Multiple immune-related adverse events secondary to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced cancer: association with treatment effectiveness.

Introduction: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are widely used in cancer treatment with a potential of causing immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Several studies have reported a positive correlation between development of IRAEs and improved survival outcome. However, few studies have focused on the potential role of multiple IRAEs on treatment effectiveness. This study aimed at investigating the association between multiple IRAEs and treatment effectiveness in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced cancer patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at three Swedish centers. All patients (n=600) treated with PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor, in monotherapy or in combination for advanced cancer between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Multiple IRAEs were defined as IRAEs involving more than one organ system either simultaneously or sequentially. Time-depending Cox-regression model to mitigate the risk for immortal time bias (ITB) was applied. Results: The major tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (205 patients; 34.2%) and malignant melanoma (196 patients; 32.7%). Of all patients,32.8% developed single IRAE and 16.2% multiple IRAEs. Patients with multiple IRAEs showed significantly improved PFS (Hazard Ratio, HR=0.78 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.57-0.98) and OS (HR=0.65 95% CI: 0.44-0.95) compared to patients with single IRAE or no IRAE (HR=0.46 95% CI:0.34-0.62 for PFS vs HR=0.41 95% CI: 0.28-0.60 for OS). Conclusion: In conclusion, our data supports a stronger association between development of multiple as opposed to single IRAEs and clinical effectiveness in advanced cancer patients treated with CPIs.

Association between parity and pregnancy-associated tumor features in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) is the most common ovarian cancer subtype. Parity is an important risk-reducing factor, but the underlying mechanism behind the protective effect is unclear. Our aim was to study if the expression of hormones and proteins involved in pregnancy were affected by the woman's parity status, and if they may be associated with tumor stage and survival. METHODS: We evaluated expression of progesterone receptor (PR), progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1), relaxin-2, and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFß1) in tumor tissue from 92 women with HGSC parous (n = 73) and nulliparous (n = 19). Key findings were then evaluated in an independent expansion cohort of 49 patients. Survival rates by hormone/protein expression were illustrated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The independent prognostic value was tested by Cox regression, using models adjusted for established poor-prognostic factors (age at diagnosis, FIGO stage, type of surgery, and macroscopic residual tumor after surgery). RESULTS: HGSC tumors from parous women were PR positive (≥ 1% PR expression in tumor cells) more often than tumors from nulliparous women (42% vs. 16%; p-value 0.04), and having more children was associated with developing PR positive tumors [i.e., ≥ 3 children versus nulliparity, adjusted for age at diagnosis and stage: OR 4.31 (95% CI 1.12-19.69)]. A similar result was seen in the expansion cohort. Parity status had no impact on expression of PGRMC1, relaxin-2 and TGFß1. No associations were seen with tumor stage or survival. CONCLUSION: Tumors from parous women with HGSC expressed PR more often than tumors from nulliparous women, indicating that pregnancies might possibly have a long-lasting impact on ovarian cancer development.

The role of dacarbazine and temozolomide therapy after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignant melanoma patients: A case series and meta-analysis.

Dacarbazine (DTIC) and its oral counterpart temozolomide (TMZ) have been the most used agents in advanced malignant melanoma (MM) patients and they are still used routinely. The preferred first line treatment, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) might shape the tumor and the tumor microenvironment, possibly affecting the response to subsequent therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment effect of DTIC/TMZ in MM patients after CPI therapy in a consecutive patient cohort and through systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Thirty-five patients with advanced MM treated with DTIC/TMZ after previous CPI therapy in three Swedish regions between 2017 and 2021 were recognized and seven case series studies were identified through systematic database review. Pooled data from all 345 patients showed a median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) of 1.9 months and overall survival (OS) of 6.0 months. Three of these studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing DTIC/TMZ after CPI treatment, versus no previous immunotherapy, showing no statistically significant differences in rwPFS or OS but higher real-world response rate to chemotherapy for the prior-CPI treated group (Odds Ratio: 2.24; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.04-4.86). The current study supports consideration of DTIC/TMZ in later line of treatment in the immunotherapy era.

Predicting immune-related adverse events using a simplified frailty score in cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are in widespread clinical use. Little is known about which patients are at risk for developing toxicity. It is essential being able to identify patients with higher risk of experiencing immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) before initiation of CPI treatment to optimize treatment decisions and follow-up strategy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a simplified frailty score based on performance status (PS), age, and comorbidity expressed as Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) could predict development of IRAEs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study at three Swedish centers. All patients (n = 596) treated with PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor for advanced cancer between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. RESULTS: In total, 361 patients (60.6%) were classified as nonfrail and 235 (39.4%) as frail. The most common cancer type was non-small cell lung cancer (n = 203; 34.1%) followed by malignant melanoma (n = 195; 32.7%). Any grade of IRAE occurred in 138 (58.7%) frail and in 155 (42.9%) non-frail patients (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.09-2.28). Age, CCI, and PS did not independently predict the occurrence of IRAEs. Multiple IRAEs occurred in 53 (22.6%) frail and in 45 (12.5%) nonfrail patients (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.00-2.64). DISCUSSION: In conclusion, the simplified frailty score predicted all grade IRAEs and multiple IRAEs in multivariate analyses whereas age, CCI, or PS did not separately predict development of IRAEs suggesting that this easy-to-use score may be of value in clinical decision making but a large prospective study is needed to assess its true value.

Parity is associated with better prognosis in ovarian germ cell tumors, but not in other ovarian cancer subtypes.

Ovarian cancer is influenced by reproductive factors, with a reduced risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in parous women. Nonepithelial ovarian cancer frequently affects young women and often precedes or occurs during the childbearing years. However, the impact of reproductive factors on ovarian cancer survival remains unclear: in epithelial ovarian cancer, data are conflicting, and subtype-specific associations have not been examined, and in nonepithelial ovarian cancer, it has not been studied. Using Swedish registers, we evaluated associations between women's reproductive history and cancer-specific mortality by subtype of epithelial and nonepithelial ovarian cancer in 3791 women born 1953 and later, diagnosed from 1990 to 2018. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using Cox-proportional hazard models. Parity was associated with a 78% decreased risk of cause-specific mortality in 243 women with germ cell tumors (GCTs) (parous vs nulliparous, adjusted for age at diagnosis: HR: 0.22 [95% CI 0.07-0.62]), with a decreased risk with increasing number of births (per birth: HR: 0.60 [95% CI 0.38-0.95]). We found no evidence of associations between parity and cause-specific mortality among the 334 patients with sex-cord stromal tumors, nor among the 3214 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer; neither overall, nor by subtype. In conclusion, in our large, population-based study, parity was associated with a clearly better prognosis in GCTs but not in the other ovarian cancer subtypes. Future research on how hormone exposure impacts GCT development may lead to a better understanding of mechanisms affecting survival.

Improved survival without increased toxicity with influenza vaccination in cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.

In international guidelines, influenza vaccination is recommended to cancer patients receiving antitumor treatment. Whether this recommendation should include patients treated with the recently introduced and now widely used checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) is unclear. The immune hyperactivation after vaccination in a patient on CPI treatment may strengthen the antitumor immunity and improve patients´ prognosis. On the other hand, the hyperactivation might increase the risk for immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Furthermore, there is a risk for decreased antitumor effect by the phenomenon of antigenic competition. Only results from few studies addressing survival have been reported and the results from studies on IRAEs are contradictory. We performed a multi-center retrospective cohort study at three Swedish centers in patients with metastatic cancer. All patients previously not treated with CPIs and who received monotherapy with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocker between January 1st, 2016 until May 31st, 2019 were included. The most common type of malignancy was melanoma (47.8%) followed by non-small cell lung cancer (31.0%). Statistically significant longer PFS and OS were observed in multivariate analyses at 6-month landmark time in the vaccinated compared to the non-vaccinated group after adjustment for age, gender, comorbidity, performance status, CNS metastasis and line of treatment (p = .041 and 0.028, respectively). Furthermore, the incidence of any IRAE grade was comparable between vaccinated and non-vaccinated group (p = .85). In conclusion, the current study indicates that survival improves with influenza vaccination while not increasing the risk for side effects in cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Hence, our results strongly support influenza vaccination in cancer patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors.

Complete response with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in BRAF mutated advanced low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

More effective treatments are needed for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). Our patient, who suffers from metastatic LGSOC, had received all established treatments. Sequencing analysis revealed an activating BRAF mutation. Therefore, combined treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which is the gold standard in malignant melanoma, was initiated. After eight months of therapy, the response was assessed as complete and the treatment is still, 3.5 years after initiation, of benefit. To our knowledge, no complete response on combined BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment of low-grade serous ovarian cancer has previously been reported.

High proliferation is associated with inferior outcome in male breast cancer patients.

Assessment of proliferation is important in female breast cancer and individual treatment decisions are based upon its results, especially in the luminal subgroups. Gene expression analyses fail to group male breast cancer into the intrinsic subgroups previously established in female breast cancer. Even though proliferation has been shown to divide male breast cancer into molecular subgroups with different prognoses, the clinical importance of proliferation markers has not yet been elucidated. Previous studies in male breast cancer have demonstrated contradictory results regarding the prognostic impact of histological grade and Ki-67, parameters strongly associated with proliferation. The aim of the present project was to study proliferation in male breast cancer by assessing other proliferation-related markers viz. cyclins A, B, D1 and mitotic count. A total of 197 male breast cancer cases with accessible paraffin-embedded material and outcome data were investigated. Immunohistochemical stainings were performed on tissue microarrays. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional regression models were used for survival analyses with breast cancer death as the event. The subset of patients with high expression of cyclin A (hazard ratio (HR) 3.7; P=0.001) and B (HR 2.7; P=0.02) demonstrated a poorer survival. Furthermore, high mitotic count was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer death (HR 2.5; P=0.01). In contrast, cyclin D1 overexpression was predictive of better breast cancer survival (HR 0.3; P=0.001). In conclusion, high levels of cyclin A and B expression and an elevated mitotic count result in a two to threefold higher risk for breast cancer death, whereas cyclin D1 overexpression halves the risk. The clinical utility of these proliferation markers needs further elucidation.

Cyclin B is an immunohistochemical proliferation marker which can predict for breast cancer death in low-risk node negative breast cancer.

UNLABELLED: Patients with low-risk node negative breast cancer have an excellent prognosis with 5% breast cancer mortality at 10 years. However, prognostic factors are needed to identify poor prognostic patients who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. Proliferation has been identified as the most important component of gene expression profiles. Cyclin B is a proliferative marker easily assessed by immunohistochemistry. We wanted to examine cyclin B as a prognostic factor in low-risk breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using an experimental study design, we compared women dying early from their breast cancer (n=17) with women free from relapse more than eight years after initial diagnosis (n=24). All women had stage I, node negative and hormone receptor positive disease. None had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor samples were immunostained for cyclin B using commercial antibodies. RESULTS: The mean percentage of cyclin B (12%) was significantly higher (p=0.001) in women dying from their breast cancer compared with women free from relapse (5%). High cyclin B (> or =9%) identified 11/17 patients dying from breast cancer and low cyclin B identified 22/24 patients free from relapse. The sensitivity and specificity of cyclin B was 65% and 92%, respectively. DISCUSSION: We found that low-risk node negative patients with high expression of cylin B had a significantly worse outcome than patients with low expression of cyclin B. Cyclin B could separate patients with poor survival from those with good survival with 80% accuracy. We suggest that cyclin B might be a potent prognostic factor in this low-risk patient group.