Effect on ovarian activity and ovulation inhibition of different oral dosages of levonorgestrel.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different oral dosages of levonorgestrel (LNG) on ovarian activity and to identify the lowest dosage at which no ovulation occurred. Secondary objectives were to assess return of ovulation after stopping treatment, bleeding pattern, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and safety and tolerability. STUDY DESIGN: A parallel-group study with adaptive design was performed in 90 healthy women with proven ovulatory cycles. Investigated dosages were LNG 0.095, 0.115 and 0.135 mg per day. Measurements of follicular growth and estradiol (E2) and progesterone concentrations were performed every 3 (±1) days during a 56-day treatment and a post-treatment period. Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations and multiple-dose PK parameters were determined during treatment. RESULTS: Two normal ovulations occurred in the LNG 0.095 mg group, none in the higher dose groups. Most subjects had active follicle-like structures without ovulation (Hoogland-Skouby scores 4). Ovarian activity was more suppressed in the highest dose group than in the other groups. Mean E2 concentrations were 241, 219 and 180 pmol/L during treatment with 0.095, 0.115 and 0.135 mg per day, respectively. PK results showed dose-proportionality. Most subjects ovulated during the post-treatment period. CONCLUSION: LNG 0.115 mg per day was the lowest effective dosage for consistent ovulation inhibition. All investigated dosages were safe and well-tolerated, and mean E2 concentrations were sufficient for prevention of hypoestrogenic side effects. IMPLICATIONS: Marketed progestogen-only pills (POP) containing 0.03 mg LNG do not consistently inhibit ovulation. Increasing the dosage to 0.115 mg or 0.135 mg per day, resulting in consistent ovulation inhibition, may improve the contraceptive efficacy of the LNG-POP.

Effects of an oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone on ovarian function.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of estetrol 15 mg/drospirenone 3 mg on ovarian function. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel study in healthy young women with proven ovulatory cycles. Participants received either estetrol 15 mg/drospirenone 3 mg (E4/DRSP) (n = 41) or ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg (EE/DRSP) (n = 41) in a 24/4-day regimen for 3 consecutive cycles. Follicular size and endometrial thickness were measured by transvaginal ultrasound every 3 days in cycles 1 and 3. Blood was sampled for hormone analysis. Ovarian function expressed as Hoogland score was based on follicular size, serum estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) concentrations. Ovulation was defined as a ruptured follicle-like structure >13 mm with serum E2 concentrations >100 pmol/L and serum P concentrations >5 nmol/L. We assessed return of ovulation after treatment cessation, and safety throughout the study. RESULTS: None of the participants ovulated with E4/DRSP use, while one participant ovulated once and one participant ovulated twice during EE/DRSP treatment. Most participants had a Hoogland score of 1 (no ovarian activity) in cycle 1 (85.0% and 82.9% of participants on E4/DRSP and EE/DRSP, respectively) and in cycle 3 (65.8% and 83.8%, respectively). E4/DRSP suppressed follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone to a lesser extent than EE/DRSP, whereas both treatments comparably suppressed E2 and P and endometrial thickness. Return of ovulation occurred, on average, 15.5 days after E4/DRSP treatment discontinuation. E4/DRSP was safe and well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg results in adequate ovulation inhibition and ovarian function suppression, comparable to a marketed combined oral contraceptive containing EE/DRSP. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Treatment with E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg showed complete ovulation inhibition, despite less suppression of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone compared to EE/DRSP. If it becomes commercially available, E4/DRSP, containing a naturally occurring estrogen, should be as effective as EE/DRSP.

Endocrine and metabolic effects of an oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect on endocrine and metabolic parameters of a new combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing estetrol (E4) and drospirenone (DRSP). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, controlled, 3-arm, parallel study. Healthy subjects received either E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg (E4/DRSP) (n = 38), or ethinylestradiol (EE) 30 µg/levonorgestrel (LNG) 150 µg (n = 29), or EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg (n = 31) for 6 treatment cycles. Median percentage change from baseline to cycle 3 and to cycle 6 were evaluated for endocrine parameters, liver proteins, lipid profile, and carbohydrate metabolism. RESULTS: At cycle 6, E4/DRSP treatment had less effect on gonadotropins (follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] +30.5%, luteinizing hormone [LH] -7.5%) compared to EE/LNG (FSH -84.0%, LH -92.0%) and EE/DRSP (FSH -64.0%, LH -90.0%). With E4/DRSP increases in total cortisol (+26.0%) and cortisol binding globulin ([CBG] (+40.0%) were less compared to EE/LNG (cortisol +109.0%, CBG +152.0%) and EE/DRSP (cortisol +107.0%, CBG +140.0%). Liver proteins, except CRP, increased, but the effect was less pronounced with E4/DRSP for angiotensinogen (+75.0%) compared to EE/LNG (+170.0%) and EE/DRSP (+206.5%) and for sex hormone binding globulin ([SHBG] +55.0%), compared to EE/LNG (+74.0%) and EE/DRSP (+251.0%). E4/DRSP had minimal impact on lipid parameters; the largest effect was observed for triglycerides (+24.0%), which was less compared to EE/LNG (+28.0%) and EE/DRSP (+65.5%). E4/DRSP had no effect on carbohydrate metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: E4/DRSP treatment has limited effects on endocrine and metabolic parameters. The effects on gonadotropins, cortisol, CBG, angiotensinogen, SHBG and triglycerides were less pronounced compared to EE-containing products. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Combining E4 15 mg with DRSP 3 mg resulted in a COC with a different metabolic profile in comparison to EE-containing products. The clinical relevance of these findings needs to be further assessed, using clinical endpoints to establish the safety profile of this new COC.

Unintended drug exposure during pregnancy in clinical trials - a survey in early drug development.

PURPOSE: To collect information on unintended drug exposure during pregnancy in early clinical drug development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaire mailed in autumn 2015 to members of human pharmacology societies in Europe for anonymous responses via the online tool SurveyMonkey. RESULTS: 53 of the ~ 700 addressees participated in the survey. 23 female trial participants and 11 female partners of male trial participants were exposed to investigational medicinal products during unintended pregnancies in a clinical trial. Most survey respondents confirmed adequate contraceptive methods by in/exclusion criteria and the use of pregnancy tests in female trial participants at screening and before the first dose. The last menstrual period was documented less frequently (at screening: 28 of 44, before first dose: 5 of 44 respondents). A considerable proportion of respondents denied the routine use of compliance checks about the appropriate use of contraceptive methods, had no procedures in place if contraceptive methods failed, and did not train physicians in instructing trial participants about the appropriate use of contraceptive methods. CONCLUSION: The methods to avoid unintended pregnancies during participation in a clinical trial need improvement and should include (i) pregnancy tests, (ii) documentation of last menstrual period before the first dose, (iii) compliance checks of the appropriate use of contraceptive methods, and (iv) training of trial physicians. Procedures should be in place for what to do if contraceptive methods fail.

Evaluation of the effect of a new oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone on hemostasis parameters.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on hemostasis parameters of a new combined oral contraceptive (COC). STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, single centre, open-label, exploratory study, healthy women received either 15 mg estetrol/3 mg drospirenone (E4/DRSP) (n = 39), 30 mcg ethinylestradiol/150 mcg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) (n = 30), or 20 mcg ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSP) (n = 32) for six 28-day cycles. Blood was collected at baseline, cycle 3, and cycle 6. Median change from baseline was evaluated for procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic parameters, and for sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). RESULTS: Median change of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) based activated protein C sensitivity resistance (APCr) at cycle 6 was +30% for E4/DRSP, +165% for EE/LNG (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), and +219% for EE/DRSP (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP). Changes to prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 and SHBG for E4/DRSP, EE/LNG, and EE/DRSP were +23%, +71%, and +64% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP); and +55%, +74% and +251% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), respectively. At cycle 6, changes to other hemostasis parameters for E4/DRSP were similar or smaller than for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, changes in hemostasis parameters after treatment with 6 cycles of E4/DRSP were smaller or similar to those observed for EE/LNG. Similar, but more pronounced changes were also observed versus EE/DRSP, which supports the hypothesis that the effect of COCs on hemostasis parameters is mainly mediated by the estrogenic component. Further studies are needed to provide more insight into the venous thromboembolic risk of E4/DRSP. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: This study reports that the effects on hemostasis parameters of a COC containing 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP are less or similar to those for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP. It also demonstrates that the choice of estrogen modulates the effects of COCs on hemostasis parameters.

The effects on ovarian activity of delaying versus immediately restarting combined oral contraception after missing three pills and taking ulipristal acetate 30 mg.

OBJECTIVE: Among combined oral contraception (COC) users, to determine the effect on ovarian activity and ovulation of waiting five days before restarting COC, versus restarting immediately, having taken ulipristal acetate 30 mg (UPA, the dose used for emergency contraception) after missing three consecutive COC pills. STUDY DESIGN: Women already using COC were enrolled for two cycles of COC use (21/7 regimen). In cycle 2, all women omitted COC pills for three consecutive days (days 5,6,7), and on day 8 took UPA 30 mg. They were randomized either to restart their COC pills that same day (immediate restart) or to wait five days (delayed restart). Transvaginal ultrasound, and blood sampling for estradiol and progesterone were undertaken on days 4,8,11,13,15,18,22 and 26. A modified Hoogland score was used to quantify ovarian activity/ovulation and to assess whether luteal phase progesterone concentrations were sufficiently 'adequate' to have conferred a theoretical risk of pregnancy. RESULTS: No one ovulated with risk of pregnancy during the five days following UPA. Among 26 women with immediate restart, none ovulated with a theoretical risk of pregnancy at any time in the cycle. Four of 23 women (17.4% CI [5.0; 38.8]) with delayed restart ovulated with theoretical risk of pregnancy before the end of the cycle. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Women who delay restarting COC for five days after taking UPA 30 mg are at much greater risk of ovulation, and therefore theoretically of pregnancy, than if they restart their COC on the same day as taking UPA. Current recommendations should be revisited. IMPLICATIONS: Women who take UPA-EC after having missed combined oral contraceptive pills are advised to wait five days before restarting the COC. This delay puts them at risk of ovulation and, if intercourse occurs, theoretically therefore of pregnancy. Women who restart their COC pills immediately are much less likely to ovulate. The label for UPA-EC and clinical guidelines on using EC after missed pills should be revisited.

Ovulation inhibition with a new vaginal ring containing trimegestone.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the lowest trimegestone (TMG) dose, administered via a vaginal ring, that effectively inhibited ovulation. STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, open-label, single-dose, parallel-group clinical trial with adaptive design. Eighty healthy female volunteers with proven ovulatory cycles were allocated to treatment with a vaginal ring during 28 days, with an average daily release rate of either 46 µg, 94 µg, 147 µg, or 184 µg TMG (20 women/group). Ultrasound measurements of follicular growth and endometrial thickness, and blood sampling for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol and progesterone determinations were performed every 3rd (±1) day from treatment day 4 (±1) until day 28 (±1), and in a follow-up phase after ring removal, until study day 39 (±1). Trimegestone concentrations were measured at each visit in the treatment phase. RESULTS: Mean age and body mass index were 28.8 years and 23.15 kg/m2. One subject in the lowest dose group (46 µg/day) ovulated, no ovulations were seen in the higher dose groups. The degree of ovarian suppression increased with the dose. Median estradiol levels were 119, 36.5, 33.2 and 27.2 pg/mL in the 46, 94, 147 and 184 µg/day groups, respectively. Ovarian activity was resumed in the follow-up phase. Plasma TMG levels gradually declined over the treatment period and showed dose proportionality. The study treatment was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The release rate of 94 µg TMG per day was the lowest effective dose for ovulation inhibition. The study results justify further development of the TMG-ring as progestogen-only contraceptive. IMPLICATIONS: The vaginal ring releasing TMG seems to be an effective new progestogen-only contraceptive preparation, having the advantage of once-a-month vaginal insertion.

A phase 2b multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal rings containing nomegestrol acetate or etonogestrel and 17ß-estradiol in the treatment of women with primary dysmenorrhea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of investigational vaginal rings containing nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) plus 17ß-estradiol (E2) or etonogestrel (ENG) plus E2 in women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: This was a Phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study. We randomized participants to one of five treatment groups: four hormonal rings and one placebo ring. The investigational vaginal rings released 300 µg of E2 daily along with 700 µg or 900 µg of NOMAC or 100 µg or 125 µg of ENG. Each participant received 2 identical rings and was to insert each for 21 days followed by a 7-day ring-free period. The primary endpoint, as assessed by a daily electronic diary (e-Diary), was the change in menstrual pain score from baseline to the second in-treatment withdrawal bleeding episode (Cycle 2). The pain score was the mean of the three highest scores for menstrual cramping pain (0-4 point scale) recorded from the day before menses to the third day of bleeding. The primary hypothesis was that at least one investigational vaginal ring would demonstrate a statistically significant larger reduction from baseline in pain score compared to placebo. Secondary endpoints included total mean impact score (which assessed the negative impact on work/school, physical activities, leisure/social activities) and the amount and days of rescue medication (ibuprofen) used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01670656. RESULTS: We randomized 439 participants. The mean pain score decreased from baseline to Cycle 2 in all groups; the decrease in all four treatment groups compared to placebo was statistically significant (p-values ≤0.002). All treatment groups had greater reductions than placebo in ibuprofen intake and greater improvement in impact scores; these differences were statistically significant for both endpoints for the ENG-E2 100/300 µg/day group, while the other groups were not statistically significant for one or both endpoints. CONCLUSION: All four investigational rings produced a statistically significantly larger reduction from baseline in mean menstrual pain score compared to placebo while pain medication use decreased. IMPLICATIONS: This placebo-controlled study provides evidence that vaginal contraceptive rings containing NOMAC-E2 or ENG-E2 improve moderate to severe dysmenorrhea, across all of doses studied. This adds to the evidence that hormonal contraceptives are effective treatments for dysmenorrhea.

Phase II dose-finding study on ovulation inhibition and cycle control associated with the use of contraceptive vaginal rings containing 17ß-estradiol and the progestagens etonogestrel or nomegestrol acetate compared to NuvaRing.

PURPOSE: To identify at least one contraceptive vaginal ring that effectively inhibits ovulation and demonstrates cycle control that is non-inferior to NuvaRing® (Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V., The Netherlands) in terms of an unscheduled bleeding incidence, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. METHODS: This was a randomised, active controlled, parallel group, multicentre, partially blinded trial in healthy women 18-35 years of age. Subjects received one of six contraceptive vaginal rings with an average daily release rate of 300 µg 17ß-estradiol (E2) and various rates of either etonogestrel (ENG; 75, 100, or 125 µg/day) or nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC; 500, 700, or 900 µg/day), or the active control NuvaRing® (ENG/ethinylestradiol 120/15 µg), for three 28-day cycles. RESULTS: Ovulation inhibition was observed in all groups as confirmed by absence of progesterone concentrations compatible with ovulation (>16 nmol/L) and absence of ultrasound evidence of ovulation. All investigational rings provided good cycle control, with the ENG-E2 125/300 µg/day group being associated with the best cycle control based on the numerically lowest incidence of unscheduled bleeding and absence of scheduled bleeding. Non-inferiority to NuvaRing® with respect to the incidence of unscheduled bleeding could not be concluded for any of the investigational ring groups. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of combined estrogen/progestin contraceptives and similar across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive rings releasing 300 µg E2 and 75-125 µg/day of ENG or 500-900 µg/day of NOMAC provided adequate ovulation inhibition and cycle control and are generally well-tolerated. While non-inferiority to NuvaRing® was not met, among the investigational rings, the ENG-E2 125/300 ring provided the best cycle control.

A new fully human recombinant FSH (follitropin epsilon): two phase I randomized placebo and comparator-controlled pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic trials.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the differences and similarities of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of the novel recombinant human FSH follitropin epsilon expressed in the human cell line GlycoExpress compared with a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) derived compound and a urinary derived product? SUMMARY ANSWER: Overall follitropin epsilon, with a fully human glycosylation, shows a comparable PK profile at single-dose as well as multiple-dose administration compared to recombinant CHO-derived FSH as well as urinary derived FSH, whereas the PD properties differ from product to product with follitropin epsilon being most active in PD parameters. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Recombinant FSH produced in CHO and FSH obtained from the urine of postmenopausal women show comparable PK and PD properties. However, more recently a comparative study of a recombinant FSH produced in the human cell line PerC6 and a CHO-derived FSH preparation revealed differences in PK and PD properties of the molecule. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Both studies were randomized, placebo- and comparator-controlled, single-blind phase I studies in healthy pituitary-suppressed female volunteers aged 18 and 40 years. The single-dose, dose escalation study included 19 women (April 2011 to September 2011) with three ascending dose levels per subject or placebo/comparators with a 14-day washout phase between dosings. The multiple-dose study included 57 women (October 2011 to April 2012) in five cohorts with three dose levels versus placebo and two comparators. Randomization to the respective treatment was performed after successful downregulation of the pituitary gland prior to Investigational Medicinal Product dosing. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the single-dose study, 12 subjects received follitropin epsilon (25, 75, 150 and 300 IU) in three of four possible ascending doses and seven subjects received one dose of two comparators (150 IU Bravelle and 150 IU Gonal-f) and placebo in random order in each treatment period. In the multiple-dose study, 30 subjects received follitropin epsilon (75 IU or 150 IU once daily [QD], or 150 IU every other day [QAD], 10 subjects each) and 27 subjects received 150 IU Gonal-f, 150 IU Bravelle, or placebo for 7 days (11/10/6 subjects). Blood samples for measuring PK as well as PD parameters were collected systematically before, during and after dosing. Adverse events (AEs) and other relevant safety parameters were recorded. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The single- and multiple-dose PK parameters maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-last) increased in a linear fashion with increasing dose levels of follitropin epsilon. Follitropin epsilon showed PK characteristics comparable to the comparators indicating that well established treatment schemes could be applied. There was a dose-response effect of single and multiple doses of follitropin epsilon on follicular growth, which was shown for the biomarker inhibin B as well as for the mean number and size of follicles. Multiple doses of 75 IU follitropin epsilon given daily, as well as 150 IU follitropin epsilon every second day, showed a follicle growth comparable with 150 IU Gonal-f given daily, while in case of daily administration of 150 IU Bravelle only weak follicle stimulation was observed. Multiple doses of 150 IU follitropin epsilon induced a much higher follicle growth compared to the same dose of Gonal-f. All single and multiple follitropin epsilon doses tested were safe and well tolerated, and overall there were no relevant differences between follitropin epsilon and the comparators in terms of safety. The average number of AEs increased with increasing dose levels. No clinically relevant abnormalities were reported for any of the other safety parameters assessed. No follitropin epsilon anti-drug antibodies were observed. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The studies were conducted as a single-blind design. Hormone levels or other parameters assessed in serum are generally not considered as being subject to bias. Other assessments directly performed by the investigators, such as transvaginal ultrasound assessments, may have been subject to personal bias. No prospective calculations of statistical power had been made, as is common practice for first in human and early phase I studies in healthy volunteers. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These early development studies showed that follitropin epsilon exhibits comparable PK characteristics, as well as inducing stronger PD effects in terms of follicle growth and serum inhibin B, than the comparators. Follitropin epsilon induced a dose-dependent increase in follicular growth. The results warrant further studies with this new fully human recombinant FSH. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The studies were sponsored by GLYCOTOPE GmbH, Berlin, Germany. K.A-E. is an employee of QPS-Netherlands, B.V., which received funding for the studies from Glycotope GmbH; I.D. and C.K. are employees of Dinox B.V., which received funding for the studies from Glycotope GmbH; L.S. and S.G. are employees and shareholders of Glycotope GmbH; B.D. and K.E. are employees of Glycotope GmbH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01354886 (single-dose); NCT01477073 (multiple-dose). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: The single-dose trial was registered on 11 May 2011 while the multiple-dose trial was registered on 09 November 2011. DATE OF FIRST SUBJECT'S ENROLMENT: First subject was enroled in the single-dose trial in 27 April 2011 and in the multiple-dose trial in 02 October 2011.

Reduced hemostatic effects with drospirenone-based oral contraceptives containing estetrol vs. ethinyl estradiol.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of estetrol (E4), a natural fetal estrogen, combined with drospirenone (DRSP) were evaluated on plasma levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), angiotensinogen and 12 hemostasis markers. STUDY DESIGN: Combinations of 3 mg DRSP with 5 or 10 mg E4 were compared with YAZ® (20 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg DRSP; EE/DRSP) in parallel groups of 15-18 healthy young women. Main outcome was the relative change from pretreatment to the end (day 24±1) of the third treatment cycle. RESULTS: All E4 combinations showed low estrogen impact compared to EE/DRSP. Effects on SHBG and angiotensinogen of 10 mg E4 combined with DRSP were 15%-20% that of EE/DRSP. Both E4/DRSP combinations reduced D-dimer level and the 5 mg E4/DRSP combination also decreased fragment 1+2. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in coagulation markers suggests an anticoagulant effect from DRSP. The indications of a low thrombosis risk for E4 preparations should be validated in larger studies. IMPLICATION STATEMENT.

Oral follicle-stimulating hormone agonist tested in healthy young women of reproductive age failed to demonstrate effect on follicular development but affected thyroid function.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MK-8389. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, ascending dose study. SETTING: Two clinical research organizations. PATIENT(S): Healthy young women. INTERVENTION(S): Once-daily oral doses of MK-8389 or placebo for 14 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Safety, including thyroid function tests (TFTs), pharmacokinetics, and follicular development (follicle size and number and serum E2 and inhibin B levels). RESULT(S): Treatment with MK-8389 was generally safe and well tolerated. An effect on TFTs was observed, which was transient and did not lead to clinical signs or symptoms but prevented dose escalation above 40 mg. MK-8389 was rapidly absorbed, slowly eliminated, and showed a large peak-to-trough ratio. No clinically meaningful effect was seen on follicle size and numbers, which was consistent with the low E2 levels. At doses >20 mg, inhibin B levels were increased, suggesting early follicular development at higher doses. CONCLUSION(S): Oral administration of MK-8389 demonstrated acceptable systemic exposure and was generally well tolerated. This study failed to demonstrate a clinically meaningful effect of MK-8389 on follicular development, whereas MK-8389 unexpectedly affected thyroid function. This study did not explore doses above 40 mg given the changes observed in TFTs, which may relate to high MK-8389 peak concentrations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT Number 2010-022396-57.

Inhibition of ovulation by administration of estetrol in combination with drospirenone or levonorgestrel: Results of a phase II dose-finding pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of different dosages of estetrol (E4) combined with one of two progestins in suppressing the pituitary-ovarian axis and ovulation in healthy premenopausal women. METHODS: This was an open, parallel, phase II, dose-finding, pilot study performed in healthy women aged 18 to 35 years with a documented ovulatory cycle before treatment. For three consecutive cycles in a 24/4-day regimen, participants received 5 mg or 10 mg E4/3 mg drospirenone (DRSP); 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg E4/150 µg levonorgestrel; or 20 µg ethinylestradiol (EE)/3 mg DRSP as comparator. Pituitary-ovarian axis activity and the occurrence of ovulation were evaluated by monitoring follicular size, serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone, estradiol and progesterone during treatment cycles 1 and 3. Endometrial thickness was evaluated throughout the trial, and the return of ovulation was evaluated after the last intake of medication. RESULTS: A total of 109 women were included in the trial. No ovulation occurred in any treatment group. Ovarian activity inhibition seemed proportional to the E4 dosage: the highest suppression was observed in the 20 mg E4 group and was very similar to that observed with EE/DRSP. Endometrial thickness was suppressed to the same extent in all groups. Post-treatment ovulation occurred in all participants between 17 and 21 days after the last active treatment. The study combinations were well tolerated and safe. CONCLUSIONS: Combined with a progestin, E4 adequately suppresses ovarian activity, particularly when given at a dosage above 10 mg/day.

Unique effects on hepatic function, lipid metabolism, bone and growth endocrine parameters of estetrol in combined oral contraceptives.

OBJECTIVES: Estetrol (E4) is a natural estrogen produced by the human fetal liver. In combination with drospirenone (DRSP) or levonorgestrel (LNG), E4 blocks ovulation and has less effect on haemostatic biomarkers in comparison with ethinylestradiol (EE) combined with DRSP. This study evaluates the impact of several doses of E4/DRSP and E4/LNG on safety parameters such as liver function, lipid metabolism, bone markers and growth endocrine parameters. METHODS: This was a dose-finding, single-centre, controlled study performed in healthy women aged 18 to 35 years with a documented pretreatment ovulatory cycle. Participants received 5 mg or 10 mg E4/3 mg DRSP; 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg E4/150 µg LNG; or 20 µg EE/3 mg DRSP as a comparator for three consecutive cycles in a 24/4-day regimen. Changes from baseline to end of treatment in liver parameters, lipid metabolism, bone markers and growth endocrinology were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 109 women were included in the study. Carrier proteins were minimally affected in the E4/DRSP and E4/LNG groups, in comparison with the EE/DRSP group, where a significant increase in sex hormone-binding globulin was observed. Similarly, minor effects on lipoproteins were observed in the E4 groups, and the effects on triglycerides elicited by the E4 groups were significantly lower than those in the EE/DRSP group. No imbalances in bone markers were observed in any groups. No alterations in insulin-like growth factor were observed in the E4 groups. CONCLUSIONS: E4-containing combinations have a limited effect on liver function, lipid metabolism, and bone and growth endocrine parameters.

No interacting influence of lavender oil preparation silexan on oral contraception using an ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel combination.

PURPOSE: Silexan is an oral Lavender oil preparation with proven anxiolytic efficacy. Given the high prevalence of anxiety and restlessness in younger women, oral contraceptives and Silexan will likely be co-administered. METHODS: A double-blind, randomised, 2-period crossover study was performed to investigate the effects of Silexan on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Microgynon(®), a combination oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg (EE) and levonorgestrel 0.15 mg (LNG) in healthy, fertile, adult females. During 2 consecutive cycles of 28 days, oral contraception was given for 21 days combined with 1 × 160 mg/day Silexan or placebo. Plasma concentration-time profiles of EE and LNG were obtained on day 18 ± 1 up to 24 h after dosing. The primary outcome measure was the area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval of τ = 24 h (AUCτ) for EE and LNG plasma levels. An interaction with Silexan was formally excluded if the 90 % confidence interval for the AUCτ ratio during co-administration with Silexan or placebo was included within the range of 0.80-1.25. Secondary outcomes included EE and LNG peak concentration (C max) and time to C max (t max), follicle size, endometrial thickness, the Hoogland score, and serum levels of estradiol, progesterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin. RESULTS: A total of 24 women (mean age 27.3 years; mean body mass index 22.2 kg/m(2)) participated. The confidence intervals for the EE and LNG AUCτ and C max ratios fell within the pre-specified limits, indicating no interaction (point estimates [Silexan/placebo] AUCτ EE 0.97, LNG 0.94; C max EE 0.99, LNG 0.96). For LNG, t max was slightly delayed. No secondary outcome indicated any impairment of contraceptive efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of Silexan did not affect the efficacy of a combination oral contraceptive containing EE and LNG and was well tolerated.

Men perceive their female partners, and themselves, as more attractive around ovulation.

The purpose of this study was to test whether men perceive changes in their female partner's attractiveness as a function of her fertility status. We further tested how both male and female self-perception varies in relation to female fertility status. This study benefits from the use of transvaginal ultrasonography to detect fertility during the regular cycle and the use of a within-subjects design in which romantic couples were followed both across the cycle and during hormonal contraceptive use. We find that men rated their female partner as more attractive near to ovulation (when fertile) as compared to during the luteal cycle phase or during hormonal contraceptive use. Moreover, our results point to a presently unrecognized negative consequence of hormonal contraceptive use on male self-perception, with men rating themselves lower in attractiveness when their partner was using hormonal contraceptives than when she was regularly cycling. In contrast, there was no difference across measures in female self-reported attractiveness. Results are discussed in terms of their potential impact on within-couple social dynamics.

Pituitary, ovarian and additional contraceptive effects of an estradiol-based combined oral contraceptive: results of a randomized, open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The estrogen step-down/progestogen step-up 28-day estradiol valerate/dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) oral contraceptive effectively inhibits ovulation; however, limited data are available regarding its effects on estradiol (E2), progesterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or its additional extraovarian contraceptive effects. STUDY DESIGN: In this secondary analysis, 100 women received E(2)V 3 mg on days 1-2, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 2 mg on days 3-7, E(2)V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg on days 8-24, E(2)V 1 mg on days 25-26 and placebo on days 27-28 for one treatment cycle. Measures included the presence/absence of cervical mucus; endometrial thickness; and serum E2, progesterone, and gonadotropin levels. RESULTS: E2, progesterone, LH and FSH levels did not exhibit the typical ovulatory increase and remained relatively stable during the cycle. E(2)V/DNG reduced mean maximal endometrial thickness and proportion of women with visible cervical mucus. All parameters returned to pretreatment levels during the posttreatment cycle. CONCLUSION: E(2)V/DNG provides extraovarian contraceptive effects (reducing endometrial thickness and cervical mucus production) in addition to inhibiting ovulation, assuring contraceptive efficacy.

Contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of a new flexible extended regimen of ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 µg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg to extend the menstrual cycle and enable management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding (flexible(MIB)) was investigated and the bleeding pattern compared with a conventional 28-day regimen and a fixed extended 124-day regimen. STUDY DESIGN: This Phase III, 2-year, multicentre, open-label study randomly (4:1:1) allocated women (aged 18-35 years) to the following regimens: flexible(MIB) (24-120 days' active hormonal intake with 4-day tablet-free intervals); conventional (24 days' active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval); or fixed extended (120 days' uninterrupted active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval). Primary outcomes included the number of bleeding/spotting days during Year 1 (all regimens) and the number of observed unintended pregnancies over 2 years (flexible(MIB) only). RESULTS: Results were analysed in 1067 women (full analysis set). The mean number of bleeding/spotting days was lower with the flexible(MIB) vs the conventional regimen [41.0±29.1 (95% CI 38.8-43.3) vs 65.8±27.0 (95% CI 62.2-69.4) days, p<0.0001; treatment difference -24.8 (95% CI -29.2 to -20.3) days]. The corresponding value for the fixed extended regimen was 60.9±51.1 (95% CI 53.9-67.9) days. The Pearl Index for the flexible(MIB) regimen was 0.64 (95% CI 0.28-1.26). All regimens had comparable tolerability profiles. CONCLUSIONS: EE 20 µg/DRSP 3 mg administered as a flexible extended regimen with MIB is effective, well tolerated and is associated with statistically significantly fewer bleeding/spotting days and fewer withdrawal bleeding episodes vs EE/DRSP in a conventional 28-day regimen. The flexible(MIB) also provided statistically significantly fewer spotting days vs EE/DRSP in a fixed extended 124-day regimen (post hoc evaluation). The flexible(MIB) regimen allows women to extend their menstrual cycle and manage their intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding.

Long-term tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 µg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: results from a randomised, controlled, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of a new flexible extended regimen of ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 µg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg, which allows management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding [flexible management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding (MIB)], in comparison to conventional 28-day and fixed extended regimens. STUDY DESIGN: In this Phase III, multicentre, open-label study, women (aged 18-35 years) were randomised to EE/DRSP in the following regimens: flexible(MIB) (24-120 days' active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval), conventional 28-day (24 days' active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval) or fixed extended (120 days' uninterrupted active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval) during a 1-year comparative phase. Thereafter, women entered a 1-year safety extension phase in which the majority received the flexible(MIB) regimen. Safety/tolerability outcomes were measured over 2 years. A separate analysis of certain safety parameters (endometrial, hormonal, lipid, haemostatic and metabolic variables) was conducted at two of the study centres. RESULTS: Results were analysed in 1067 and 783 women in the comparative and safety extension phases. Overall, 56.3% of women experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE) in the safety extension phase. Serious AEs occurred in 3.0%, 1.4% and 3.3% of women receiving the flexible(MIB), conventional and fixed extended regimens, respectively. No unexpected endometrial, hormonal, lipid, haemostatic or metabolic findings occurred with any of the three regimens. CONCLUSIONS: EE/DRSP in a flexible extended regimen with management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding is well-tolerated and, when administered for up to 2 years, has a good safety profile comparable to other estrogen/progestogen oral contraceptives.

Bioequivalence study of an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium relative to ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and to levomefolate calcium alone.

BACKGROUND: A new tablet formulation containing 0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone/0.451 mg levomefolate calcium (calcium salt containing 0.416 mg L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate) was assessed for bioequivalence compared to the approved oral contraceptive (OC) tablet containing identical amounts of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone and to a tablet containing 0.451 mg levomefolate calcium. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-four subjects received in an intraindividual crossover design single doses of the new tablet formulation or the established ethinylestradiol/drospirenone tablet or the levomefolate calcium tablet. RESULTS: Bioequivalence was demonstrated for ethinylestradiol, drospirenone and L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (active moiety of levomefolate calcium) between the investigated tablet formulations. The geometric mean ratios of the AUC((0-tlast)) and C(max) values for all three compounds and their 90% confidence intervals were well within the 80%-125% range generally accepted to demonstrate bioequivalence. CONCLUSION: The rate and extent of absorption of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone were not affected by the concomitant administration of levomefolate calcium and vice versa.