Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 6(2): e430, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33855251

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Vaccine hesitancy and delays in vaccine administration time have limited the success of prior influenza vaccination initiatives in the pediatric emergency department (ED). In 2018-2019, season 1, this ED implemented mandatory vaccine screening and offered the vaccine to all eligible patients; however, only 9% of the eligible population received the vaccine. In 2019-2020, season 2, the team sought to improve influenza vaccination rates from 9% to 15% and administer over 2,000 vaccines to eligible ED patients. METHODS: Key drivers included: identifying vaccine hesitancy, providing counseling, reducing administration delays, and developing reminders for vaccine administration. We tested interventions using plan-do-study-act cycles. We included discharged ED patients, age 6 months-18 years old, emergency severity index score 2-5, and no prior vaccine this season. Process measures included percent of patients screened, eligible, accepting the vaccine, and leaving before vaccination. Outcome measures were the percent of eligible patients vaccinated and the total number of vaccines administered. Vaccination time was the balancing measure. RESULTS: We included 57,804 children in this study. Comparing season 1 to 2, screening rates (84%) and eligibility rates (58%) were similar. Vaccine acceptance rates improved from 13% to 22%, the proportion of patients leaving before vaccination decreased from 32% to 17%, and vaccination rates improved from 9% to 20%. Total vaccines administered increased from 1,309 to 3,180, and vaccination time was 5 minutes faster in season 2. CONCLUSIONS: This ED influenza vaccination process provides a model to overcome vaccine hesitancy and can be adapted and replicated for any vaccine-preventable illness.

2.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 5(4): e322, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32766495

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all US children 6 months and older to prevent morbidity and mortality. Despite these recommendations, only ~50% of US children are vaccinated annually. Influenza vaccine administration in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is an innovative solution to improve vaccination rates. However, during the 2017-2018 influenza season, only 75 influenza vaccinations were given in this tertiary care ED. We aimed to increase the number of influenza vaccines administered to ED patients from 75 to 1,000 between August 2018 and March 2019.s. METHODS: Process mapping identified potential barriers and solutions. Key interventions included mandatory vaccine screening, creation of a vaccine administration protocol, education for family, provider, and nursing, a revised pharmacy workflow, and weekly staff feedback. Interventions were tested using plan-do-study-act cycles. The process measure was the percent of patients screened for vaccine status. The primary outcome was the number of influenza vaccines administered. The balancing measures were ED length of stay (LOS), wasted vaccines, and financial impact on the institution. RESULTS: We included 33,311 children in this study. Screening for vaccine status improved from 0% to 90%. Of those screened, 58% were eligible for vaccination, and 8.5% of eligible patients were vaccinated in the ED. In total, 1,323 vaccines were administered with no significant change in ED LOS (139 min) and no lost revenue to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: We implemented an efficient, cost-effective, influenza vaccination program in the pediatric ED and successfully increased vaccinations in a population that might not otherwise receive the vaccine.

3.
J Pediatr Health Care ; 33(1): 92-96, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30190186

RESUMO

Child maltreatment is a serious public health concern in the United States. Young infants and children younger than 3 years are at the highest risk of being abused and can experience both acute injuries and long-term developmental, behavioral, and mental health problems. Health care providers are mandated reporters of suspected abuse but may misdiagnose potentially abusive injuries because of lack of knowledge in recognizing maltreatment. Premobile infants rarely have bruising or intraoral injuries without a reported accident or underlying systemic disease and should raise concern for abuse. It is not uncommon for an abused child to present with an injury that at first glance may seem trivial but is actually suspicious for physical abuse and later be found to have abusive fractures or head trauma. The following case presentations show the importance of recognizing sentinel injuries and red flags for maltreatment in young, premobile infants with unexplained bruises.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Contusões/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico , Notificação de Abuso , Pais/psicologia , Profissionais de Enfermagem Pediátrica , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Maus-Tratos Infantis/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Proteção Infantil , Contusões/etiologia , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Freio Labial/lesões , Masculino , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Fraturas das Costelas/etiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA