Audio-visual navigation reduces treatment time in deep-inspiration breath hold radiotherapy.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment times for deep-inspiration breath hold with and without audio-visual (A-V) navigation. METHODS: We measured the real treatment time in 60 patients with breast cancer undergoing postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty consecutive patients were treated without deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and another 30 patients using deep-inspiration breath hold (10 patients with DIBH only, 10 patients with DIBH using visual feedback and 10 patients with DIBH using visual feedback following breath training). The treatment time was relativized to number of fields and 100 monitor units (MU). The independent t-test was used to analyse differences between cohorts. RESULTS: The mean treatment time for patients without DIBH was 46.5 seconds per field and 90.9 seconds per 100 MU, for DIBH only 92.3 and 170.2 seconds, for DIBH with audio-visual navigation 68.1 and 133.8 seconds, and for DIBH with A-V feedback including breath training 66.1 and 132.5 seconds. The treatment times for patients treated using DIBH with visual navigation were significantly shorter in comparison with patients without visual feedback. We were not able to prove any significant benefit for breath training in terms of reducing the treatment time. CONCLUSION: Audio-visual navigation enables to significantly reduce the treatment time in comparison with DIBH without A-V feedback.

Comparing morbidity and cancer control after 3D-conformal (70/74 Gy) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (78/82 Gy) for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare toxicity and cancer control between patients with prostate cancer treated using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and those treated using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 553 patients with prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT 70-74 Gy (3D-CRT 70, 3D-CRT 74) or IMRT 78-82 Gy (IMRT 78, IMRT/SIB 82). Late toxicity was scored according to FC-RTOG/LENT criteria. Biochemical failure was defined using the Phoenix and ASTRO definitions. RESULTS: The 5-year risk of grade 2-4 genitourinary toxicity was 26.3 % (3D-CRT 70), 27.2 % (3D-CRT 74), 17.3 % (IMRT 78), and 25.1 % (IMRT/SIB 82) without statistical differences. The 5-year risk of grade 2-4 gastrointestinal toxicity was 19.4 % (3D-CRT 70), 42.1 % (3D-CRT 74), 20.5 % (IMRT 78), and 26.6 % (IMRT/SIB 82). The differences between 3D-CRT 74 and 3D-CRT 70 and between 3D-CRT 74 and IMRT 78 were statistically significant (log rank p = 0.03). The 5-year Phoenix PSA relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS) in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients treated using 3D-CRT were 89.4, 65.5, and 57.8 %, respectively. Patients treated with IMRT achieved the following results: 90.9, 89.4, and 83.9 %. Clinical relapse-free survival (C-RFS) in patients treated using 3D-CRT vs. IMRT for the aforementioned groups were 94.7 vs. 100 %, 86.8 vs. 98.6 %, and 84.4 vs. 94.5 %. Disease-free survival (DFS) for patients treated using 3D-CRT were 83.1, 70.9, and 71.5 %. The IMRT group reached 95.8, 89.1, and 87.6 %. The PSA-RFS for intermediate- and high-risk patients were statistically significant, while C-RFS and DFS were marginally better. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation with IMRT was associated with improved cancer control in intermediate- and high-risk patients in comparison with 3D-CRT, without compromising toxicity.

MRI-based preplanning using CT and MRI data fusion in patients with cervical cancer treated with 3D-based brachytherapy: feasibility and accuracy study.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assisted radiation treatment planning enables enhanced target contouring. The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility and accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and MRI data fusion for MRI-based treatment planning in an institution where an MRI scanner is not available in the radiotherapy department. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The registration inaccuracy of applicators and soft tissue was assessed in 42 applications with CT/MRI data fusion. The absolute positional difference of the center of the applicators was measured in four different planes from the top of the tandem to the cervix. Any inaccuracy of registration of soft tissue in relation to the position of applicators was determined and dose-volume parameters for MRI preplans and for CT/MRI fusion plans with or without target and organs at risk (OAR) adaptation were evaluated. RESULTS: We performed 6,132 measurements in 42 CT/MRI image fusions. Median absolute difference of the center of tandem on CT and MRI was 1.1 mm. Median distance between the center of the right ovoid on CT and MRI was 1.7 and 1.9 mm in the laterolateral and anteroposterior direction, respectively. Corresponding values for the left ovoid were 1.6 and 1.8 mm. Rotation of applicators was 3.1°. Median absolute difference in position of applicators in relation to soft tissue was 1.93, 1.50, 1.05, and 0.84 mm in the respective transverse planes, and 1.17, 1.28, 1.27, and 1.17 mm in selected angular directions. The dosimetric parameters for organs at risk on CT/MRI fusion plans without OAR adaptation were significantly impaired whereas the target coverage was not influenced. Planning without target adaptation led to overdosing of the target volume, especially high-risk clinical target volume--D90 88.2 vs. 83.1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MRI-based preplanning with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion can be safe and feasible, with an acceptable inaccuracy of soft tissue registration.

Late toxicity after conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: impact of previous surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare late toxicity of conventional-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 340 patients with T1-3 prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT (n = 228) and IMRT (n = 112). The median follow-up time was 5.9 years and 3.0 years, respectively. The prescription dose was 70 Gy for 3D-CRT and 78 Gy for IMRT. Late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were graded according to the Fox Chase modification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force criteria. RESULTS: There was no difference between 3D-CRT and IMRT in the incidence of GI and GU toxicity at 3 years. On multivariate analysis, transurethral resection of prostate/open transvesical prostatectomy (TURP/TVPE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia, carried out before radiotherapy, significantly increased the risk of Grade >or=2 GU toxicity (risk ratio 1.88). Among patients who experienced TURP/TVPE, the 5-year actuarial likelihood of Grade 2-3 urinary incontinence was 23%, compared with 9% for those without prostate surgery (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance of 3D-CRT and IMRT was similar, despite the use of high radiation dose with IMRT. Previous TURP/TVPE increased the risk of GU toxicity.

Survival after oxaliplatin therapy of irinotecan-pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The activity of oxaliplatin (OHP) and irinotecan (CPT) alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced colorectal cancer is comparable, but there are limited data on the effectiveness of oxaliplatin in patients pretreated by irinotecan. METHODOLOGY: We have analyzed retrospectively the survival of 77 consecutive advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with OHP after previous CPT therapy. Multivariate analysis was performed by Cox regression method, with the results expressed as hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: The median survival from the start of OHP therapy was 10.7 months (1-year survival 43%). The median survival was not reached in 10 patients treated by hepatic arterial infusion of OHP (>10.6 months). The median survival from the diagnosis of advanced/metastatic disease was 34.3 months. On multivariate analysis, hemoglobin <125g/L (HR=2.42), neutrophils <5200 per microL (HR=0.36), duration of advanced/metastatic disease <21 months (HR=2.40) and interval from last CPT administration <3 months (HR=0.27) were statistically significant (p<0.05) independent predictors of survival from the start of OHP treatment, but only hemoglobin (HR=2.07), neutrophils (HR=0.32) and CEA <100microg/L (HR=0.44) were independent predictors of survival from the last CPT. There were 4 treatment-induced deaths after combination of OHP and raltitrexed (TOMOX). CONCLUSIONS: More than 40% of patients pretreated by irinotecan survived 1 year after start of OHP therapy. The therapy was similarly effective as a second or higher line of treatment. Hemoglobin levels and neutrophil count were independent factors associated with survival. The number of toxic deaths observed after TOMOX is alarming.

Brain metastases of epithelial ovarian carcinoma responding to cisplatin and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Brain represents a rare site of metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). CASE REPORT: We observed a case of multiple brain metastases in an EOC patient after complete response of a pelvic recurrence to platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Complete response of brain metastases was observed after whole brain radiotherapy and subsequent chemotherapy by combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine. Three subsequent recurrences of brain metastases were controlled by re-treatment by the combination of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and gemcitabine. METHODS: Because of limited information on the outcome of EOC brain metastases in reported case series, a pooled analysis of the published reports in patients with EOC brain metastases was performed. Data were extracted from 46 reports that contained sufficient details on 189 individual patients. The survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the log-rank test and Cox method, respectively. RESULTS: The most favorable outcome was observed in patients treated by surgery combined with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The survival was significantly better in reports describing only one or two cases, in patients diagnosed after 1992, in patients who received therapy in addition to symptomatic treatment, in patients treated by radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery, in patients without extracranial metastases and with single brain metastases. On multivariate analysis, the absence of extracranial metastases, treatment by chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy were independent positive predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: EOC brain metastases are responsive to chemotherapy. An aggressive multidisciplinary therapeutic approach including chemotherapy may lead to prolonged survival.

Prognostic impact of hemoglobin level prior to radiotherapy on survival in patients with glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma treated with postoperative or primary radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 2000, a total of 100 patients underwent irradiation as part of their initial treatment for glioblastoma. All patients had undergone surgery or biopsy followed by conventional external-beam radiotherapy. 85 patients who received the planned dose of irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) were analyzed for the influence of prognostic factors. 73/85 (86%) of patients were given postoperative irradiation, while 12/85 (14%) of patients were primarily treated with radiotherapy after biopsy. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 10.1 months (range, 3.7-49.8 months), the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 41% and 5%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed age < or = 55 years (p < 0.001), pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin (Hb) level > 12 g/dl (p = 0.009), and pre-radiotherapy dose of dexamethasone < or = 2 mg/day (p = 0.005) to be associated with prolonged survival. At multivariate analysis, younger age (p < 0.001), higher Hb level (p = 0.002), lower dose of dexamethasone (p = 0.026), and a hemispheric tumor location (p = 0.019) were identified as independent prognostic factors for longer survival. The median survival for patients with an Hb level > 12 g/dl was 12.1 months compared to 7.9 months for those with a lower Hb level. Contingency-table statistics showed no significant differences for the two Hb groups in the distribution of other prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that lower Hb level prior to radiotherapy for glioblastoma can adversely influence prognosis. This finding deserves further evaluation.