Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Klin Med (Mosk) ; 81(11): 54-8, 2003.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14689713

RESUMO

A randomized single blind cross-over trial with placebo lead-in has been conducted in 71 anginal patients with arterial hypotension (group 1) and 38 ischemic heart disease patients with normal arterial pressure (group 2) to compare efficacy of therapy with isosorbide dinitrate (ID), sustac-forte (SF), isosorbide dinitrate retard (IDR) and trinitrolong (TN). Paired bicycle exercises revealed that in group 1 patients ID was low effective in 49%, SF--in 61%, IDR was highly effective in 97% and TN--in 96%. In group 1 tolerance to antianginal effect of ID, SF and IDR shown by stress myocardial scintigraphy with Tl-199 developed earlier--in 2-4 weeks in 63-70% patients (versus 22-27% in group 2; p < 0.01). Recovery of ID, SF, IDR effect required prolongation of the drug withdrawal period to 8-16 days (versus 3-5 days in group 2; p < 0.05). TN therapy remained effective for 3 months. Resistance to ID, SF in group 1 was relative and depended on dosage form of nitrates.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Hipotensão/complicações , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamento farmacológico , Nitratos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Cross-Over , Teste de Esforço , Humanos , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/administração & dosagem , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitratos/administração & dosagem , Doadores de Óxido Nítrico/administração & dosagem , Doadores de Óxido Nítrico/uso terapêutico , Nitroglicerina/administração & dosagem , Nitroglicerina/uso terapêutico , Placebos , Fatores de Tempo , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico
2.
Ter Arkh ; 74(6): 63-6, 2002.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12136489

RESUMO

AIM: To compare effectiveness and tolerance of isosorbide dinitrate (ID) and molsidomin in retard forms in patients with effort angina (EA) in combination with arterial hypotension (AH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomised blind cross-over trial with lead-in placebo period trial compared efficiency of retard ID and molsidomin in 65 EA patients with AH (group 1) and 40 normotensive patients with coronary heart disease (group 2). RESULTS: Bicycle exercise has shown that retard ID and molsidomin retard were highly effective in group 1 (97% vs 92% 0 and group 2 (100 and 95%, respectively). Molsidomin retard treatment improved myocardial perfusion and was effective for a year in both groups. CONCLUSION: Retard ID was highly effective in anginal patients with AH but its tolerance is also high. Molsidomin retard is proposed as alternative treatment in anginal patients with AH.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/tratamento farmacológico , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/uso terapêutico , Molsidomina/uso terapêutico , Hipotonia Muscular/complicações , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Angina Pectoris/complicações , Humanos , Dinitrato de Isossorbida/efeitos adversos , Molsidomina/efeitos adversos , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA