Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors after proton beam therapy in head and neck mucosal melanoma: a case series.

Proton beam therapy (PBT) has shown promising efficacy in treating locally advanced head and neck mucosal melanoma despite its poor prognosis. Although PBT may improve the efficacy of subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the safety of ICIs in patients who have previously received PBT has not been established. Hence, this study evaluated the safety of ICIs in patients who had recurrent mucosal melanoma after PBT. Between April 2013 and June 2022, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Seven patients were treated with ICIs after their head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) recurred after PBT. Four of the seven patients experienced grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to irAE in the irradiation field, two patients had grade 3 hypopituitarism. Other grade 3 or higher irAEs included an increase in serum alanine aminotransferase in two patients and gastritis in one, and two patients discontinued ICI due to the irAEs. All irAEs were resolved with appropriate management. Although administering ICIs after PBT may increase the risk of irAEs, especially in the irradiation field, they appear manageable. These findings could help in the development of a treatment strategy for locally advanced HNMM that includes PBT and subsequent ICIs.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Since it was first reported in December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly across the globe resulting in a pandemic. As of August 2022, seven outbreak peaks have been confirmed in Tokyo, and the numbers of new cases in the fifth and later outbreak periods have been far greater than in the preceding periods. This retrospective study examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer who received perioperative chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were divided into 2 groups: 120 and 384 patients who started chemotherapy before and during the pandemic, respectively. The incidence of critical events that had potential detrimental effects on the prognosis, such as start of adjuvant chemotherapy ≥91 days after surgery and relative dose intensity of chemotherapy <85% were compared between groups. RESULTS: No significant difference in the incidence of critical events was found. When stratified by outbreak period, the incidence of critical events was positively correlated with the increasing number of new cases of COVID-19 (r = 0.83, p = 0.04). Moreover, 25/173 patients (14%) who started perioperative chemotherapy during the fifth and sixth outbreak periods developed COVID-19 infection, 80% of whom (20/25) had a delay or interruption to their surgery or other perioperative treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Although the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative chemotherapy on whole groups of patients was not evident when comparing periods before and after the pandemic, the impact is becoming prominent in parallel with increasing numbers of new COVID-19 cases.

Clinical Features of Patients with Active Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Successfully Treated with Mepolizumab.

BACKGROUND: In some patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), remission cannot be induced, despite treatment with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants. We evaluated the clinical features of patients with EGPA in whom mepolizumab was effective. METHODS: There were 59 EGPA patients treated at Hiratsuka City Hospital, Japan, between April 2018 and September 2020, and 30 of them received mepolizumab. Twenty (66.7%) experienced a "marked effect" (the daily dose of corticosteroid or immunosuppressant could be decreased, or the interval between intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatments could be prolonged) and 10 (33.3%) experienced a "weak effect" (these measures were not achieved). Eosinophil numbers, serum IgG levels, daily doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, and the interval between IVIG treatments at diagnosis and before and after mepolizumab initiation were determined. RESULTS: Eosinophil numbers at diagnosis were significantly higher in the marked-effect group than in the weak-effect group (p < 0.05) but not before mepolizumab initiation or at the last visit. Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Scores (BVASs) before mepolizumab initiation (p < 0.05) and at last visit (p < 0.01), and frequency of relapse before treatment initiation (p < 0.05) were significantly higher, and the serum IgG level before mepolizumab treatment was significantly lower in the weak-effect group than in the marked-effect group. The weak-effect group received higher doses of corticosteroids, even if the corticosteroid dose could be reduced for a while after mepolizumab initiation. CONCLUSION: High peripheral blood eosinophil numbers at EGPA diagnosis were suggestive of a positive clinical response to mepolizumab.