Cytokeratin-18 is Elevated Prior to Conventional Measures of Liver Disease in Fontan-Associated Liver Disease.

The Fontan procedure is used to palliate complex forms of congenital heart disease. This results in adverse hepatic sequelae now known as Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD). Conventional laboratory measures of liver disease do not correlate well with FALD severity. Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) is a measure of cell death and is sensitive in detecting other causes of liver disease. Our aim was to assess the use of a novel measure of liver disease, CK-18, in Fontan patients. This is a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study of Fontan patients aged 8-21 years old. We performed ultrasound elastography, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and serum laboratory testing. Novel laboratory test CK-18 levels in Fontan subjects were compared to healthy age-matched controls. Thirteen Fontan patients were evaluated with a median age 15 years (10, 14), 4 Hypoplastic left heart syndrome, 11 were male, and 5 were symptomatic. Fontan patients had normal AST/ALT, but a significantly elevated liver stiffness by elastography (median 13.4 kPa). Hepatic stiffness by elastography was associated with diastolic-indexed (rho = 0.58, p = 0.04) ventricular volumes. Compared to 10 aged-matched controls, CK-18 was higher in the Fontan group-cleaved CK-18 protein (p < 0.01) and full CK-18 protein, (p = 0.02). CK-18 was positively associated with AST and ALT. Elevated CK-18 levels were found in Fontan patients compared to controls suggesting hepatic cell death even in these relatively healthy Fontan patients. CK-18 was elevated prior to changes in traditional testing. CK-18 may be a useful sensitive marker of liver disease in FALD.

Changes in Psychiatric Medication Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Pediatric Long-Term Care Facility.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused a global pandemic that dramatically altered infection control procedures in long-term care facilities. Mental health decline among residents of geriatric facilities during the pandemic has been described (Ferro Uriguen et al., 2022). Our study aims to evaluate psychological effects of the pandemic on residents of a pediatric long-term care facility, a population comprised of medically complex children. To characterize this, we compared patterns of psychotropic medication use during the COVID-19 pandemic to those of the prepandemic period among residents of a 76-bed pediatric long-term care facility. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of psychotropic medication use from January 2019 to August 2022 using de-identified monthly facility medication refill data. Linear multivariable regression models were used to estimate the level and trends in the monthly rates of medication refills per 10,000 bed days among resident children before and after the pandemic onset. Six classes of psychotropic medications were analyzed including antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiety medications, trazodone, clonidine, mood stabilizers, and gabapentin. Results: The pandemic onset was associated with a significant increase in the monthly prescribing rates of antidepressant and anxiety medications (20.83; 95% CI, 3.96-37.71; p = 0.017), mood stabilizers (10.44; 95% CI, 5.79-15.09; p < 0.001), and trazodone (-27.66; 95% CI, -40.44 to 14.88; p < 0.001) above those expected by prepandemic trends. The trend in trazodone use changed significantly during the pandemic from decreasing prepandemic to increasing (2.21; 95% CI, 1.28-3.14; p < 0.001). Antidepressant, anxiety medication, and gabapentin use increased throughout the study. Antidepressant and anxiety medication use surged early in the pandemic, but then continued growth at their prior rates of use. Discussion: Increased use of antidepressant and anxiety medications and trazodone suggests a possible impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates of anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and agitation among children with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities living in long-term care.

Emergency departments: An underutilized resource to address pediatric influenza vaccine coverage.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) based influenza vaccine (IV) programs have been successful in adults; however, little is known about pediatric ED IV programs in terms of prevalence, feasibility, or successful implementation. AIMS: To describe the reach and effectiveness of IV practices in pediatric EDs, and identify IV facilitators and barriers. METHODS: We assessed, via cross-sectional survey of pediatric ED physicians, number of EDs offering IV to children, vaccines administered annually, and perceived facilitators/barriers to vaccination. The proportion of EDs offering IV is reported. Chi-square tests compared facilitators and barriers among high performers (≥50 IV/year), low performers (<50 IV/yr), and non-vaccinators. We calculated an area of missed effect for the number of children who could be vaccinated if non-vaccinating EDs offered IV. RESULTS: Among 492 physicians from 166 EDs, 142 responded (representing 61 (37.3 %) EDs). Most EDs were in large, urban, academic, freestanding children's hospitals (Table 1). Only twenty-six EDs (44.3 %) offer ≥ 1 IV/yr. Seventeen (65.4 %) were low performers, five (19.2 %) high performers, and four (15.4 %) were model programs. High/model performers used establish workflows more commonly than lower performers (78 % vs. 33 %), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.077). Common facilitators included: strong provider and administration buy-in, electronic health record facilitation, storage/accessibility, and having a leadership team/champion (Fig. 1). Non-vaccinators commonly perceived lack of these factors as barriers. Many (24/61, 39.3 %) EDs expressed interested in establishing or growing IV programs. Up to 18,250 unvaccinated children could receive IV annually if non-vaccinating EDs offered IV during influenza season. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of EDs participating in the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee do not currently offer pediatric IV. Addressing identified barriers/facilitators to develop IV programs in EDs has potential to improve vaccination rates, especially among minority and underserved children.

Emergency Departments: An Underutilized Resource for Expanding COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage in Children.

COVID-19 vaccine (CV) acceptance rates remain suboptimal in children. Emergency departments (EDs) represent a unique opportunity to improve vaccination rates, particularly in underserved children. Little is known about the presence or reach of CV programs in US EDs. We assessed, via a cross-sectional survey of pediatric ED physicians, the number of EDs offering CVs to children, the approximate numbers of vaccines administered annually, and the perceived facilitators/barriers to vaccination. The proportion of EDs offering CVs is reported. Chi-square tests compared facilitators and barriers among frequent vaccinators (≥50 CVs/year), infrequent vaccinators (<50 CVs/year), and non-vaccinators. Among 492 physicians from 166 EDs, 142 responded (representing 61 (37.3%) EDs). Most EDs were in large, urban, academic, freestanding children's hospitals. Only 11 EDs (18.0%) offer ≥1 CV/year, and only two (18.2%) of these gave ≥50 CVs. Common facilitators of vaccination included the electronic health record facilitation of vaccination, a strong provider/staff buy-in, storage/accessibility, and having a leadership team or champion. Barriers included patient/caregiver refusal, forgetting to offer vaccines, and, less commonly, a lack of buy-in/support and the inaccessibility of vaccines. Many (28/47, 59.6%) EDs expressed interest in establishing a CV program.