Course of neuropsychological impairment during natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), an opportunistic infection of the central nervous system from the John Cunningham virus (JCV), is a side effect of natalizumab (NTZ) treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), potentially leading to a substantial increase of physical and mental disability. Nevertheless, data of neuropsychological impairment during the NTZ-PML disease course are missing. Our objective was to evaluate the neuropsychological disease course of NTZ-PML patients and to compare neuropsychological deficits of NTZ-PML patients with two different non-PML multiple sclerosis (MS) cohorts. METHODS: Neuropsychological examinations of 28 NTZ-PML patients performed during different phases of the disease ([i] at PML diagnosis, [ii] during immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome [IRIS], and [iii] post-IRIS/PML) were retrospectively analyzed and compared to those of NTZ-treated RRMS or secondary progressive MS patients with and without immunotherapy. RESULTS: Compared to controls, NTZ-PML patients performed worse in neuropsychological examinations during all stages of disease, mainly affecting visuospatial ability and working memory. Furthermore, failure to eliminate the JCV from the central nervous system was associated with a progredient decline of cognition, especially working memory. CONCLUSIONS: Working memory and visuospatial abilities are the core neuropsychological deficits of NTZ-PML patients in long-term follow-up. Our findings should be implemented in neurorehabilitation strategies.

Effects of IVIg treatment on autoantibody testing in neurological patients: marked reduction in sensitivity but reliable specificity.

BACKGROUND: Therapy of autoimmune diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system with intravenous IgG immunoglobulin (IVIg) is well established. Since IVIg is produced from pooled human plasma, autoantibodies can be found in IVIg products and, accordingly, in patient sera after transfusion. The de novo evidence or disappearance of anti-neural autoantibodies after IVIg treatment has so far not been systematically examined. METHODS: We screened 50 neurological patients before and after IVIg treatment for classical onconeural and the most common neurological surface autoantibodies as well as for ganglioside autoantibodies and 23 different antinuclear autoantibodies using immunoblot or cell-based indirect immunofluorescence assays. Furthermore, we screened 31 neurological patients with previously known seropositivity for disappearance of the corresponding antibody after treatment. RESULTS: After IVIg treatment, 90% of all sera were de novo positive for antinuclear antibodies, especially for Ro-52. In contrast, 94% of all sera did not show any de novo-positive anti-neural antibodies. In the remaining three cases, titers were very low. Importantly, 12.9% of all tested sera of patients with known antibody positivity turned false negative after IVIg treatment and titers were falsely low in 37% of the remaining sera. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present for the first time results of a broad screening for clinically relevant autoantibodies before and after IVIg treatment in neurological patients. We identified a high specificity but reduced sensitivity for anti-neural antibody testing after IVIg transfusion. In contrast, antinuclear antibody testing is not reliable after IVIg treatment. These results are of high practical importance for diagnostic of neuroimmunological diseases.