Short interruptions of TNF-inhibitor treatment can be associated with treatment failure in patients with immune-mediated diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of immune-mediated diseases has increased in the past decades and despite the use of biological treatments all patients do not achieve remission. The aim of this study was to characterise the reasons for short interruptions during treatment with two commonly used TNF-inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab and to analyse the possible effects of the interruptions on immunisation and switching the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This case-control study was based on retrospective analyses of patient records and a questionnaire survey to clinicians. A total of 370 patients (194 immunised cases and 172 non-immunised controls, 4 excluded) were enrolled from eight hospitals around Finland. Eleven different diagnoses were represented, and the largest patient groups were those with inflammatory bowel or rheumatic diseases. RESULTS: Treatment interruptions were associated with immunisation in patients using infliximab (p < .001) or adalimumab (p < .000001). Patients with treatment interruptions were more likely to have been treated with more than one biological agent compared to those without treatment interruptions. This was particularly prominent among patients with a rheumatic disease (p < .00001). The most frequent reason for a treatment interruption among the cases was an infection, whereas among the control patients it was remission. The median length of one interruption was one month (interquartile range 1-3 months). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the interruptions of the treatment with TNF-inhibitors expose patients to immunisation and increase the need for drug switching. These findings stress the importance of careful judgement of the need for a short interruption in the biological treatment in clinical work, especially during non-severe infections.

Survival and safety of infliximab bio-original and infliximab biosimilar (CT-P13) in usual rheumatology care.

OBJECTIVES: Reports to-date indicate similarity between infliximab biosimilar (IB) and infliximab bio-original (IO) in clinical efficacy and safety. This study examines the survival of IB and IO using routinely collected data over a 2-year period. METHODS: Routinely collected clinical data inputted directly in an electronic database at a large rheumatology centre were analysed. Adult patients taking IO or IB for any rheumatological diagnosis were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to examine IB and IO survival, with a sub-group analysis among those starting infliximab from 2008 onwards. RESULTS: Out of 395 patients analysed, 53% (n=209) were female; the majority had rheumatoid arthritis (31%) followed by spondyloarthritis (28%). Ninety-nine patients had IB as the first infliximab drug. Patients who started on IB vs. IO as their first infliximab product, had better survival over the first 2 years (log rank=0.001). Discontinuation due to inefficacy was much commoner in IO versus IB users (18 vs. 5%). In patients switching from IO to IB, drug survival was better versus those receiving IB as the first infliximab drug (log rank=0.073). CONCLUSIONS: IB was well-tolerated and comparable to IO, with no additional safety signals identified. The results suggest superior survival of IB over IO over the first 2 years.

Early Remission Is a Realistic Target in a Majority of Patients with DMARD-naive Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed remission rates at 3 and 12 months in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were naive for disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and who were treated in a Finnish rheumatology clinic from 2008 to 2011. We compared remission rates and drug treatments between patients with RA and patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA). METHODS: Data from all DMARD-naive RA and UA patients from the healthcare district were collected using software that includes demographic and clinical characteristics, disease activity, medications, and patient-reported outcomes. Our rheumatology clinic applies the treat-to-target principle, electronic monitoring of patients, and multidisciplinary care. RESULTS: Out of 409 patients, 406 had data for classification by the 2010 RA criteria of the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism. A total of 68% were female, and mean age (SD) was 58 (16) years. Respectively, 56%, 60%, and 68% were positive for anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), rheumatoid factor (RF), and RF/anti-CCP, and 19% had erosive disease. The median (interquartile range) duration of symptoms was 6 (4-12) months. A total of 310 were classified as RA and 96 as UA. The patients with UA were younger, had better functional status and lower disease activity, and were more often seronegative than the patients with RA. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (3 variables) remission rates of RA and UA patients at 3 months were 67% and 58% (p = 0.13), and at 12 months, 71% and 79%, respectively (p = 0.16). Sustained remission was observed in 57%/56% of RA/UA patients. Patients with RA used more conventional synthetic DMARD combinations than did patients with UA. None used biological DMARD at 3 months, and only 2.7%/1.1% of the patients (RA/UA) used them at 12 months (p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Remarkably high remission rates are achievable in real-world DMARD-naive patients with RA or UA.

Clinical effectiveness of CT-P13 (Infliximab biosimilar) used as a switch from Remicade (infliximab) in patients with established rheumatic disease. Report of clinical experience based on prospective observational data.

OBJECTIVE: To gain clinical experience on the effectiveness and safety of switching from infliximab-Remicade(INX) to infliximab-biosimilar-CT-P13(INB) in patients with established rheumatic disease. METHODS: Patients receiving INX treatment at a rheumatology clinic consented to switching from INX to INB. Patient reported outcomes (PROs), disease-activity, and inflammatory markers were recorded at every visit. Generalized estimating equation models and time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) before/during INX and INB treatments were employed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients [mean (SD) age 53 (11), 17 F] with various rheumatic diseases were switched to INB after a mean (SD) of 4.1 (2.3) years on INX. Thirty-one patients were on concomitant methotrexate. At a median (range) of 11 (7.5-13) months following the first administration of INB, AUCs for disease activity and PROs were similar for INX and INB. They were better compared to those prior to INX. Eleven patients (28.2%) discontinued INB, due to INX antidrug antibodies detected prior to INB infusion (n = 3); latent tuberculosis (n = 1); new-onset neurofibromatosis (n = 1); subjective reasons with no objective deterioration of disease (n = 6). CONCLUSION: The clinical effectiveness of INB in both PROs and disease-activity measures was comparable to INX during the first year of switching, with no immediate safety signals. Subjective reasons (negative expectations) may play a role among discontinuations of biosimilars. Larger patient numbers and longer follow-up are necessary for confirming this clinical experience.

Similar clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis with more versus less expensive treatment strategies. Observational data from two rheumatology clinics.

OBJECTIVES: Selection of efficacious medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has tremendously increased over a decade including new costly biologic agents and inexpensive conventional anti-rheumatic drugs, used in combinations for more efficacy. Treatments aim at remission or at least low disease activity. Our objective was to study whether treatment target is reached and to what cost, in patients with RA in two Nordic rheumatology clinics. METHODS: Cross sectional observational clinical data of all patients with RA seen in 2010 in two Nordic county hospital rheumatology units: Kristiansand, Norway and Jyväskylä, Finland, which both serve a population of about 275,000. Measures included patient demographic measures, clinical characteristics, disease activity, functional status, and treatments. Annual costs of medications to the society were calculated per 100 patients, using an assumption that a patient is taking current medications for one year. RESULTS: Patient populations from Kristiansand and Jyväskylä were similar according to age, gender, disease duration, and prevalence of RF and CCP. Disease activity was low and patients' functional status well reserved in both clinics. Almost twice as many patients in Kristiansand than in Jyväskylä (33% vs. 17%) used biologic agents. A combination of conventional anti-rheumatic drugs was currently used by <1% of patients in Kristiansand and by 37% of patients in Jyväskylä. Estimated annual costs of medications per 100 patients were €508,000 in Kristiansand and €280,000 in Jyväskylä. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment target of remission/low disease activity and good functional status can be reached in RA using expensive and less-expensive anti-rheumatic drugs.