Both host prion protein 131-188 subregion and prion strain characteristics regulate glycoform of PrP Sc.

Prion proteins (PrPs) contain 2 N-linked glycosylation sites and are present in cells in 3 different forms. An abnormal isoform of prion protein (PrP(Sc)) has different glycoform patterns for different prion strains. However, the molecular basis of the strain-specific glycoform variability in prions has remained elusive. To understand the molecular basis of these glycoform differences, we analyzed PrP(Sc) in 2 lines of transgenic mice (MHM2 and MH2M with PrP null background) that expressed a chimeric PrP. Our result indicated that PrP 131-188 (substitutions at I139M, Y155N, and S170N) contributed to both PrP(C) and PrP(Sc) glycoform ratios. Furthermore, the PrP(Sc) glycoform pattern within these transgenic mice showed a subtle difference depending on the inoculated prion. This study indicated that the PrP(Sc) glycoform ratio was influenced by both host PrP(C) and the prion strain.

In vivo conversion of cellular prion protein to pathogenic isoforms, as monitored by conformation-specific antibodies.

The central event in prion disease is thought to be conformational conversion of the cellular isoform of prion protein (PrP(C)) to the insoluble isoform PrP(Sc). We generated polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies by immunizing PrP(C)-null mice with native PrP(C). All seven monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) immunoprecipitated PrP(C), but they immunoprecipitated PrP(Sc) weakly or not at all, thereby indicating preferential reactivities to PrP(C) in solution. Immunoprecipitation using these mAbs revealed a marked loss of PrP(C) in brains at the terminal stage of illness. Histoblot analyses using these polyclonal antibodies in combination of pretreatment of blots dissociated PrP(C) and PrP(Sc) in situ and consistently demonstrated the decrease of PrP(C) at regions where PrP(Sc) accumulated. Interestingly, same mAbs showed immunohistochemical reactivities to abnormal isoforms. One group of mAbs showed reactivity to materials that accumulated in astrocytes, while the other group did so to amorphous plaques in neuropil. Epitope mapping indicated that single mAbs have reactivities to multiple epitopes, thus implying dual specificities. This suggests the importance of octarepeats as a part of PrP(C)-specific conformation. Our observations support the notion that loss of function of PrP(C) may partly underlie the pathogenesis of prion diseases. The conversion of PrP(C) to PrP(Sc) may involve multiple steps at different sites.