Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ear Hear ; 35(3): 306-17, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24441742

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal hearing tests have been noted in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients in several studies, but the nature of the hearing deficit has not been clearly defined. The authors performed a cross-sectional study of both HIV+ and HIV- individuals in Tanzania by using an audiological test battery. The authors hypothesized that HIV+ adults would have a higher prevalence of abnormal central and peripheral hearing test results compared with HIV- controls. In addition, they anticipated that the prevalence of abnormal hearing assessments would increase with antiretroviral therapy (ART) use and treatment for tuberculosis (TB). DESIGN: Pure-tone thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), tympanometry, and a gap-detection test were performed using a laptop-based hearing testing system on 751 subjects (100 HIV- in the United States, plus 651 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, including 449 HIV+ [130 ART- and 319 ART+], and 202 HIV-, subjects. No U.S. subjects had a history of TB treatment. In Tanzania, 204 of the HIV+ and 23 of the HIV- subjects had a history of TB treatment. Subjects completed a video and audio questionnaire about their hearing, as well as a health history questionnaire. RESULTS: HIV+ subjects had reduced DPOAE levels compared with HIV- subjects, but their hearing thresholds, tympanometry results, and gap-detection thresholds were similar. Within the HIV+ group, those on ART reported significantly greater difficulties understanding speech in noise, and were significantly more likely to report that they had difficulty understanding speech than the ART- group. The ART+ group had a significantly higher mean gap-detection threshold compared with the ART- group. No effects of TB treatment were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that the ART+/ART- groups did not differ in measures of peripheral hearing ability (DPOAEs, thresholds), or middle ear measures (tympanometry), but that the ART+ group had significantly more trouble understanding speech and had higher gap-detection thresholds indicates a central processing deficit. These data suggest that: (1) hearing deficits in HIV+ individuals could be a CNS side effect of HIV infection, (2) certain ART regimens might produce CNS side effects that manifest themselves as hearing difficulties, and/or (3) some ART regimens may treat CNS HIV inadequately, perhaps due to insufficient CNS drug levels, which is reflected as a central hearing deficit. Monitoring of central hearing parameters could be used to track central effects of either HIV or ART.


Assuntos
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/estatística & dados numéricos , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Perda Auditiva/fisiopatologia , Emissões Otoacústicas Espontâneas/fisiologia , Percepção da Fala/fisiologia , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Impedância Acústica , Adulto , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Limiar Auditivo , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Perda Auditiva/complicações , Testes Auditivos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tanzânia , Tuberculose/complicações , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int J Audiol ; 52(11): 783-8, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23992487

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to obtain reliable threshold measurements without a sound booth by using a passive noise-attenuating hearing protector combined with in-ear 1/3-octave band noise measurements to verify the ear canal was suitably quiet. DESIGN: We deployed laptop-based hearing testing systems to Tanzania as part of a study of HIV infection and hearing. An in-ear probe containing a microphone was used under the hearing protector for both the in-ear noise measurements and threshold audiometry. The 1/3-octave band noise spectrum from the microphone was displayed on the operator's screen with acceptable levels in grey and unacceptable levels in red. Operators attempted to make all bars grey, but focused on achieving grey bars at 2000 Hz and above. STUDY SAMPLE: 624 adults and 197 children provided 3381 in-ear octave band measurements. Repeated measurements from 144 individuals who returned for testing on three separate occasions were also analysed. RESULTS: In-ear noise levels exceeded the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANL) for ears not covered, but not the dB SPL levels corresponding to 0 dB HL between 2000-4000 Hz. In-ear noise measurements were repeatable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable audiometry can be performed using a passive noise-attenuating hearing protector and in-ear noise measurements.


Assuntos
Audiometria de Tons Puros/instrumentação , Limiar Auditivo , Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas , Orelha , Ruído/prevenção & controle , Estimulação Acústica , Adulto , Criança , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador , Espectrografia do Som , Tanzânia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA