RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Variant-adapted COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, many patients rely on pre-existing immunity by original vaccines or prior infections. AIM: To assess whether such immunity sufficiently combats the highly immune-evasive SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant. METHODS: Utilising two longitudinal cohorts, we evaluated immunity against JN.1 induced by original vaccines (IBD: n = 98; healthy: n = 48), omicron breakthrough infection (IBD: n = 55; healthy: n = 57) or XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines (IBD: n = 18). Neutralisation and anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and JN.1 were assessed using multiplex immunoassays. Study outcomes were wild-type and JN.1 neutralisation following three doses of original mRNA vaccines, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy (primary outcome), and JN.1 neutralisation following third-dose breakthrough infection or a fourth dose of XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Following original vaccines, JN.1 neutralisation was lower than wild-type neutralisation in all study groups (healthy, anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF; each p < 0.001); most individuals lacked JN.1 neutralisation (healthy: 97.9%; anti-TNF: 98.3% and non-anti-TNF: 92.3%). Confounder-adjusted multivariable modelling strongly associated anti-TNF therapy with low levels of anti-JN.1-RBD IgG (fold-change 0.48 [95% CI 0.39-0.59]). JN.1 neutralisation was similar in patients with or without breakthrough infection (anti-TNF, non-anti-TNF; each p > 0.05); neutralisation failure was 100% despite breakthrough infection. XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines enhanced JN.1 neutralisation (p < 0.001) and reduced neutralisation failure rates in patients with IBD (94.4% pre-vaccination vs. 44.4% post-vaccination; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Only variant-adapted vaccines protect against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Patients with IBD and healthy individuals without recent vaccination may lack protection against the JN.1 subvariant KP.3 which causes current COVID-19 surges.
RESUMO
Recently updated COVID-19 mRNA vaccines encode the spike protein of the omicron subvariant XBB.1.5 and are recommended for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immunosuppressive treatment. Nonetheless, their immunogenicity in patients with IBD against rapidly expanding virus variants remains unknown. This prospective multicenter cohort study is the first study to investigate the immunogenicity of XBB.1.5-adapted vaccines in patients with IBD. Systemic and mucosal antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of the omicron subvariants XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86, as well as their neutralization were quantified before and two to four weeks after vaccination with monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted mRNA vaccines. Vaccination increased levels of serum anti-RBD IgG targeting XBB.1.5, EG.5.1, and BA.2.86 (1.9-fold, 1.8-fold, and 2.6-fold, respectively) and enhanced corresponding neutralization responses (2.3-fold, 3.1-fold, and 3.5-fold, respectively). Following vaccination, anti-TNF-treated patients had reduced virus neutralization compared to patients on treatments with other cellular targets. 11.1% and 16.7% of patients lacked EG.5.1 and BA.2.86 neutralization, respectively; all these patients received anti-TNF treatment. At mucosal sites, vaccination induced variant-specific anti-RBD IgG but failed to induce RBD-targeting IgA. Our findings provide a basis for future vaccine recommendations while highlighting the importance of frequent booster vaccine adaptation and the need for mucosal vaccination strategies in patients with IBD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vaccine-elicited immune responses are impaired in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF biologics. AIMS: To assess vaccination efficacy against the novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in immunosuppressed patients with IBD. METHODS: This prospective multicentre case-control study included 98 biologic-treated patients with IBD and 48 healthy controls. Anti-spike IgG concentrations and surrogate neutralisation against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 were measured at two different time points (2-16 weeks and 22-40 weeks) following third dose vaccination. Surrogate neutralisation was based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein-protein interaction. Primary outcome was surrogate neutralisation against tested SARS-CoV-2 sublineages. Secondary outcomes were proportions of participants with insufficient surrogate neutralisation, impact of breakthrough infection, and correlation of surrogate neutralisation with anti-spike IgG concentration. RESULTS: Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages was reduced in patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNF biologics compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each p ≤ 0.001) at visit 1. Anti-TNF therapy (odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.19-0.46]) and time since vaccination (0.85 [0.72-1.00]) were associated with low, and mRNA-1273 vaccination (1.86 [1.12-3.08]) with high wild-type surrogate neutralisation in a ß-regression model. Accordingly, higher proportions of patients treated with anti-TNF biologics had insufficient surrogate neutralisation against omicron sublineages at visit 1 compared to patients treated with non-anti-TNF biologics and healthy controls (each p ≤ 0.015). Surrogate neutralisation against all tested sublineages decreased over time but was increased by breakthrough infection. Anti-spike IgG concentrations correlated with surrogate neutralisation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD who are treated with anti-TNF biologics show impaired neutralisation against novel omicron sublineages BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 and may benefit from prioritisation for future variant-adapted vaccines.