Compression therapy using surgical gloves does not prevent paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: results from a double-blind phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse effect of paclitaxel (PTX). There is no known prophylactic measure, although there are some reports of prevention with compression therapy using surgical gloves. On account of its predominantly subjective symptoms, it is difficult to exclude bias when assessing for CIPN. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of the same procedure for the prevention of paclitaxel-induced PN based on a double-blind study design. METHODS: The patients with early and recurrent breast cancer (with no prior PTX exposure) initiating weekly chemotherapy with PTX 80 mg/m2 were enrolled. Each patient donned two gloves on each hand at every PTX infusion. Two one-size-smaller gloves were donned on one hand (study side) and two normal-size gloves were donned on the other hand (control side) during 90 min from 30 min before the infusion to 30 min after the end of the infusion. Study side are blind for both patients and assessing physicians according to determination of the study side by research nurses in the chemotherapy unit. The primary outcome was the difference in the frequency of CIPN (motor/sensory) determined by the physician using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v4.0), with an evaluation at each cycle of PTX infusion. McNemar test was used to assess the primary outcome. RESULTS: Between July 2017 and November 2018, 56 patients were enrolled and 49 patients were evaluated. Overall, Grade ≥ 2 PN (sensory) was observed in 30.6 and 36.7% in the study and control sides, respectively (McNemar p = 0.25). PN (motor) was observed in 4.1 and 6.1% in the study and control sides, respectively (McNemar p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Surgical glove compression therapy showed no statistically significant effect on the incidence of PTX-induced PN. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry managed by the National University Hospital Council of Japan ( UMIN000027944 ). Registered 26 June 2017.

A Prospective Trial Evaluating the Safety of a Shortened Infusion of Ramucirumab in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: A shortened infusion of ramucirumab (from 60 to 20 minutes) was safe and feasible without infusion-related reactions.Twenty-minute infusions of ramucirumab can be an option for patients with no infusion-related reactions during the first 60-minute treatment. BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab is usually administered over 60 minutes, during which it is unlikely to cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs). This prospective study evaluated the safety of a shortened infusion of ramucirumab. METHODS: Patients who received their first dose of ramucirumab in a 60-minute infusion without developing IRRs were eligible and received their second ramucirumab dose for 20 minutes. The primary study endpoint was incidence of IRR during the first short-term infusion, and the secondary endpoints were incidence of IRR at any time and adverse events other than IRR. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients enrolled (median age, 68.5 years), 20 (55%) were male, 27 (67.5%) had stage IV gastric cancer, 25 (62.5%) received ramucirumab in combination with taxane-based chemotherapy, and 24 (60%) received only a single administration of ramucirumab prior to their enrollment. Notably, no IRR was observed during the first short-term infusion (IRR rate, 0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-0.72%). Among the 149 short-term infusions performed, there were no instances of IRRs or unexpected adverse events related to the treatment (Table 1). CONCLUSION: For patients without development of IRRs upon the first ramucirumab administration, shortening infusion time (from 60 to 20 minutes) is safe and feasible.

Efficacy and Safety Data of Osimertinib in Elderly Patients with NSCLC Who Harbor the EGFR T790M Mutation After Failure of Initial EGFR-TKI Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of osimertinib for elderly patients, since the data remain limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 77 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation and treated with osimertinib were reviewed. Efficacy and safety indicators, such as EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-related adverse events (AEs) and osimertinib-associated hematotoxicity, were evaluated in elderly patients (elderly group, EG; age, ≥75 years) by comparing them with younger patients (non-EG; aged <75 years). The frequency of AEs associated with osimertinib was compared with the initial EGFR-TKI treatment before osimertinib administration in the same patient cohort. RESULTS: Of the total 77 patients, 18 (23%) were assigned to the EG, whereas 59 (77%) were assigned to the non-EG. There were no significant differences in overall response rate and progression-free survival between the two groups. Regarding the safety of osimertinib, the EG had significantly more grade ≥2 paronychia than the non-EG (16.6% vs. 1.6%, p=0.04). Additionally, the maximum grade of EGFR-TKI-related AEs associated with osimertinib in the EG was significantly lower than that of the initial EGFR-TKI treatment (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Osimertinib is a safe and effective treatment option for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC who harbor the EGFR mutation.

Association between ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 polymorphisms and adverse drug reactions to regorafenib: a preliminary study
.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the occurrence of severe adverse drug reactions to regorafenib, a drug used in cancer therapy, the identification of a predictive marker(s) is needed to increase the therapeutic applicability of this compound. We therefore investigated whether polymorphisms in the ABCG2 and SLCO1B genes are associated with adverse drug reactions to regorafenib. METHODS: For these analyses, 37 Japanese cancer patients were treated with regorafenib, genotyped for polymorphisms in ABCG2 and SLCO1B, and evaluated for drug-related adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: There was no association between the ABCG2 421C>A variant and adverse drug reactions to regorafenib. After treatment, the incidences of increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as well as increased total bilirubin (grade ≥ 2) were 8%, 4%, and 12%, and 42%, 25%, and 25% among SLCO1B1*1b carriers and non-carriers, respectively. There were no significant associations between elevated ALT and bilirubin and the SLCO1B1*1b allele. However, there were significantly lower incidences of increased AST (8% vs. 42%) and anemia (16% vs. 50%) in SLCO1B1*1b carriers than in non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of SLCO1B1*1b allele appears to be associated with the development of adverse drug reactions to regorafenib; however, further studies involving larger test groups and other populations are needed to confirm these findings.
.