RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The effect of social drivers of health (SDOH) on readmissions and costs after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is poorly understood. Policies such as the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program have targeted overall readmission reduction, using value-based strategies to improve healthcare quality. However, the implications of SDOH on these outcomes are not yet understood. We hypothesized that the area deprivation index (ADI) as a surrogate for SDOH would markedly influence readmission rates and healthcare costs in the 90-day postprocedural period for THA and TKA. METHODS: We used the 100% US fee-for-service Medicare claims data from 2019 to 2021. Patients were identified using diagnosis-related groups. Our primary outcomes included 90-day unplanned readmission after hospital discharge and cost of care, treated as "high cost" if > 1 standard deviation above the mean. The relationships between ADI and primary outcomes were estimated with logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 628,399 patients were included in this study. The mean age of patients was 75.6, 64% were female, and 7.8% were dually eligible for Medicaid. After full covariate adjustment, readmission was higher for patients in more deprived areas (high Area Deprivation Index (ADI)) (low socioeconomic status (SES) group OR: 1.30 [95% confidence intervals 1.23, 1.38]). ADI was associated with high cost before adjustment (low SES group odds ratio 1.08 [95% confidence intervals 1.04, 1.11], P < 0.001), although, after adjustment, this association was lost. DISCUSSION: This analysis highlights the effect of SDOH on readmission rates after THA and TKA. A nuanced understanding of neighborhood-level disparities may facilitate targeted strategies to reduce avoidable readmissions in orthopaedic surgery. Regarding cost, although there is some association between ADI and cost, this study may illustrate that ADI for THA and TKA is not sufficiently granular to identify the contribution of social drivers to elevated costs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Single patient Investigational New Drug (IND) applications are one mechanism through which experimental therapies are accessed for children with cancer. The landscape of use, outcomes, and toxicity from single patient INDs remains unknown in pediatric oncology. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all single patient INDs requested and prescribed at a single institution between 1/1/2007 and 5/1/2019. We report aggregate data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on single patient IND applications over the final two years of the study (2017-2019). We report an overview of all IND applications, as well as clinical descriptions of patients, treatments, outcomes, and toxicity. RESULTS: Over the 2-year period, the FDA approved all 171 submitted single patient IND requests for pediatric oncology. We identified 56 requests from our center during the 12-year study period, and all were approved (median time from FDA submission to approval: 1 day (range 0-12)). 71% of requests were based on disease histology. Lack of pediatric clinical trial (65%) was the most common reason for use. 48 approved requests were ultimately administered. The median duration of treatment was 84 days (range: 4-1590), with 3 patients remaining on treatment at time of analysis. Only 7% discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Three-year overall survival was 50% (95% CI, 35-64). CONCLUSIONS: Single patient INDs in pediatric oncology were universally approved in our national and single-center analysis. In our cohort, single patient INDs were primarily utilized based on disease histology, rather than genomics, for agents that lacked a clinical trial.