A diagnostic challenge of KIT p.V559D and BRAF p.G469A mutations in a paragastric mass.

A patient with gastrointestinal stroma tumor (GIST) and KIT p.V559D and BRAF p.G469A alterations was referred to our institutional molecular tumor board (MTB) to discuss therapeutic implications. The patient had been diagnosed with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) years prior to the MTB presentation. GIST had been diagnosed 1 month earlier. After structured clinical annotation of the molecular alterations and interdisciplinary discussion, we considered BRAF/KIT co-mutation unlikely in a treatment-naïve GIST. Discordant variant allele frequencies furthermore suggested a second malignancy. NGS of a CLL sample revealed the identical class 2 BRAF alteration, thus supporting admixture of CLL cells in the paragastric mass, leading to the detection of 2 alterations. Following the MTB recommendation, the patient received imatinib and had a radiographic response. Structured annotation and interdisciplinary discussion in specialized tumor boards facilitate the clinical management of complex molecular findings. Coexisting malignancies and clonal hematopoiesis warrant consideration in case of complex and uncommon molecular findings.

Leveraging Large Language Models for Decision Support in Personalized Oncology.

Importance: Clinical interpretation of complex biomarkers for precision oncology currently requires manual investigations of previous studies and databases. Conversational large language models (LLMs) might be beneficial as automated tools for assisting clinical decision-making. Objective: To assess performance and define their role using 4 recent LLMs as support tools for precision oncology. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study examined 10 fictional cases of patients with advanced cancer with genetic alterations. Each case was submitted to 4 different LLMs (ChatGPT, Galactica, Perplexity, and BioMedLM) and 1 expert physician to identify personalized treatment options in 2023. Treatment options were masked and presented to a molecular tumor board (MTB), whose members rated the likelihood of a treatment option coming from an LLM on a scale from 0 to 10 (0, extremely unlikely; 10, extremely likely) and decided whether the treatment option was clinically useful. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of treatment options, precision, recall, F1 score of LLMs compared with human experts, recognizability, and usefulness of recommendations. Results: For 10 fictional cancer patients (4 with lung cancer, 6 with other; median [IQR] 3.5 [3.0-4.8] molecular alterations per patient), a median (IQR) number of 4.0 (4.0-4.0) compared with 3.0 (3.0-5.0), 7.5 (4.3-9.8), 11.5 (7.8-13.0), and 13.0 (11.3-21.5) treatment options each was identified by the human expert and 4 LLMs, respectively. When considering the expert as a criterion standard, LLM-proposed treatment options reached F1 scores of 0.04, 0.17, 0.14, and 0.19 across all patients combined. Combining treatment options from different LLMs allowed a precision of 0.29 and a recall of 0.29 for an F1 score of 0.29. LLM-generated treatment options were recognized as AI-generated with a median (IQR) 7.5 (5.3-9.0) points in contrast to 2.0 (1.0-3.0) points for manually annotated cases. A crucial reason for identifying AI-generated treatment options was insufficient accompanying evidence. For each patient, at least 1 LLM generated a treatment option that was considered helpful by MTB members. Two unique useful treatment options (including 1 unique treatment strategy) were identified only by LLM. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study, treatment options of LLMs in precision oncology did not reach the quality and credibility of human experts; however, they generated helpful ideas that might have complemented established procedures. Considering technological progress, LLMs could play an increasingly important role in assisting with screening and selecting relevant biomedical literature to support evidence-based, personalized treatment decisions.

Individual hematotoxicity prediction of further chemotherapy cycles by dynamic mathematical models in patients with gastrointestinal tumors.

PURPOSE: Hematotoxicity is a common side-effect of cytotoxic gastrointestinal (GI) cancer therapies. An unsolved problem is to predict the individual risk therefore to decide on treatment adaptions. We applied an established biomathematical prediction model and primarily evaluated its predictive value in patients undergoing chemotherapy for GI cancers in curative intent. METHODS: In a prospective, observational multicenter study on patients with gastro-esophageal or pancreatic cancer (n = 28) receiving myelosuppressive adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FLO(T) or FOLFIRINOX), individual model parameters were learned based on patients' observed laboratory values during the first chemotherapy cycle and further external data resources. Grades of hematotoxicity of subsequent cycles were predicted by model simulation and compared with observed data. RESULTS: The most common high-grade hematological toxicity was neutropenia [19/28 patients (68%)]. For the FLO(T) regimen, individual grades of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia could be well predicted for cycles 2-4, as well as grades of neutropenia for cycle 2. Prediction accuracy for neutropenia in the third and fourth cycle differed by one toxicity grade on average. For the FOLFIRINOX-regimen, thrombocytopenia predictions showed a maximum deviation of one toxicity grade up to the end of therapy (8 cycles). Deviations of predictions were less than one degree on average up to cycle 4 for neutropenia, and up to cycle 6 for leukopenia. CONCLUSION: The biomathematical model showed excellent short-term and decent long-term prediction performance for all relevant hematological side effects associated with FLO(T)/FOLFIRINOX. Clinical utility of this precision-medicine approach needs to be further investigated in a larger cohort.

Guideline adherence and implementation of tumor board therapy recommendations for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

PURPOSE: Although participation in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) is an obligatory quality criterion for certification, there is scarce evidence, whether MTB recommendations are consistent with consensus guidelines and whether they are followed in clinical practice. Reasons of guideline and tumor board deviations are poorly understood so far. METHODS: MTB's recommendations from the weekly MTB for gastrointestinal cancers at the University Cancer Center Leipzig/Germany (UCCL) in 2020 were analyzed for their adherence to therapy recommendations as stated in National German guidelines and implementation within an observation period of 3 months. To assess adherence, an objective classification system was developed assigning a degree of guideline and tumor board adherence to each MTB case. For cases with deviations, underlying causes and influencing factors were investigated and categorized. RESULTS: 76% of MTBs were fully adherent to guidelines, with 16% showing deviations, mainly due to study inclusions and patient comorbidities. Guideline adherence in 8% of case discussions could not be determined, especially because there was no underlying guideline recommendation for the specific topic. Full implementation of the MTBs treatment recommendation occurred in 64% of all cases, while 21% showed deviations with primarily reasons of comorbidities and differing patient wishes. Significantly lower guideline and tumor board adherences were demonstrated in patients with reduced performance status (ECOG-PS ≥ 2) and for palliative intended therapy (p = 0.002/0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of guideline deviations and adherence to MTB decisions by a systematic and objective quality assessment tool could become a meaningful quality criterion for cancer centers in Germany.

Predictors for thromboembolism in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of thromboembolic events contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Because cholangiocarcinoma is a rare type of cancer, the incidence of thromboembolism in this patient population is not well defined. METHODS: Patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated at the University Cancer Center Leipzig between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively regarding the incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: A total of 133 newly and consecutively diagnosed patients were included, of whom 22% had stage IV disease. Thromboembolism was diagnosed in 39 (29.3%), with 48% of the events occurring between 60 days prior and 30 days after the initial diagnosis. Arterial thrombosis accounted for 19% and portal venous thrombosis for 33% of the events, while the rest of events occurred in the non-portal venous system. In multivariable analysis, an ONKOTEV score ≥ 2 was the only independent predictor for thromboembolism. Serum CA 19-9 was available in 87 patients (65.4%). In this subgroup, CA 19-9 above the median of 97.7 U/ml and vascular or lymphatic compression were independent predictors for thromboembolism in the first year and CA 19-9 alone remained a significant predictor over the whole observation period. An ONKOTEV score ≥ 2 and increasing age were predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: A very high thromboembolic risk was observed in cholangiocarcinoma, comparable to the risk situation in pancreatic and gastric cancer. The ONKOTEV score and serum CA 19-9 are independent predictors of thromboembolic events. Prospective validation of our observations in this patient population is warranted.

Evaluation of Biomarkers for the Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Ambulatory Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of cancer. This study aimed to evaluate immature platelet fraction (IPF), mean platelet volume (MPV), P-selectin, D-dimer, and thrombin generation (TG) as predictive biomarkers for VTE and further the improvement of existing risk assessment models (RAMs). METHODS: A prospective, observational, exploratory study was conducted on ambulatory cancer patients with indication for systemic chemotherapy. Baseline RAMs included the Khorana-, Vienna Cancer, Thrombosis-, Protecht-, ONKOTEV-, and Catscore. IPF, MPV, P-selectin, D-dimer, and TG were analysed at baseline and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: We enrolled 100 patients, of whom 89 completed the follow-up. Frequent tumour types were breast (30%), gastric (14%), gynaecological (14%), and colorectal (14%) cancer. Ten of the 89 patients (11.2%) developed VTE. The highest VTE rate was observed in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (3/5; 60%). Baseline D-dimer levels but not IPF, MPV, or P-selectin were associated with the risk of developing VTE (HR 6.9; p = 0.021). None of the RAMs showed statistical significance in predicting VTE. Peak thrombin and endogenous thrombin potential were lower in patients who developed VTE. Biomarker changes between baseline and follow-up were not associated with VTE risk. CONCLUSIONS: VTE risk was well predicted by baseline D-dimer levels. Adding D-dimer could improve existing RAMs to better identify patients who may benefit from primary VTE prophylaxis. The VTE risk among patients with cholangiocarcinoma should be further evaluated.

The performance of three oncogeriatric screening tools - G8, optimised G8 and CARG - in predicting chemotherapy-related toxicity in older patients with cancer. A prospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Older patients are vulnerable to chemotherapy-related toxicity (CRT). Therefore we evaluated screening tools in their power to predict CRT. METHODS: Patients with cancer aged ≥65 years completed three screening questionnaires (G8, optimised G8 and Cancer and Ageing Research Group (CARG). Additionally, Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for verification of supportive care needs was undertaken on patients with impaired G8 scores. During chemotherapy treatment patients were assessed, capturing grade 0-5 CRT as defined by NCI CTCAE 4. RESULTS: 104 patients with non-haematological cancers were included at three study sites. Median age was 73 years (range 65-85). Onco-geriatric screening detected 74% as impaired using G8 and optimised G8 questionnaires and 86% using CARG screening. Grade 3-5 toxicity affected 64.4% of all patients. G8 (OR 0.3 95% CI [0.1;1.0]) and optimised G8 (OR 0.4 95% CI [0.1; 1.5]) did not reliably predict CRT, whereas screening with CARG demonstrated a strong prediction of severe CRT: OR 4.2, 95% CI [1.1, 15.9]. CGA was undertaken on 66 patients, revealing deficiencies in nutritional (83%) and functional-status (54%) and occurrence of relevant comorbidity (53%). CONCLUSION: The CARG tool could be useful for predicting CRT. CGA showed clinically relevant supportive care needs in patients with a positive G8 screening.

A Rare Case of Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma (MANEC) of the Gastroesophageal Junction with HER2/neu Overexpression and Distinct Orbital and Optic Nerve Toxicity after Intravenous Administration of Cisplatin.

BACKGROUND: Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) are rare malignancies with both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. To date, the prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic MANECs remains dismal, and treatment options are mainly based on guidelines for the treatment of pure neuroendocrine carcinomas or small cell lung cancer. Established first-line therapy in the metastatic situation is cisplatin and etoposide. Platinum derivatives are known to cause a variety of side effects also involving the visual system. Severe orbital and optic nerve toxicities have been described mainly after intracarotid infusion of cisplatin. CASE REPORT: Herein we report a rare case of a 60-year-old male patient suffering from MANEC of the gastroesophageal junction with HER2/neu overexpression who developed severe orbital and ocular neurotoxicity (grade 3 according to CTCAE v4.03) after intravenous cisplatin. CONCLUSION: We discuss diagnostic approaches and differential diagnoses in this clinical situation. Before starting treatment with intravenous and topical steroids, it is crucial to rule out meningeal and cerebral spread as well as paraneoplastic and endocrine syndromes.

VESTIGE: Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients With Resected Esophageal, Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Cancer Following Preoperative Chemotherapy With High Risk for Recurrence (N+ and/or R1): An Open Label Randomized Controlled Phase-2-Study.

Background: Perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery is one recommended standard treatment for patients with resectable gastric and esophageal cancer. Even with a multimodality treatment more than half of patients will relapse following surgical resection. Patients who have a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have an incomplete (R1) resection or have metastatic lymph nodes in the resection specimen (N+) are especially at risk of recurrence. Current clinical practice is to continue with the same chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting as before surgery. In the phase II randomized EORTC VESTIGE trial (NCT03443856), patients with high risk resected gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma will be randomized to either adjuvant chemotherapy (as before surgery) or to immunotherapy with nivolumab and low dose ipilimumab (nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W plus Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV Q6W for 1 year). The primary endpoint of the study is disease free survival, with secondary endpoints of overall survival, safety and toxicity, and quality of life. This is an open label randomized controlled multi-center phase-2 superiority trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to study arms. The trial will recruit 240 patients; recruitment commenced July 2019 and is anticipated to take 30 months. Detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria, toxicity management guidelines, and statistical plans for EORTC VESTIGE are described in the manuscript. Clinical Trial Registration: The trial is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03443856.

Randomised phase II trial to investigate catumaxomab (anti-EpCAM × anti-CD3) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) represents an unfavourable prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Intraperitoneal treatment with the bispecific and trifunctional antibody catumaxomab (EpCAM, CD3), in addition to systemic chemotherapy, could improve elimination of PC. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, phase II study investigated the efficacy of catumaxomab followed by chemotherapy (arm A, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel, FLOT) or FLOT alone (arm B) in patients with GC and PC. Primary endpoint was the rate of macroscopic complete remission (mCR) of PC at the time of second diagnostic laparoscopy/laparotomy prior to optional surgery. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52 months. Out of 35 patients screened, 15 were allocated to arm A and 16 to arm B. mCR rate was 27% in arm A and 19% in arm B (p = 0.69). Severe side effects associated with catumaxomab were nausea, infection, abdominal pain, and elevated liver enzymes. Median progression-free (6.7 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.71) and overall survival (13.2 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.97) were not significantly different in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of catumaxomab to systemic chemotherapy was feasible and tolerable in advanced GC. Although the primary endpoint could not be demonstrated, results are promising for future investigations integrating intraperitoneal immunotherapy into a multimodal treatment strategy.

PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR polymorphisms: association with clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving cetuximab-docetaxel.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in AKT1, AKT2, FRAP1, PIK3CA, and PTEN were associated with treatment response and clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed tissue of 45 patients with recurrent or initially metastatic HNSCC, and SNPs were genotyped by means of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system or direct sequencing. RESULTS: The AKT2:rs8100018 and the PTEN:rs12569998 homozygous variants resulted as associated with an increased risk of progression (hazard ratio [HR], 4.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-21.03; and HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.24-4.50, respectively). An additive effect on risk of progression was observed. The AKT2:rs8100018 homozygous variant was significantly associated with a higher risk of death (HR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.06-12.00), whereas the presence of at least one variant allele of AKT1:rs3803304 was associated with a lower risk of death (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.97). CONCLUSION: We identified combined genotypes associated with outcome of HNSCC, which might have an impact for identification of a target population for cetuximab-docetaxel treatment. Results should be considered as an initial finding and warrant validation in larger clinical trials.

Expression of amphiregulin and EGFRvIII affect outcome of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving cetuximab-docetaxel treatment.

PURPOSE: Constitutive activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a result of gene amplification, mutation, or overexpression of its ligands has been associated with response to EGFR targeting strategies. The role of these molecular mechanisms for the responsiveness of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) to cetuximab-containing regimens remains unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor biopsies from 47 patients, enrolled in a single-arm phase II multicenter study for second-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with cetuximab and docetaxel, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of EGFR, its deletion variant III (EGFRvIII) and its ligand amphiregulin (AREG). The relation between expression levels and disease control rate (DCR) was evaluated by logistic regression. Association between expression levels, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: High expression of EGFR, EGFRvIII, and AREG was detected in 73%, 17%, and 45% of SCCHN cases, respectively. Expression levels of EGFR had no impact on PFS or OS. High expression levels of EGFRvIII were significantly associated with reduced DCR and shortened PFS (HR: 3.3, P = 0.005) but not with OS. Patients with high AREG expression in tumor cells had significantly shortened OS (HR: 2.2, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR 2.2, P = 0.019) compared with patients with low expression score. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed an independent association of AREG and EGFRvIII with PFS but only AREG was an independent prognosticator of OS. CONCLUSIONS: High EGFRvIII and AREG expression levels identify SCCHN patients who are less likely to benefit from combination treatment with cetuximab and docetaxel.

Association of epidermal growth factor receptor polymorphism, skin toxicity, and outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving cetuximab-docetaxel treatment.

PURPOSE: Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has shown clinical efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with prolonged progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In this study, we analyzed whether cetuximab-induced skin rash was correlated with distinct polymorphisms within the EGFR gene known to modulate EGFR expression, ligand binding, or signaling activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Fifty-one patients enrolled in a single-arm phase II multicenter study for second-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with cetuximab/docetaxel were genotyped for two genetic variations in the EGFR gene, a point substitution G-->A in exon 13 resulting in an amino acid substitution in position 521 (EGFR-R521K) and a CA repeat (CA-SSR) polymorphism in intron 1. Association between genotypes and incidence/grade of skin rash was determined by Fisher's exact test. The predictive value of genotypes for PFS and OS was determined using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Overall, 21 patients (41%) developed skin rash with grade >1 within 6 weeks of treatment. The common EGFR-R521K genotype (G/G) was significantly associated with increased skin toxicity (P = 0.024) and showed a trend toward reduced risk of tumor progression (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-1.08; P = 0.08), whereas no correlation of the EGFR-R521K genotype with OS could be observed (P = 0.20). No significant interaction between CA-SSR polymorphism and skin toxicity, PFS, or OS could be detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed an influence of the EGFR-R521K genotype on skin toxicity and suggested its relation to clinical activity of cetuximab/docetaxel treatment.

Phase II trial of second-line bendamustine chemotherapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine chemotherapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was determined in this phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cytologically or histologically proven SCLC, who had a sensitive relapse, which was defined as a relapse>or=2 months after completion of primary therapy, were eligible for this study. After informed consent patients received 120 mg/m2 of bendamustine on Days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks. A maximum of six cycles was administered. Primary endpoint was response rate, secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a median age of 59 years (range 47-76) were accrued to this trial. Six (29%) of 21 patients achieved a confirmed partial remission, 6 (29%) had stable disease and 9 (42%) patients progressed according to RECIST criteria. Median progression free survival was 4 months (95% CI 0-8, 3), median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI 5, 8-8, 2). One- and 2-year survival was 16% and 8%, respectively. Grade III/IV neutropenia occurred in 3 (15%) of 21 patients, 1 patient had a lethal Gram-negative sepsis in neutropenia. Two additional patients had pneumonia in the absence of neutropenia. Two patients (10%) had a grade III anemia, no grade III or IV thrombocytopenia was observed. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates efficacy of bendamustine in relapsed SCLC and a favourable toxicity profile. Therefore, single-agent bendamustine is a treatment option for patients with SCLC, who have responded to initial platinum containing chemotherapy and should further be investigated in randomized trials.