Prognostic value of predominant subtype in pathological stage II-III lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation.

OBJECTIVES: This study extracted clinicopathological features associated with recurrence and evaluated the tumor microenvironment in consecutive cases with resected pathological stage II-III epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (EGFR-mt). METHODS: Between January 2008 and November 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 387 consecutive patients with pathological stage II-III lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection. We examined the EGFR mutation status (wild-type or mutant) and the evaluated clinicopathological features of all patients. In addition, tumor-promoting cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), tumor-associated M2 macrophages (TAMs), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the tumor microenvironment of EGFR-mt cells were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS: EGFR-mt (n = 124, 32 %) had more lymph node and pulmonary metastases than EGFR-wild-type lung adenocarcinoma (EGFR-wt) despite the smaller invasive component size. The disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with EGFR-mt tended to be shorter than that of patients with EGFR-wt. In the analysis according to the predominant subtype, EGFR-mt with papillary-predominant subtype had a significantly shorter 5-year DFS than that of EGFR-wt with papillary-predominant subtype (15.3 % vs. 44.1 %, p < 0.01). We observed no significant differences among the other subtypes. Multivariate analysis of DFS in patients with EGFR-mt revealed that male sex, pathological stage III, lymph node metastasis, pulmonary metastasis in the same lobe and non-acinar and non-lepidic predominant subtypes (papillary, solid, or micropapillary) were independent poor prognostic factors. Immunohistochemical analysis of EGFR-mt revealed that non-acinar- and non-lepidic-predominant subtypes were associated with a higher frequency of podoplanin-positive CAFs (36 % vs. 13 %, p = 0.01) and a higher median number of CD204-positive TAMs (61 vs. 49, p = 0.07) compared to the acinar- or lepidic-predominant subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Non-acinar and non-lepidic predominant subtypes were predictors of recurrence and had an aggressive tumor microenvironment in pathological stage II-III EGFR-mt.

First-line osimertinib in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status.

Background: The efficacy of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients with poor performance status (PS) remains unclear. Patients & methods: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients treated with osimertinib between 2018 and 2020, with PS 2-4. Results: Among 36 patients with PS 2, the median progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year PFS, median overall survival (OS) and 1-year OS were 14.5 months, 65.4%, 18.1 months and 72.7%, respectively. Among 20 patients with PS 3-4, the median PFS, 1-year PFS, median OS and 1-year OS were 3.0 months, 27.1%, 5.0 months and 46.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Osimertinib was not as efficacious as other EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Lay abstract Osimertinib is a first-line pharmacotherapy for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. However, the efficacy of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients with poor performance status (PS) remains unclear. This study evaluated 56 patients classified as PS 2, 3 and 4 (36, 14 and 6 patients, respectively) treated with osimertinib between 2018 and 2020. Osimertinib efficacy was lower than that of other EGFR­tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This study is the first to report using osimertinib as a first-line treatment in patients with poor PS.

Switching administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies as immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Based on several phase III studies, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential and promising drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in patients previously treated with ICI, the efficacy and safety of rechallenging the same or another type of ICI inhibitor remain unclear. Moreover, clinical data about the efficacy of switching the administration of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies (e.g. nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies (e.g. atezolizumab) as ICI rechallenge are limited. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of such treatment strategy in NSCLC patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 17 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received both anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies during their clinical courses. RESULTS: Among the 17 patients, one (5.9%) and nine (52.9%) achieved partial response and stable disease, respectively, after ICI rechallenge. The median progression-free survival of ICI rechallenge in these patients was 4.0 (range: 0.4-8.0) months, and the median overall survival from the start of the initial ICI was 31.0 (range: 7.6-46.8) months. Of the 10 patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during the first ICI treatment, five presented with these events after the readministration of ICI. Among them, four experienced relapsed irAEs and two patients had pneumonitis, which is a grade 3 or higher irAE. Almost all irAEs during the rechallenge treatment were manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Switching the administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies as ICI rechallenge could be a treatment option for some NSCLC patients. KEY POINTS: • Significant findings of the study In this study, switching the administration of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies as ICI rechallenge could be an effective and safe treatment option for some patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC. • What this study adds Switching the administration of ICI may increase the efficacy of readministration. However, the mechanism is unknown. Thus, further accumulation of cases is required, and extensive investigations must be conducted to elucidate the mechanism and benefits of such treatment.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy for patients with massive non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Baseline tumor size (BTS) and the presence of massive lesions are important for predicting the clinical course of cancer. However, their impact on survival and clinical response in patients with advanced NSCLC undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has been scarcely investigated. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 294 patients who underwent ICI therapy for advanced or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2016 and July 2019. RESULTS: Of these 294 patients, 284 (96.6%) had at least one measurable lesion. Of these, 263 patients treated with ICI monotherapy were included in the analysis. The median total and maximum target lesion diameters were 96.5 mm and 49.1 mm, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with massive lesions (max BTS > 50 mm, group A) and without massive lesions (max BTS ≤ 50 mm, group B) was 2.5 months (95% CI 1.8-3.7) and 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1-9.7), respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for groups A and B was 9.5 months (95% CI 5.5-12.3) and 20.0 months (95% CI 13.3-32.0), respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed marked associations between the presence of massive lesions and both PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: The presence of massive lesions (max diameters > 50 mm) is an independent prognostic factor in advanced NSCLC treated with ICI monotherapy. Although overall response rates were similar between groups A and B, the disease control rate was significantly poorer for group A. Max BTS might be useful for predicting clinical outcomes for patients undergoing immunotherapy as a parameter reflecting their tumor burden.

Pembrolizumab and salvage chemotherapy in EGFR T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression.

Immuno-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become an effective treatment option for non-small-cell lung cancer patients. However, ICI therapy was reported to be less effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations than in those with wild-type EGFR. We report here that an non-small-cell lung cancer patient with the EGFR mutant T790M showed a programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level that increased from <25% to >90% after eighth-line osimertinib therapy. He was treated with pembrolizumab as a ninth-line treatment, and attained stable disease. After the pembrolizumab therapy, he was treated with gemcitabine, which produced a good response despite being the 10th-line treatment. We should consider administering ICI and chemotherapy even to EGFR mutant patients after failure of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, especially in cases with high PD-LI expression.

A novel, easy, and safe technique to repair a stoma prolapse using a surgical stapling device.

A stoma prolapse is one of the late complications and often occurs when the stoma is made in an emergency situation. This complication is not lethal, but causes irritable stoma, skin trouble, and difficulty in stoma care. We herein report the case of a 48-year-old female with an end colostomy that was created as an emergency operation 4 months before. On admission, her colostomy protruded approximately 20 cm from the skin with marked redness, swelling, and erosion; it was impossible to treat manually. We repaired the prolapse successfully in a simple procedure with a Proximate Linear Cutter 100. Briefly, under mild sedation, the instrument was diagonally inserted into the prolapsed stoma and applied twice on both sides. Then, the base of each divided tissue was stapled and cut with the same device. Finally, the prolapse was completely repaired without major bleeding and severe pain. We have applied this novel technique successfully in 5 further cases, and there have been no complications or recurrences. This technique can be performed without spinal or general anesthesia and seems to be a very useful procedure for patients with prolapse of a stoma.

Transanal repair of rectourethral fistula after a radical retropubic prostatectomy: report of a case.

Rectourethral fistula occurred in a 64-year-old man after a radical prostatectomy. Despite conservative treatment the fistula did not close spontaneously. Eleven months after the original prostatectomy, an operation was performed. We chose the Latzko technique with slight modifications as follows. The patient was placed in the prone jackknife position. The fistula was found at a site about 6.0 cm from the anal verge. An elliptical area of rectal mucosa was incised about 1.5 cm from the fistulous orifice and subsequently the rectal mucosa was denuded. The submucosa was dissected above the fistula about 2.0 cm from the edge of the incision. The fistula was then closed with one layer of side-by-side absorbable 2-0 polyglactin sutures. The dissected rectal mucosal flap was brought down over the fistula and sutured in one layer to the distal edge of the rectal muscularis propria through the mucosa with 3-0 polyglactin sutures. On postoperative day 21 a retrograde urethrogram was made and it showed no leakage of urine via the rectum. This procedure is a simple, effective, and minimally morbid technique for the repair of rectourethral fistula after a radical prostatectomy, although it is only useful for the treatment of low rectourethral fistulas.