Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 264: 44-52, 2024 Mar 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518990

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the refractive accuracy of legacy and new no-history formulas in eyes with previous myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Setting: Two academic centers Study Population: 576 eyes (400 patients) with previous M-LVC that underwent cataract surgery between 2019-2023. A SS-OCT biometer was used to obtain biometric measurements, including standard (K), posterior (PK), and total keratometry values (TK). OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Refractive prediction errors were calculated for 11 no-history formulas: two legacy M-LVC formulas, four new M-LVC formulas using K values only, and five new M-LVC formulas using K with PK or TK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Heteroscedastic testing was used to evaluate relative formula performance, and formulas were ranked by root mean square error (RMSE). RESULTS: New M-LVC formulas performed better than legacy M-LVC formulas. New M-LVC formulas with PK/TK values performed better than versions without PK/TK values. Among new M-LVC formulas with PK/TK values, EVO 2.0-PK was superior to Hoffer QST-PK (P < 0.005). Among new M-LVC formulas using K only, Pearl DGS-K and EVO 2.0-K were both superior to Hoffer QST-K and Barrett True K NH-K formulas (all P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should favor using new no-history post M-LVC formulas over legacy post M-LVC formulas whenever possible. The top-performing M-LVC formulas (EVO 2.0-PK, Pearl DGS-PK, and Barrett True K-TK) utilized posterior corneal power values. Among formulas utilizing K alone, the EVO 2.0-K and Pearl DGS-K performed best.

2.
R I Med J (2013) ; 105(10): 49-51, 2022 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36413452

RESUMO

We present a case of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) with a rare complication of orbital apex syndrome (OAS) manifesting as optic perineuritis with multiple cranial nerve palsies. A 65-year-old with COPD presented to the hospital with a vesicular rash involving his left eyelid. He was admitted for HZO and a concurrent COPD exacerbation. The HZO was treated with antivirals and the COPD exacerbation was treated with corticosteroids. On hospital day three, he developed left-sided ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and a mid-dilated fixed pupil. MRI of the brain demonstrated enhancement of the left optic nerve sheath, rectus muscles, and periorbital soft tissues. He was diagnosed with OAS and treated with an increased dose of corticosteroids. After two months, his orbital symptoms resolved. This case is unique because the patient developed HZO in the setting of corticosteroid treatment for a COPD exacerbation, and his HZO progressed to OAS despite proper initiation of antiviral therapy.


Assuntos
Herpes Zoster Oftálmico , Oftalmoplegia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/complicações , Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/diagnóstico , Oftalmoplegia/tratamento farmacológico , Oftalmoplegia/etiologia , Oftalmoplegia/diagnóstico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Síndrome , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações
3.
J AAPOS ; 25(5): 314-316, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34425235

RESUMO

We report a case of confirmed Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf optic atrophy syndrome presenting with suspected optic nerve hypoplasia, corpus callosum agenesis, and low levels of insulin-like growth factor 1. This patient's presentation demonstrates the clinical overlap of Bosch-Boonstra-Schaaf Optic atrophy syndrome with septo-optic dysplasia and the importance of genetic testing for correct diagnosis.


Assuntos
Deficiência Intelectual , Atrofias Ópticas Hereditárias , Atrofia Óptica , Displasia Septo-Óptica , Fator I de Transcrição COUP , Criança , Humanos , Atrofias Ópticas Hereditárias/genética , Atrofia Óptica/diagnóstico , Atrofia Óptica/genética , Displasia Septo-Óptica/diagnóstico , Displasia Septo-Óptica/genética
4.
Global Spine J ; 8(7): 728-732, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30443484

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis using publicly available data. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: to assess patient-rated trustworthiness of spine surgeons as a whole and to assess if academic proclivity, region of practice, or physician sex affects ratings of patient perceived trust. METHODS: Orthopedic spine surgeons were randomly selected from the North American Spine Society directory. Surgeon profiles on 3 online physician rating websites, HealthGrades, Vitals, and RateMDs were analyzed for patient-reported trustworthiness. Whether or not the surgeon had published a PubMed-indexed paper in 2016 was assessed with regard to trustworthiness scores. Total number of publications was also assessed. Individuals with >300 publications were excluded due to the likelihood of repeat names. RESULTS: Recent publication and total number of publications has no relationship with online patient ratings of trustworthiness across all surgeons in this study. Region of practice likewise has no influence on mean trust ratings, yet varied levels of correlation are observed. Furthermore, there was no difference in trust scores between male and female surgeons. CONCLUSION: Total academic proclivity via indexed publications does not correlate with patient perceived physician trustworthiness among spine surgeons as reported on physician review websites. Furthermore, region of practice within the United States does not have an influence on these trust scores. Likewise, there is no difference in trust score between female and male spine surgeons. This study also highlights an increasing utility for physician rating websites in spine surgery for evaluating and monitoring patient perception.

5.
Orthopedics ; 41(1): e33-e37, 2018 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29136254

RESUMO

Orthopedic surgeons have become increasingly subspecialized, and recent studies have shown that American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Step II applicants are performing a higher percentage of their cases within their chosen subspecialties. However, these studies focused exclusively on surgeons who have completed a single fellowship; little data exist on those who pursue a second fellowship. All applicants to the ABOS Part II examination from 2004 to 2016 were classified by their self-reported fellowship training history using the ABOS Part II examination database. Trends in the number of applicants completing multiple fellowships and the types of fellowships combined were analyzed. In addition, cases performed by applicants who had performed multiple fellowships were analyzed to determine what percentage were within their chosen subspecialties. A total of 9776 applicants to ABOS Part II were included in the database from 2004 to 2016, including 444 (4.5%) applicants who completed more than one fellowship. There were 43 different combinations of fellowships; the most common additional fellowships were trauma (40.1%), sports medicine (38.7%), and joints (30.4%). The most common combinations were joints and sports medicine (10.6%) and foot and ankle and sports medicine (10.1%). A significant increase occurred in physicians training in both pediatric orthopedics and sports medicine (P=.02). The percentage of cases within the applicants' chosen specialties ranged from 91.4% in sports to 73.6% in tumor. Multiple fellowship applicants represent a small percentage of all applicants, and although subspecialization in orthopedics is increasing, no increasing trend toward multiple fellowships within this dataset was observed. However, the significant increase in applicants who combined pediatric orthopedic and sports medicine fellowships suggests an increasing interest in treating this increasing patient population in addition to social and economic factors. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(1):e33-e37.].


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo/tendências , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/educação , Ortopedia/educação , Especialização/tendências , Certificação , Bases de Dados Factuais , Bolsas de Estudo/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/tendências , Ortopedia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ortopedia/tendências , Especialização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA