Race Does Not Affect Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recent evidence has shown that African American men with prostate cancer may have more radiosensitive disease with greater overall survival (OS) with radiotherapy compared to Caucasian men. We compared OS in African American and Caucasian men receiving radiotherapy utilizing the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: African American or Caucasian men with N0M0 prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 were selected and grouped into favorable and unfavorable risk based on clinical T-stage, clinical Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen. Patients with favorable risk received brachytherapy or dose-escalated external beam radiation (EBRT); those with unfavorable risk received EBRT plus anti-androgen therapy with/without brachytherapy. African American and Caucasian men in each subgroup were propensity score-matched and analyzed for survival. Sensitivity analysis used treatment-race and age-race interaction terms. RESULTS: 27,150 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median age of 68 (range=38-90) years and median follow-up of 59.93 (range=48-142.62) months. OS was equivalent between African American and Caucasian race in favorable risk [log-rank p=0.82; hazard ratio (HR)=0.928; 95% confidence intervaI (CI)=0.583-1.477, p=0.753] and unfavorable-risk subgroups (log-rank p=0.87, HR=1.078, 95% CI=0.843-1.379, p=0.550). No significant interaction existed between treatment and race for either cohort but there was a significant interaction between race and age in those with unfavorable risk (HR=1.046, 95% CI=1.009-1.084, p=0.015), with greater OS in those of Caucasian race ≤60 years (HR=0.320, 95% CI=0.137-0.752, p=0.009). CONCLUSION: African American and Caucasian men have similar survival when treated with risk-appropriate definitive radiotherapy. However, younger (age ≤60 years) African American men with unfavorable risk have poorer survival than their Caucasian counterparts and may harbor a significantly different biology of disease.

Radical Prostatectomy Without Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Is Widely Practiced in High-Risk Patients Despite Poorer Survival.

PURPOSE: Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the standard of care for unfavorable risk prostate cancer. We investigated dissection practice patterns and their impact on overall survival using a large national database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Disease was classified as either favorable or unfavorable on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Minimum follow-up was 4 years. All patients received risk-appropriate surgery: prostatectomy with or without PLND. Prostatectomy alone and prostatectomy with PLND was propensity score matched within each risk cohort. Survival analysis included Kaplan-Meier statistics, Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 66,469 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Median (range) age was 63 (27-90) years. Median (range) follow-up was 59.53 (48-143.54) months. Within the cohort of patients with favorable risk disease, 51% did not undergo nodal dissection. Matched analysis demonstrated no difference in survival (P = .926). Within the cohort of patients with unfavorable risk disease, 39.2% did not receive nodal dissection. Matched analysis demonstrated that nodal dissection had superior survival (log-rank P = .002; hazard ratio = 0.624; 95% confidence interval, 0.466-0.835; P = .002). Greater odds of receiving nodal dissection included an open or robot-assisted approach compared to a laparoscopic approach, academic/research programs, and higher risk groups. CONCLUSION: Although PLND is associated with a significant survival benefit in men with unfavorable risk prostate cancer, nearly 40% of patients with unfavorable risk disease did not receive PLND.

Challenging AJCC 8 Staging for Soft Tissue Sarcoma Using the NCDB.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8 grouping of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with nodal disease (N1M0) and metastatic disease (M1) as stage IV correctly represents the prognosis of these previously separate patient groups, using the National Cancer Database. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adults with STS identified in the 2004 to 2014 National Cancer Database, classified by the World Health Organization 2013 system into 10 histologic subgroups, were grouped according to AJCC 8 staging and analyzed according to demographic characteristics, histology, primary site, disease extent, and adjuvant treatment. Primary retroperitoneal sites, "other/unusual" histologic subgroups, and those with delays in therapy (>180 days from diagnosis) were excluded. We used χ2 tests, Cox proportional hazard models, and propensity-score matched analyses. RESULTS: Of 82,987 patients identified, 55,417 met inclusion criteria; 29,855 (53.9%) were male, and 25,262 (46.1%) were female. Median age was 60 years (range, 18-90 years). Overall survival (OS) of STS of all sites was significantly different between N1M0 and N0-1M1 patients at 5 years (34.4%; [95% confidence interval {CI}, 30.1%-38.8%] vs 10.1% [95% CI, 9%-11%], respectively) and 10 years (27.3% [95% CI, 22.5%- 32.2%] vs 5.4% [95% CI, 4.5%-6.5%], respectively; log-rank test, P < .001). For STS of trunk and extremities in N1M0 and N0-1M1 patients, the N1M0 cohort was associated with significantly greater OS on multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.41-0.58; P < .001), and this OS difference remained significant for propensity-matched cohorts of all primary sites (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44-0.64; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In adult STS, including those of the trunk and extremity, OS is superior with N1M0 compared with N0-1M1 disease. These results suggest that the AJCC 8th edition grouping of N1 and M1 patients into stage IV may obscure the more favorable prognosis of patients with N1M0 disease.

Limb-sparing surgery plus radiotherapy results in superior survival: an analysis of patients with high-grade, extremity soft-tissue sarcoma from the NCDB and SEER.

Small randomized trials have not shown an overall survival (OS) difference among local treatment modalities for patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (E-STS) but were underpowered for OS. We examine the impact of local treatment modalities on OS and sarcoma mortality (SM) using two national registries. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were analyzed separately to identify patients with stage II-III, high-grade E-STS diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 and treated with (1) amputation alone, (2) limb-sparing surgery (LSS) alone, (3) preoperative radiation therapy (RT) and LSS, or (4) LSS and postoperative RT. Multivariable analyses (MVAs) and 1:1 matched pair analyses (MPAs) examined treatment impacts on OS (both databases) and SM (SEER only). From the NCDB and SEER, 7828 and 2937 patients were included. On MVAs, amputation was associated with inferior OS and SM. Relative to LSS alone, both preoperative RT and LSS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.62-0.78) and LSS and postoperative RT (HR, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.75) improved OS in NCDB analyses with confirmation by SEER. Estimated median survivals from MPA utilizing NCDB data were 7.2 years with LSS alone (95% CI: 6.5-8.9 years) vs 9.8 years (95% CI: 9.0-11.2 years) with LSS and postoperative RT. A MPA comparing preoperative RT and LSS to LSS alone found median survivals of 8.9 years (95% CI: 7.9-not estimable) and 6.6 years (95% CI: 5.4-7.8 years). Optimal high-grade E-STS management includes LSS with preoperative or postoperative RT as evidenced by superior OS and SM.

Topical antioxidants in radiodermatitis: a clinical review.

Radiation-induced skin toxicity is the most prevalent side effect of radiation therapy. Not only does it have a significant effect on patients' quality of life, but it also results in poor follow-up and early termination of radiotherapy treatment. Several skin care practices and topical applications have been studied in the field of radiodermatitis, including skin washing, topical steroids, and mechanical skin barriers. Aside from these methods, many patients turn to complementary and alternative medicine for the prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis. Many of these alternative therapies are topically applied antioxidants. While the rationale behind the use of antioxidants in treating radiodermatitis is strong, clinical studies have been far less consistent. Even in large scale randomised controlled trials, findings have been limited by the inconsistent use of topical vehicles and placebos. In this article, the authors review the role of topical antioxidants to better help the practitioner navigate through different available skin directed antioxidants.

Lipoma and liposarcoma of the larynx: case reports and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Two cases of laryngeal lipomatous tumors are presented. Their diagnoses and management are discussed and contrasted. METHODS: Case report and literature review. RESULTS: Patient 1 is a 58 year old male presenting with five years of progressive shortness of breath, dysphagia, and globus sensation. Clinical exam and imaging study showed a 3.5 cm hypodense laryngeal mass, and he underwent transoral robotic-assisted surgery for complete excision. Final pathology revealed a well-differentiated liposarcoma. Patient 2 is a 79 year old female presenting with one year of non-progressive hoarseness and globus sensation. Clinical examination and imaging study revealed a 1.8 cm hypodense laryngeal mass. Transoral endoscopic complete excision of the submucosal mass was performed. Final pathology revealed benign spindle-cell lipoma. CONCLUSION: Liposarcoma and lipoma may present with similar symptomatology, clinical, and imaging findings. Pathology evaluation is of utmost importance for definitive diagnosis. Therefore, diagnosis and treatment of laryngeal lipomatous lesions are best accomplished with complete excision of the mass.

A Review of the Use of Topical Calendula in the Prevention and Treatment of Radiotherapy-Induced Skin Reactions.

Calendula is a topical agent derived from a plant of the marigold family Calendula Officinalis. Containing numerous polyphenolic antioxidants, calendula has been studied in both the laboratory and clinical setting for the use in treating and preventing radiation induced skin toxicity. Despite strong evidence in the laboratory supporting calendula's mechanism of action in preventing radiation induced skin toxicity, clinical studies have demonstrated mixed results. In light of the controversy surrounding the efficacy of calendula in treating and preventing radiodermatitis, the topic warrants further discussion.

Role of innate immunity in the pathogenesis of otitis media.

Otitis media (OM) is a public health problem in both developed and developing countries. It is the leading cause of hearing loss and represents a significant healthcare burden. In some cases, acute OM progresses to chronic suppurative OM (CSOM), characterized by effusion and discharge, despite antimicrobial therapy. The emergence of antibiotic resistance and potential ototoxicity of antibiotics has created an urgent need to design non-conventional therapeutic strategies against OM based on modern insights into its pathophysiology. In this article, we review the role of innate immunity as it pertains to OM and discuss recent advances in understanding the role of innate immune cells in protecting the middle ear. We also discuss the mechanisms utilized by pathogens to subvert innate immunity and thereby overcome defensive responses. A better knowledge about bacterial virulence and host resistance promises to reveal novel targets to design effective treatment strategies against OM. The identification and characterization of small natural compounds that can boost innate immunity may provide new avenues for the treatment of OM. There is also a need to design novel methods for targeted delivery of these compounds into the middle ear, allowing higher therapeutic doses and minimizing systemic side effects.