Periodontal Regenerative Therapy Using rhFGF-2 and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral versus rhFGF-2 Alone: 4-Year Extended Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The aim of this study was to evaluate longitudinal outcomes of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor (rhFGF)-2 plus deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) therapy in comparison with rhFGF-2 alone for treating periodontal intrabony defects. This study describes 4-year follow-up outcomes of the original randomized controlled trial. Intrabony defects in periodontitis patients were treated with rhFGF-2 (control) or rhFGF-2 plus DBBM (test). Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were used to evaluate the outcomes. Thirty-two sites were able to be followed up. At 4 years postoperatively, clinical attachment level (CAL) gains in the test and control groups were 3.5 ± 1.4 mm and 2.7 ± 1.4 mm, respectively, showing significant improvement from preoperative values but no difference between groups. Both groups showed an increase in radiographic bone fill (RBF) over time. At 4 years, the mean value for RBF in the test group (62%) was significantly greater than that in the control group (42%). In 1-2-wall defects, the test treatment yielded significantly greater RBF than the control treatment. No significant difference in PRO scores was noted between the groups. Although no significant difference in CAL gain was found between the groups at the 4-year follow-up, the combination treatment significantly enhanced RBF. Favorable clinical, radiographic outcomes, and PRO in both groups can be maintained for at least 4 years.

Treatment for Chronic Periodontitis with Class II Furcation Involvement: A Case Report with Four-year Follow-up.

This report describes a case of generalized chronic periodontitis requiring periodontal treatment including surgery. The patient was a 64-year-old man who visited the Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital with the chief complaint of pain in tooth #27. An initial examination revealed a probing depth (PD) of ≥4 mm at 38.2% of sites and bleeding on probing at 26.5% of sites. Radiographic examination revealed vertical bone resorption in # 27, 34, and 47, and horizontal resorption in other areas. Based on a clinical diagnosis of severe chronic periodontitis, initial periodontal therapy consisting of plaque control, scaling and root planing was performed. Both #27 and #47 were extracted due to bone resorption extending as far as the root apex. After initial periodontal therapy, sites with a PD of ≥4 mm were observed at 16.7% of sites. Furcation involvement was observed in #16, 17, 36, and 37. The need and options for periodontal surgery based on these findings were explained to the patient. Open flap debridement was implemented for #16, 17, 31, 34, 36, and 37 to reduce periodontal pockets. After reevaluation, the patient was placed on supportive periodontal therapy. The results of the periodontal examination at first visit revealed a periodontal pocket depth of 6 mm and 7 mm in #16 and 17, respectively, and class II furcation involvement in both. Periodontal therapy with open flap debridement resulted in an improvement in horizontal bone resorption where there was class II furcation involvement. This improvement has been adequately maintained over a 4-year period.

Periodontal surgery using rhFGF-2 with deproteinized bovine bone mineral or rhFGF-2 alone: 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To compare outcomes of rhFGF-2 + DBBM therapy with rhFGF-2 alone in the treatment of intrabony defects. This study provides 2-year follow-up results from the previous randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Defects were randomly allocated to receive rhFGF-2 + DBBM (test) or rhFGF-2 (control). Treated sites were re-evaluated at 2 years postoperatively, using original clinical and patient-centred measures. RESULTS: Thirty-eight sites were available for re-evaluation. At 2 years, both groups showed a significant improvement in clinical attachment level (CAL) from baseline. A gain in CAL of 3.4 ± 1.3 mm in the test group and 3.1 ± 1.5 mm in the control group was found. No significant inter-group difference was noted. Both groups showed a progressive increase in radiographic bone fill (RBF). The test treatment yielded greater RBF (56%) compared with the control group (41%). The control treatment performed better in contained defects in terms of CAL and RBF. There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: At 2-year follow-up, the test and cotrol treatments were similarly effective in improving CAL, whereas the test treatment achieved a significantly greater RBF. In both treatments, favourable clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes can be sustained for at least 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) 000025257.

Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects using rhFGF-2 in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral or rhFGF-2 alone: A 6-month randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To evaluate the use of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor (rhFGF)-2 in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) compared with rhFGF-2 alone, in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with periodontitis who had received initial periodontal therapy and had intrabony defects of ≥ 3 mm in depth were enrolled. Sites were randomly assigned to receive a commercial formulation of 0.3% rhFGF-2 + DBBM (test) or rhFGF-2 alone (control). Clinical parameters and a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) were evaluated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-two sites in each group were evaluated. A significant improvement in clinical attachment level (CAL) from baseline was observed in both groups at 6 months postoperatively. CAL gain was 3.16 ± 1.45 mm in the test group and 2.77 ± 1.15 mm in the control group, showing no significant difference between groups. Radiographic bone fill was significantly greater in the test group (47.2%) than in the control group (29.3%). No significant difference in PROM between groups was observed. CONCLUSIONS: At 6 months, no significant difference in CAL gain or PROM between the two treatments was observed, although combination therapy yielded an enhanced radiographic outcome.