Mortality on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Evaluation of independent risk factors and causes of death during venoarterial and venovenous support.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decease during therapy on the system. However, the actual causes of death have not been studied sufficiently. This study analyses the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors for the outcome variable death during ongoing ECMO for all patients and divided according to venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) support. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients receiving ECMO support at our institution between March 2006 to January 2021. Only the patients deceased during ongoing support were included. RESULTS: 2016 patients were placed on VA (n = 1168; 58%) or VV (n = 848; 42%) ECMO; 759 patients (37.7%) deceased on support. The causes of death differed between the support types: VA ECMO patients mostly died from cerebral ischemia (34%), low-cardiac output (LCO; 24.1%) and multi-organ failure (MOF; 21.6%), whereas in VV ECMO cases, refractory respiratory failure (28.2%), and sepsis (20.4%) dominated. Multivariate regression analysis revealed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and acidosis prior to ECMO as risk factors for dying on VA ECMO, while high inotropic doses pre-ECMO, a high fraction of inspired oxygen on day 1, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and international normalized ratio levels lead to an unfavourable outcome in VV ECMO patients. CONCLUSION: Even in highly experienced centers, ECMO mortality remains high and occurs mainly on support or 24 h after its termination. The causes of death differ between VV and VA ECMO, depending on the underlying diseases responsible for the need of extracorporeal support.

Evaluation of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device in Transfemoral TAVI.

BACKGROUND: The MANTA vascular closure device (VCD) is a novel collagen plug-based VCD for large bore arteriotomies. The current literature regarding complication rates of this device is quite variable and mostly limited to relatively small case series. METHODS: This study is retrospective analysis of the MANTA VCD-related main access site complications according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria during the hospital stay. Particular attention was paid to the detailed analysis of multislice computed tomography with regard to the anatomy of the access vessel and the puncture site itself. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF TAVI) including the use of the MANTA device (18F) for percutaneous vascular closure. A group of 22 patients was excluded from the study due to incomplete imaging data. During the study period, we observed 28 major (5.6%) and five minor (1.0%) MANTA device-related vascular complications. There was no patient death related to these adverse events. Female gender, vessel angulation at the puncture site, and at least moderate calcification of the dorsal vessel segment were identified as independent predictors for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The MANTA device is a feasible option for vascular closure of large bore arteriotomies in patients undergoing TF TAVI or other percutaneous transfemoral interventions. Furthermore, we have identified novel predictors for device failure/complications that should be taken into account for selection of the appropriate closure device. To our knowledge, this report is one of the largest case series analyzing the use of the MANTA VCD.

Protected complex percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve replacement using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a high-risk frail patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has become a routine procedure for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk. Not much is known about using prophylactic support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement and eventually concomitant complex percutaneous coronary intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a successful procedure of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention utilizing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for hemodynamic support in a very frail 88-year-old Caucasian woman with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and coronary bypass grafting in the past. Echocardiography revealed a "low-flow low-gradient" aortic stenosis (mean transvalvular gradient 30 mmHg, aortic valve area 0.4 cm2, significant calcification), a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%, severe mitral regurgitation with moderate stenosis (mean transvalvular gradient 7 mmHg), with a systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 80 mmHg. Moreover, pre-interventional coronary angiography exposed a severe left main ostial stenosis and sequential subtotal heavily calcified stenosis of the left anterior descending artery . Computed tomographic angiography showed no heavy tortuosity but moderate calcification of the iliofemoral arteries. The procedure was performed under general anesthesia in our hybrid operating room. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was established by left femoral percutaneous cannulation using a 21-Fr venous and 15-Fr arterial cannula. Subsequently, complex percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of two drug-eluting stents from the left main into the left anterior descending artery was performed via a right femoral arterial 7F sheath. Thereafter, a 23-mm Sapien 3 aortic valve prosthesis (Edwards, Irvine, CA, USA) was implanted via right femoral artery in the usual manner, whereby the arterial pigtail catheter for marking the aortic annulus during transcatheter aortic valve replacement was inserted over a Check-Flo® Hemostasis Assembly (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) on a Y-adapter via the arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula. After extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation, vascular closure was easily performed using the MANTA vascular closure device in order to reduce procedural time and risk of access site complications. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we demonstrate the feasibility of elective prophylactic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implementation in selected very high-risk and frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention in order to avoid intraprocedural complications.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Massive Pulmonary Embolism as Bridge to Therapy.

Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a common illness in western countries. The purpose of this study is to report the institutional experience with massive PE and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in inoperable patients on admission. A retrospective analysis using the institutional ECMO-registry including the time between 2006 and 2017 was performed. During the study period, 75 patients (n = 46 patients venoarterial [VA], n = 29 patients venovenous [VV]) were placed on ECMO for massive PE. The primary support for massive PE consists of VA; however, VV support can be applied as well in selected cases as this work demonstrates. In the VA group, more patients (38 vs. 83%, P = 0.001) required mechanical resuscitation whereas in the VV group a more aggressive ventilation before support was noted (e.g. minute ventilation: VA=8.8 ± 3.7 L/min, VV=11.5 ± 4.5 L/min, P = 0.01). Survival to discharge was similar in VV and VA patients (45 vs. 48%, P = 0.9). Patients who received additional therapeutic interventions after stabilization with ECMO - e.g. surgical thrombectomy - displayed a similar survival compared with those being only anticoagulated (44% vs. 49%, P = 0.40). ECMO is feasible for initial stabilization serving as a bridge to therapy in primarily inoperable patients with massive PE. The principal configuration of support is VA; however, VV can be applied as well in selected hemodynamically compromised cases under aggressive ventilation.

Passive-fixation lead failure rates and long-term patient mortality in subjects implanted with Sprint Fidelis electrodes.

AIMS: To evaluate passive-fixation lead failure rates and long-term patient survival in subjects implanted with Sprint Fidelis electrodes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 748 subjects who received a Sprint Fidelis (n = 429; Medtronic models 6948: 94.8%, 6949: 2.6%, 6930: 1.9%, 6931: 0.7%) or a Sprint 'non-Fidelis' implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead (n = 319, Medtronic models 6944: 68.6%, 6947: 17.9%, 6942: 7.8%, 6943: 3.4%, 6945: 2.2%) at our centre between 1998 and 2008. Kaplan-Meier patient survival was lower in the Fidelis group than in the Control cohort (68.4 vs. 77.0% at 5 years, P = 0.0061), but multivariate analyses revealed no significant association between mortality and implanted lead type. Passive-fixation lead failure rate at 5 years was 14.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) [9.2, 19.3]) in the Fidelis (n = 414) group and 1.8% (95% CI [0.0-3.8]) in the Control (n = 241) cohort (P < 0.001 upon multivariate comparison). CONCLUSION: Failure rates of passive-fixation Sprint Fidelis leads are increased and similar to those previously reported for active-fixation Fidelis electrodes. Despite the elevated risk for lead failure and its potential sequelae, the Sprint Fidelis has no obvious impact on long-term mortality.