprism, 4.6 ± 1.5Δprism, and 6.1 ± 4.6Δprism for participants with HES, highly myopic SES and SES, respectively. The average distance hypertropia was 5.3 ± 5.9Δprism in participants with highly myopic SES and 4.8 ± 2.7Δprism in those with SES. The mean vertical angle of the LR was 32.6 ± 10.8°, 18.1 ± 5.4°, and 14.6 ± 6.8°; the mean tilting angle of the LR was 31.6 ± 9.2°, 15.9 ± 6.0°, and 13.8 ± 5.9°; and the mean displacement angle between the LR and SR was 152.3 ± 16.7°, 125.0 ± 7.1°, and 112.5 ± 7.5° for participants with HES, highly myopic SES and SES, respectively. The LR-SR displacement angle in HES-SES was significantly larger than in SES (p < .001) but the vertical and tilting angles were not. Also, the IR shift showed no significant difference with HES-SES and HES (5.8 ± 1.4 mm and 5.3 ± 1.2 mm) but not with SES (4.0 ± 0.8 mm) (p < .0001). DISCUSSION: SES-like symptoms can develop in highly myopic eyes; however, MRI showed that the state of the LR muscle in highly myopic SES deviated almost similarly to that in SES; however, the eyeball was more dislocated than in SES. This may be useful in deciding the appropriate operative procedure.