Colonic interposition in esophagectomy: an ACS-NSQIP study.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with cancer or injury of the esophagus, esophagectomy with reconstruction using the stomach (gastric pull-up, GPU) or colon (colonic interposition, CI) can restore function but is associated with high morbidity. We sought to describe the differences in outcomes between the two replacement organs using a national database. METHODS: From ACS-NSQIP, patients who underwent GPU or CI between 2006 and 2020 were identified. Univariate analyses were performed on length of stay, complications, reoperation, readmission, and mortality. Variables with P ≤ 0.2 were included in the multivariate regression. Primary outcomes were 30-day reoperation, readmission, and mortality. Data were assessed using Chi-squared tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 12,545 GPU and 502 CI patients. GPU patients were older with higher BMI, and more likely to be male (80.3% versus 70.3%, P < 0.0001) and white (77.8% versus 69.1%, P < 0.0001). More GPU patients had independent functional status and underlying bleeding disorders, but fewer other preoperative comorbidities than CI patients. On univariate analysis, CI patients had longer hospital stays (13 versus 10 days, P < 0.0001); more reoperations (23.9% versus 14.5%, P < 0.0001); a lower rate of discharge to home (70.9% versus 82.1%, P < 0.0001); and a higher mortality rate (6.2% versus 2.9%, P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, CI was associated with increased risk of reoperation but not with readmission or mortality. Reoperation was associated with CI, smoking, chronic wound, hypertension, higher ASA class, contaminated or dirty wound class, and longer operative time. Readmission was associated with female gender, hypertension, and longer operative time. Mortality was associated with age, metastatic cancer, preoperative sepsis, preoperative renal failure, malignant esophageal disease, higher ASA class, incomplete closure, and longer operative time. CONCLUSION: Colonic interposition, although a more difficult option with traditionally worse outcomes, should still be considered for patients requiring esophagectomy if the stomach cannot be used to restore continuity, as differences in outcomes appear to be due to underlying frailty of patients rather than the procedure.

Overview of Common Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery.

The complication rate after surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is high owing to chronic inflammatory and suboptimal physiologic state, the effect of steroids and immunosuppressive medication, and the inherent complexity of the surgical procedures. Although some of the complications after surgery are similar for Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, others are specific to the diagnosis. Complications are divided into early postoperative and late complications. Specific complications are related to more extensive surgery such as a proctocolectomy or reoperative procedures or with complex reconstructive procedures such as the ileoanal pouch and continent ileostomy.

Construction of and Conversion to Continent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Continent ileostomy was first introduced by Nils Kock in 1969 as Kock pouch (K-pouch). Its most characteristic feature, the nipple valve that offers continence' was a later addition. Even though today's continent ileostomy is sidelined by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the gold standard of restorative procedures for colectomy patients, it remains an excellent option for select patients, offering an alternative to end-ileostomy or a poorly functioning ileoanal pouch. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to summarize principles and techniques behind K-pouch construction, both de novo and as "J to K" conversion, as well as examine surgical outcomes following the procedure in the modern era regardless of indication. DATA SOURCES: Data sources included PubMed and the Cochrane Library up to July 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The study selection materials included articles reviewing continent ileostomy procedures and outcomes between 2000-2021. Case reports and series <15 were excluded. RESULTS: Fifteen articles were selected for review, describing 958 patients with a K-pouch, 510 patients who had undergone a Barnett continent intestinal reservoir, and 40 who had undergone construction of a T-pouch. CONCLUSION: Continent ileostomies carried out in specialized centers by experienced surgeons can be a great option for patients who would otherwise be confined by an end ileostomy. High pouch survival rates with higher quality-of-life scores than end ileostomy and comparable with IPAA make continent ileostomy a great option, even if we consider the less than ideal reoperation and complication rates. However, it is of paramount importance that patients are carefully selected, thoroughly educated, highly motivated, and engaged in their care. Specifically, for patients with Crohn's disease, further research is needed to help elucidate factors that affect pouch survival and candidacy for K-pouch creation. Finally, continuous surgical technique modifications and refinements can allow even more patients to be considered suitable for the procedure.

Geospatial distribution of severe paediatric intussusception in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.

INTRODUCTION: intussusception in South African (SA) children is often severe. A proportion of cases require management at quaternary hospitals which are a scare resource in SA. A geospatial investigation of severe paediatric intussusception (SPI) in the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) province of SA would assist with identifying regions which should be targeted for preventative interventions. This could reduce resource utilisation for this condition at quaternary hospitals. The objective of this study was to determine the geospatial distribution of SPI in KZN. METHODS: this was a retrospective analysis of data for patients with SPI who were admitted to a quaternary hospital in KZN over an 11-year period. Data related to patient demographics, duration of hospitalization, surgical intervention, inpatient mortality and residential postal code were extracted from the electronic hospital admissions system. Each residential postal code was linked to a corresponding KZN district municipality. Descriptive statistical methods were used to determine the distribution of various characteristics in the study sample. Semi-quantitative geospatial analysis was used to determine the distribution of patients with SPI in each KZN district municipality. RESULTS: the study sample consisted of 182 patients with SPI. Most patients were <1 year old (83.5%), male (51.1%) and black African (87.9%). All patients underwent surgical intervention. Inpatient mortality was 2.7%. The majority of patients in the study sample resided in the eThekwini and King Cetshwayo district municipalities (51.1% and 14.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: preventative interventions for SPI should be considered for rollout in the eThekwini and King Cetshwayo district municipalities of KZN, SA.

Optimizing Patient Selection for Laparoscopic and Open Colorectal Cancer Resections: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Matched Analysis.

The aim of this study was to identify patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) resection who might benefit specifically from either an open or laparoscopic approach. From the NSQIP database (2012-2013), patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy (LC) or open colectomy (OC) for CRC were identified. The two groups were matched and compared in terms of any, medical, and surgical complications. A wide range of patient characteristics were collected and analyzed. Interaction analysis was performed in a multivariable regression model to identify risk factors that may make LC or OC more beneficial in certain subgroups of patients. Overall, OC (n = 6593) was associated with a significantly higher risk of any [odds ratio (OR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.87-2.20], surgical (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.82-2.16), and medical (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.51-1.94) complications than LC (n = 6593). No subgroup of patients benefited from an open approach. Patients with obesity (BMI > 30) (P = 0.03) and older age (>65 years) (P = 0.01) benefited more than average from a laparoscopic approach. For obese patients, LC was associated with less overall complications (OC vs LC: OR 1.92 obese vs 1.21 nonobese patients). For elderly patients, LC was more preferable regarding the risk of medical complications (OC vs LC OR of 1.91 vs 1.34 for younger patients). No subgroup of CRC patients benefited specifically more from an open colorectal resection. This supports that the laparoscopic technique should be performed whenever feasible. For the obese and elderly patients, the benefits of the laparoscopic approach were more pronounced.

Alvimopan Significantly Reduces Length of Stay and Costs Following Colorectal Resection and Ostomy Reversal Even Within an Enhanced Recovery Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Alvimopan accelerates GI recovery after colorectal resection. Data on real-world cost-effectiveness have been mixed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if adding alvimopan to an enhanced recovery pathway reduces length of stay. DESIGN: Patients undergoing colorectal resection or ostomy reversal for the year before and after the introduction of alvimopan were evaluated. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection (488) or ostomy reversal (148) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were length of stay and prolonged length of stay defined as >75th percentile for each procedure. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six patients (45%) received alvimopan. Alvimopan and no-alvimopan groups had similar demographics, comorbidities, operative indication, and case mix. In the alvimopan group, more of the colorectal resections were laparoscopic (87% vs 79%, p = 0.015). Length of stay was reduced with alvimopan (6.2 vs 4.9 days, p = 0.003), and this effect persisted when controlling for procedure type, approach, and ASA class (decreased length of stay by 1.0 day, p = 0.014). The alvimopan group had lower risk of prolonged length of stay (14.7% vs 23.1%, p = 0.007) and ileus (10.8% vs 16.2%, p = 0.05). On multivariable analysis, no alvimopan use (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7), ASA ≥3 (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.1), and history of cardiac surgery (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.5) were significant predictors of prolonged length of stay. Alvimopan use was associated with a lower risk of infectious complications other than surgical site infection (2.8% vs 6.7%, p = 0.025), and did not increase risk of any adverse outcomes. The addition of alvimopan to the protocol resulted in cost savings of $708.39 per patient. LIMITATIONS: Data collected from a single center limit external validity. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of alvimopan to a postoperative protocol following elective colorectal resection or ostomy reversal significantly reduces length of stay and is associated with cost savings even within an enhanced recovery protocol. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A911.

Outcomes of Pregnancies for Women Undergoing Endoscopy While They Were Pregnant: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopy is an integral part of the investigation and management of gastrointestinal disease. We aimed to examine outcomes of pregnancies for women who underwent endoscopy during their pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study, linking data from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry (for births from 1992 through 2011) with those from the Swedish Patient Registry. We identified 3052 pregnancies exposed to endoscopy (2025 upper endoscopies, 1109 lower endoscopies, and 58 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies). Using Poisson regression, we calculated adjusted relative risks (ARRs) for adverse outcomes of pregnancy according to endoscopy status using 1,589,173 unexposed pregnancies as reference. To consider the effects of disease activity, we examined pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth, stillbirth, small for gestational age, or congenital malformations) in women who underwent endoscopy just before or after pregnancy. Secondary outcome measures included induction of labor, low birth weight (<2500 g), cesarean section, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, and neonatal death within 28 days. To consider intrafamilial factors, we compared pregnancies within the same mother. RESULTS: Exposure to any endoscopy during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (ARR, 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.75) or small for gestational age (ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57) but not of congenital malformation (ARR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20) or stillbirth (ARR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.87-2.40). None of the 15 stillbirths to women with endoscopy occurred <2 weeks after endoscopy. ARRs were independent of trimester. Compared to women with endoscopy <1 year before or after pregnancy, endoscopy during pregnancy was associated with preterm birth (ARR, 1.16) but not with small for gestational age (ARR, 1.19), stillbirth (ARR, 1.11), or congenital malformation (ARR, 0.90). Restricting the study population to women having an endoscopy during pregnancy or before/after, and only analyzing data from women without a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or liver disease, endoscopy during pregnancy was not linked to preterm birth (ARR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.27). Comparing births within the same mother, for which only 1 birth had been exposed to endoscopy, we found no association between endoscopy and gestational age or birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide population-based cohort study, we found endoscopy during pregnancy to be associated with increased risk of preterm birth or small for gestational age, but not of congenital malformation or stillbirth. However, these risks are small and likely due to intrafamilial factors or disease activity.

Ongoing challenges and controversies in ulcerative colitis surgery.

For patients with ulcerative colitis requiring surgery, surgical options include a total proctocolectomy with an end ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or a continent reservoir, or instead, a subtotal colectomy with an ileorectal anastomosis. The ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is currently considered the gold standard procedure that is employed in the majority of patients. Despite strong data supporting the feasibility, durability and the maintenance of long term functional outcomes and quality of life, certain controversies pertaining to its relative role, method of creation and effects on related pelvic structures remain a matter of debate.

Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify whether bowel preparation use or its individual components [mechanical bowel preparation (MBP)/oral antibiotics] impact specific outcomes after colorectal surgery. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted colectomy data initiated in 2012 capture information on the use/type of bowel preparation and colorectal-specific complications. For patients undergoing elective colorectal resection, the impact of preoperative MBP and antibiotics (MBP+/ABX+), MBP alone (MBP+/ABX-), and no bowel preparation (no-prep) on outcomes, particularly anastomotic leak, surgical site infection (SSI), and ileus, were evaluated using unadjusted/adjusted logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 8442 patients, 2296 (27.2%) had no-prep, 3822 (45.3%) MBP+/ABX-, and 2324 (27.5%) MBP+/ABX+. Baseline characteristics were similar; however, there were marginally more patients with prior sepsis, ascites, steroid use, bleeding disorders, and disseminated cancer in no-prep. MBP with or without antibiotics was associated with reduced ileus [MBP+/ABX+: odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.68; MBP+/ABX-: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.91] and SSI [MBP+/ABX+: OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.32-0.48; MBP+/ABX-: OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93] versus no-prep. MBP+/ABX+ was also associated with lower anastomotic leak rate than no-prep [OR = 0.45 (95% CI: 0.32-0.64)]. On multivariable analysis, MBP with antibiotics, but not without, was independently associated with reduced anastomotic leak (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.35-0.94), SSI (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.31-0.53), and postoperative ileus (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: These data clarify the near 50-year debate whether bowel preparation improves outcomes after colorectal resection. MBP with oral antibiotics reduces by nearly half, SSI, anastomotic leak, and ileus, the most common and troublesome complications after colorectal surgery.

Polypectomy rate: a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important measure of the quality of colonoscopy; it is associated with interval colorectal cancer and varies among sexes and locations. Recommended indicators of competence for colonoscopy include minimal ADRs >25% for average-risk men and >15% for women. These ADRs are rigorous, so polypectomy detection rate (PR) has been suggested as a surrogate. Colonoscopy is less effective in the proximal colon, where interval cancers are more likely to occur. We compared ADRs and PRs in different segments of colon and between sexes. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional review of findings from 2167 screening colonoscopies performed by 65 endoscopists on average-risk outpatients at the Cleveland Clinic, 2008-2009. We reviewed colonoscopy and pathology reports of randomly selected procedures (mean, 33 ± 16 procedures per endoscopist). We calculated PRs, ADRs, and correlation between PR and ADR for each colon segment and sex. RESULTS: The mean overall PR was 42% ± 16.7%, and ADR was 25% ± 3.3%. The correlation between overall ADR and PR was strong (r = 0.80). PR of 40% in men and 30% in women correlated with the established minimum benchmark ADRs of 25% and 15% for men and women, respectively. PR was more strongly correlated with ADR in the proximal colon (r = 0.92) than the distal colon (r = 0.58). The correlation was stronger in men than in women, as well as in the entire colon (r = 0.88 vs 0.75), the proximal colon (r = 0.91 vs 0.87), and the distal colon (r = 0.75 vs 0.55). The advanced ADR was 4% and did not correlate with PR (r = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a review of findings from screening colonoscopies, overall PR correlates with ADR for the entire colon, but PR and ADR correlate most strongly for the proximal colon, where many adenomas can be missed and interval cancers develop. The correlation between PR and ADR is weaker for women than men and for distal colon. If PR is used as a surrogate for ADR, colon location and patient sex should be considered.

Quantification of risk for early unplanned readmission after rectal resection: a single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Several factors predictive of readmission after colorectal surgery have been identified. Although often grouped together in readmission studies, colon and rectal resections differ in many ways. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with readmission after rectal resection. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of 565 patients who underwent rectal resections at a tertiary referral center in 2010 and 2011. The main outcomes measure was readmission within 30 days. Univariate comparison between readmitted and nonreadmitted patients was followed by a stepwise logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for readmission. RESULTS: There were 105 patients (18.6%) readmitted. Indication (inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], p = 0.008), type of operation (pelvic pouch surgery, p = 0.02), use of laparoscopy (readmission 27.8% vs 14%, p < 0.001), and length of operation (p < 0.001) were associated with a higher readmission rate on univariate analysis. Neither preoperative chemoradiation (p = 0.89) nor American Society of Anesthesiologists class (p = 0.09) was associated with readmission. Logistic regression showed use of laparoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.07), initial diagnosis of IBD (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.93), and length of operation (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.16 per 30 minutes) to be independent risk factors. Risks of readmission were 6.7%, 13.4%, 27.4%, and 27.4% with 0, 1, 2, or 3 positive risk factors, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission after rectal resection is associated with the indication for surgery and the operative technique used. Optimization of factors related to the underlying pathology and careful appraisal of the operative technique may result in decreased readmission after proctectomy.

Impact of resident participation in surgical operations on postoperative outcomes: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether resident participation in operations influences postoperative outcomes. BACKGROUND: : Identification of potential differences in outcome associated with resident participation in operations may facilitate planning from educational and health resource perspectives. METHODS: From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2007), postoperative outcomes were compared for patients with and without resident participation (RES vs no-RES). Groups were matched in a 2:1 ratio, based on age, sex, specialty, surgical procedure, morbidity probability, and important comorbidities and risk factors. RESULTS: RES (40,474; 66.7%) and no-RES (20,237; 33.3%) groups were comparable for matched characteristics. Mortality was similar (0.18% vs 0.20%, P = 0.55). Thirty-day complications classified as "mild" (4.4% vs 3.5%, P < 0.001) and "surgical" (7% vs 6.2%, P < 0.001) were higher in RES group. Individual complications were largely similar, except superficial surgical site infection (3.0% vs 2.2%, P < 0.001). Operative time was longer in the RES group [mean (SD) 122 (80) vs 97 (67) minutes, P < 0.001]. Overall complications were lower for postgraduate year 1-2 residents than for other years. These differences persisted on multivariate analysis adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Resident involvement in surgical procedures is safe. The small overall increase in mild surgical complications is mostly caused by superficial wound infections. Reasons for this are likely multifactorial but may be related to prolonged operative time.

Perioperative factors during ileal pouch-anal anastomosis predict pouchitis.

PURPOSE: Pouchitis is the most common complication of IPAA. Identifying factors predictive of pouchitis may improve outcomes by modifying contributing factors and enhancing patient selection. The most objective means for confirming pouchitis is by histology because the clinical and endoscopic diagnoses rely on more subjective assessments. The importance of histological pouchitis in the absence of clinical or endoscopic findings is unknown. METHODS: Prospectively collected data on patients with IPAA and pouch surveillance were evaluated. Patients who developed pouchitis, defined as symptoms of pouchitis confirmed by endoscopic biopsy (group B) were compared with those without any episode of clinical, endoscopic, or histological pouchitis (group A) for pre- and intraoperative factors and outcomes. Asymptomatic patients with histological pouchitis on surveillance biopsies (group C) were further compared with group A. Patients with Crohn's disease were excluded. RESULT: Of the 673 patients with pouch biopsies, 422 (62.7%) were in group A, 161 (23.9%) in group B, and 90 (13.4%) in group C. Mean follow-up was 9.8 (±5.1), 12.4 (±5.4), and 13. (±4.7) years. Of the 43 preoperative factors evaluated, those associated with group B included leukocytosis (P < .001), rheumatologic extraintestinal disease (P < .001), disease proximal to splenic flexure (P = .001), pulmonary comorbidity (P = .004), prior steroid use (P = .006), and age at operation and diagnosis (P = .018 and .021). Of the 10 intraoperative factors evaluated, pouchitis was associated with S-pouch reconstruction (P < .001), transfusion (P < .001), and 2-stage instead of 3-stage operation (P = .05), all surrogates for operative complexity. On multivariate analysis, pulmonary comorbidity (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.62-7.07), disease proximal to splenic flexure (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.18-4.77), extraintestinal disease manifestations (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.01-2.54), and S-pouch reconstruction (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.99 - 2.54) were associated with pouchitis. Patients in group B had worse outcomes, including more strictures (P = .015), bowel obstructions (P = .019), fistulas (P = .18), and lower quality of life (P < .001). Group C patients had the same outcomes as those in group A and the finding was not predicted by the above-mentioned parameters. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic, biopsy-confirmed pouchitis have worse long-term outcomes than those without pouchitis. This complication is associated with specific pre- and intraoperative factors. Histological pouchitis incidentally found on surveillance biopsy in asymptomatic patients is of no clinical relevance and does not influence outcome. Identification of these preoperative factors associated with the subsequent development of pouchitis will strengthen patient counseling and may facilitate risk stratification.

Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and leads to a significantly shorter hospital stay for octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: Concerns about prolonged postoperative recovery may detract surgeons from offering colectomy to patients older than 80 years. The adoption of a minimally invasive approach may help to counter these beliefs, but concerns remain as to whether these patients can tolerate a pneumoperitoneum. This study compared outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy (LC) and open colectomy (OC) for patients older than 80 years. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database, 97 patients undergoing elective LC between 1994 and 2008 were identified and matched 1:1 to OC patients for age, gender, year of surgery, extent of resection, proximal diversion, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and body mass index. Short-term outcomes including postoperative mortality, morbidity, and discharge status were assessed. RESULTS: The LC and OC patients were similar for the matched characteristics. Their mean age was 82.8 years (range, 80-94 years). The conversion rate for the LC patients was 14.4%. The OC group had a higher proportion of cancer patients (93.8% vs. 59.8%; P = 0.001). The discharge status for the LC and OC patients was similar, and most patients were discharged home without assistance (63.9% vs. 62.9%; P = 0.88). The median hospital stay was significantly shorter for LC (6 days; range, 1-67 days) than for OC (7 days; range, 2-53 days; P = 0.001). The 30-day postoperative complications (OC, 43.3% vs. LC, 37.1%; P = 0.38), reoperations (OC, 5.2% vs. LC, 4.1%; P = 0.73), and readmissions (OC, 6.2% vs. LC, 9.3%; P = 0.41) were similar. The overall mortality rate was 5.2% and similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Complications and other outcomes are similar for LC and OC, and the earlier recovery associated with LC, as evidenced by a shorter hospital stay, may encourage a wider adoption of LC for patients older than 80 years.

Wound complications in rectal cancer patients undergoing primary closure of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection.

PURPOSE: Perineal wound complications have a significant impact on postoperative morbidity after excision of the rectum and anus. The aim of this study is to evaluate factors affecting perineal wound complications after primary closure of the wound following abdominoperineal resection. METHODS: Data were reviewed from all patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma between 1982 and 2007. Data pertaining to demographics, tumor characteristics, and use of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy were retrieved. Complications studied included delayed wound healing, wound infection, dehiscence, abscess or sinus, reoperation, and perineal hernias. Patients who developed perineal wound complications (Group A) were compared with the remaining patients (Group B) to evaluate factors associated with the development of perineal wound complications. RESULTS: Six hundred ninety-six patients (59% male) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 63 years (standard deviation, 13), and the mean body mass index was 28.9 kg/m2 (standard deviation, 7.8). Two hundred seventy-three patients (39.2%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The overall rate of wound complications was 16.2%, and reoperation was required in 5.2% of patients. Group A and Group B patients were similar with respect to age (P = 0.1), gender (P = 0.7), grade (P = 0.4), and stage of disease (P = 0.5). A greater proportion of Group A patients had associated comorbidity (P = 0.001), obesity (0.04), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (0.02), and intraoperative bleeding (0.04). In multivariate analysis, comorbidity was the only independent factor associated with the development of perineal complications (odds ratio, 1.8 (1.09-2.96)). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients have perineal wound healing without complications after abdominoperineal resection. In multivariate analysis, comorbidity was the only significant factor that predicted perineal wound complications.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of anal fistula and anorectal sepsis.

Complex perianal disease may be extremely debilitating for the patient with significant impingement on quality of life. The accurate identification of anatomical areas of involvement and subsequent appropriate management is crucial to achieving a successful outcome when treating anorectal sepsis and anal fistulae. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a powerful tool in the evaluation of anal anatomy. In patients with complex disease MRI is an important adjunct in delineating disease location and extent, its relationship to sphincter muscles, and in planning management. MRI also plays an important role in evaluating the response to medical and surgical therapies.

Long-term outcome after operative intervention for rectal cancer in patients aged over 80 years: analysis of 9,501 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Perceptions of poor outcome may detract caregivers from offering standard therapies to patients over 80 years who have been diagnosed with rectal cancer. We evaluate the effect of operative intervention on their survival. METHODS: Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and survival for patients over 80 years with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer from 1993 to 2002 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute were examined. Survival was determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients who underwent operation (Group A) were compared with those who did not undergo surgery (Group B). Fisher's exact, chi-squared, analysis of variance, and log-rank tests were used as appropriate, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 9,501 patients (19 percent) were aged older than 80 years. Mean age was 85 years, and median survival was 24 months. Stage of disease was unknown for 2,915 patients. Median survival was 58, 53, 39, 27, and 5 months for Stages 0 (n=163), I (n=1,878), II (n=1,796), III (n=1,536), and IV (n=1,213), respectively. A total of 6,900 patients (81 percent) underwent surgery. Median survival for operated patients was significantly longer for all stages (36 vs. 5 months, P < 0.00001), Stage 0 (60 vs. 7 months, P < 0.01), Stage I (55 vs. 11 months, P < 0.0001), Stage II (41 vs. 13 months, P < 0.0001), Stage III (28 vs. 14 months, P < 0.05), and Stage IV (8 vs. 3 months, P < 0.0001). For patients with rectal cancer, local therapy also significantly improved median survival compared with nonoperated patients (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Operative intervention provides sustained benefit in terms of survival to patients aged >80 years with rectal cancer at all stages who are assessed to be a good operative risk. Age older than 80 years should not detract surgeons from offering optimal therapy to good-risk patients.