Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of asymptomatic central nervous system involvement in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Examination of central nervous system (CNS) involvement is not routine diagnostic practice in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therefore, many asymptomatic patients with CNS involvement might go undetected. The effect of CNS involvement on the AML disease course is not well defined, with conflicting results regarding clinical outcome. This study aimed to determine the incidence of asymptomatic CNS involvement in AML estimated by multiparametric flow cytometry of cerebrospinal fluid (MFC-CSF) at diagnosis, the related potential risk factors, and prognosis. In total, 645 patients with de novo AML were screened; 183 (28.4%) of them fulfilled institutional practice for MFC-CSF analysis based on presence of CNS symptoms and/or clinical features. CNS symptoms and signs were observed in 8/183 (4.4%) patients, but most patients (175/183, 95.6%) were asymptomatic. In the asymptomatic group, 73/175 (41.7%) patients had positive or suspicious cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings categorized as CNS positive (CNSpos) and 102/175 (58.3%) had normal CNS findings categorized as CNS negative (CNSneg). The presence of leukemic blasts was confirmed in 81/183 (44.3%) patients; the total incidence of CNS involvement in the whole AML group was 12.6% (81/645). Compared with asymptomatic patients with CNSneg, those with CNSpos had a significantly higher frequency of lymphadenopathy, white blood cell count ≥30 × 109/L, presence of the monocytic phenotype, and a high percentage of bone marrow (BM) blasts. The multivariate logistic regression model identified monocytic phenotype (p = 0.047) and high percentage of BM blasts (p = 0.042) as predictors for CNSpos. CNSpos did not affect overall survival in patients with AML. There was a higher incidence of CNS involvement in asymptomatic adult patients with de novo AML, emphasizing possible undervalued rates of CNS disease at diagnosis. Prospective studies should determine whether diagnostic lumbar puncture for MFC-CSF analysis and CNS prophylaxis could contribute to better selection and prognosis in this patient population.

Correlation between leukocyte-platelet aggregates and thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of activated blood and endothelial cells on the thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) has not yet been clarified. We prospectively analyzed correlation between circulating leukocyte-platelet aggregates and soluble selectins to thrombosis occurrence in MPN, in the context of standard and cardiovascular risk factors, and different clinical and biological characteristics. METHODS: Flow cytometric analysis of neutrophil-platelet (Neu-Plt) and monocyte-platelet (Mo-Plt) aggregates in peripheral blood, as well as quantification of soluble E-/L-/P-selectins by enzyme immunoassay, was performed on 95 newly diagnosed MPN patients. RESULTS: During the follow-up, thrombosis occurred in 12.6% MPN patients (arterial 9.4%, venous 3.2%), with a mean time of 39 months. The overall incidence rate of main thrombotic events was 4.36 per 100 patient-years. The incidence of arterial hypertension (HTA) was significantly higher in patients with thrombosis, compared to those without thrombosis (P < .05). The level of soluble P-selectin was significantly higher in patients with thrombosis compared to those without thrombosis (346.89 ng/mL vs 286.39 ng/mL, P = .034). The mean level of Neu-Plt (26.7% vs 22.4%) and Mo-Plt (17.8% vs 12.3%) aggregates did not differ significantly between the groups with and without thrombosis. A multivariate COX proportional hazard regression model confirmed an independent predictive significance of Mo-Plt aggregates (HR = 1.561, 95% CI: 1.007-2.420, P = .046), as well as the cumulative effect of Mo-Plt aggregates and HTA (HR = 1.975, 95%CI: 1.215-3.212, P = .006) for thrombosis occurrence. CONCLUSION: Monocyte-platelet aggregates represent an independent risk factor for thrombosis occurrence, further on supported by HTA.

The predictive value of morphological findings in early diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities.

This study explores cytomorphologic features and their predictive role for early identification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with morphological distinctive recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities (RCA): t(15;17), t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16). We retrospectively evaluated 396 de novo AML cases, diagnosed and treated at single institution, between 2013-2017. Specific cytomorphologic features suggesting distinctive AML-RCA were revealed at diagnosis in 62 (15.65%) patients, including AML with t(15;17) in 41 (66.13%), t(8;21) in 13 (20.97%) and inv(16)/t(16;16) in 8 (12.90%). Final diagnoses of AML-RCA according to WHO integrated diagnostic criteria were established in 66 (16.66%) cases, including AML with t(15;17) 40 (60.60%), t(8;21) 17 (25.76%), and inv(16)/t(16;16) 9 (13.64%). Discordance between cytomorphological and other integrated criteria was detected as missed/wrong-call in 0/1 for t(15;17), 6/2 for t(8;21) and 2/1 for inv(16)/t(16;16). The cytomorphological accuracy was 97.56% (40/41) for t(15;17), 57.89% (11/19) for t(8;21) and 70% (7/10) for inv (16)/t(16;16). Positive/negative predictive values of cytomorphological evaluation were: 97.56%/100% for t(15;17); 84.62%/88.68% for t(8;21); 87.50%/96.65% for inv(16)/t(16;16). Sensitivity/specificity were: 100%/96.15% for t(15;17); 64.10%/95.92% for t(8;21); 77.78%/98.25% for inv(16)/t(16;16). We confirmed that morphology is still a highly relevant evaluation method in diagnosing several common AML-RCAs before completing cytogenetic and molecular studies, enabling early detection, particularly of AML with t(15;17).

The role of immunophenotyping in differential diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) acquires immunophenotyping by flow cytometry in order to facilitate differential diagnosis between CLL and other mature B-cell neoplasms (MBCN). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define immunological profile of CLL cells. METHODS: Immunophenotyping by flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood specimens at diagnosis in the group of 211 patients with de novo MBCN. RESULTS: Absolute count of B-cells was significantly increased in all MBCN patients comparing to healthy control group (p < 0.05). B-cell monoclonality was detected in 96% of all MBCN patients, by using surface immunoglobulin (sIg) light chain restriction. B-cell antigens, CD19, CD20, CD22, were expressed with very high frequency in CLL and other MBCN. In comparison with other MBCN, in CLL group, the frequency of expression was higher for CD5 and CD23 (p < 0.0001), though lower for FMC7 antigen (p < 0.0001). CLL patients were characterized by lower expression patterns of CD20, CD22, CD79b, and sIg (p < 0.0001) as well as higher expression pattern of CD5 antigen (p < 0.05). Correlation between the final diagnosis of MBCN and values of CLL scoring system showed that the majority of CLL patients (97%) had higher values (5 or 4) whereas the majority of other MBCN patients (96%) had lower score values (0-3). CONCLUSION: Our results have shown that characteristic immunophenotype which differentiates CLL from other MBCN is defined by following marker combination--CD19+ CD20(+Iow) CD22(+low) CD5(+high) CD23+ FMC7-CD79b(+Iow) sIg(+Iow). CLL score values of 5 or 4 points are highly suggestive for diagnosis of CLL.