Epidemiology and Outcomes of Children with Kidney Failure Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy in Australia and New Zealand.

Introduction: The incidence and outcomes of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) have been well-studied in adults, but much less so in children. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology and outcomes of KRT in children in Australia and New Zealand from 2000 to 2020. Methods: Children aged <18 years initiating KRT in Australia and New Zealand between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020 and reported to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry were included. Patient survival, technique-survival, and graft survival were analyzed by Cox regression analyses. Results: Overall, 1058 children (median [interquartile range (IQR)] age 11 [5-15] years, 41% female, 66% White) were followed-up with for a median period of 12.3 years. First KRT modalities were peritoneal dialysis (PD; 48%), hemodialysis (HD; 34%), and kidney transplantation (KT; 18%). Pre-emptive KT incidence was highest in Caucasian children (80.4%) and lowest in the Indigenous population (3.2%). There was no difference in 5-year patient survival rates between 2011 and 2020 (96.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 93.8-98.4) and the preceding decade, 2000-2010 (94.5%, 95% CI 90.4-96.8) (P = 0.79). There was no difference in 5-year death-censored technique survival between 2011 and 2020 (51.2%, 95% CI 39.1-62) and 2000-2010 (48.8%, 95% CI 40.5-56.6) (P = 0.27). However, 5-year derath-censored graft survival was significantly higher in 2011-2020 (88.4%, 95% CI 84.6-91.4) than in 2000-2010 (84.3%, 95% CI 80.4-87.5) (P < 0.001). Conclusions: PD is the most commonly prescribed KRT modality for children in Australia and New Zealand. Patient-survival, technique-survival, and graft survival rates are excellent and graft survival has improved over the last 2 decades.

Corrigendum: PCRRT Expert Committee ICONIC position paper on prescribing kidney replacement therapy in critically sick children with acute liver failure.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.833205.].

PCRRT Expert Committee ICONIC Position Paper on Prescribing Kidney Replacement Therapy in Critically Sick Children With Acute Liver Failure.

Management of acute liver failure (ALF) and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) in the pediatric population can be challenging. Kidney manifestations of liver failure, such as hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and acute kidney injury (AKI), are increasingly prevalent and may portend a poor prognosis. The overall incidence of AKI in children with ALF has not been well-established, partially due to the difficulty of precisely estimating kidney function in these patients. The true incidence of AKI in pediatric patients may still be underestimated due to decreased creatinine production in patients with advanced liver dysfunction and those with critical conditions including shock and cardiovascular compromise with poor kidney perfusion. Current treatment for kidney dysfunction secondary to liver failure include conservative management, intravenous fluids, and kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Despite the paucity of evidence-based recommendations concerning the application of KRT in children with kidney dysfunction in the setting of ALF, expert clinical opinions have been evaluated regarding the optimal modalities and timing of KRT, dialysis/replacement solutions, blood and dialysate flow rates and dialysis dose, and anticoagulation methods.

Clofazimine in Mycobacterium abscessus peritonitis: A pediatric case report.

Peritonitis- and catheter-related infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) including Mycobacterium abscessus have been reported among adults on peritoneal dialysis (PD). There is no recommended antimicrobial regimen for the treatment of M. abscessus peritonitis. Clofazimine has emerged as an important adjuvant antimicrobial treatment of M. abscessus lung infection. We report, to our knowledge, the first case of M. abscessus PD peritonitis in a child treated successfully using clofazimine as a novel adjuvant therapy to amikacin and clarithromycin. Her clinical features were similar to those of bacterial peritonitis, but she had persistence of symptoms and high inflammatory markers despite empirical therapy for peritonitis. Bacterial culture of PD effluent became positive for M. abscessus after 5 days. There was complete symptom resolution after 6 days of multidrug therapy. Due to ototoxicity, amikacin was discontinued after 6 weeks, while clarithromycin and clofazimine were continued for 9 months to ensure complete pathogen eradication before a planned renal transplant. A high index of suspicion in refractory or culture-negative cases is important for the diagnosis of NTM peritonitis. Multidrug therapy is recommended for M. abscessus infections. Clofazimine was chosen as a novel adjunct antimicrobial because of its pharmacokinetics, ease of administration, cost-effectiveness, and lack of serious adverse events.

Risk factors associated with allograft failure in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: With improved outcomes for children transplanted with FSGS since previous NAPRTCS registry reports, this study re-evaluates the association of living donation, immunosuppression, and DGF on graft survival. SETTING: Patients transplanted between 2002 and 2016, comparing FSGS diagnosis vs other glomerular diseases. METHODS: Primary outcomes were allograft survival and FSGS recurrent-free graft survival. Potential risk factors were obtained at the time of transplant and up to 30 days post-transplantation. Analysis considered a priori that DGF may be a proxy for severe FSGS recurrence. Multivariable survival models for outcome were tested for sensitivity without/with DGF to determine features independent of recurrence. RESULTS: From the larger cohort of 3010 patients, 5-year graft survival in children with FSGS (n = 455) was worse (74.3%) compared with other glomerular diseases (87.1%, n = 690) (HR 1.45, P = 0.033). Modeling all glomerular diseases, survival risk was associated with deceased donor (HR 1.83, P = 0.002), re-transplantation (HR 1.58, P = 0.013), and recipient age (HR 1.06/y, P = 0.002). The living donor advantage was not confirmed in a FSGS model (HR 1.51 for deceased, P = 0.12). DGF was highly associated with graft failure (HR 4.39, P < 0.001) and independent of re-transplant history but not FSGS diagnosis. Induction agents or primary immunosuppression choices were not associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Graft survival rates have improved since the previous report. Living donor did not predict graft failure, but there remains no survival advantage. DGF was the primary independent predictor for graft loss secondary to FSGS recurrence, consistent with DGF being a proxy for severe recurrent disease.